Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap
The current difficulties in keeping systematic reviews up to date leads to considerable inaccuracy, hampering the translation of knowledge into action. Incremental advances in conventional review updating are unlikely to lead to substantial improvements in review currency. A new approach is needed....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PLoS medicine 2014-02, Vol.11 (2), p.e1001603-e1001603 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e1001603 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | e1001603 |
| container_title | PLoS medicine |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Elliott, Julian H Turner, Tari Clavisi, Ornella Thomas, James Higgins, Julian P T Mavergames, Chris Gruen, Russell L |
| description | The current difficulties in keeping systematic reviews up to date leads to considerable inaccuracy, hampering the translation of knowledge into action. Incremental advances in conventional review updating are unlikely to lead to substantial improvements in review currency. A new approach is needed. We propose living systematic review as a contribution to evidence synthesis that combines currency with rigour to enhance the accuracy and utility of health evidence. Living systematic reviews are high quality, up-to-date online summaries of health research, updated as new research becomes available, and enabled by improved production efficiency and adherence to the norms of scholarly communication. Together with innovations in primary research reporting and the creation and use of evidence in health systems, living systematic review contributes to an emerging evidence ecosystem. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001603 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1507814909</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A362727691</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8607f0c7a9e04b76bbf74150eef39ab2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A362727691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c659t-424fb2e8b6f315b47a2814ebb58bd21d58506b7398ef16b75ff5700a62f8650a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkttuEzEQhlcIREvhDRCshITgIsGHtb3LBVJVcYgUUYlDby17M9642thb25uSt8dp0iq5gyuPPN_8Hv8zRfESoymmAn-49mNwqp8OK1hMMUKYI_qoOMWsaiaYC_74ID4pnsV4jRBpUIOeFiekYqymjJ4WV3O7tq4r4yYmWKlk2zLA2sJt_FgqV8IKQrfN-2HwIY3Opk2ZfOlUCP62TEsoM70A18JkCKrN9VB2anhePDGqj_Bif54Vv798_nXxbTK__Dq7OJ9PWs6aNKlIZTSBWnNDMdOVUKTGFWjNar0geMFqhrgWtKnB4BwwY5hASHFias6QomfF653u0Pso95ZEiRkSWSj_NhOzHbHw6loOwa5U2EivrLy78KGTKuS2e5A1R8KgVqgGUKUF19qIKksBGNooTbLWp_1ro86ut-BSUP2R6HHG2aXs_FrShtTZ_Czwbi8Q_M0IMcmVjS30vXLgx7u-82xRZjP6Zod2KrdmnfFZsd3i8pxyIojgDc7U-yOq9S7Bn9SpMUY5-_njP9jv_85eXh2zbw_YJag-LaPvx2S9i8dgtQPb4GMMYB6cw0hud_p-gHK703K_07ns1aHrD0X3S0z_Andm8cI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1501370802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Elliott, Julian H ; Turner, Tari ; Clavisi, Ornella ; Thomas, James ; Higgins, Julian P T ; Mavergames, Chris ; Gruen, Russell L</creator><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Julian H ; Turner, Tari ; Clavisi, Ornella ; Thomas, James ; Higgins, Julian P T ; Mavergames, Chris ; Gruen, Russell L</creatorcontrib><description>The current difficulties in keeping systematic reviews up to date leads to considerable inaccuracy, hampering the translation of knowledge into action. Incremental advances in conventional review updating are unlikely to lead to substantial improvements in review currency. A new approach is needed. We propose living systematic review as a contribution to evidence synthesis that combines currency with rigour to enhance the accuracy and utility of health evidence. Living systematic reviews are high quality, up-to-date online summaries of health research, updated as new research becomes available, and enabled by improved production efficiency and adherence to the norms of scholarly communication. Together with innovations in primary research reporting and the creation and use of evidence in health systems, living systematic review contributes to an emerging evidence ecosystem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-1676</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1549-1277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-1676</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001603</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24558353</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Access to Information ; Accuracy ; Biomedical research ; Biomedical Research - trends ; Collaboration ; Cooperative Behavior ; Decision making ; Decision support systems ; Drug therapy ; Efficiency ; Evidence-based medicine ; Evidence-Based Medicine - trends ; Humans ; Information Dissemination ; Management ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Methods ; Policy Forum ; Review Literature as Topic ; Studies ; Technological change ; Time Factors ; Workflow</subject><ispartof>PLoS medicine, 2014-02, Vol.11 (2), p.e1001603-e1001603</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Elliott et al 2014 Elliott et al</rights><rights>2014 Elliott et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Elliott JH, Turner T, Clavisi O, Thomas J, Higgins JPT, et al. (2014) Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap. PLoS Med 11(2): e1001603. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001603</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c659t-424fb2e8b6f315b47a2814ebb58bd21d58506b7398ef16b75ff5700a62f8650a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c659t-424fb2e8b6f315b47a2814ebb58bd21d58506b7398ef16b75ff5700a62f8650a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3928029/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3928029/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24558353$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Julian H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Tari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavisi, Ornella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Julian P T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavergames, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruen, Russell L</creatorcontrib><title>Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap</title><title>PLoS medicine</title><addtitle>PLoS Med</addtitle><description>The current difficulties in keeping systematic reviews up to date leads to considerable inaccuracy, hampering the translation of knowledge into action. Incremental advances in conventional review updating are unlikely to lead to substantial improvements in review currency. A new approach is needed. We propose living systematic review as a contribution to evidence synthesis that combines currency with rigour to enhance the accuracy and utility of health evidence. Living systematic reviews are high quality, up-to-date online summaries of health research, updated as new research becomes available, and enabled by improved production efficiency and adherence to the norms of scholarly communication. Together with innovations in primary research reporting and the creation and use of evidence in health systems, living systematic review contributes to an emerging evidence ecosystem.