Barriers to and facilitators of research utilization: a survey of registered nurses in China
This survey aims to describe the perception of barriers to and facilitators of research utilization by registered nurses in Sichuan province, China, and to explore the factors influencing the perceptions of the barriers to and facilitators of research utilization. A cross sectional survey design and...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2013-11, Vol.8 (11), p.e81908-e81908 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e81908 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | e81908 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Wang, Li-Ping Jiang, Xiao-Lian Wang, Lei Wang, Guo-Rong Bai, Yang-Jing |
| description | This survey aims to describe the perception of barriers to and facilitators of research utilization by registered nurses in Sichuan province, China, and to explore the factors influencing the perceptions of the barriers to and facilitators of research utilization.
A cross sectional survey design and a double cluster sampling method were adopted. A total of 590 registered nurses from 3 tertiary level hospitals in Sichuan province, China, were recruited in a period from September 2006 to January 2007. A modified BARRUERS Scale and a Facilitators Scale were used. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, rank transformation test, and multiple linear regression.
Barriers related to the setting subscale were more influential than barriers related to other subscales. The lack of authority was ranked as the top greatest barrier (15.7%), followed by the lack of time (13.4%) and language barrier (15.0%). Additional barriers identified were the reluctance of patients to research utilization, the lack of funding, and the lack of legal protection. The top three greatest facilitators were enhancing managerial support (36.9%), advancing education to increase knowledge base (21.1%), and increasing time for reviewing and implementing (17.5%), while cooperation of patients to research utilization, establishing a panel to evaluate researches, and funding were listed as additional facilitators. Hospital, educational background, research experience, and knowledge on evidence-based nursing were the factors influencing perceptions of the barriers and facilitators.
Nurses in China are facing a number of significant barriers in research utilization. Enhancing managerial support might be the most promising facilitator, given Chinese traditional culture and existing health care system. Hospital, educational background, research experience and knowledge on evidence-based nursing should be taken into account to promote research utilization. The BARRIERS Scale should consider funding and involvement of patients in research utilization. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0081908 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1462543040</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3e2980894b6e4804bfde0ab928110d3a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3141615521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-e4940fae11c5a9cd710cbd4041cda704385c18f00d395cb75bfb18b747754b5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1v1DAUjBCIlsI_QGCJC5ddnmM7cTggwYqPSpW4wA3JenZedr3K2ovtVCq_nrS7rVrEydZ4ZjzPnqp6yWHJRcvfbeOUAo7LfQy0BNC8A_2oOuWdqBdNDeLxvf1J9SznLYASummeVie1FLwWGk6rX58wJU8psxIZhp4N6PzoC5Y4Y3FgiTJhchs2lRn_g8XH8J4hy1O6pKsDY-1zoUQ9C1PKlJkPbLXxAZ9XTwYcM704rmfVzy-ff6y-LS6-fz1ffbxYOFU3ZUGykzAgce4Udq5vOTjbS5Dc9diCFFo5rgeAXnTK2VbZwXJtW9m2SlrlxFn1-uC7H2M2x4fJhsumVlKAhJlxfmD0Ebdmn_wO05WJ6M0NENPaYCrejWQE1Z0G3UnbkNQg7dAToO1qzfmcAGevD8fbJruj3lEoCccHpg9Pgt-Ydbw0QkvRgpgN3h4NUvw9US5m57OjccRAcbrJreZ_6oSaqW_-of5_OnlguRRzTjTcheFgrstyqzLXZTHHssyyV_cHuRPdtkP8BZwGvbo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1462543040</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Barriers to and facilitators of research utilization: a survey of registered nurses in China</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Wang, Li-Ping ; Jiang, Xiao-Lian ; Wang, Lei ; Wang, Guo-Rong ; Bai, Yang-Jing</creator><contributor>Morgan, Daniel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wang, Li-Ping ; Jiang, Xiao-Lian ; Wang, Lei ; Wang, Guo-Rong ; Bai, Yang-Jing ; Morgan, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>This survey aims to describe the perception of barriers to and facilitators of research utilization by registered nurses in Sichuan province, China, and to explore the factors influencing the perceptions of the barriers to and facilitators of research utilization.
A cross sectional survey design and a double cluster sampling method were adopted. A total of 590 registered nurses from 3 tertiary level hospitals in Sichuan province, China, were recruited in a period from September 2006 to January 2007. A modified BARRUERS Scale and a Facilitators Scale were used. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, rank transformation test, and multiple linear regression.
