Distractor interference during a choice limb reaching task

According to action-centered models of attention, the patterns of distractor interference that emerge in selective reaching tasks are related to the time and effort required to resolve a race for activation between competing target and non-target response producing processes. Previous studies have o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2014-01, Vol.9 (1), p.e85961-e85961
Hauptverfasser: Ray, Matthew, Weeks, Daniel, Welsh, Timothy N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e85961
container_issue 1
container_start_page e85961
container_title PloS one
container_volume 9
creator Ray, Matthew
Weeks, Daniel
Welsh, Timothy N
description According to action-centered models of attention, the patterns of distractor interference that emerge in selective reaching tasks are related to the time and effort required to resolve a race for activation between competing target and non-target response producing processes. Previous studies have only used unimanual aiming tasks and, as such, only examined the effects of competition that occurs within a limb. The results of studies using unimanual aiming movements often reveal an "ipsilateral effect"--distractors on the same side of space as the effector cause greater interference than distractors on the opposite side of space. The cost of the competition when response selection is between the limbs has yet to be addressed. Participants in the present study executed reaching movements to 1 of 4 (2 left, 2 right) possible target locations with and without a distractor. Participants made ipsilateral reaches (left hand to left targets, right hand to right targets). In contrast to studies using unimanual aiming movements, a "contralateral effect" was observed; distractors affording responses for the other hand (in contralateral space) caused more interference than distractors affording responses for the same hand. The findings from the present research demonstrate that when certain portions of response planning must be resolved prior to response initiation, distractors that code for that dimension cause the greatest interference.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0085961
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1478266459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478861886</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4650bcad350049edaee8311065c0a154</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478861886</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-af79e581d53b8d846b79d9ffa1f694e43e7f5e18dbc4bcfd1c4348ddd964406b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7jr6D0QHBNGLGZMmTRMvhGVddWBhwa_bkCYnMxk7zZikov_edKe7TGUvJJS0p895T87JWxRPMVpiUuM3W9-HTrXLve9giRCvBMP3ilMsSLlgJSL3j95PikcxbhGqCGfsYXFSUsoqjslp8fa9iykonXyYuy5BsBCg0zA3fXDdeq7meuNd_m7drpkHUHozhJOKPx4XD6xqIzwZ91nx7cPF1_NPi8urj6vzs8uFZqJMC2VrAbmYqUjDDaesqYUR1ipsmaBACdS2AsxNo2mjrcGaEsqNMYJRilhDZsXzg-6-9VGObUeJac1LxmglMrE6EMarrdwHt1Phj_TKyeuAD2upQnK6BZn7Ro1WhlQIUQFGAXCCMWKVRgpXNGu9G6v1zQ6Mhi6Pp52ITv90biPX_pckXFQoz3pWvBoFgv_ZQ0xy56KGtlUd-H44tygZF6Qezv3iH_Tu7kZqrXIDrrN-uLBBVJ5lijOcn0wt76DyMrBzOnvEuhyfJLyeJGQmwe-0Vn2McvXl8_-zV9-n7MsjdgOqTZvo2z4538UpSA-gDj7GAPZ2yBjJweI305CDxeVo8Zz27PiCbpNuPE3-ApdZ9dg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1478266459</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distractor interference during a choice limb reaching task</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Ray, Matthew ; Weeks, Daniel ; Welsh, Timothy N</creator><contributor>Holmes, Nicholas P.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ray, Matthew ; Weeks, Daniel ; Welsh, Timothy N ; Holmes, Nicholas P.</creatorcontrib><description>According to action-centered models of attention, the patterns of distractor interference that emerge in selective reaching tasks are related to the time and effort required to resolve a race for activation between competing target and non-target response producing processes. Previous studies have only used unimanual aiming tasks and, as such, only examined the effects of competition that occurs within a limb. The results of studies using unimanual aiming movements often reveal an "ipsilateral effect"--distractors on the same side of space as the effector cause greater interference than distractors on the opposite side of space. The cost of the competition when response selection is between the limbs has yet to be addressed. Participants in the present study executed reaching movements to 1 of 4 (2 left, 2 right) possible target locations with and without a distractor. Participants made ipsilateral reaches (left hand to left targets, right hand to right targets). In contrast to studies using unimanual aiming movements, a "contralateral effect" was observed; distractors affording responses for the other hand (in contralateral space) caused more interference than distractors affording responses for the same hand. The findings from the present research demonstrate that when certain portions of response planning must be resolved prior to response initiation, distractors that code for that dimension cause the greatest interference.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085961</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24465813</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biology ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Competition ; Extremities - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Interference ; Kinesiology ; Light emitting diodes ; Male ; Medicine ; Movement - physiology ; Photic Stimulation ; Physical education ; Planning ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Social and Behavioral Sciences ; Studies ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Visual task performance ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-01, Vol.9 (1), p.e85961-e85961</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Ray et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Ray et al 2014 Ray et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-af79e581d53b8d846b79d9ffa1f694e43e7f5e18dbc4bcfd1c4348ddd964406b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-af79e581d53b8d846b79d9ffa1f694e43e7f5e18dbc4bcfd1c4348ddd964406b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3895020/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3895020/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465813$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Holmes, Nicholas P.