Taurolidine lock solutions for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients, contributing to prolonged hospital stays and increased costs. Whether taurolidine lock solutions (TLS) are beneficial for the prevention of CRBSIs remains controversial. In...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2013-11, Vol.8 (11), p.e79417-e79417
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Yong, Zhang, An-Qiang, Cao, Lin, Xia, Hong-Tao, Ma, Jun-Jie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e79417
container_issue 11
container_start_page e79417
container_title PloS one
container_volume 8
creator Liu, Yong
Zhang, An-Qiang
Cao, Lin
Xia, Hong-Tao
Ma, Jun-Jie
description Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients, contributing to prolonged hospital stays and increased costs. Whether taurolidine lock solutions (TLS) are beneficial for the prevention of CRBSIs remains controversial. In this meta-analysis, we aim to assess the efficacy of TLS for preventing CRBSIs. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials that reported on the effects of TLS for preventing CRBSIs. The primary outcome in these studies was catheter-related bloodstream infections, with microbial distribution of CRBSI and catheter-associated thrombosis as secondary outcomes. Data were combined using random-effects models owing to significant clinical heterogeneity. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted from 2004 through 2013 involving 431 patients and 86,078 catheter-days were included in the review. TLS were significantly associated with a lower incidence of CRBSIs when compared to heparin lock solutions (Risk Ratio [RR], 0.34; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.21-0.55). Use of TLS significantly decreased the incidence of CRBSIs from gram-negative (G-) bacteria (P = 0.004; RR, 0.27; CI, 0.11-0.65), and was associated with a non-significant decrease in gram-positive (G+) bacterial infections (P = 0.07; RR, 0.41; CI, 0.15-1.09). No significant association was observed with TLS and catheter-associated thrombosis (RR, 1.99; CI, 0.75-5.28). The use of TLS reduced the incidence of CRBSIs without obvious adverse effects or bacterial resistance. However, the susceptibility of G+ and G- bacteria to taurolidine and the risk for catheter-associated thrombosis of TLS are indeterminate due to limited data. The results should be treated with caution due to the limited sample sizes and methodological deficiencies of included studies. Therefore, additional well-designed and adequately powered RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0079417
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1460504757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478172115</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8d2dbe213b024f1780d8adbce8cb1ec6</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478172115</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-82f14bf968ff56be44d7e9788fb579b6d32e816da31ba0534cf58bd9724f09af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7jr6DUQDguhDx6Zpm9QHYVm8DCws6OprSJOTmaxpMybp6vhl_KpmLjvMyD5IHxJOf-efc82yp7iYYkLxm2s3-kHY6dINMC0K2laY3stOcUvKvCkLcv_gfpI9CuG6KGrCmuZhdlJWJWWYkNPsz5UYvbNGmQGQdfI7Cs6O0bghIO08igtASw83MKxtyGkkRbJF8LkHKyIo1FnnVIgeRI_MoEFuvN8igcIqROhFNBIlCQM_kRgU6iGKXKTQV8GEtaJPVteb30lLuiGmcGy6Rm-EDY-zBzod8GR3TrKvH95fnX_KLy4_zs7PLnJJaxZzVmpcdbptmNZ100FVKQotZUx3NW27RpESGG6UILgTqQyV1DXrVEvLShet0GSSPd_qLq0LfFfbwHHVFHVR0ZomYrYllBPXfOlNL_yKO2H4xuD8nAufUrXAmSpVByUmXZH0MWWFYkJ1EpjsMMgmab3bvTZ2PSiZquuFPRI9_jOYBZ-7G04YadgmmFc7Ae9-jBAi702QYK0YwI2buEvM6jZNwCR78Q96d3Y7ai5SAqmNLr0r16L8rEqzQkuM60RN76DSp6A3qXegTbIfObw-clj3F37FuRhD4LMvn_-fvfx2zL48YBcgbFzsB_cYrLag9C4ED3pfZFzw9R7dVoOv94jv9ii5PTts0N7pdnHIX8zuHSI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1460504757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Taurolidine lock solutions for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Liu, Yong ; Zhang, An-Qiang ; Cao, Lin ; Xia, Hong-Tao ; Ma, Jun-Jie</creator><contributor>Landoni, Giovanni</contributor><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yong ; Zhang, An-Qiang ; Cao, Lin ; Xia, Hong-Tao ; Ma, Jun-Jie ; Landoni, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><description>Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients, contributing to prolonged hospital stays and increased costs. Whether taurolidine lock solutions (TLS) are beneficial for the prevention of CRBSIs remains controversial. In this meta-analysis, we aim to assess the efficacy of TLS for preventing CRBSIs. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials that reported on the effects of TLS for preventing CRBSIs. The primary outcome in these studies was catheter-related bloodstream infections, with microbial distribution of CRBSI and catheter-associated thrombosis as secondary outcomes. Data were combined using random-effects models owing to significant clinical heterogeneity. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted from 2004 through 2013 involving 431 patients and 86,078 catheter-days were included in the review. TLS were significantly associated with a lower incidence of CRBSIs when compared to heparin lock solutions (Risk Ratio [RR], 0.34; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.21-0.55). Use of TLS significantly decreased the incidence of CRBSIs from gram-negative (G-) bacteria (P = 0.004; RR, 0.27; CI, 0.11-0.65), and was associated with a non-significant decrease in gram-positive (G+) bacterial infections (P = 0.07; RR, 0.41; CI, 0.15-1.09). No significant association was observed with TLS and catheter-associated thrombosis (RR, 1.99; CI, 0.75-5.28). The use of TLS reduced the incidence of CRBSIs without obvious adverse effects or bacterial resistance. However, the susceptibility of G+ and G- bacteria to taurolidine and the risk for catheter-associated thrombosis of TLS are indeterminate due to limited data. The results should be treated with caution