Spatial arrangement overrules environmental factors to structure native and non-native assemblages of synanthropic harvestmen

Understanding how space affects the occurrence of native and non-native species is essential for inferring processes that shape communities. However, studies considering spatial and environmental variables for the entire community - as well as for the native and non-native assemblages in a single st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2014-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e90474-e90474
Hauptverfasser: Muster, Christoph, Meyer, Marc, Sattler, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e90474
container_issue 3
container_start_page e90474
container_title PloS one
container_volume 9
creator Muster, Christoph
Meyer, Marc
Sattler, Thomas
description Understanding how space affects the occurrence of native and non-native species is essential for inferring processes that shape communities. However, studies considering spatial and environmental variables for the entire community - as well as for the native and non-native assemblages in a single study - are scarce for animals. Harvestmen communities in central Europe have undergone drastic turnovers during the past decades, with several newly immigrated species, and thus provide a unique system to study such questions. We studied the wall-dwelling harvestmen communities from 52 human settlements in Luxembourg and found the assemblages to be largely dominated by non-native species (64% of specimens). Community structure was analysed using Moran's eigenvector maps as spatial variables, and landcover variables at different radii (500 m, 1000 m, 2000 m) in combination with climatic parameters as environmental variables. A surprisingly high portion of pure spatial variation (15.7% of total variance) exceeded the environmental (10.6%) and shared (4%) components of variation, but we found only minor differences between native and non-native assemblages. This could result from the ecological flexibility of both, native and non-native harvestmen that are not restricted to urban habitats but also inhabit surrounding semi-natural landscapes. Nevertheless, urban landcover variables explained more variation in the non-native community, whereas coverage of semi-natural habitats (forests, rivers) at broader radii better explained the native assemblage. This indicates that some urban characteristics apparently facilitate the establishment of non-native species. We found no evidence for competitive replacement of native by invasive species, but a community with novel combination of native and non-native species.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0090474
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1504191190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478778217</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0d8f2ce0472c4dd0a8e4a423fa35840b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478778217</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d14de7af2284f5e626d39c96d65f7b961efff94af5f7d67aca3e87996bf8d10b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0WInzodvkKaJj0qTJjHg1jq1j9NMrl1sp2IX_HfcNZ0atAuUi8Qnz_se-01Olr2kZE7Lhn64cYO3YOYbZ3FOCCesYY-yU8rLYlYXpHx89HySPQvhhpCqbOv6aXZSsIpXJeGn2Z_rDcQeTA7eg-1wjTbmboveDwZDjnbbe2d31cRokNH5kEeXh-gHGQePuU36LeZgVW6dnR2WIeB6aaBLJk7n4daCjSvvNr3MV-C3GGIyfZ490WACvhjvZ9mPz5--X3ydXV59WVycX85kzYs4U5QpbEAXRct0hXVRq5JLXqu60s2S1xS11pyBTktVNyChxLbhvF7qVlGyLM-y13vfjXFBjMkFQSvCKKeUk0Qs9oRycCM2vl-DvxUOenFXcL4T4GMvDQqiWl1ITHkXkilFoEUGrCg1lFXL7rp9HLsNyzUqmcLzYCam0ze2X4nObUXJWcFYnQzejQbe_RpSVGLdB4nGgEU37PfdMErJbt9v_kEfPt1IdZAO0FvtUl-5MxXnrGmbpi1ok6j5A1S6FK57mX4z3af6RPB-IkhMxN-xgyEEsbj-9v_s1c8p-_aIXSGYuArODLF3NkxBtgeldyF41PchUyJ2U3JIQ-ymRIxTkmSvjj_QvegwFuVf2SQQ-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1504191190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial arrangement overrules environmental factors to structure native and non-native assemblages of synanthropic harvestmen</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Muster, Christoph ; Meyer, Marc ; Sattler, Thomas</creator><contributor>Shaw, Peter</contributor><creatorcontrib>Muster, Christoph ; Meyer, Marc ; Sattler, Thomas ; Shaw, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding how space affects the occurrence of native and non-native species is essential for inferring processes that shape communities. However, studies considering spatial and environmental variables for the entire community - as well as for the native and non-native assemblages in a single study - are scarce for animals. Harvestmen communities in central Europe have undergone drastic turnovers during the past decades, with several newly immigrated species, and thus provide a unique system to study such questions. We studied the wall-dwelling harvestmen communities from 52 human settlements in Luxembourg and found the assemblages to be largely dominated by non-native species (64% of specimens). Community structure was analysed using Moran's eigenvector maps as spatial variables, and landcover variables at different radii (500 m, 1000 m, 