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ray, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weeks, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsh, Timothy N</creatorcontrib><title>Distractor interference during a choice limb reaching task</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>According to action-centered models of attention, the patterns of distractor interference that emerge in selective reaching tasks are related to the time and effort required to resolve a race for activation between competing target and non-target response producing processes. Previous studies have only used unimanual aiming tasks and, as such, only examined the effects of competition that occurs within a limb. The results of studies using unimanual aiming movements often reveal an "ipsilateral effect"--distractors on the same side of space as the effector cause greater interference than distractors on the opposite side of space. The cost of the competition when response selection is between the limbs has yet to be addressed. Participants in the present study executed reaching movements to 1 of 4 (2 left, 2 right) possible target locations with and without a distractor. Participants made ipsilateral reaches (left hand to left targets, right hand to right targets). In contrast to studies using unimanual aiming movements, a "contralateral effect" was observed; distractors affording responses for the other hand (in contralateral space) caused more interference than distractors affording responses for the same hand. The findings from the present research demonstrate that when certain portions of response planning must be resolved prior to response initiation, distractors that code for that dimension cause the greatest interference.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Extremities - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interference</subject><subject>Kinesiology</subject><subject>Light emitting diodes</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Physical education</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Social and Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Visual task performance</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7jr6D0QHBNGLGZMmTRMvhGVddWBhwa_bkCYnMxk7zZikov_edKe7TGUvJJS0p895T87JWxRPMVpiUuM3W9-HTrXLve9giRCvBMP3ilMsSLlgJSL3j95PikcxbhGqCGfsYXFSUsoqjslp8fa9iykonXyYuy5BsBCg0zA3fXDdeq7meuNd_m7drpkHUHozhJOKPx4XD6xqIzwZ91nx7cPF1_NPi8urj6vzs8uFZqJMC2VrAbmYqUjDDaesqYUR1ipsmaBACdS2AsxNo2mjrcGaEsqNMYJRilhDZsXzg-6-9VGObUeJac1LxmglMrE6EMarrdwHt1Phj_TKyeuAD2upQnK6BZn7Ro1WhlQIUQFGAXCCMWKVRgpXNGu9G6v1zQ6Mhi6Pp52ITv90biPX_pckXFQoz3pWvBoFgv_ZQ0xy56KGtlUd-H44tygZF6Qezv3iH_Tu7kZqrXIDrrN-uLBBVJ5lijOcn0wt76DyMrBzOnvEuhyfJLyeJGQmwe-0Vn2McvXl8_-zV9-n7MsjdgOqTZvo2z4538UpSA-gDj7GAPZ2yBjJweI305CDxeVo8Zz27PiCbpNuPE3-ApdZ9dg</recordid><startdate>20140117</startdate><enddate>20140117</enddate><creator>Ray, Matthew</creator><creator>Weeks, Daniel</creator><creator>Welsh, Timothy N</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140117</creationdate><title>Distractor interference during a choice limb reaching task</title><author>Ray, Matthew ; Weeks, Daniel ; Welsh, Timothy N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-af79e581d53b8d846b79d9ffa1f694e43e7f5e18dbc4bcfd1c4348ddd964406b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Extremities - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interference</topic><topic>Kinesiology</topic><topic>Light emitting diodes</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Physical education</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Social and Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Visual task performance</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ray, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weeks, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsh, Timothy N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ray, Matthew</au><au>Weeks, Daniel</au><au>Welsh, Timothy N</au><au>Holmes, Nicholas P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distractor interference during a choice limb reaching task</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-01-17</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e85961</spage><epage>e85961</epage><pages>e85961-e85961</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>According to action-centered models of attention, the patterns of distractor interference that emerge in selective reaching tasks are related to the time and effort required to resolve a race for activation between competing target and non-target response producing processes. Previous studies have only used unimanual aiming tasks and, as such, only examined the effects of competition that occurs within a limb. The results of studies using unimanual aiming movements often reveal an "ipsilateral effect"--distractors on the same side of space as the effector cause greater interference than distractors on the opposite side of space. The cost of the competition when response selection is between the limbs has yet to be addressed. Participants in the present study executed reaching movements to 1 of 4 (2 left, 2 right) possible target locations with and without a distractor. Participants made ipsilateral reaches (left hand to left targets, right hand to right targets). In contrast to studies using unimanual aiming movements, a "contralateral effect" was observed; distractors affording responses for the other hand (in contralateral space) caused more interference than distractors affording responses for the same hand. The findings from the present research demonstrate that when certain portions of response planning must be resolved prior to response initiation, distractors that code for that dimension cause the greatest interference.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24465813</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0085961</doi><tpages>e85961</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2014-01, Vol.9 (1), p.e85961-e85961
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1478266459
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Biology
Choice Behavior - physiology
Competition
Extremities - physiology
Female
Humans
Interference
Kinesiology
Light emitting diodes
Male
Medicine
Movement - physiology
Photic Stimulation
Physical education
Planning
Reaction Time - physiology
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Studies
Task Performance and Analysis
Visual task performance
Young Adult
title Distractor interference during a choice limb reaching task
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A51%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distractor%20interference%20during%20a%20choice%20limb%20reaching%20task&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ray,%20Matthew&rft.date=2014-01-17&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e85961&rft.epage=e85961&rft.pages=e85961-e85961&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0085961&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478861886%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1478266459&rft_id=info:pmid/24465813&rft_galeid=A478861886&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4650bcad350049edaee8311065c0a154&rfr_iscdi=true