due to the limited sample sizes and methodological deficiencies of included studies. Therefore, additional well-designed and adequately powered RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079417</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24278133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Anti-Infective Agents - therapeutic use ; Anticoagulants ; Bacteria ; Bacterial infections ; Catheter-Related Infections - microbiology ; Catheter-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Catheterization ; Catheters ; Clinical trials ; Confidence intervals ; Gram-Negative Bacteria - pathogenicity ; Gram-Positive Bacteria - pathogenicity ; Health aspects ; Health care costs ; Heparin ; Humans ; Incidence ; Infection ; Infections ; Medical instruments ; Medical research ; Meta-analysis ; Microbial drug resistance ; Microorganisms ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Parenteral nutrition ; Patients ; Prevention ; Randomization ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Systematic review ; Taurine - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Taurine - therapeutic use ; Thiadiazines - therapeutic use ; Thromboembolism ; Thrombosis</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2013-11, Vol.8 (11), p.e79417-e79417</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2013 Liu et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2013 Liu et al 2013 Liu et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-82f14bf968ff56be44d7e9788fb579b6d32e816da31ba0534cf58bd9724f09af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-82f14bf968ff56be44d7e9788fb579b6d32e816da31ba0534cf58bd9724f09af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3836857/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3836857/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24278133$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Landoni, Giovanni</contributor><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, An-Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Hong-Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Jun-Jie</creatorcontrib><title>Taurolidine lock solutions for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients, contributing to prolonged hospital stays and increased costs. Whether taurolidine lock solutions (TLS) are beneficial for the prevention of CRBSIs remains controversial. In this meta-analysis, we aim to assess the efficacy of TLS for preventing CRBSIs. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials that reported on the effects of TLS for preventing CRBSIs. The primary outcome in these studies was catheter-related bloodstream infections, with microbial distribution of CRBSI and catheter-associated thrombosis as secondary outcomes. Data were combined using random-effects models owing to significant clinical heterogeneity. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted from 2004 through 2013 involving 431 patients and 86,078 catheter-days were included in the review. TLS were significantly associated with a lower incidence of CRBSIs when compared to heparin lock solutions (Risk Ratio [RR], 0.34; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.21-0.55). Use of TLS significantly decreased the incidence of CRBSIs from gram-negative (G-) bacteria (P = 0.004; RR, 0.27; CI, 0.11-0.65), and was associated with a non-significant decrease in gram-positive (G+) bacterial infections (P = 0.07; RR, 0.41; CI, 0.15-1.09). No significant association was observed with TLS and catheter-associated thrombosis (RR, 1.99; CI, 0.75-5.28). The use of TLS reduced the incidence of CRBSIs without obvious adverse effects or bacterial resistance. However, the susceptibility of G+ and G- bacteria to taurolidine and the risk for catheter-associated thrombosis of TLS are indeterminate due to limited data. The results should be treated with caution due to the limited sample sizes and methodological deficiencies of included studies. Therefore, additional well-designed and adequately powered RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.</description><subject>Anti-Infective Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anticoagulants</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Catheter-Related Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Catheter-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Catheterization</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacteria - pathogenicity</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacteria - pathogenicity</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care costs</subject><subject>Heparin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Medical instruments</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Microbial drug resistance</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Parenteral nutrition</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Taurine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Taurine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Thiadiazines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Thromboembolism</subject><subject>Thrombosis</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7jr6DUQDguhDx6Zpm9QHYVm8DCws6OprSJOTmaxpMybp6vhl_KpmLjvMyD5IHxJOf-efc82yp7iYYkLxm2s3-kHY6dINMC0K2laY3stOcUvKvCkLcv_gfpI9CuG6KGrCmuZhdlJWJWWYkNPsz5UYvbNGmQGQdfI7Cs6O0bghIO08igtASw83MKxtyGkkRbJF8LkHKyIo1FnnVIgeRI_MoEFuvN8igcIqROhFNBIlCQM_kRgU6iGKXKTQV8GEtaJPVteb30lLuiGmcGy6Rm-EDY-zBzod8GR3TrKvH95fnX_KLy4_zs7PLnJJaxZzVmpcdbptmNZ100FVKQotZUx3NW27RpESGG6UILgTqQyV1DXrVEvLShet0GSSPd_qLq0LfFfbwHHVFHVR0ZomYrYllBPXfOlNL_yKO2H4xuD8nAufUrXAmSpVByUmXZH0MWWFYkJ1EpjsMMgmab3bvTZ2PSiZquuFPRI9_jOYBZ-7G04YadgmmFc7Ae9-jBAi702QYK0YwI2buEvM6jZNwCR78Q96d3Y7ai5SAqmNLr0r16L8rEqzQkuM60RN76DSp6A3qXegTbIfObw-clj3F37FuRhD4LMvn_-fvfx2zL48YBcgbFzsB_cYrLag9C4ED3pfZFzw9R7dVoOv94jv9ii5PTts0N7pdnHIX8zuHSI</recordid><startdate>20131121</startdate><enddate>20131121</enddate><creator>Liu, Yong</creator><creator>Zhang, An-Qiang</creator><creator>Cao, Lin</creator><creator>Xia, Hong-Tao</creator><creator>Ma, Jun-Jie</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131121</creationdate><title>Taurolidine