The roles of different sources of social support on emotional well-being among Chinese elderly
Social support has been widely known as a protective factor for the emotional well-being (EWB) of older adults, but less studies have investigated the roles of different sources of social support (i.e., family and friend support) on different facets of EWB (i.e., positive affect and negative affect)...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2014-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e90051-e90051 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e90051 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | e90051 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 9 |
| creator | Li, Haifeng Ji, Yang Chen, Tianyong |
| description | Social support has been widely known as a protective factor for the emotional well-being (EWB) of older adults, but less studies have investigated the roles of different sources of social support (i.e., family and friend support) on different facets of EWB (i.e., positive affect and negative affect) simultaneously.
In this study, the associations between family/friend support and positive/negative affect were investigated in a sample of 700 Chinese elderly. The EWB and social support were measured with a 12-item affective wordlist (Kahneman et al., 2004) and a self-prepared questionnaire. The results showed that (1) the order of contact frequency and mutual support followed a hierarchical order from spouse, children, to friends; (2) zero-order correlations of both family support and friend support were associated with more positive affect and less negative affect; and when compared with the relative role of family and friend support, (3) spouse (children if spouse is not available) support had greater contribution on decreasing negative affect, while friend support had greater influence on increasing positive affect, even after controlling the demographic, self-rated health and life events variables.
Family and friend support play different roles on the two facets of EWB of the elderly. These results were better explained in light of the task specificity model rather than the hierarchical compensatory model. Moreover, positive affect may be enhanced by friend support (based on personal interests and selectable) rather than family support (bonded by kinship and not selectable), which added evidences to the socioemotional selectivity theory. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0090051 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1503771739</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478785992</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_390675ef6a6b4df5801827bba73bdf6d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478785992</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-baa89d5ff4971c9f98eb031be4b2e91c858cc8181738694c777ecac3f43dd23a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk2-L1DAQxoso3nn6DUQLguiLrkmTNskb4Vj8s3BwoKcvDWk62c2SNmvSqvftzd72jq3cCym0Yfp7nulMZ7LsOUYLTBh-t_Vj6JVb7HwPC4QEQhV-kJ1iQcqiLhF5eHQ-yZ7EuE0E4XX9ODspaSVoRevT7MfVBvLgHcTcm7y1xkCAfshjcteHYPTaKpfHcbfzYch9n0PnB-tT8vw3OFc0YPt1rjqf7suN7SFCDq6F4K6fZo-MchGeTc-z7NvHD1fLz8XF5afV8vyi0KziQ9EoxUVbGUMFw1oYwaFBBDdAmxIE1rziWnPMMUsFCKoZY6CVJoaSti2JImfZy4Pvzvkop9ZEiStEGEsqkYjVgWi92spdsJ0K19IrK28CPqylCoPVDiQRqGYVmFrVDW1NxRHmJWsaxUjTmrpNXu-nbGPTQatTw4JyM9P5m95u5Nr_Ss4UMVwlgzeTQfA_R4iD7GzUqZeqBz_efDdlFJdlndBX_6D3VzdRa5UKsL3xKa_em8pzyjjjlRBlohb3UOlqobM6zZGxKT4TvJ0JEjPAn2Gtxhjl6uuX_2cvv8_Z10fsBpQbNtG7cT9VcQ7SA6iDjzGAuWsyRnK_BrfdkPs1kNMaJNmL4x90J7qde_IXarwDRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1503771739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The roles of different sources of social support on emotional well-being among Chinese elderly</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Li, Haifeng ; Ji, Yang ; Chen, Tianyong</creator><contributor>Uchino, Bert N.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Li, Haifeng ; Ji, Yang ; Chen, Tianyong ; Uchino, Bert N.</creatorcontrib><description>Social support has been widely known as a protective factor for the emotional well-being (EWB) of older adults, but less studies have investigated the roles of different sources of social support (i.e., family and friend support) on different facets of EWB (i.e., positive affect and negative affect) simultaneously.