2000 m) in combination with climatic parameters as environmental variables. A surprisingly high portion of pure spatial variation (15.7% of total variance) exceeded the environmental (10.6%) and shared (4%) components of variation, but we found only minor differences between native and non-native assemblages. This could result from the ecological flexibility of both, native and non-native harvestmen that are not restricted to urban habitats but also inhabit surrounding semi-natural landscapes. Nevertheless, urban landcover variables explained more variation in the non-native community, whereas coverage of semi-natural habitats (forests, rivers) at broader radii better explained the native assemblage. This indicates that some urban characteristics apparently facilitate the establishment of non-native species. We found no evidence for competitive replacement of native by invasive species, but a community with novel combination of native and non-native species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090474</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24595309</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biology ; Communities ; Community structure ; Ecological effects ; Ecosystem ; Environmental factors ; Geography ; Human settlements ; Humans ; Indigenous peoples ; Indigenous species ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; Landscape ; Luxembourg ; Opiliones ; Rivers ; Settlements ; Species Specificity ; Spiders - physiology ; Variation</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e90474-e90474</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Muster et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Muster et al 2014 Muster et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d14de7af2284f5e626d39c96d65f7b961efff94af5f7d67aca3e87996bf8d10b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d14de7af2284f5e626d39c96d65f7b961efff94af5f7d67aca3e87996bf8d10b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942446/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942446/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24595309$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Shaw, Peter</contributor><creatorcontrib>Muster, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sattler, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial arrangement overrules environmental factors to structure native and non-native assemblages of synanthropic harvestmen</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Understanding how space affects the occurrence of native and non-native species is essential for inferring processes that shape communities. However, studies considering spatial and environmental variables for the entire community - as well as for the native and non-native assemblages in a single study - are scarce for animals. Harvestmen communities in central Europe have undergone drastic turnovers during the past decades, with several newly immigrated species, and thus provide a unique system to study such questions. We studied the wall-dwelling harvestmen communities from 52 human settlements in Luxembourg and found the assemblages to be largely dominated by non-native species (64% of specimens). Community structure was analysed using Moran's eigenvector maps as spatial variables, and landcover variables at different radii (500 m, 1000 m, 2000 m) in combination with climatic parameters as environmental variables. A surprisingly high portion of pure spatial variation (15.7% of total variance) exceeded the environmental (10.6%) and shared (4%) components of variation, but we found only minor differences between native and non-native assemblages. This could result from the ecological flexibility of both, native and non-native harvestmen that are not restricted to urban habitats but also inhabit surrounding semi-natural landscapes. Nevertheless, urban landcover variables explained more variation in the non-native community, whereas coverage of semi-natural habitats (forests, rivers) at broader radii better explained the native assemblage. This indicates that some urban characteristics apparently facilitate the establishment of non-native species. We found no evidence for competitive replacement of native by invasive species, but a community with novel combination of native and non-native species.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Human settlements</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Luxembourg</subject><subject>Opiliones</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Settlements</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Spiders - physiology</subject><subject>Variation</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0WInzodvkKaJj0qTJjHg1jq1j9NMrl1sp2IX_HfcNZ0atAuUi8Qnz_se-01Olr2kZE7Lhn64cYO3YOYbZ3FOCCesYY-yU8rLYlYXpHx89HySPQvhhpCqbOv6aXZSsIpXJeGn2Z_rDcQeTA7eg-1wjTbmboveDwZDjnbbe2d31cRokNH5kEeXh-gHGQePuU36LeZgVW6dnR2WIeB6aaBLJk7n4daCjSvvNr3MV-C3GGIyfZ490WACvhjvZ9mPz5--X3ydXV59WVycX85kzYs4U5QpbEAXRct0hXVRq5JLXqu60s2S1xS11pyBTktVNyChxLbhvF7qVlGyLM-y13vfjXFBjMkFQSvCKKeUk0Qs9oRycCM2vl-DvxUOenFXcL4T4GMvDQqiWl1ITHkXkilFoEUGrCg1lFXL7rp9HLsNyzUqmcLzYCam0ze2X4nObUXJWcFYnQzejQbe_RpSVGLdB4nGgEU37PfdMErJbt9v_kEfPt1IdZAO0FvtUl-5MxXnrGmbpi1ok6j5A1S6FK57mX4z3af6RPB-IkhMxN-xgyEEsbj-9v_s1c8p-_aIXSGYuArODLF3NkxBtgeldyF41PchUyJ2U3JIQ-ymRIxTkmSvjj_QvegwFuVf2SQQ-w</recordid><startdate>20140304</startdate><enddate>20140304</enddate><creator>Muster, Christoph</creator><creator>Meyer, Marc</creator><creator>Sattler, Thomas</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140304</creationdate><title>Spatial