Barriers related to the setting subscale were more influential than barriers related to other subscales. The lack of authority was ranked as the top greatest barrier (15.7%), followed by the lack of time (13.4%) and language barrier (15.0%). Additional barriers identified were the reluctance of patients to research utilization, the lack of funding, and the lack of legal protection. The top three greatest facilitators were enhancing managerial support (36.9%), advancing education to increase knowledge base (21.1%), and increasing time for reviewing and implementing (17.5%), while cooperation of patients to research utilization, establishing a panel to evaluate researches, and funding were listed as additional facilitators. Hospital, educational background, research experience, and knowledge on evidence-based nursing were the factors influencing perceptions of the barriers and facilitators.
Nurses in China are facing a number of significant barriers in research utilization. Enhancing managerial support might be the most promising facilitator, given Chinese traditional culture and existing health care system. Hospital, educational background, research experience and knowledge on evidence-based nursing should be taken into account to promote research utilization. The BARRIERS Scale should consider funding and involvement of patients in research utilization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081908</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24312380</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; China ; Clinical medicine ; Cluster Analysis ; Corporate culture ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Data Collection ; Data processing ; Education ; Evidence-based nursing ; Female ; Funding ; Health care ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence) ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Medicine ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing administration ; Nursing Research ; Nursing schools ; Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology ; Patients ; Perceptions ; Quality ; Regression analysis ; Researchers ; Sampling methods ; Statistical tests ; Transformation ; Utilization ; Validity</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2013-11, Vol.8 (11), p.e81908-e81908</ispartof><rights>2013 Wang et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2013 Wang et al 2013 Wang et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-e4940fae11c5a9cd710cbd4041cda704385c18f00d395cb75bfb18b747754b5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-e4940fae11c5a9cd710cbd4041cda704385c18f00d395cb75bfb18b747754b5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3843703/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3843703/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24312380$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Morgan, Daniel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wang, Li-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Xiao-Lian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Guo-Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Yang-Jing</creatorcontrib><title>Barriers to and facilitators of research utilization: a survey of registered nurses in China</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>This survey aims to describe the perception of barriers to and facilitators of research utilization by registered nurses in Sichuan province, China, and to explore the factors influencing the perceptions of the barriers to and facilitators of research utilization.
A cross sectional survey design and a double cluster sampling method were adopted. A total of 590 registered nurses from 3 tertiary level hospitals in Sichuan province, China, were recruited in a period from September 2006 to January 2007. A modified BARRUERS Scale and a Facilitators Scale were used. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, rank transformation test, and multiple linear regression.
Barriers related to the setting subscale were more influential than barriers related to other subscales. The lack of authority was ranked as the top greatest barrier (15.7%), followed by the lack of time (13.4%) and language barrier (15.0%). Additional barriers identified were the reluctance of patients to research utilization, the lack of funding, and the lack of legal protection. The top three greatest facilitators were enhancing managerial support (36.9%), advancing education to increase knowledge base (21.1%), and increasing time for reviewing and implementing (17.5%), while cooperation of patients to research utilization, establishing a panel to evaluate researches, and funding were listed as additional facilitators. Hospital, educational background, research experience, and knowledge on evidence-based nursing were the factors influencing perceptions of the barriers and facilitators.
