A case study in serendipity: environmental researchers use of traditional and social media for dissemination
In the face of demands for researchers to engage more actively with a wider range of publics and to capture different kinds of research impacts and engagements, we explored the ways a small number of environmental researchers use traditional and social media to disseminate research. A questionnaire...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2013-12, Vol.8 (12), p.e84339 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e84339 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Wilkinson, Clare Weitkamp, Emma |
description | In the face of demands for researchers to engage more actively with a wider range of publics and to capture different kinds of research impacts and engagements, we explored the ways a small number of environmental researchers use traditional and social media to disseminate research. A questionnaire was developed to investigate the impact of different media as a tool to broker contact between researchers and a variety of different stakeholders (for example, publics, other researchers, policymakers, journalists) as well as how researchers perceive that their use of these media has changed over the past five years. The questionnaire was sent to 504 researchers whose work had featured in a policy-oriented e-news service. 149 valid responses were received (29%). Coverage in traditional media (newspapers, broadcast) not only brokers contact with other journalists, but is a good source of contact from other researchers (n=47, 62%) and members of the public (n=36, 26%). Although the use of social media was limited amongst our sample, it did broker contact with other researchers (n=17, 47%) and the public (n=10, 28%). Nevertheless, few environmental researchers were actively using social media to disseminate their research findings, with many continuing to rely on academic journals and face-to-face communication to reach both academic and public audiences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0084339 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1467912282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478298138</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3f7e0ffa028d49a894000021b86dd93c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478298138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-76c4f869c7a9617660e69339a84f5aab879b87fa3a16c2db99b43bee8886ed593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1tr2zAUx83YWLtu32BsgsHYHpJZkiNLexiEskugUNjtVRzrkig4UirZZfn2UxK3xKMPszES8u_8z02nKF7icoppjT-sQx89tNNt8GZalryiVDwqzrGgZMJISR-f7M-KZymty3JGOWNPizNS0UrManxetHOkIBmUul7vkPMomWi8dlvX7T4i429dDH5jfActiiYZiGplYkJ9tgkWdRG061zIgSDwGqWgXN5ujHaAbIhIu5TMxnnYQ8-LJxbaZF4M60Xx68vnn5ffJlfXXxeX86uJYoJ0k5qpynImVA2C4Zqx0jCRswNe2RlAw2uRPwsUMFNEN0I0FW2M4Zwzo2eCXhSvj7rbNiQ5FCpJXLFaYEI4ycTiSOgAa7mNbgNxJwM4eTgIcSkhdk61RlJbm9JaKAnXVY5BVGV-CG4401pQlbU-Dd76JieucrEitCPR8R_vVnIZbmVuBuGUZoF3g0AMN71Jndy4pEzbgjehP8Qt2MFrRt_8gz6c3UAtISfgvA3Zr9qLynlVcyI4pjxT0weo_OrcMJVvlXX5fGTwfmSQmc786ZbQpyQXP77_P3v9e8y-PWFXBtpulULb769MGoPVEVQxpBSNvS8yLuV-KO6qIfdDIYehyGavTht0b3Q3BfQvZ3cH_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1467912282</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A case study in serendipity: environmental researchers use of traditional and social media for dissemination</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Wilkinson, Clare ; Weitkamp, Emma</creator><contributor>Hermes-Lima, Marcelo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Clare ; Weitkamp, Emma ; Hermes-Lima, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><description>In the face of demands for researchers to engage more actively with a wider range of publics and to capture different kinds of research impacts and engagements, we explored the ways a small number of environmental researchers use traditional and social media to disseminate research. A questionnaire was developed to investigate the impact of different media as a tool to broker contact between researchers and a variety of different stakeholders (for example, publics, other researchers, policymakers, journalists) as well as how researchers perceive that their use of these media has changed over the past five years. The questionnaire was sent to 504 researchers whose work had featured in a policy-oriented e-news service. 149 valid responses were received (29%). Coverage in traditional media (newspapers, broadcast) not only brokers contact with other journalists, but is a good source of contact from other researchers (n=47, 62%) and members of the public (n=36, 26%). Although the use of social media was limited amongst our sample, it did broker contact with other researchers (n=17, 47%) and the public (n=10, 28%). Nevertheless, few environmental researchers were actively using social media to disseminate their research findings, with many continuing to rely on academic journals and face-to-face communication to reach both academic and public audiences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084339</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24349571</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Access to information ; Case reports ; Case studies ; Communication ; Digital media ; Environmental research ; Female ; Humans ; Information Dissemination ; Information services ; Institutional repositories ; Journalism ; Male ; Mediation ; News media ; Researchers ; Scientists ; Social Media ; Social networks ; Social research ; Society ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2013-12, Vol.8 (12), p.e84339</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2013 Wilkinson, Weitkamp. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2013 Wilkinson, Weitkamp 2013 Wilkinson, Weitkamp</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-76c4f869c7a9617660e69339a84f5aab879b87fa3a16c2db99b43bee8886ed593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-76c4f869c7a9617660e69339a84f5aab879b87fa3a16c2db99b43bee8886ed593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3862833/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3862833/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24349571$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Hermes-Lima, Marcelo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weitkamp, Emma</creatorcontrib><title>A case study in serendipity: environmental researchers use of traditional and social media for dissemination</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>In the face of demands for researchers to engage more actively with a wider range of publics and to capture different kinds of research impacts and engagements, we explored the ways a small number of environmental researchers use traditional and social media to disseminate research. A questionnaire was developed to investigate the impact of different media as a tool to broker contact between researchers and a variety of different stakeholders (for example, publics, other researchers, policymakers, journalists) as well as how researchers perceive that their use of these media has changed over the past five years. The questionnaire was sent to 504 researchers whose work had featured in a policy-oriented e-news service. 