</description><subject>Access to Information</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Biomedical research</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - trends</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision support systems</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Dissemination</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Policy Forum</subject><subject>Review Literature as Topic</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><issn>1549-1676</issn><issn>1549-1277</issn><issn>1549-1676</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkttuEzEQhlcIREvhDRCshITgIsGHtb3LBVJVcYgUUYlDby17M9642thb25uSt8dp0iq5gyuPPN_8Hv8zRfESoymmAn-49mNwqp8OK1hMMUKYI_qoOMWsaiaYC_74ID4pnsV4jRBpUIOeFiekYqymjJ4WV3O7tq4r4yYmWKlk2zLA2sJt_FgqV8IKQrfN-2HwIY3Opk2ZfOlUCP62TEsoM70A18JkCKrN9VB2anhePDGqj_Bif54Vv798_nXxbTK__Dq7OJ9PWs6aNKlIZTSBWnNDMdOVUKTGFWjNar0geMFqhrgWtKnB4BwwY5hASHFias6QomfF653u0Pso95ZEiRkSWSj_NhOzHbHw6loOwa5U2EivrLy78KGTKuS2e5A1R8KgVqgGUKUF19qIKksBGNooTbLWp_1ro86ut-BSUP2R6HHG2aXs_FrShtTZ_Czwbi8Q_M0IMcmVjS30vXLgx7u-82xRZjP6Zod2KrdmnfFZsd3i8pxyIojgDc7U-yOq9S7Bn9SpMUY5-_njP9jv_85eXh2zbw_YJag-LaPvx2S9i8dgtQPb4GMMYB6cw0hud_p-gHK703K_07ns1aHrD0X3S0z_Andm8cI</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Elliott, Julian H</creator><creator>Turner, Tari</creator><creator>Clavisi, Ornella</creator><creator>Thomas, James</creator><creator>Higgins, Julian P T</creator><creator>Mavergames, Chris</creator><creator>Gruen, Russell L</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><scope>CZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap</title><author>Elliott, Julian H ; Turner, Tari ; Clavisi, Ornella ; Thomas, James ; Higgins, Julian P T ; Mavergames, Chris ; Gruen, Russell L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c659t-424fb2e8b6f315b47a2814ebb58bd21d58506b7398ef16b75ff5700a62f8650a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Access to Information</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Biomedical research</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - trends</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision support systems</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Dissemination</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Policy Forum</topic><topic>Review Literature as Topic</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Julian H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Tari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavisi, Ornella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Julian P T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavergames, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruen, Russell L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PLoS Medicine</collection><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elliott, Julian H</au><au>Turner, Tari</au><au>Clavisi, Ornella</au><au>Thomas, James</au><au>Higgins, Julian P T</au><au>Mavergames, Chris</au><au>Gruen, Russell L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap</atitle><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Med</addtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e1001603</spage><epage>e1001603</epage><pages>e1001603-e1001603</pages><issn>1549-1676</issn><issn>1549-1277</issn><eissn>1549-1676</eissn><abstract>The current difficulties in keeping systematic reviews up to date leads to considerable inaccuracy, hampering the translation of knowledge into action. Incremental advances in conventional review updating are unlikely to lead to substantial improvements in review currency. A new approach is needed. We propose living systematic review as a contribution to evidence synthesis that combines currency with rigour to enhance the accuracy and utility of health evidence. Living systematic reviews are high quality, up-to-date online summaries of health research, updated as new research becomes available, and enabled by improved production efficiency and adherence to the norms of scholarly communication. Together with innovations in primary research reporting and the creation and use of evidence in health systems, living systematic review contributes to an emerging evidence ecosystem.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24558353</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pmed.1001603</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1549-1676 |
| ispartof | PLoS medicine, 2014-02, Vol.11 (2), p.e1001603-e1001603 |
| issn | 1549-1676 1549-1277 1549-1676 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1507814909 |
| source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Access to Information Accuracy Biomedical research Biomedical Research - trends Collaboration Cooperative Behavior Decision making Decision support systems Drug therapy Efficiency Evidence-based medicine Evidence-Based Medicine - trends Humans Information Dissemination Management Medical research Medicine Methods Policy Forum Review Literature as Topic Studies Technological change Time Factors Workflow |
| title | Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T03%3A42%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Living%20systematic%20reviews:%20an%20emerging%20opportunity%20to%20narrow%20the%20evidence-practice%20gap&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20medicine&rft.au=Elliott,%20Julian%20H&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e1001603&rft.epage=e1001603&rft.pages=e1001603-e1001603&rft.issn=1549-1676&rft.eissn=1549-1676&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001603&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA362727691%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1501370802&rft_id=info:pmid/24558353&rft_galeid=A362727691&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_8607f0c7a9e04b76bbf74150eef39ab2&rfr_iscdi=true |