Distractor interference during a choice limb reaching task
According to action-centered models of attention, the patterns of distractor interference that emerge in selective reaching tasks are related to the time and effort required to resolve a race for activation between competing target and non-target response producing processes. Previous studies have o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2014-01, Vol.9 (1), p.e85961-e85961 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e85961 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e85961 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Ray, Matthew Weeks, Daniel Welsh, Timothy N |
description | According to action-centered models of attention, the patterns of distractor interference that emerge in selective reaching tasks are related to the time and effort required to resolve a race for activation between competing target and non-target response producing processes. Previous studies have only used unimanual aiming tasks and, as such, only examined the effects of competition that occurs within a limb. The results of studies using unimanual aiming movements often reveal an "ipsilateral effect"--distractors on the same side of space as the effector cause greater interference than distractors on the opposite side of space. The cost of the competition when response selection is between the limbs has yet to be addressed. Participants in the present study executed reaching movements to 1 of 4 (2 left, 2 right) possible target locations with and without a distractor. Participants made ipsilateral reaches (left hand to left targets, right hand to right targets). In contrast to studies using unimanual aiming movements, a "contralateral effect" was observed; distractors affording responses for the other hand (in contralateral space) caused more interference than distractors affording responses for the same hand. The findings from the present research demonstrate that when certain portions of response planning must be resolved prior to response initiation, distractors that code for that dimension cause the greatest interference. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0085961 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1478266459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478861886</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4650bcad350049edaee8311065c0a154</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478861886</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-af79e581d53b8d846b79d9ffa1f694e43e7f5e18dbc4bcfd1c4348ddd964406b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7jr6D0QHBNGLGZMmTRMvhGVddWBhwa_bkCYnMxk7zZikov_edKe7TGUvJJS0p895T87JWxRPMVpiUuM3W9-HTrXLve9giRCvBMP3ilMsSLlgJSL3j95PikcxbhGqCGfsYXFSUsoqjslp8fa9iykonXyYuy5BsBCg0zA3fXDdeq7meuNd_m7drpkHUHozhJOKPx4XD6xqIzwZ91nx7cPF1_NPi8urj6vzs8uFZqJMC2VrAbmYqUjDDaesqYUR1ipsmaBACdS2AsxNo2mjrcGaEsqNMYJRilhDZsXzg-6-9VGObUeJac1LxmglMrE6EMarrdwHt1Phj_TKyeuAD2upQnK6BZn7Ro1WhlQIUQFGAXCCMWKVRgpXNGu9G6v1zQ6Mhi6Pp52ITv90biPX_pckXFQoz3pWvBoFgv_ZQ0xy56KGtlUd-H44tygZF6Qezv3iH_Tu7kZqrXIDrrN-uLBBVJ5lijOcn0wt76DyMrBzOnvEuhyfJLyeJGQmwe-0Vn2McvXl8_-zV9-n7MsjdgOqTZvo2z4538UpSA-gDj7GAPZ2yBjJweI305CDxeVo8Zz27PiCbpNuPE3-ApdZ9dg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1478266459</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distractor interference during a choice limb reaching task</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Ray, Matthew ; Weeks, Daniel ; Welsh, Timothy N</creator><contributor>Holmes, Nicholas P.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ray, Matthew ; Weeks, Daniel ; Welsh, Timothy N ; Holmes, Nicholas P.</creatorcontrib><description>According to action-centered models of attention, the patterns of distractor interference that emerge in selective reaching tasks are related to the time and effort required to resolve a race for activation between competing target and non-target response producing processes. Previous studies have only used unimanual aiming tasks and, as such, only examined the effects of competition that occurs within a limb. The results of studies using unimanual aiming movements often reveal an "ipsilateral effect"--distractors on the same side of space as the effector cause greater interference than distractors on the opposite side of space. The cost of the competition when response selection is between the limbs has yet to be addressed. Participants in the present study executed reaching movements to 1 of 4 (2 left, 2 right) possible target locations with and without a distractor. Participants made ipsilateral reaches (left hand to left targets, right hand to right targets). In contrast to studies using unimanual aiming movements, a "contralateral effect" was observed; distractors affording responses for the other hand (in contralateral space) caused more interference than distractors affording responses for the same hand. The findings from the present research demonstrate that when certain portions of response planning must be resolved prior to response initiation, distractors that code for that dimension cause the greatest interference.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085961</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24465813</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biology ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Competition ; Extremities - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Interference ; Kinesiology ; Light emitting diodes ; Male ; Medicine ; Movement - physiology ; Photic Stimulation ; Physical education ; Planning ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Social and Behavioral Sciences ; Studies ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Visual task performance ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-01, Vol.9 (1), p.e85961-e85961</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Ray et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Ray et al 2014 Ray et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-af79e581d53b8d846b79d9ffa1f694e43e7f5e18dbc4bcfd1c4348ddd964406b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-af79e581d53b8d846b79d9ffa1f694e43e7f5e18dbc4bcfd1c4348ddd964406b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3895020/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3895020/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465813$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Holmes, Nicholas P.