Correction of the Caulobacter crescentus NA1000 genome annotation

Bacterial genome annotations are accumulating rapidly in the GenBank database and the use of automated annotation technologies to create these annotations has become the norm. However, these automated methods commonly result in a small, but significant percentage of genome annotation errors. To impr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2014-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e91668-e91668
Hauptverfasser: Ely, Bert, Scott, LaTia Etheredge
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e91668
container_issue 3
container_start_page e91668
container_title PloS one
container_volume 9
creator Ely, Bert
Scott, LaTia Etheredge
description Bacterial genome annotations are accumulating rapidly in the GenBank database and the use of automated annotation technologies to create these annotations has become the norm. However, these automated methods commonly result in a small, but significant percentage of genome annotation errors. To improve accuracy and reliability, we analyzed the Caulobacter crescentus NA1000 genome utilizing computer programs Artemis and MICheck to manually examine the third codon position GC content, alignment to a third codon position GC frame plot peak, and matches in the GenBank database. We identified 11 new genes, modified the start site of 113 genes, and changed the reading frame of 38 genes that had been incorrectly annotated. Furthermore, our manual method of identifying protein-coding genes allowed us to remove 112 non-coding regions that had been designated as coding regions. The improved NA1000 genome annotation resulted in a reduction in the use of rare codons since noncoding regions with atypical codon usage were removed from the annotation and 49 new coding regions were added to the annotation. Thus, a more accurate codon usage table was generated as well. These results demonstrate that a comparison of the location of peaks third codon position GC content to the location of protein coding regions could be used to verify the annotation of any genome that has a GC content that is greater than 60%.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0091668
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1506819702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478770315</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_078df4ddbf9842f7ac222857dd07419e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478770315</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d0343fa84633d2654ce6229801f8a5e28d656027ada110f91e705ae2d1c639b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNktuL1DAYxYso7rr6H4gWBNGHGXNpbi_CMHgZWFzw9hoyyZeZDp1mNmlF_3vTne4ylX2QPrQkv3OS7_QUxXOM5pgK_G4X-tiaZn4ILcwRUphz-aA4x4qSGSeIPjz5PiuepLRDiFHJ-ePijFScYCH4ebFYhhjBdnVoy-DLbgvl0vRNWBvbQSxthGSh7fpUfllghFC5gTbsoTRtGzozyJ4Wj7xpEjwb3xfFj48fvi8_zy6vPq2Wi8uZ5Yp0M4doRb2RFafUEc4qC5wQJRH20jAg0nHGERHGGYyRVxgEYgaIw5ZTtWb0onh59D00Ielx-qQxQ1xiJRDJxOpIuGB2-hDrvYl_dDC1vlkIcaNN7GrbgEZCOl85t_ZKVsQLYwkhkgnnkKiwguz1fjytX-_BDRlE00xMpzttvdWb8EtTxXDFZDZ4MxrEcN1D6vS-zlE2jWkh9Df3FkJxzHBGX_2D3j_dSG1MHqBufcjn2sFULyohhUAUDynN76Hy42Bf21wVX-f1ieDtRJCZDn53G9OnpFffvv4_e_Vzyr4-Ybdgmm6bQtMPlUlTsDqCNoaUIvi7kDHSQ9Nv09BD0_XY9Cx7cfqD7kS31aZ_Aam69fY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1506819702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correction of the Caulobacter crescentus NA1000 genome annotation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Ely, Bert ; Scott, LaTia Etheredge</creator><contributor>Tuller, Tamir</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ely, Bert ; Scott, LaTia Etheredge ; Tuller, Tamir</creatorcontrib><description>Bacterial genome annotations are accumulating rapidly in the GenBank database and the use of automated annotation technologies to create these annotations has become the norm. However, these automated methods commonly result in a small, but significant percentage of genome annotation errors. To improve accuracy and reliability, we analyzed the Caulobacter crescentus NA1000 genome utilizing computer programs Artemis and MICheck to manually examine the third codon position GC content, alignment to a third codon position GC frame plot peak, and matches in the GenBank database. We identified 11 new genes, modified the start site of 113 genes, and changed the reading frame of 38 genes that had been incorrectly annotated. Furthermore, our manual method of identifying protein-coding genes allowed us to remove 112 non-coding regions that had been designated as coding regions. The improved NA1000 genome annotation resulted in a reduction in the use of rare codons since noncoding regions with atypical codon usage were removed from the annotation and 49 new coding regions were added to the annotation. Thus, a more accurate codon usage table was generated as well. These results demonstrate that a comparison of the location of peaks third codon position GC content to the location of protein coding regions could be used to verify the annotation of any genome that has a GC content that is greater than 60%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091668</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24621776</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Amino acids ; Analysis ; Annotations ; Automation ; Biology ; Caulobacter crescentus - genetics ; Codon, Initiator - genetics ; Codons ; Computer programs ; Computer Science ; Computers ; Genes ; Genes, Bacterial - genetics ; Genomes ; Genomics ; Genomics - methods ; Identification methods ; Molecular Sequence Annotation - methods ; Position (location) ; Proteins ; Proteomics ; Reading ; Software ; Technology application ; Use statistics</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e91668-e91668</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Ely, Scott. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Ely, Scott 2014 Ely, Scott</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d0343fa84633d2654ce6229801f8a5e28d656027ada110f91e705ae2d1c639b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d0343fa84633d2654ce6229801f8a5e28d656027ada110f91e705ae2d1c639b53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3951458/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3951458/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24621776$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Tuller, Tamir</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ely, Bert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, LaTia Etheredge</creatorcontrib><title>Correction of the Caulobacter crescentus NA1000 genome annotation</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Bacterial genome annotations are accumulating rapidly in the GenBank database and the use of automated annotation technologies to create these annotations has become the norm. However, these automated methods commonly result in a small, but significant percentage of genome annotation errors. To improve accuracy and reliability, we