149 valid responses were received (29%). Coverage in traditional media (newspapers, broadcast) not only brokers contact with other journalists, but is a good source of contact from other researchers (n=47, 62%) and members of the public (n=36, 26%). Although the use of social media was limited amongst our sample, it did broker contact with other researchers (n=17, 47%) and the public (n=10, 28%). Nevertheless, few environmental researchers were actively using social media to disseminate their research findings, with many continuing to rely on academic journals and face-to-face communication to reach both academic and public audiences.</description><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Case reports</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Environmental research</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Dissemination</subject><subject>Information services</subject><subject>Institutional repositories</subject><subject>Journalism</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mediation</subject><subject>News media</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1tr2zAUx83YWLtu32BsgsHYHpJZkiNLexiEskugUNjtVRzrkig4UirZZfn2UxK3xKMPszES8u_8z02nKF7icoppjT-sQx89tNNt8GZalryiVDwqzrGgZMJISR-f7M-KZymty3JGOWNPizNS0UrManxetHOkIBmUul7vkPMomWi8dlvX7T4i429dDH5jfActiiYZiGplYkJ9tgkWdRG061zIgSDwGqWgXN5ujHaAbIhIu5TMxnnYQ8-LJxbaZF4M60Xx68vnn5ffJlfXXxeX86uJYoJ0k5qpynImVA2C4Zqx0jCRswNe2RlAw2uRPwsUMFNEN0I0FW2M4Zwzo2eCXhSvj7rbNiQ5FCpJXLFaYEI4ycTiSOgAa7mNbgNxJwM4eTgIcSkhdk61RlJbm9JaKAnXVY5BVGV-CG4401pQlbU-Dd76JieucrEitCPR8R_vVnIZbmVuBuGUZoF3g0AMN71Jndy4pEzbgjehP8Qt2MFrRt_8gz6c3UAtISfgvA3Zr9qLynlVcyI4pjxT0weo_OrcMJVvlXX5fGTwfmSQmc786ZbQpyQXP77_P3v9e8y-PWFXBtpulULb769MGoPVEVQxpBSNvS8yLuV-KO6qIfdDIYehyGavTht0b3Q3BfQvZ3cH_g</recordid><startdate>20131213</startdate><enddate>20131213</enddate><creator>Wilkinson, Clare</creator><creator>Weitkamp, Emma</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131213</creationdate><title>A case study in serendipity: environmental researchers use of traditional and social media for dissemination</title><author>Wilkinson, Clare ; Weitkamp, Emma</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-76c4f869c7a9617660e69339a84f5aab879b87fa3a16c2db99b43bee8886ed593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Case reports</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Environmental research</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Dissemination</topic><topic>Information services</topic><topic>Institutional repositories</topic><topic>Journalism</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mediation</topic><topic>News media</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weitkamp, Emma</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilkinson, Clare</au><au>Weitkamp, Emma</au><au>Hermes-Lima, Marcelo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A case study in serendipity: environmental researchers use of traditional and social media for dissemination</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2013-12-13</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e84339</spage><pages>e84339-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>In the face of demands for researchers to engage more actively with a wider range of publics and to capture different kinds of research impacts and engagements, we explored the ways a small number of environmental researchers use traditional and social media to disseminate research. A questionnaire was developed to investigate the impact of different media as a tool to broker contact between researchers and a variety of different stakeholders (for example, publics, other researchers, policymakers, journalists) as well as how researchers perceive that their use of these media has changed over the past five years. The questionnaire was sent to 504 researchers whose work had featured in a policy-oriented e-news service. 149 valid responses were received (29%). Coverage in traditional media (newspapers, broadcast) not only brokers contact with other journalists, but is a good source of contact from other researchers (n=47, 62%) and members of the public (n=36, 26%). Although the use of social media was limited amongst our sample, it did broker contact with other researchers (n=17, 47%) and the public (n=10, 28%). Nevertheless, few environmental researchers were actively using social media to disseminate their research findings, with many continuing to rely on academic journals and face-to-face communication to reach both academic and public audiences.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24349571</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0084339</doi><tpages>e84339</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2013-12, Vol.8 (12), p.e84339 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1467912282 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Access to information Case reports Case studies Communication Digital media Environmental research Female Humans Information Dissemination Information services Institutional repositories Journalism Male Mediation News media Researchers Scientists Social Media Social networks Social research Society Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | A case study in serendipity: environmental researchers use of traditional and social media for dissemination |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T17%3A36%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20case%20study%20in%20serendipity:%20environmental%20researchers%20use%20of%20traditional%20and%20social%20media%20for%20dissemination&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Wilkinson,%20Clare&rft.date=2013-12-13&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e84339&rft.pages=e84339-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0084339&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478298138%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1467912282&rft_id=info:pmid/24349571&rft_galeid=A478298138&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_3f7e0ffa028d49a894000021b86dd93c&rfr_iscdi=true |