In this study, the associations between family/friend support and positive/negative affect were investigated in a sample of 700 Chinese elderly. The EWB and social support were measured with a 12-item affective wordlist (Kahneman et al., 2004) and a self-prepared questionnaire. The results showed that (1) the order of contact frequency and mutual support followed a hierarchical order from spouse, children, to friends; (2) zero-order correlations of both family support and friend support were associated with more positive affect and less negative affect; and when compared with the relative role of family and friend support, (3) spouse (children if spouse is not available) support had greater contribution on decreasing negative affect, while friend support had greater influence on increasing positive affect, even after controlling the demographic, self-rated health and life events variables.
Family and friend support play different roles on the two facets of EWB of the elderly. These results were better explained in light of the task specificity model rather than the hierarchical compensatory model. Moreover, positive affect may be enhanced by friend support (based on personal interests and selectable) rather than family support (bonded by kinship and not selectable), which added evidences to the socioemotional selectivity theory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090051</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24594546</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adults ; Age ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Analysis ; Biology ; Children ; China ; Demographic variables ; Demographics ; Elderly ; Emotions ; Female ; Friendship ; Geriatrics ; Gerontology ; Handbooks ; Humans ; Laboratories ; Loneliness ; Male ; Medicine ; Mental depression ; Mental health ; Middle Aged ; Older people ; Psychological aspects ; Psychology ; Social and Behavioral Sciences ; Social aspects ; Social behavior ; Social interactions ; Social Support ; Society ; Studies ; Well being</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e90051-e90051</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Li et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Li et al 2014 Li et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-baa89d5ff4971c9f98eb031be4b2e91c858cc8181738694c777ecac3f43dd23a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-baa89d5ff4971c9f98eb031be4b2e91c858cc8181738694c777ecac3f43dd23a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3940715/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3940715/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24594546$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Uchino, Bert N.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Li, Haifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Tianyong</creatorcontrib><title>The roles of different sources of social support on emotional well-being among Chinese elderly</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Social support has been widely known as a protective factor for the emotional well-being (EWB) of older adults, but less studies have investigated the roles of different sources of social support (i.e., family and friend support) on different facets of EWB (i.e., positive affect and negative affect) simultaneously.
In this study, the associations between family/friend support and positive/negative affect were investigated in a sample of 700 Chinese elderly. The EWB and social support were measured with a 12-item affective wordlist (Kahneman et al., 2004) and a self-prepared questionnaire. The results showed that (1) the order of contact frequency and mutual support followed a hierarchical order from spouse, children, to friends; (2) zero-order correlations of both family support and friend support were associated with more positive affect and less negative affect; and when compared with the relative role of family and friend support, (3) spouse (children if spouse is not available) support had greater contribution on decreasing negative affect, while friend support had greater influence on increasing positive affect, even after controlling the demographic, self-rated health and life events variables.
