Unbiased proteomics analysis demonstrates significant variability in mucosal immune factor expression depending on the site and method of collection

Female genital tract secretions are commonly sampled by lavage of the ectocervix and vaginal vault or via a sponge inserted into the endocervix for evaluating inflammation status and immune factors critical for HIV microbicide and vaccine studies. This study uses a proteomics approach to comprehensi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2013-11, Vol.8 (11), p.e79505-e79505
Hauptverfasser: Birse, Kenzie M, Burgener, Adam, Westmacott, Garrett R, McCorrister, Stuart, Novak, Richard M, Ball, T Blake
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e79505
container_issue 11
container_start_page e79505
container_title PloS one
container_volume 8
creator Birse, Kenzie M
Burgener, Adam
Westmacott, Garrett R
McCorrister, Stuart
Novak, Richard M
Ball, T Blake
description Female genital tract secretions are commonly sampled by lavage of the ectocervix and vaginal vault or via a sponge inserted into the endocervix for evaluating inflammation status and immune factors critical for HIV microbicide and vaccine studies. This study uses a proteomics approach to comprehensively compare the efficacy of these methods, which sample from different compartments of the female genital tract, for the collection of immune factors. Matching sponge and lavage samples were collected from 10 healthy women and were analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry. Data was analyzed by a combination of differential protein expression analysis, hierarchical clustering and pathway analysis. Of the 385 proteins identified, endocervical sponge samples collected nearly twice as many unique proteins as cervicovaginal lavage (111 vs. 61) with 55% of proteins common to both (213). Each method/site identified 73 unique proteins that have roles in host immunity according to their gene ontology. Sponge samples enriched for specific inflammation pathways including acute phase response proteins (p = 3.37×10(-24)) and LXR/RXR immune activation pathways (p = 8.82×10(-22)) while the role IL-17A in psoriasis pathway (p = 5.98×10(-4)) and the complement system pathway (p = 3.91×10(-3)) were enriched in lavage samples. Many host defense factors were differentially enriched (p
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0079505
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1458576899</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478276984</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8e4bdc6eab114743a33a027428d8f5f8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478276984</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1aa23aa14d0c946eceeb796151b709d9b6c844555a09e8fd90ef0df2622576cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk91qFDEUxwdRbK2-gWhAEL3YNZlJZpIboRQ_CoWCWm9DJjmzmyWTbJNMad_DBzbbbsuu9EJyka_f-Z-ck3Oq6jXBc9J05NMqTNErN18HD3OMO8Ewe1IdEtHUs7bGzdOd9UH1IqUVxqzhbfu8OqhpTSkj7LD6c-F7qxIYtI4hQxitTkgV3ZtkEzIwBp9yVBkSSnbh7WC18hldqWhVb53NN8h6NE46JOWQHcfJAxqUziEiuF5HSMkGX4TW4I31C1Q2eQlFLEPxY9AIeRkMCgPSwTnQueAvq2eDcglebeej6uLrl18n32dn599OT47PZroVdZ4RpepGKUIN1oK2oAH6TrSEkb7Dwoi-1byEyZjCAvhgBIYBm6Fu65p1re6bo-rtne7ahSS3CU2SUMYLwIUoxOkdYYJayXW0o4o3Migrbw9CXEgVs9UOJAfaG92C6gmhHW1U0yhcd7Tmhg9s4EXr89bb1I9gNPiSWLcnun_j7VIuwpVseM0btnnMh61ADJcTpCxHmzQ4pzyE6fbdgrFOcFzQd_-gj0e3pRaqBGD9EIpfvRGVx7TjddcKTgs1f4Qqo1SH1aX6BlvO9ww-7hkUJsN1XqgpJXn688f_s-e_99n3O-wSlMvLFNy0KZm0D9I7UMeQUoThIckEy03z3GdDbppHbpunmL3Z_aAHo_tuaf4C5hUYpw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1458576899</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unbiased proteomics analysis demonstrates significant variability in mucosal immune factor expression depending on the site and method of collection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Birse, Kenzie M ; Burgener, Adam ; Westmacott, Garrett R ; McCorrister, Stuart ; Novak, Richard M ; Ball, T Blake</creator><contributor>Gray, Clive M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Birse, Kenzie M ; Burgener, Adam ; Westmacott, Garrett R ; McCorrister, Stuart ; Novak, Richard M ; Ball, T Blake ; Gray, Clive M.</creatorcontrib><description>Female genital tract secretions are commonly sampled by lavage of the ectocervix and vaginal vault or via a sponge inserted into the endocervix for evaluating inflammation status and immune factors critical for HIV microbicide and vaccine studies. This study uses a proteomics approach to comprehensively compare the efficacy of these methods, which sample from different compartments of the female genital tract, for the collection of immune factors. Matching sponge and lavage samples were collected from 10 healthy women and were analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry. Data was analyzed by a combination of differential protein expression analysis, hierarchical clustering and pathway analysis. Of the 385 proteins identified, endocervical sponge samples collected nearly twice as many unique proteins as cervicovaginal lavage (111 vs. 61) with 55% of proteins common to both (213). Each method/site identified 73 unique proteins that have roles in host immunity according to their gene ontology. Sponge samples enriched for specific inflammation pathways including acute phase response proteins (p = 3.37×10(-24)) and LXR/RXR immune activation pathways (p = 8.82×10(-22)) while the role