A qualitative assessment of the content validity of the ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L and their appropriateness for use in health research
The ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L are two index measures appropriate for use in health research. Assessment of content validity allows understanding of whether a measure captures the most relevant and important aspects of a concept. This paper reports a qualitative assessment of the content validity and app...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2013-12, Vol.8 (12), p.e85287-e85287 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e85287 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | e85287 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Keeley, Thomas Al-Janabi, Hareth Lorgelly, Paula Coast, Joanna |
| description | The ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L are two index measures appropriate for use in health research. Assessment of content validity allows understanding of whether a measure captures the most relevant and important aspects of a concept. This paper reports a qualitative assessment of the content validity and appropriateness for use of the eq-5D-5L and ICECAP-A measures, using novel methodology.
In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with research professionals in the UK and Australia. Informants were purposively sampled based on their professional role. Data were analysed in an iterative, thematic and constant comparative manner. A two stage investigation--the comparative direct approach--was developed to address the methodological challenges of the content validity research and allow rigorous assessment.
Informants viewed the ICECAP-A as an assessment of the broader determinants of quality of life, but lacking in assessment of health-related determinants. The eq-5D-5L was viewed as offering good coverage of health determinants, but as lacking in assessment of these broader determinants. Informants held some concerns about the content or wording of the Self-care, Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression items (EQ-5D-5L) and the Enjoyment, Achievement and attachment items (ICECAP-A).
Using rigorous qualitative methodology the results suggest that the ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L hold acceptable levels of content validity and are appropriate for use in health research. This work adds expert opinion to the emerging body of research using patients and public to validate these measures. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0085287 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1469701974</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478214936</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8c796a4144bb4f36989cc32200c85283</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478214936</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4f0c264bde245347753ab52ba5d2c3c939cc4ccb28ec8e984bb8c3f2b428a1583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk02P0zAQhiMEYpeFf4DAEhKCQ4pjO7F9QapKgUqVlu-r5ThO6yqNu7ZTsVd-OU6brhq0B5SD4_Ez74xnPEnyPIOTDNPs3cZ2rpXNZGdbPYGQ5YjRB8llxjFKCwTxw7P_i-SJ9xsIc8yK4nFygQguKIXsMvkzBTedbEyQwew1kN5r77e6DcDWIKw1ULYN_XYfocqE25N9MZvPpl_SKZBtBeZf0_xDmi8Pm3hqHJC7nbM7Z2T0jpKgtg50XgPTgrWWTVgDp72WTq2fJo9q2Xj9bFivkp8f5z9mn9Pl9afFbLpMVcFRSEkNFSpIWWlEckwozbEsc1TKvEIKK465UkSpEjGtmOaMlCVTuEYlQUxmOcNXycuj7q6xXgzl8yIjBacw45REYnEkKis3Iia_le5WWGnEwWDdSkgXjGq0YIryQpKMxDCkxgVnMTxGCELVdwJHrfdDtK7c6krFGjrZjETHJ61Zi5Xdi9gilvM-mTeDgLM3nfZBbI1Xumlkq23X580hRTSHPfrqH_T-2w3USsYLmLa2Ma7qRcWUUIaiIC4iNbmHil-ltyY-Bl2baB85vB05HB7M77CSnfdi8f3b_7PXv8bs6zP2-Ga8bbpgbOvHIDmCylnvna7vipxB0Y_KqRqiHxUxjEp0e3HeoDun02zgvx7qDT4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1469701974</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A qualitative assessment of the content validity of the ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L and their appropriateness for use in health research</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Keeley, Thomas ; Al-Janabi, Hareth ; Lorgelly, Paula ; Coast, Joanna</creator><contributor>Thiem, Ulrich</contributor><creatorcontrib>Keeley, Thomas ; Al-Janabi, Hareth ; Lorgelly, Paula ; Coast, Joanna ; Thiem, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><description>The ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L are two index measures appropriate for use in health research. Assessment of content validity allows understanding of whether a measure captures the most relevant and important aspects of a concept. This paper reports a qualitative assessment of the content validity and appropriateness for use of the eq-5D-5L and ICECAP-A measures, using novel methodology.
