Clinical impact of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in the fecal flora of hematological patients with neutropenia and levofloxacin prophylaxis

Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia and hematological malignancies is said to be effective on febrile netropenia (FN)-related infection and mortality; however, the emergence of antibiotic resistance has become a concern. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin prophylaxis are most common...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2014-01, Vol.9 (1), p.e85210
Hauptverfasser: Chong, Yong, Shimoda, Shinji, Yakushiji, Hiroko, Ito, Yoshikiyo, Aoki, Takatoshi, Miyamoto, Toshihiro, Kamimura, Tomohiko, Shimono, Nobuyuki, Akashi, Koichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page e85210
container_title PloS one
container_volume 9
creator Chong, Yong
Shimoda, Shinji
Yakushiji, Hiroko
Ito, Yoshikiyo
Aoki, Takatoshi
Miyamoto, Toshihiro
Kamimura, Tomohiko
Shimono, Nobuyuki
Akashi, Koichi
description Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia and hematological malignancies is said to be effective on febrile netropenia (FN)-related infection and mortality; however, the emergence of antibiotic resistance has become a concern. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin prophylaxis are most commonly recommended. A significant increase in the rate of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in fecal flora has been reported following ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. The acquisition of quinolone-resistant E. coli after levofloxacin use has not been evaluated. We prospectively examined the incidence of quinolone-resistant E. coli isolates recovered from stool cultures before and after levofloxacin prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia from August 2011 to May 2013. Some patients received chemotherapy multiple times. In this trial, 68 patients were registered. Levofloxacin-resistant E. coli isolates were detected from 11 and 13 of all patients before and after the prophylaxis, respectively. However, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.65). Multiple prophylaxis for sequential chemotherapy did not induce additional quinolone resistance among E. coli isolates. Interestingly, quinolone-resistant E. coli, most of which were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers, were already detected in approximately 20% of all patients before the initiation of prophylaxis. FN-related bacteremia developed in 2 patients, accompanied by a good prognosis. Levofloxacin prophylaxis for neutropenia did not result in a significant acquisition of quinolone-resistant E. coli. However, we detected previous colonization of quinolone-resistant E. coli before prophylaxis, which possibly reflects the spread of ESBL. The epidemic spread of resistant E. coli as a local factor may influence strategies toward the use of quinolone prophylaxis.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0085210
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1491120427</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478854515</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_700611b6b74a47719f96a4692dda26dc</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478854515</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5cfb82de1e585b0820fac5f42d4bfb1bf3372590710730721f6f0ab8d4ea067b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9EBQfBi1ySTzMeNUJaqC4WCX7fhTCbZyZJNxiRT23_izzXbnZYdUJBcTEie95nDCSfLXmK0xEWF32_d6C2Y5eCsXCJUM4LRo-wUNwVZlAQVj4_2J9mzELYIsaIuy6fZCaG0ZAyVp9nvldFWCzC53g0gYu5UrszovPs5autMki-8DDpEsDG_CKKXXoteQy6c0bm2eexlruTeoIzzsBf0cgcxZTd34gGiljaG_JeOfW7lGL0bpE0KsF1u5LVLwRsQyTWkm_7WwI0Oz7MnCkyQL6bvWfb948W31efF5dWn9er8ciHKhsQFE6qtSSexZDVrUU2QAsEUJR1tVYtbVRQVYQ2qMKoKVBGsSoWgrTsqAZVVW5xlrw_ewbjAp6YGjmmDMUGUVIlYH4jOwZYPXu_A33IHmt8dOL_h4KMWRvIKoRLjtmwrCrSqcKOaEmgqtOuAlJ1Irg_T38Z2JzuR-uLBzKTzG6t7vnHXvKibumFFEryZBPsXkiH-o-SJ2kCqSlvlkkzsdBD8nFZ1zSjDLFHLv1BpdXKnRXp5pdP5LPBuFkhMlDdxA2MIfP31y_-zVz_m7NsjtpdgYh-cGaN2NsxBegCFdyF4qR46hxHfT8V9N_h-Kvg0FSn26rjrD6H7MSj-AJVDC4I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1491120427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical impact of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in the fecal flora of hematological patients with neutropenia and levofloxacin prophylaxis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Chong, Yong ; Shimoda, Shinji ; Yakushiji, Hiroko ; Ito, Yoshikiyo ; Aoki, Takatoshi ; Miyamoto, Toshihiro ; Kamimura, Tomohiko ; Shimono, Nobuyuki ; Akashi, Koichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Chong, Yong ; Shimoda, Shinji ; Yakushiji, Hiroko ; Ito, Yoshikiyo ; Aoki, Takatoshi ; Miyamoto, Toshihiro ; Kamimura, Tomohiko ; Shimono, Nobuyuki ; Akashi, Koichi</creatorcontrib><description>Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia and hematological malignancies is said to be effective on febrile netropenia (FN)-related infection and mortality; however, the emergence of antibiotic resistance has become a concern. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin prophylaxis are most commonly recommended. A significant increase in the rate of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in fecal flora has been reported following ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. The acquisition of quinolone-resistant E. coli after levofloxacin use has not been evaluated. We prospectively examined the incidence of quinolone-resistant E. coli isolates recovered from stool cultures before and after levofloxacin prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia from August 2011 to May 2013. Some patients received chemotherapy multiple times. In this trial, 68 patients were registered. Levofloxacin-resistant E. coli isolates were detected from 11 and 13 of all patients before and after the prophylaxis, respectively. However, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.65). Multiple prophylaxis for sequential chemotherapy did not induce additional quinolone resistance among E. coli isolates. Interestingly, quinolone-resistant E. coli, most of which were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers, were already detected in approximately 20% of all patients before the initiation of prophylaxis. FN-related bacteremia developed in 2 patients, accompanied by a good prognosis. Levofloxacin prophylaxis for neutropenia did not result in a significant acquisition of quinolone-resistant E. coli. However, we detected previous colonization of quinolone-resistant E. coli before prophylaxis, which possibly reflects the spread of ESBL. The epidemic spread of resistant E. coli as a local factor may influence strategies toward the use of quinolone prophylaxis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085210</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24465506</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibiotic resistance ; Antibiotics ; Antimicrobial agents ; Bacteremia ; Beta lactamases ; Biology ; Cancer therapies ; Chemotherapy ; Ciprofloxacin ; Colonization ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial - drug effects ; E coli ; Epidemics ; Escherichia coli ; Escherichia coli - drug effects ; Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification ; Escherichia coli - physiology ; Escherichia coli Infections - complications ; Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology ; Escherichia coli Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Evolution &amp; development ; Febrile Neutropenia - complications ; Feces ; Feces - microbiology ; Female ; Flora ; Health aspects ; Hematologic Neoplasms - complications ; Hematology ; Hospitals ; Host-Pathogen Interactions - drug effects ; Humans ; Infection ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Klebsiella pneumoniae ; Laboratories ; Levofloxacin ; Levofloxacin - therapeutic use ; Male ; Mathematics ; Medicine ; Microbial drug resistance ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Neutropenia ; Neutrophils ; Patients ; Prophylaxis ; Prospective Studies ; Science ; Statistical analysis ; Stem cells ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Treatment Outcome ; University graduates</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-01, Vol.9 (1), p.e85210</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Chong et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Chong et al 2014 Chong et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5cfb82de1e585b0820fac5f42d4bfb1bf3372590710730721f6f0ab8d4ea067b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5cfb82de1e585b0820fac5f42d4bfb1bf3372590710730721f6f0ab8d4ea067b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898953/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898953/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465506$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chong, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimoda, Shinji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakushiji, Hiroko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Yoshikiyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Takatoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyamoto, Toshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamimura, Tomohiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimono, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akashi, Koichi</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical impact of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in the fecal flora of hematological patients with neutropenia and levofloxacin prophylaxis</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia and hematological malignancies is said to be effective on febrile netropenia (FN)-related infection and mortality; however, the emergence of antibiotic resistance has become a concern. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin prophylaxis are most commonly recommended. A significant increase in the rate of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in fecal flora has been reported following ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. The acquisition of quinolone-resistant E. coli after levofloxacin use has not been evaluated. We prospectively examined the incidence of quinolone-resistant E. coli isolates recovered from stool cultures before and after levofloxacin prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia from August 2011 to May 2013. Some patients received chemotherapy multiple times. In this trial, 68 patients were registered. Levofloxacin-resistant E. coli isolates were detected from 11 and 13 of all patients before and after the prophylaxis, respectively. However, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.65). Multiple prophylaxis for sequential chemotherapy did not induce additional quinolone resistance among E. coli isolates. Interestingly, quinolone-resistant E. coli, most of which were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers, were already detected in approximately 20% of all patients before the initiation of prophylaxis. FN-related bacteremia developed in 2 patients, accompanied by a good prognosis. Levofloxacin prophylaxis for neutropenia did not result in a significant acquisition of quinolone-resistant E. coli. However, we detected previous colonization of quinolone-resistant E. coli before prophylaxis, which possibly reflects the spread of ESBL. The epidemic spread of resistant E. coli as a local factor may influence strategies toward the use of quinolone prophylaxis.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Bacteremia</subject><subject>Beta lactamases</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Ciprofloxacin</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Bacterial - drug effects</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - drug effects</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - physiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - complications</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Evolution &amp; development</subject><subject>Febrile Neutropenia - complications</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flora</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hematologic Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Host-Pathogen Interactions - drug effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Klebsiella pneumoniae</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Levofloxacin</subject><subject>Levofloxacin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Microbial drug resistance</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neutropenia</subject><subject>Neutrophils</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>University graduates</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9EBQfBi1ySTzMeNUJaqC4WCX7fhTCbZyZJNxiRT23_izzXbnZYdUJBcTEie95nDCSfLXmK0xEWF32_d6C2Y5eCsXCJUM4LRo-wUNwVZlAQVj4_2J9mzELYIsaIuy6fZCaG0ZAyVp9nvldFWCzC53g0gYu5UrszovPs5autMki-8DDpEsDG_CKKXXoteQy6c0bm2eexlruTeoIzzsBf0cgcxZTd34gGiljaG_JeOfW7lGL0bpE0KsF1u5LVLwRsQyTWkm_7WwI0Oz7MnCkyQL6bvWfb948W31efF5dWn9er8ciHKhsQFE6qtSSexZDVrUU2QAsEUJR1tVYtbVRQVYQ2qMKoKVBGsSoWgrTsqAZVVW5xlrw_ewbjAp6YGjmmDMUGUVIlYH4jOwZYPXu_A33IHmt8dOL_h4KMWRvIKoRLjtmwrCrSqcKOaEmgqtOuAlJ1Irg_T38Z2JzuR-uLBzKTzG6t7vnHXvKibumFFEryZBPsXkiH-o-SJ2kCqSlvlkkzsdBD8nFZ1zSjDLFHLv1BpdXKnRXp5pdP5LPBuFkhMlDdxA2MIfP31y_-zVz_m7NsjtpdgYh-cGaN2NsxBegCFdyF4qR46hxHfT8V9N_h-Kvg0FSn26rjrD6H7MSj-AJVDC4I</recordid><startdate>20140122</startdate><enddate>20140122</enddate><creator>Chong, Yong</creator><creator>Shimoda, Shinji</creator><creator>Yakushiji, Hiroko</creator><creator>Ito, Yoshikiyo</creator><creator>Aoki, Takatoshi</creator><creator>Miyamoto, Toshihiro</creator><creator>Kamimura, Tomohiko</creator><creator>Shimono, Nobuyuki</creator><creator>Akashi, Koichi</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140122</creationdate><title>Clinical impact of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in the fecal flora of hematological patients with neutropenia and levofloxacin prophylaxis</title><author>Chong, Yong ; Shimoda, Shinji ; Yakushiji, Hiroko ; Ito, Yoshikiyo ; Aoki, Takatoshi ; Miyamoto, Toshihiro ; Kamimura, Tomohiko ; Shimono, Nobuyuki ; Akashi, Koichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5cfb82de1e585b0820fac5f42d4bfb1bf3372590710730721f6f0ab8d4ea067b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Bacteremia</topic><topic>Beta lactamases</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Ciprofloxacin</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Bacterial - drug effects</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - drug effects</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - physiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - complications</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Evolution &amp; development</topic><topic>Febrile Neutropenia - complications</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flora</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hematologic Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Host-Pathogen Interactions - drug effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Levofloxacin</topic><topic>Levofloxacin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Microbial drug resistance</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neutropenia</topic><topic>Neutrophils</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>University