IL-17A in psoriasis pathway (p = 5.98×10(-4)) and the complement system pathway (p = 3.91×10(-3)) were enriched in lavage samples. Many host defense factors were differentially enriched (p&lt;0.05) between sites including known/potential antimicrobial factors (n = 21), S100 proteins (n = 9), and immune regulatory factors such as serpins (n = 7). Immunoglobulins (n = 6) were collected at comparable levels in abundance in each site although 25% of those identified were unique to sponge samples. This study demonstrates significant differences in types and quantities of immune factors and inflammation pathways collected by each sampling technique. Therefore, clinical studies that measure mucosal immune activation or factors assessing HIV transmission should utilize both collection methods to obtain the greatest representation of immune factors secreted into the female genital tract.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079505</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24244515</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome ; Activation ; Adolescent ; Adult ; AIDS ; AIDS vaccines ; Analysis ; Cervix Uteri - metabolism ; Clinical trials ; Cluster Analysis ; Clustering ; Collection ; Complement activation ; Cytokines ; Data processing ; Disease transmission ; Enrichment ; Female ; Gene Expression ; Genital tract ; HIV ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Humans ; Immune response ; Immunity ; Immunoglobulins ; Immunologic Factors - genetics ; Immunologic Factors - immunology ; Immunologic Factors - metabolism ; Immunology ; Infections ; Inflammation ; Inflammation - metabolism ; Laboratories ; Mass spectrometry ; Mass spectroscopy ; Medical research ; Methods ; Mucosal immunity ; Mucous Membrane - immunology ; Mucous Membrane - metabolism ; Neutrophils ; Organ Specificity - genetics ; Pathogenesis ; Pathways ; Proteins ; Proteome ; Proteomics ; Proteomics - methods ; Psoriasis ; Public health ; Retinoid X receptors ; Sampling methods ; Sampling techniques ; Scientific imaging ; Secretions ; Serine proteinase inhibitors ; Serpins ; Signal Transduction ; Studies ; Vagina ; Vagina - metabolism ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2013-11, Vol.8 (11), p.e79505-e79505</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2013 Birse et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2013 Birse et al 2013 Birse et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1aa23aa14d0c946eceeb796151b709d9b6c844555a09e8fd90ef0df2622576cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1aa23aa14d0c946eceeb796151b709d9b6c844555a09e8fd90ef0df2622576cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3828359/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3828359/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27903,27904,53769,53771,79346,79347</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244515$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gray, Clive M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Birse, Kenzie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgener, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westmacott, Garrett R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCorrister, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novak, Richard M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ball, T Blake</creatorcontrib><title>Unbiased proteomics analysis demonstrates significant variability in mucosal immune factor expression depending on the site and method of collection</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Female genital tract secretions are commonly sampled by lavage of the ectocervix and vaginal vault or via a sponge inserted into the endocervix for evaluating inflammation status and immune factors critical for HIV microbicide and vaccine studies. This study uses a proteomics approach to comprehensively compare the efficacy of these methods, which sample from different compartments of the female genital tract, for the collection of immune factors. Matching sponge and lavage samples were collected from 10 healthy women and were analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry. Data was analyzed by a combination of differential protein expression analysis, hierarchical clustering and pathway analysis. Of the 385 proteins identified, endocervical sponge samples collected nearly twice as many unique proteins as cervicovaginal lavage (111 vs. 61) with 55% of proteins common to both (213). Each method/site identified 73 unique proteins that have roles in host immunity according to their gene ontology. Sponge samples enriched for specific inflammation pathways including acute phase response proteins (p = 3.37×10(-24)) and LXR/RXR immune activation pathways (p = 8.82×10(-22)) while the role IL-17A in psoriasis pathway (p = 5.98×10(-4)) and the complement system pathway (p = 3.91×10(-3)) were enriched in lavage samples. Many host defense factors were differentially enriched (p&lt;0.05) between sites including known/potential antimicrobial factors (n = 21), S100 proteins (n = 9), and immune regulatory factors such as serpins (n = 7). Immunoglobulins (n = 6) were collected at comparable levels in abundance in each site although 25% of those identified were unique to sponge samples. This study demonstrates significant differences in types and quantities of immune factors and inflammation pathways collected by each sampling technique. Therefore, clinical studies that measure mucosal immune activation or factors assessing HIV transmission should utilize both collection methods to obtain the greatest representation of immune factors secreted into the female genital tract.