arrangement overrules environmental factors to structure native and non-native assemblages of synanthropic harvestmen</title><author>Muster, Christoph ; Meyer, Marc ; Sattler, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d14de7af2284f5e626d39c96d65f7b961efff94af5f7d67aca3e87996bf8d10b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Human settlements</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Luxembourg</topic><topic>Opiliones</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Settlements</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Spiders - physiology</topic><topic>Variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muster, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sattler, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muster, Christoph</au><au>Meyer, Marc</au><au>Sattler, Thomas</au><au>Shaw, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial arrangement overrules environmental factors to structure native and non-native assemblages of synanthropic harvestmen</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-03-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e90474</spage><epage>e90474</epage><pages>e90474-e90474</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Understanding how space affects the occurrence of native and non-native species is essential for inferring processes that shape communities. However, studies considering spatial and environmental variables for the entire community - as well as for the native and non-native assemblages in a single study - are scarce for animals. Harvestmen communities in central Europe have undergone drastic turnovers during the past decades, with several newly immigrated species, and thus provide a unique system to study such questions. We studied the wall-dwelling harvestmen communities from 52 human settlements in Luxembourg and found the assemblages to be largely dominated by non-native species (64% of specimens). Community structure was analysed using Moran's eigenvector maps as spatial variables, and landcover variables at different radii (500 m, 1000 m, 2000 m) in combination with climatic parameters as environmental variables. A surprisingly high portion of pure spatial variation (15.7% of total variance) exceeded the environmental (10.6%) and shared (4%) components of variation, but we found only minor differences between native and non-native assemblages. This could result from the ecological flexibility of both, native and non-native harvestmen that are not restricted to urban habitats but also inhabit surrounding semi-natural landscapes. Nevertheless, urban landcover variables explained more variation in the non-native community, whereas coverage of semi-natural habitats (forests, rivers) at broader radii better explained the native assemblage. This indicates that some urban characteristics apparently facilitate the establishment of non-native species. We found no evidence for competitive replacement of native by invasive species, but a community with novel combination of native and non-native species.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24595309</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0090474</doi><tpages>e90474</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2014-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e90474-e90474
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1504191190
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Animals
Biology
Communities
Community structure
Ecological effects
Ecosystem
Environmental factors
Geography
Human settlements
Humans
Indigenous peoples
Indigenous species
Introduced species
Invasive species
Landscape
Luxembourg
Opiliones
Rivers
Settlements
Species Specificity
Spiders - physiology
Variation
title Spatial arrangement overrules environmental factors to structure native and non-native assemblages of synanthropic harvestmen
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A51%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20arrangement%20overrules%20environmental%20factors%20to%20structure%20native%20and%20non-native%20assemblages%20of%20synanthropic%20harvestmen&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Muster,%20Christoph&rft.date=2014-03-04&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e90474&rft.epage=e90474&rft.pages=e90474-e90474&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0090474&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478778217%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1504191190&rft_id=info:pmid/24595309&rft_galeid=A478778217&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_0d8f2ce0472c4dd0a8e4a423fa35840b&rfr_iscdi=true