analyzed the Caulobacter crescentus NA1000 genome utilizing computer programs Artemis and MICheck to manually examine the third codon position GC content, alignment to a third codon position GC frame plot peak, and matches in the GenBank database. We identified 11 new genes, modified the start site of 113 genes, and changed the reading frame of 38 genes that had been incorrectly annotated. Furthermore, our manual method of identifying protein-coding genes allowed us to remove 112 non-coding regions that had been designated as coding regions. The improved NA1000 genome annotation resulted in a reduction in the use of rare codons since noncoding regions with atypical codon usage were removed from the annotation and 49 new coding regions were added to the annotation. Thus, a more accurate codon usage table was generated as well. These results demonstrate that a comparison of the location of peaks third codon position GC content to the location of protein coding regions could be used to verify the annotation of any genome that has a GC content that is greater than 60%.</description><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Annotations</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Caulobacter crescentus - genetics</subject><subject>Codon, Initiator - genetics</subject><subject>Codons</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genes, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Genomics - methods</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Annotation - methods</subject><subject>Position (location)</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proteomics</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Technology application</subject><subject>Use statistics</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNktuL1DAYxYso7rr6H4gWBNGHGXNpbi_CMHgZWFzw9hoyyZeZDp1mNmlF_3vTne4ylX2QPrQkv3OS7_QUxXOM5pgK_G4X-tiaZn4ILcwRUphz-aA4x4qSGSeIPjz5PiuepLRDiFHJ-ePijFScYCH4ebFYhhjBdnVoy-DLbgvl0vRNWBvbQSxthGSh7fpUfllghFC5gTbsoTRtGzozyJ4Wj7xpEjwb3xfFj48fvi8_zy6vPq2Wi8uZ5Yp0M4doRb2RFafUEc4qC5wQJRH20jAg0nHGERHGGYyRVxgEYgaIw5ZTtWb0onh59D00Ielx-qQxQ1xiJRDJxOpIuGB2-hDrvYl_dDC1vlkIcaNN7GrbgEZCOl85t_ZKVsQLYwkhkgnnkKiwguz1fjytX-_BDRlE00xMpzttvdWb8EtTxXDFZDZ4MxrEcN1D6vS-zlE2jWkh9Df3FkJxzHBGX_2D3j_dSG1MHqBufcjn2sFULyohhUAUDynN76Hy42Bf21wVX-f1ieDtRJCZDn53G9OnpFffvv4_e_Vzyr4-Ybdgmm6bQtMPlUlTsDqCNoaUIvi7kDHSQ9Nv09BD0_XY9Cx7cfqD7kS31aZ_Aam69fY</recordid><startdate>20140312</startdate><enddate>20140312</enddate><creator>Ely, Bert</creator><creator>Scott, LaTia Etheredge</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140312</creationdate><title>Correction of the Caulobacter crescentus NA1000 genome annotation</title><author>Ely, Bert ; Scott, LaTia Etheredge</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d0343fa84633d2654ce6229801f8a5e28d656027ada110f91e705ae2d1c639b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Annotations</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Caulobacter crescentus - genetics</topic><topic>Codon, Initiator - genetics</topic><topic>Codons</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genes, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Genomics - methods</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Annotation - methods</topic><topic>Position (location)</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proteomics</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Technology application</topic><topic>Use statistics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ely, Bert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, LaTia Etheredge</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ely, Bert</au><au>Scott, LaTia Etheredge</au><au>Tuller, Tamir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correction of the Caulobacter crescentus NA1000 genome annotation</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-03-12</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e91668</spage><epage>e91668</epage><pages>e91668-e91668</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Bacterial genome annotations are accumulating rapidly in the GenBank database and the use of automated annotation technologies to create these annotations has become the norm. However, these automated methods commonly result in a small, but significant percentage of genome annotation errors. To improve accuracy and reliability, we analyzed the Caulobacter crescentus NA1000 genome utilizing computer programs Artemis and MICheck to manually examine the third codon position GC content, alignment to a third codon position GC frame plot peak, and matches in the GenBank database. We identified 11 new genes, modified the start site of 113 genes, and changed the reading frame of 38 genes that had been incorrectly annotated. Furthermore, our manual method of identifying protein-coding genes allowed us to remove 112 non-coding regions that had been designated as coding regions. The improved NA1000 genome annotation resulted in a reduction in the use of rare codons since noncoding regions with atypical codon usage were removed from the annotation and 49 new coding regions were added to the annotation. Thus, a more accurate codon usage table was generated as well. These results demonstrate that a comparison of the location of peaks third codon position GC content to the location of protein coding regions could be used to verify the annotation of any genome that has a GC content that is greater than 60%.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24621776</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0091668</doi><tpages>e91668</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2014-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e91668-e91668
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1506819702
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Amino acids
Analysis
Annotations
Automation
Biology
Caulobacter crescentus - genetics
Codon, Initiator - genetics
Codons
Computer programs
Computer Science
Computers
Genes
Genes, Bacterial - genetics
Genomes
Genomics
Genomics - methods
Identification methods
Molecular Sequence Annotation - methods
Position (location)
Proteins
Proteomics
Reading
Software
Technology application
Use statistics
title Correction of the Caulobacter crescentus NA1000 genome annotation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A50%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correction%20of%20the%20Caulobacter%20crescentus%20NA1000%20genome%20annotation&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ely,%20Bert&rft.date=2014-03-12&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e91668&rft.epage=e91668&rft.pages=e91668-e91668&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0091668&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478770315%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1506819702&rft_id=info:pmid/24621776&rft_galeid=A478770315&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_078df4ddbf9842f7ac222857dd07419e&rfr_iscdi=true