Using fiction to assess mental state understanding: a new task for assessing theory of mind in adults

Social functioning depends on the ability to attribute and reason about the mental states of others--an ability known as theory of mind (ToM). Research in this field is limited by the use of tasks in which ceiling effects are ubiquitous, rendering them insensitive to individual differences in ToM ab...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2013-11, Vol.8 (11), p.e81279-e81279
Hauptverfasser: Dodell-Feder, David, Lincoln, Sarah Hope, Coulson, Joseph P, Hooker, Christine I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e81279
container_issue 11
container_start_page e81279
container_title PloS one
container_volume 8
creator Dodell-Feder, David
Lincoln, Sarah Hope
Coulson, Joseph P
Hooker, Christine I
description Social functioning depends on the ability to attribute and reason about the mental states of others--an ability known as theory of mind (ToM). Research in this field is limited by the use of tasks in which ceiling effects are ubiquitous, rendering them insensitive to individual differences in ToM ability and instances of subtle ToM impairment. Here, we present data from a new ToM task--the Short Story Task (SST)--intended to improve upon many aspects of existing ToM measures. More specifically, the SST was designed to: (a) assess the full range of individual differences in ToM ability without suffering from ceiling effects; (b) incorporate a range of mental states of differing complexity, including epistemic states, affective states, and intentions to be inferred from a first- and second-order level; (c) use ToM stimuli representative of real-world social interactions; (d) require participants to utilize social context when making mental state inferences; (e) exhibit adequate psychometric properties; and (f) be quick and easy to administer and score. In the task, participants read a short story and were asked questions that assessed explicit mental state reasoning, spontaneous mental state inference, and comprehension of the non-mental aspects of the story. Responses were scored according to a rubric that assigned greater points for accurate mental state attributions that included multiple characters' mental states. Results demonstrate that the SST is sensitive to variation in ToM ability, can be accurately scored by multiple raters, and exhibits concurrent validity with other social cognitive tasks. The results support the effectiveness of this new measure of ToM in the study of social cognition. The findings are also consistent with studies demonstrating significant relationships among narrative transportation, ToM, and the reading of fiction. Together, the data indicate that reading fiction may be an avenue for improving ToM ability.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0081279
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1449331733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478392571</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2b4bcee0114044399735b0f7c4dbe491</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478392571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2c5f30dbb86e95da55fca561cc4251b857f335a35aa8ad2e0d70ee1ede452fac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9GAIHqxaz7nwwuhFD8WCgW13oZMcmY3dTZZk4zaf2_GnZYd6YVMYA6Z531PcuaconhK8JKwiry58kNwql_uvIMlxjWhVXOvOCYNo4uSYnb_ID4qHsV4hbFgdVk-LI4op5xXrDwu4DJat0ad1cl6h5JHKkaIEW3BJdWjmFQCNDgDIYfOZPgtUsjBL5RU_I46HybFaJM24MM18h3aWmeQdUiZoU_xcfGgU32EJ9P7pLj88P7r2afF-cXH1dnp-UKXDU0LqkXHsGnbuoRGGCVEp5UoidacCtLWouoYEyovVStDAZsKAxAwwAXtlGYnxfO97673UU4VipJw3jBGKsYysdoTxqsruQt2q8K19MrKvxs-rKUKyeoeJG15qwEwIRxzzpqmYqLFXaW5aYE3JHu9m7IN7RaMzhULqp-Zzr84u5Fr_1OymmLRiGzwajII_scAMcmtjRr6Xjnww3juTImqLsdcL_5B777dRK1VvoB1nc959WgqT3lVs4aKavRa3kHlx8DW6txOnc37M8HrmSAzCX6ntRpilKsvn_-fvfg2Z18esBtQfdpE3w9jK8Y5yPegDj7GAN1tkQmW4zTcVEOO0yCnaciyZ4c_6FZ00_7sD8tRBbc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1449331733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using fiction to assess mental state understanding: a new task for assessing theory of mind in adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Dodell-Feder, David ; Lincoln, Sarah Hope ; Coulson, Joseph P ; Hooker, Christine I</creator><contributor>Young, Liane</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dodell-Feder, David ; Lincoln, Sarah Hope ; Coulson, Joseph P ; Hooker, Christine I ; Young, Liane</creatorcontrib><description>Social functioning depends on the ability to attribute and reason about the mental states of others--an ability known as theory of mind (ToM). Research in this field is limited by the use of tasks in which ceiling effects are ubiquitous, rendering them insensitive to individual differences in ToM ability and instances of subtle ToM impairment. Here, we present data from a new ToM task--the Short Story Task (SST)--intended to improve upon many aspects of existing ToM measures. More specifically, the SST was designed to: (a) assess the full range of individual differences in ToM ability without suffering from ceiling effects; (b) incorporate a range of mental states of differing complexity, including epistemic states, affective states, and intentions to be inferred from a first- and second-order level; (c) use ToM stimuli representative of real-world social interactions; (d) require participants to utilize social context when making mental state inferences; (e) exhibit