In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with research professionals in the UK and Australia. Informants were purposively sampled based on their professional role. Data were analysed in an iterative, thematic and constant comparative manner. A two stage investigation--the comparative direct approach--was developed to address the methodological challenges of the content validity research and allow rigorous assessment.
Informants viewed the ICECAP-A as an assessment of the broader determinants of quality of life, but lacking in assessment of health-related determinants. The eq-5D-5L was viewed as offering good coverage of health determinants, but as lacking in assessment of these broader determinants. Informants held some concerns about the content or wording of the Self-care, Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression items (EQ-5D-5L) and the Enjoyment, Achievement and attachment items (ICECAP-A).
Using rigorous qualitative methodology the results suggest that the ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L hold acceptable levels of content validity and are appropriate for use in health research. This work adds expert opinion to the emerging body of research using patients and public to validate these measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085287</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24367708</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Anxiety ; Australia ; Data processing ; Health ; Health economics ; Humans ; Ice caps ; Interviews ; Interviews as Topic ; Medical research ; Mental depression ; Pain ; Patients ; Personal Satisfaction ; Population ; Psychometrics - methods ; Quality of life ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Quantitative psychology ; Research Personnel ; Researchers ; Science ; Self Report ; United Kingdom ; Validation studies ; Validity</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2013-12, Vol.8 (12), p.e85287-e85287</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2013 Keeley et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2013 Keeley et al 2013 Keeley et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4f0c264bde245347753ab52ba5d2c3c939cc4ccb28ec8e984bb8c3f2b428a1583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4f0c264bde245347753ab52ba5d2c3c939cc4ccb28ec8e984bb8c3f2b428a1583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3868594/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3868594/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24367708$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Thiem, Ulrich</contributor><creatorcontrib>Keeley, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Janabi, Hareth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorgelly, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coast, Joanna</creatorcontrib><title>A qualitative assessment of the content validity of the ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L and their appropriateness for use in health research</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L are two index measures appropriate for use in health research. Assessment of content validity allows understanding of whether a measure captures the most relevant and important aspects of a concept. This paper reports a qualitative assessment of the content validity and appropriateness for use of the eq-5D-5L and ICECAP-A measures, using novel methodology.
In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with research professionals in the UK and Australia. Informants were purposively sampled based on their professional role. Data were analysed in an iterative, thematic and constant comparative manner. A two stage investigation--the comparative direct approach--was developed to address the methodological challenges of the content validity research and allow rigorous assessment.
Informants viewed the ICECAP-A as an assessment of the broader determinants of quality of life, but lacking in assessment of health-related determinants. The eq-5D-5L was viewed as offering good coverage of health determinants, but as lacking in assessment of these broader determinants. Informants held some concerns about the content or wording of the Self-care, Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression items (EQ-5D-5L) and the Enjoyment, Achievement and attachment items (ICECAP-A).