Family and friend support play different roles on the two facets of EWB of the elderly. These results were better explained in light of the task specificity model rather than the hierarchical compensatory model. Moreover, positive affect may be enhanced by friend support (based on personal interests and selectable) rather than family support (bonded by kinship and not selectable), which added evidences to the socioemotional selectivity theory.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Demographic variables</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Elderly</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Friendship</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Gerontology</subject><subject>Handbooks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Loneliness</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Social and Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social behavior</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk2-L1DAQxoso3nn6DUQLguiLrkmTNskb4Vj8s3BwoKcvDWk62c2SNmvSqvftzd72jq3cCym0Yfp7nulMZ7LsOUYLTBh-t_Vj6JVb7HwPC4QEQhV-kJ1iQcqiLhF5eHQ-yZ7EuE0E4XX9ODspaSVoRevT7MfVBvLgHcTcm7y1xkCAfshjcteHYPTaKpfHcbfzYch9n0PnB-tT8vw3OFc0YPt1rjqf7suN7SFCDq6F4K6fZo-MchGeTc-z7NvHD1fLz8XF5afV8vyi0KziQ9EoxUVbGUMFw1oYwaFBBDdAmxIE1rziWnPMMUsFCKoZY6CVJoaSti2JImfZy4Pvzvkop9ZEiStEGEsqkYjVgWi92spdsJ0K19IrK28CPqylCoPVDiQRqGYVmFrVDW1NxRHmJWsaxUjTmrpNXu-nbGPTQatTw4JyM9P5m95u5Nr_Ss4UMVwlgzeTQfA_R4iD7GzUqZeqBz_efDdlFJdlndBX_6D3VzdRa5UKsL3xKa_em8pzyjjjlRBlohb3UOlqobM6zZGxKT4TvJ0JEjPAn2Gtxhjl6uuX_2cvv8_Z10fsBpQbNtG7cT9VcQ7SA6iDjzGAuWsyRnK_BrfdkPs1kNMaJNmL4x90J7qde_IXarwDRg</recordid><startdate>20140303</startdate><enddate>20140303</enddate><creator>Li, Haifeng</creator><creator>Ji, Yang</creator><creator>Chen, Tianyong</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140303</creationdate><title>The roles of different sources of social support on emotional well-being among Chinese elderly</title><author>Li, Haifeng ; Ji, Yang ; Chen, Tianyong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-baa89d5ff4971c9f98eb031be4b2e91c858cc8181738694c777ecac3f43dd23a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Demographic variables</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Elderly</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Friendship</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Gerontology</topic><topic>Handbooks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Loneliness</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Social and Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social behavior</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Haifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Tianyong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Haifeng</au><au>Ji, Yang</au><au>Chen, Tianyong</au><au>Uchino, Bert N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The roles of different sources of social support on emotional well-being among Chinese elderly</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-03-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e90051</spage><epage>e90051</epage><pages>e90051-e90051</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Social support has been widely known as a protective factor for the emotional well-being (EWB) of older adults, but less studies have investigated the roles of different sources of social support (i.e., family and friend support) on different facets of EWB (i.e., positive affect and negative affect) simultaneously.
In this study, the associations between family/friend support and positive/negative affect were investigated in a sample of 700 Chinese elderly. The EWB and social support were measured with a 12-item affective wordlist (Kahneman et al., 2004) and a self-prepared questionnaire. The results showed that (1) the order of contact frequency and mutual support followed a hierarchical order from spouse, children, to friends; (2) zero-order correlations of both family support and friend support were associated with more positive affect and less negative affect; and when compared with the relative role of family and friend support, (3) spouse (children if spouse is not available) support had greater contribution on decreasing negative affect, while friend support had greater influence on increasing positive affect, even after controlling the demographic, self-rated health and life events variables.
Family and friend support play different roles on the two facets of EWB of the elderly. These results were better explained in light of the task specificity model rather than the hierarchical compensatory model. Moreover, positive affect may be enhanced by friend support (based on personal interests and selectable) rather than family support (bonded by kinship and not selectable), which added evidences to the socioemotional selectivity theory.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24594546</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0090051</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2014-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e90051-e90051 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1503771739 |
| source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Adults Age Aged Aged, 80 and over Aging Analysis Biology Children China Demographic variables Demographics Elderly Emotions Female Friendship Geriatrics Gerontology Handbooks Humans Laboratories Loneliness Male Medicine Mental depression Mental health Middle Aged Older people Psychological aspects Psychology Social and Behavioral Sciences Social aspects Social behavior Social interactions Social Support Society Studies Well being |
| title | The roles of different sources of social support on emotional well-being among Chinese elderly |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A06%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20roles%20of%20different%20sources%20of%20social%20support%20on%20emotional%20well-being%20among%20Chinese%20elderly&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Li,%20Haifeng&rft.date=2014-03-03&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e90051&rft.epage=e90051&rft.pages=e90051-e90051&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0090051&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478785992%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1503771739&rft_id=info:pmid/24594546&rft_galeid=A478785992&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_390675ef6a6b4df5801827bba73bdf6d&rfr_iscdi=true |