</description><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</subject><subject>Activation</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>AIDS</subject><subject>AIDS vaccines</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cervix Uteri - metabolism</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Collection</subject><subject>Complement activation</subject><subject>Cytokines</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Enrichment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene Expression</subject><subject>Genital tract</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Immunity</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins</subject><subject>Immunologic Factors - genetics</subject><subject>Immunologic Factors - immunology</subject><subject>Immunologic Factors - metabolism</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Inflammation - metabolism</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Mass spectroscopy</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mucosal immunity</subject><subject>Mucous Membrane - immunology</subject><subject>Mucous Membrane - metabolism</subject><subject>Neutrophils</subject><subject>Organ Specificity - genetics</subject><subject>Pathogenesis</subject><subject>Pathways</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proteome</subject><subject>Proteomics</subject><subject>Proteomics - methods</subject><subject>Psoriasis</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Retinoid X receptors</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Sampling techniques</subject><subject>Scientific imaging</subject><subject>Secretions</subject><subject>Serine proteinase inhibitors</subject><subject>Serpins</subject><subject>Signal Transduction</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>Vagina - metabolism</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk91qFDEUxwdRbK2-gWhAEL3YNZlJZpIboRQ_CoWCWm9DJjmzmyWTbJNMad_DBzbbbsuu9EJyka_f-Z-ck3Oq6jXBc9J05NMqTNErN18HD3OMO8Ewe1IdEtHUs7bGzdOd9UH1IqUVxqzhbfu8OqhpTSkj7LD6c-F7qxIYtI4hQxitTkgV3ZtkEzIwBp9yVBkSSnbh7WC18hldqWhVb53NN8h6NE46JOWQHcfJAxqUziEiuF5HSMkGX4TW4I31C1Q2eQlFLEPxY9AIeRkMCgPSwTnQueAvq2eDcglebeej6uLrl18n32dn599OT47PZroVdZ4RpepGKUIN1oK2oAH6TrSEkb7Dwoi-1byEyZjCAvhgBIYBm6Fu65p1re6bo-rtne7ahSS3CU2SUMYLwIUoxOkdYYJayXW0o4o3Migrbw9CXEgVs9UOJAfaG92C6gmhHW1U0yhcd7Tmhg9s4EXr89bb1I9gNPiSWLcnun_j7VIuwpVseM0btnnMh61ADJcTpCxHmzQ4pzyE6fbdgrFOcFzQd_-gj0e3pRaqBGD9EIpfvRGVx7TjddcKTgs1f4Qqo1SH1aX6BlvO9ww-7hkUJsN1XqgpJXn688f_s-e_99n3O-wSlMvLFNy0KZm0D9I7UMeQUoThIckEy03z3GdDbppHbpunmL3Z_aAHo_tuaf4C5hUYpw</recordid><startdate>20131114</startdate><enddate>20131114</enddate><creator>Birse, Kenzie M</creator><creator>Burgener, Adam</creator><creator>Westmacott, Garrett R</creator><creator>McCorrister, Stuart</creator><creator>Novak, Richard M</creator><creator>Ball, T Blake</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131114</creationdate><title>Unbiased proteomics analysis demonstrates significant variability in mucosal immune factor expression depending on the site and method of collection</title><author>Birse, Kenzie M ; Burgener, Adam ; Westmacott, Garrett R ; McCorrister, Stuart ; Novak, Richard M ; Ball, T Blake</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1aa23aa14d0c946eceeb796151b709d9b6c844555a09e8fd90ef0df2622576cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</topic><topic>Activation</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>AIDS</topic><topic>AIDS vaccines</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cervix Uteri - metabolism</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Collection</topic><topic>Complement activation</topic><topic>Cytokines</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Enrichment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene Expression</topic><topic>Genital tract</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Immunity</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins</topic><topic>Immunologic Factors - genetics</topic><topic>Immunologic Factors - immunology</topic><topic>Immunologic Factors - metabolism</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Inflammation - metabolism</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Mass spectroscopy</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mucosal immunity</topic><topic>Mucous Membrane - immunology</topic><topic>Mucous Membrane - metabolism</topic><topic>Neutrophils</topic><topic>Organ Specificity - genetics</topic><topic>Pathogenesis</topic><topic>Pathways</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proteome</topic><topic>Proteomics</topic><topic>Proteomics - methods</topic><topic>Psoriasis</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Retinoid X receptors</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Sampling techniques</topic><topic>Scientific imaging</topic><topic>Secretions</topic><topic>Serine proteinase inhibitors</topic><topic>Serpins</topic><topic>Signal Transduction</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>Vagina - metabolism</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Birse, Kenzie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgener, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westmacott, Garrett R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCorrister, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novak, Richard M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ball, T Blake</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Birse, Kenzie M</au><au>Burgener, Adam</au><au>Westmacott, Garrett R</au><au>McCorrister, Stuart</au><au>Novak, Richard M</au><au>Ball, T Blake</au><au>Gray, Clive M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unbiased proteomics analysis demonstrates significant variability in mucosal immune factor expression depending on the site and method of collection</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2013-11-14</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e79505</spage><epage>e79505</epage><pages>e79505-e79505</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Female genital tract secretions are commonly sampled by lavage of the ectocervix and vaginal vault or via a sponge inserted into the endocervix for evaluating inflammation status and immune factors critical for HIV microbicide and vaccine studies. This study uses a proteomics approach to comprehensively compare the efficacy of these methods, which sample from different compartments of the female genital tract, for the collection of immune factors. Matching sponge and lavage samples were collected from 10 healthy women and were analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry. Data was analyzed by a combination of differential protein expression analysis, hierarchical clustering and pathway analysis. Of the 385 proteins identified, endocervical sponge samples collected nearly twice as many unique proteins as cervicovaginal lavage (111 vs. 61) with 55% of proteins common to both (213). Each method/site identified 73 unique proteins that have roles in host immunity according to their gene ontology. Sponge samples enriched for specific inflammation pathways including acute phase response proteins (p = 3.37×10(-24)) and LXR/RXR immune activation pathways (p = 8.82×10(-22)) while the role IL-17A in psoriasis pathway (p = 5.98×10(-4)) and the complement system pathway (p = 3.91×10(-3)) were enriched in lavage samples. Many host defense factors were differentially enriched (p&lt;0.05) between sites including known/potential antimicrobial factors (n = 21), S100 proteins (n = 9), and immune regulatory factors such as serpins (n = 7). Immunoglobulins (n = 6) were collected at comparable levels in abundance in each site although 25% of those identified were unique to sponge samples. This study demonstrates significant differences in types and quantities of immune factors and inflammation pathways collected by each sampling technique. Therefore, clinical studies that measure mucosal immune activation or factors assessing HIV transmission should utilize both collection methods to obtain the greatest representation of immune factors secreted into the female genital tract.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24244515</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0079505</doi><tpages>e79505</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2013-11, Vol.8 (11), p.e79505-e79505
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1458576899
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Acquired immune deficiency syndrome
Activation
Adolescent
Adult
AIDS
AIDS vaccines
Analysis
Cervix Uteri - metabolism
Clinical trials
Cluster Analysis
Clustering
Collection
Complement activation
Cytokines
Data processing
Disease transmission
Enrichment
Female
Gene Expression
Genital tract
HIV
Human immunodeficiency virus
Humans
Immune response
Immunity
Immunoglobulins
Immunologic Factors - genetics
Immunologic Factors - immunology
Immunologic Factors - metabolism
Immunology
Infections
Inflammation
Inflammation - metabolism
Laboratories
Mass spectrometry
Mass spectroscopy
Medical research
Methods
Mucosal immunity
Mucous Membrane - immunology
Mucous Membrane - metabolism
Neutrophils
Organ Specificity - genetics
Pathogenesis
Pathways
Proteins
Proteome
Proteomics
Proteomics - methods
Psoriasis
Public health
Retinoid X receptors
Sampling methods
Sampling techniques
Scientific imaging
Secretions
Serine proteinase inhibitors
Serpins
Signal Transduction
Studies
Vagina
Vagina - metabolism
Young Adult
title Unbiased proteomics analysis demonstrates significant variability in mucosal immune factor expression depending on the site and method of collection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T02%3A21%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unbiased%20proteomics%20analysis%20demonstrates%20significant%20variability%20in%20mucosal%20immune%20factor%20expression%20depending%20on%20the%20site%20and%20method%20of%20collection&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Birse,%20Kenzie%20M&rft.date=2013-11-14&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e79505&rft.epage=e79505&rft.pages=e79505-e79505&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0079505&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478276984%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1458576899&rft_id=info:pmid/24244515&rft_galeid=A478276984&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_8e4bdc6eab114743a33a027428d8f5f8&rfr_iscdi=true