graduates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chong, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimoda, Shinji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakushiji, Hiroko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Yoshikiyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Takatoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyamoto, Toshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamimura, Tomohiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimono, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akashi, Koichi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chong, Yong</au><au>Shimoda, Shinji</au><au>Yakushiji, Hiroko</au><au>Ito, Yoshikiyo</au><au>Aoki, Takatoshi</au><au>Miyamoto, Toshihiro</au><au>Kamimura, Tomohiko</au><au>Shimono, Nobuyuki</au><au>Akashi, Koichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical impact of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in the fecal flora of hematological patients with neutropenia and levofloxacin prophylaxis</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-01-22</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e85210</spage><pages>e85210-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia and hematological malignancies is said to be effective on febrile netropenia (FN)-related infection and mortality; however, the emergence of antibiotic resistance has become a concern. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin prophylaxis are most commonly recommended. A significant increase in the rate of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in fecal flora has been reported following ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. The acquisition of quinolone-resistant E. coli after levofloxacin use has not been evaluated. We prospectively examined the incidence of quinolone-resistant E. coli isolates recovered from stool cultures before and after levofloxacin prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia from August 2011 to May 2013. Some patients received chemotherapy multiple times. In this trial, 68 patients were registered. Levofloxacin-resistant E. coli isolates were detected from 11 and 13 of all patients before and after the prophylaxis, respectively. However, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.65). Multiple prophylaxis for sequential chemotherapy did not induce additional quinolone resistance among E. coli isolates. Interestingly, quinolone-resistant E. coli, most of which were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers, were already detected in approximately 20% of all patients before the initiation of prophylaxis. FN-related bacteremia developed in 2 patients, accompanied by a good prognosis. Levofloxacin prophylaxis for neutropenia did not result in a significant acquisition of quinolone-resistant E. coli. However, we detected previous colonization of quinolone-resistant E. coli before prophylaxis, which possibly reflects the spread of ESBL. The epidemic spread of resistant E. coli as a local factor may influence strategies toward the use of quinolone prophylaxis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24465506</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0085210</doi><tpages>e85210</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2014-01, Vol.9 (1), p.e85210
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1491120427
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Antibiotic resistance
Antibiotics
Antimicrobial agents
Bacteremia
Beta lactamases
Biology
Cancer therapies
Chemotherapy
Ciprofloxacin
Colonization
Drug Resistance, Bacterial - drug effects
E coli
Epidemics
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli - drug effects
Escherichia coli - isolation & purification
Escherichia coli - physiology
Escherichia coli Infections - complications
Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology
Escherichia coli Infections - prevention & control
Evolution & development
Febrile Neutropenia - complications
Feces
Feces - microbiology
Female
Flora
Health aspects
Hematologic Neoplasms - complications
Hematology
Hospitals
Host-Pathogen Interactions - drug effects
Humans
Infection
Infections
Infectious diseases
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Laboratories
Levofloxacin
Levofloxacin - therapeutic use
Male
Mathematics
Medicine
Microbial drug resistance
Middle Aged
Mortality
Neutropenia
Neutrophils
Patients
Prophylaxis
Prospective Studies
Science
Statistical analysis
Stem cells
Transplants & implants
Treatment Outcome
University graduates
title Clinical impact of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in the fecal flora of hematological patients with neutropenia and levofloxacin prophylaxis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T21%3A34%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20impact%20of%20fluoroquinolone-resistant%20Escherichia%20coli%20in%20the%20fecal%20flora%20of%20hematological%20patients%20with%20neutropenia%20and%20levofloxacin%20prophylaxis&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Chong,%20Yong&rft.date=2014-01-22&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e85210&rft.pages=e85210-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0085210&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478854515%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1491120427&rft_id=info:pmid/24465506&rft_galeid=A478854515&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_700611b6b74a47719f96a4692dda26dc&rfr_iscdi=true