lock solutions for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><author>Liu, Yong ; Zhang, An-Qiang ; Cao, Lin ; Xia, Hong-Tao ; Ma, Jun-Jie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-82f14bf968ff56be44d7e9788fb579b6d32e816da31ba0534cf58bd9724f09af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Anti-Infective Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anticoagulants</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Catheter-Related Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Catheter-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Catheterization</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacteria - pathogenicity</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacteria - pathogenicity</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care costs</topic><topic>Heparin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Medical instruments</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Microbial drug resistance</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Parenteral nutrition</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Taurine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Taurine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Thiadiazines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Thromboembolism</topic><topic>Thrombosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, An-Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Hong-Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Jun-Jie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Yong</au><au>Zhang, An-Qiang</au><au>Cao, Lin</au><au>Xia, Hong-Tao</au><au>Ma, Jun-Jie</au><au>Landoni, Giovanni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Taurolidine lock solutions for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2013-11-21</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e79417</spage><epage>e79417</epage><pages>e79417-e79417</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients, contributing to prolonged hospital stays and increased costs. Whether taurolidine lock solutions (TLS) are beneficial for the prevention of CRBSIs remains controversial. In this meta-analysis, we aim to assess the efficacy of TLS for preventing CRBSIs. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials that reported on the effects of TLS for preventing CRBSIs. The primary outcome in these studies was catheter-related bloodstream infections, with microbial distribution of CRBSI and catheter-associated thrombosis as secondary outcomes. Data were combined using random-effects models owing to significant clinical heterogeneity. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted from 2004 through 2013 involving 431 patients and 86,078 catheter-days were included in the review. TLS were significantly associated with a lower incidence of CRBSIs when compared to heparin lock solutions (Risk Ratio [RR], 0.34; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.21-0.55). Use of TLS significantly decreased the incidence of CRBSIs from gram-negative (G-) bacteria (P = 0.004; RR, 0.27; CI, 0.11-0.65), and was associated with a non-significant decrease in gram-positive (G+) bacterial infections (P = 0.07; RR, 0.41; CI, 0.15-1.09). No significant association was observed with TLS and catheter-associated thrombosis (RR, 1.99; CI, 0.75-5.28). The use of TLS reduced the incidence of CRBSIs without obvious adverse effects or bacterial resistance. However, the susceptibility of G+ and G- bacteria to taurolidine and the risk for catheter-associated thrombosis of TLS are indeterminate due to limited data. The results should be treated with caution due to the limited sample sizes and methodological deficiencies of included studies. Therefore, additional well-designed and adequately powered RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24278133</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0079417</doi><tpages>e79417</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2013-11, Vol.8 (11), p.e79417-e79417
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1460504757
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Anti-Infective Agents - therapeutic use
Anticoagulants
Bacteria
Bacterial infections
Catheter-Related Infections - microbiology
Catheter-Related Infections - prevention & control
Catheterization
Catheters
Clinical trials
Confidence intervals
Gram-Negative Bacteria - pathogenicity
Gram-Positive Bacteria - pathogenicity
Health aspects
Health care costs
Heparin
Humans
Incidence
Infection
Infections
Medical instruments
Medical research
Meta-analysis
Microbial drug resistance
Microorganisms
Morbidity
Mortality
Parenteral nutrition
Patients
Prevention
Randomization
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Systematic review
Taurine - analogs & derivatives
Taurine - therapeutic use
Thiadiazines - therapeutic use
Thromboembolism
Thrombosis
title Taurolidine lock solutions for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T06%3A37%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Taurolidine%20lock%20solutions%20for%20the%20prevention%20of%20catheter-related%20bloodstream%20infections:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis%20of%20randomized%20controlled%20trials&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Liu,%20Yong&rft.date=2013-11-21&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e79417&rft.epage=e79417&rft.pages=e79417-e79417&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0079417&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478172115%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1460504757&rft_id=info:pmid/24278133&rft_galeid=A478172115&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_8d2dbe213b024f1780d8adbce8cb1ec6&rfr_iscdi=true