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ray, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weeks, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsh, Timothy N</creatorcontrib><title>Distractor interference during a choice limb reaching task</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>According to action-centered models of attention, the patterns of distractor interference that emerge in selective reaching tasks are related to the time and effort required to resolve a race for activation between competing target and non-target response producing processes. Previous studies have only used unimanual aiming tasks and, as such, only examined the effects of competition that occurs within a limb. The results of studies using unimanual aiming movements often reveal an "ipsilateral effect"--distractors on the same side of space as the effector cause greater interference than distractors on the opposite side of space. The cost of the competition when response selection is between the limbs has yet to be addressed. Participants in the present study executed reaching movements to 1 of 4 (2 left, 2 right) possible target locations with and without a distractor. Participants made ipsilateral reaches (left hand to left targets, right hand to right targets). In contrast to studies using unimanual aiming movements, a "contralateral effect" was observed; distractors affording responses for the other hand (in contralateral space) caused more interference than distractors affording responses for the same hand. The findings from the present research demonstrate that when certain portions of response planning must be resolved prior to response initiation, distractors that code for that dimension cause the greatest interference.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Extremities - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interference</subject><subject>Kinesiology</subject><subject>Light emitting diodes</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Physical education</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Social and Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Visual task performance</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7jr6D0QHBNGLGZMmTRMvhGVddWBhwa_bkCYnMxk7zZikov_edKe7TGUvJJS0p895T87JWxRPMVpiUuM3W9-HTrXLve9giRCvBMP3ilMsSLlgJSL3j95PikcxbhGqCGfsYXFSUsoqjslp8fa9iykonXyYuy5BsBCg0zA3fXDdeq7meuNd_m7drpkHUHozhJOKPx4XD6xqIzwZ91nx7cPF1_NPi8urj6vzs8uFZqJMC2VrAbmYqUjDDaesqYUR1ipsmaBACdS2AsxNo2mjrcGaEsqNMYJRilhDZsXzg-6-9VGObUeJac1LxmglMrE6EMarrdwHt1Phj_TKyeuAD2upQnK6BZn7Ro1WhlQIUQFGAXCCMWKVRgpXNGu9G6v1zQ6Mhi6Pp52ITv90biPX_pckXFQoz3pWvBoFgv_ZQ0xy56KGtlUd-H44tygZF6Qezv3iH_Tu7kZqrXIDrrN-uLBBVJ5lijOcn0wt76DyMrBzOnvEuhyfJLyeJGQmwe-0Vn2McvXl8_-zV9-n7MsjdgOqTZvo2z4538UpSA-gDj7GAPZ2yBjJweI305CDxeVo8Zz27PiCbpNuPE3-ApdZ9dg</recordid><startdate>20140117</startdate><enddate>20140117</enddate><creator>Ray, Matthew</creator><creator>Weeks, Daniel</creator><creator>Welsh, Timothy N</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140117</creationdate><title>Distractor interference during a choice limb reaching task</title><author>Ray, Matthew ; Weeks, Daniel ; Welsh, Timothy N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-af79e581d53b8d846b79d9ffa1f694e43e7f5e18dbc4bcfd1c4348ddd964406b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Extremities - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interference</topic><topic>Kinesiology</topic><topic>Light emitting diodes</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Physical education</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Social and Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Visual task performance</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ray, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weeks, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsh, Timothy N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ray, Matthew</au><au>Weeks, Daniel</au><au>Welsh, Timothy N</au><au>Holmes, Nicholas P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distractor interference during a choice limb reaching task</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-01-17</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e85961</spage><epage>e85961</epage><pages>e85961-e85961</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>According to action-centered models of attention, the patterns of distractor interference that emerge in selective reaching tasks are related to the time and effort required to resolve a race for activation between competing target and non-target response producing processes. Previous studies have only used unimanual aiming tasks and, as such, only examined the effects of competition that occurs within a limb. The results of studies using unimanual aiming movements often reveal an "ipsilateral effect"--distractors on the same side of space as the effector cause greater interference than distractors on the opposite side of space. The cost of the competition when response selection is between the limbs has yet to be addressed. Participants in the present study executed reaching movements to 1 of 4 (2 left, 2 right) possible target locations with and without a distractor. Participants made ipsilateral reaches (left hand to left targets, right hand to right targets). In contrast to studies using unimanual aiming movements, a "contralateral effect" was observed; distractors affording responses for the other hand (in contralateral space) caused more interference than distractors affording responses for the same hand. The findings from the present research demonstrate that when certain portions of response planning must be resolved prior to response initiation, distractors that code for that dimension cause the greatest interference.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24465813</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0085961</doi><tpages>e85961</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2014-01, Vol.9 (1), p.e85961-e85961 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1478266459 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Biology Choice Behavior - physiology Competition Extremities - physiology Female Humans Interference Kinesiology Light emitting diodes Male Medicine Movement - physiology Photic Stimulation Physical education Planning Reaction Time - physiology Social and Behavioral Sciences Studies Task Performance and Analysis Visual task performance Young Adult |
title | Distractor interference during a choice limb reaching task |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A51%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distractor%20interference%20during%20a%20choice%20limb%20reaching%20task&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ray,%20Matthew&rft.date=2014-01-17&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e85961&rft.epage=e85961&rft.pages=e85961-e85961&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0085961&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478861886%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1478266459&rft_id=info:pmid/24465813&rft_galeid=A478861886&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4650bcad350049edaee8311065c0a154&rfr_iscdi=true |