Nurses in China are facing a number of significant barriers in research utilization. Enhancing managerial support might be the most promising facilitator, given Chinese traditional culture and existing health care system. Hospital, educational background, research experience and knowledge on evidence-based nursing should be taken into account to promote research utilization. The BARRIERS Scale should consider funding and involvement of patients in research utilization.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Corporate culture</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Evidence-based nursing</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing administration</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Nursing schools</subject><subject>Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Transformation</subject><subject>Utilization</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1v1DAUjBCIlsI_QGCJC5ddnmM7cTggwYqPSpW4wA3JenZedr3K2ovtVCq_nrS7rVrEydZ4ZjzPnqp6yWHJRcvfbeOUAo7LfQy0BNC8A_2oOuWdqBdNDeLxvf1J9SznLYASummeVie1FLwWGk6rX58wJU8psxIZhp4N6PzoC5Y4Y3FgiTJhchs2lRn_g8XH8J4hy1O6pKsDY-1zoUQ9C1PKlJkPbLXxAZ9XTwYcM704rmfVzy-ff6y-LS6-fz1ffbxYOFU3ZUGykzAgce4Udq5vOTjbS5Dc9diCFFo5rgeAXnTK2VbZwXJtW9m2SlrlxFn1-uC7H2M2x4fJhsumVlKAhJlxfmD0Ebdmn_wO05WJ6M0NENPaYCrejWQE1Z0G3UnbkNQg7dAToO1qzfmcAGevD8fbJruj3lEoCccHpg9Pgt-Ydbw0QkvRgpgN3h4NUvw9US5m57OjccRAcbrJreZ_6oSaqW_-of5_OnlguRRzTjTcheFgrstyqzLXZTHHssyyV_cHuRPdtkP8BZwGvbo</recordid><startdate>20131129</startdate><enddate>20131129</enddate><creator>Wang, Li-Ping</creator><creator>Jiang, Xiao-Lian</creator><creator>Wang, Lei</creator><creator>Wang, Guo-Rong</creator><creator>Bai, Yang-Jing</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131129</creationdate><title>Barriers to and facilitators of research utilization: a survey of registered nurses in China</title><author>Wang, Li-Ping ; Jiang, Xiao-Lian ; Wang, Lei ; Wang, Guo-Rong ; Bai, Yang-Jing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-e4940fae11c5a9cd710cbd4041cda704385c18f00d395cb75bfb18b747754b5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Corporate culture</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Evidence-based nursing</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing administration</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Nursing schools</topic><topic>Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Transformation</topic><topic>Utilization</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Li-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Xiao-Lian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Guo-Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Yang-Jing</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Li-Ping</au><au>Jiang, Xiao-Lian</au><au>Wang, Lei</au><au>Wang, Guo-Rong</au><au>Bai, Yang-Jing</au><au>Morgan, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Barriers to and facilitators of research utilization: a survey of registered nurses in China</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2013-11-29</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e81908</spage><epage>e81908</epage><pages>e81908-e81908</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>This survey aims to describe the perception of barriers to and facilitators of research utilization by registered nurses in Sichuan province, China, and to explore the factors influencing the perceptions of the barriers to and facilitators of research utilization.
A cross sectional survey design and a double cluster sampling method were adopted. A total of 590 registered nurses from 3 tertiary level hospitals in Sichuan province, China, were recruited in a period from September 2006 to January 2007. A modified BARRUERS Scale and a Facilitators Scale were used. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, rank transformation test, and multiple linear regression.
Barriers related to the setting subscale were more influential than barriers related to other subscales. The lack of authority was ranked as the top greatest barrier (15.7%), followed by the lack of time (13.4%) and language barrier (15.0%). Additional barriers identified were the reluctance of patients to research utilization, the lack of funding, and the lack of legal protection. The top three greatest facilitators were enhancing managerial support (36.9%), advancing education to increase knowledge base (21.1%), and increasing time for reviewing and implementing (17.5%), while cooperation of patients to research utilization, establishing a panel to evaluate researches, and funding were listed as additional facilitators. Hospital, educational background, research experience, and knowledge on evidence-based nursing were the factors influencing perceptions of the barriers and facilitators.
Nurses in China are facing a number of significant barriers in research utilization. Enhancing managerial support might be the most promising facilitator, given Chinese traditional culture and existing health care system. Hospital, educational background, research experience and knowledge on evidence-based nursing should be taken into account to promote research utilization. The BARRIERS Scale should consider funding and involvement of patients in research utilization.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24312380</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0081908</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2013-11, Vol.8 (11), p.e81908-e81908 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1462543040 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Adult Attitude of Health Personnel China Clinical medicine Cluster Analysis Corporate culture Cross-Sectional Studies Data Collection Data processing Education Evidence-based nursing Female Funding Health care Hospitals Humans Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence) Male Medical personnel Medicine Nurses Nursing Nursing administration Nursing Research Nursing schools Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology Patients Perceptions Quality Regression analysis Researchers Sampling methods Statistical tests Transformation Utilization Validity |
| title | Barriers to and facilitators of research utilization: a survey of registered nurses in China |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T22%3A15%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Barriers%20to%20and%20facilitators%20of%20research%20utilization:%20a%20survey%20of%20registered%20nurses%20in%20China&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Wang,%20Li-Ping&rft.date=2013-11-29&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e81908&rft.epage=e81908&rft.pages=e81908-e81908&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0081908&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E3141615521%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1462543040&rft_id=info:pmid/24312380&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_3e2980894b6e4804bfde0ab928110d3a&rfr_iscdi=true |