Using rigorous qualitative methodology the results suggest that the ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L hold acceptable levels of content validity and are appropriate for use in health research. This work adds expert opinion to the emerging body of research using patients and public to validate these measures.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ice caps</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Personal Satisfaction</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Research Personnel</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk02P0zAQhiMEYpeFf4DAEhKCQ4pjO7F9QapKgUqVlu-r5ThO6yqNu7ZTsVd-OU6brhq0B5SD4_Ez74xnPEnyPIOTDNPs3cZ2rpXNZGdbPYGQ5YjRB8llxjFKCwTxw7P_i-SJ9xsIc8yK4nFygQguKIXsMvkzBTedbEyQwew1kN5r77e6DcDWIKw1ULYN_XYfocqE25N9MZvPpl_SKZBtBeZf0_xDmi8Pm3hqHJC7nbM7Z2T0jpKgtg50XgPTgrWWTVgDp72WTq2fJo9q2Xj9bFivkp8f5z9mn9Pl9afFbLpMVcFRSEkNFSpIWWlEckwozbEsc1TKvEIKK465UkSpEjGtmOaMlCVTuEYlQUxmOcNXycuj7q6xXgzl8yIjBacw45REYnEkKis3Iia_le5WWGnEwWDdSkgXjGq0YIryQpKMxDCkxgVnMTxGCELVdwJHrfdDtK7c6krFGjrZjETHJ61Zi5Xdi9gilvM-mTeDgLM3nfZBbI1Xumlkq23X580hRTSHPfrqH_T-2w3USsYLmLa2Ma7qRcWUUIaiIC4iNbmHil-ltyY-Bl2baB85vB05HB7M77CSnfdi8f3b_7PXv8bs6zP2-Ga8bbpgbOvHIDmCylnvna7vipxB0Y_KqRqiHxUxjEp0e3HeoDun02zgvx7qDT4</recordid><startdate>20131219</startdate><enddate>20131219</enddate><creator>Keeley, Thomas</creator><creator>Al-Janabi, Hareth</creator><creator>Lorgelly, Paula</creator><creator>Coast, Joanna</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131219</creationdate><title>A qualitative assessment of the content validity of the ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L and their appropriateness for use in health research</title><author>Keeley, Thomas ; Al-Janabi, Hareth ; Lorgelly, Paula ; Coast, Joanna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4f0c264bde245347753ab52ba5d2c3c939cc4ccb28ec8e984bb8c3f2b428a1583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ice caps</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Personal Satisfaction</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Research Personnel</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keeley, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Janabi, Hareth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorgelly, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coast, Joanna</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keeley, Thomas</au><au>Al-Janabi, Hareth</au><au>Lorgelly, Paula</au><au>Coast, Joanna</au><au>Thiem, Ulrich</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A qualitative assessment of the content validity of the ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L and their appropriateness for use in health research</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2013-12-19</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e85287</spage><epage>e85287</epage><pages>e85287-e85287</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L are two index measures appropriate for use in health research. Assessment of content validity allows understanding of whether a measure captures the most relevant and important aspects of a concept. This paper reports a qualitative assessment of the content validity and appropriateness for use of the eq-5D-5L and ICECAP-A measures, using novel methodology.
In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with research professionals in the UK and Australia. Informants were purposively sampled based on their professional role. Data were analysed in an iterative, thematic and constant comparative manner. A two stage investigation--the comparative direct approach--was developed to address the methodological challenges of the content validity research and allow rigorous assessment.
Informants viewed the ICECAP-A as an assessment of the broader determinants of quality of life, but lacking in assessment of health-related determinants. The eq-5D-5L was viewed as offering good coverage of health determinants, but as lacking in assessment of these broader determinants. Informants held some concerns about the content or wording of the Self-care, Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression items (EQ-5D-5L) and the Enjoyment, Achievement and attachment items (ICECAP-A).
Using rigorous qualitative methodology the results suggest that the ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L hold acceptable levels of content validity and are appropriate for use in health research. This work adds expert opinion to the emerging body of research using patients and public to validate these measures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24367708</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0085287</doi><tpages>e85287</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2013-12, Vol.8 (12), p.e85287-e85287 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1469701974 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Analysis Anxiety Australia Data processing Health Health economics Humans Ice caps Interviews Interviews as Topic Medical research Mental depression Pain Patients Personal Satisfaction Population Psychometrics - methods Quality of life Quality of Life - psychology Quantitative psychology Research Personnel Researchers Science Self Report United Kingdom Validation studies Validity |
| title | A qualitative assessment of the content validity of the ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L and their appropriateness for use in health research |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T15%3A09%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20qualitative%20assessment%20of%20the%20content%20validity%20of%20the%20ICECAP-A%20and%20EQ-5D-5L%20and%20their%20appropriateness%20for%20use%20in%20health%20research&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Keeley,%20Thomas&rft.date=2013-12-19&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e85287&rft.epage=e85287&rft.pages=e85287-e85287&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0085287&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478214936%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1469701974&rft_id=info:pmid/24367708&rft_galeid=A478214936&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_8c796a4144bb4f36989cc32200c85283&rfr_iscdi=true |