adequate psychometric properties; and (f) be quick and easy to administer and score. In the task, participants read a short story and were asked questions that assessed explicit mental state reasoning, spontaneous mental state inference, and comprehension of the non-mental aspects of the story. Responses were scored according to a rubric that assigned greater points for accurate mental state attributions that included multiple characters' mental states. Results demonstrate that the SST is sensitive to variation in ToM ability, can be accurately scored by multiple raters, and exhibits concurrent validity with other social cognitive tasks. The results support the effectiveness of this new measure of ToM in the study of social cognition. The findings are also consistent with studies demonstrating significant relationships among narrative transportation, ToM, and the reading of fiction. Together, the data indicate that reading fiction may be an avenue for improving ToM ability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081279</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24244736</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adult ; Adults ; Autism ; Children &amp; youth ; Cognition ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive tasks ; Emotional behavior ; Female ; Humans ; Language ; Male ; Memory ; Middle Aged ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Psychiatry ; Reading ; Researchers ; Schizophrenia ; Social aspects ; Social factors ; Social interactions ; Social Perception ; Theory of Mind - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2013-11, Vol.8 (11), p.e81279-e81279</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2013 Dodell-Feder et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2013 Dodell-Feder et al 2013 Dodell-Feder et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2c5f30dbb86e95da55fca561cc4251b857f335a35aa8ad2e0d70ee1ede452fac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2c5f30dbb86e95da55fca561cc4251b857f335a35aa8ad2e0d70ee1ede452fac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3820595/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3820595/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244736$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Young, Liane</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dodell-Feder, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lincoln, Sarah Hope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulson, Joseph P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooker, Christine I</creatorcontrib><title>Using fiction to assess mental state understanding: a new task for assessing theory of mind in adults</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Social functioning depends on the ability to attribute and reason about the mental states of others--an ability known as theory of mind (ToM). Research in this field is limited by the use of tasks in which ceiling effects are ubiquitous, rendering them insensitive to individual differences in ToM ability and instances of subtle ToM impairment. Here, we present data from a new ToM task--the Short Story Task (SST)--intended to improve upon many aspects of existing ToM measures. More specifically, the SST was designed to: (a) assess the full range of individual differences in ToM ability without suffering from ceiling effects; (b) incorporate a range of mental states of differing complexity, including epistemic states, affective states, and intentions to be inferred from a first- and second-order level; (c) use ToM stimuli representative of real-world social interactions; (d) require participants to utilize social context when making mental state inferences; (e) exhibit adequate psychometric properties; and (f) be quick and easy to administer and score. In the task, participants read a short story and were asked questions that assessed explicit mental state reasoning, spontaneous mental state inference, and comprehension of the non-mental aspects of the story. Responses were scored according to a rubric that assigned greater points for accurate mental state attributions that included multiple characters' mental states. Results demonstrate that the SST is sensitive to variation in ToM ability, can be accurately scored by multiple raters, and exhibits concurrent validity with other social cognitive tasks. The results support the effectiveness of this new measure of ToM in the study of social cognition. The findings are also consistent with studies demonstrating significant relationships among narrative transportation, ToM, and the reading of fiction. Together, the data indicate that reading fiction may be an avenue for improving ToM ability.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Autism</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive tasks</subject><subject>Emotional behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>Theory of Mind - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9GAIHqxaz7nwwuhFD8WCgW13oZMcmY3dTZZk4zaf2_GnZYd6YVMYA6Z531PcuaconhK8JKwiry58kNwql_uvIMlxjWhVXOvOCYNo4uSYnb_ID4qHsV4hbFgdVk-LI4op5xXrDwu4DJat0ad1cl6h5JHKkaIEW3BJdWjmFQCNDgDIYfOZPgtUsjBL5RU_I46HybFaJM24MM18h3aWmeQdUiZoU_xcfGgU32EJ9P7pLj88P7r2afF-cXH1dnp-UKXDU0LqkXHsGnbuoRGGCVEp5UoidacCtLWouoYEyovVStDAZsKAxAwwAXtlGYnxfO97673UU4VipJw3jBGKsYysdoTxqsruQt2q8K19MrKvxs-rKUKyeoeJG15qwEwIRxzzpqmYqLFXaW5aYE3JHu9m7IN7RaMzhULqp-Zzr84u5Fr_1OymmLRiGzwajII_scAMcmtjRr6Xjnww3juTImqLsdcL_5B777dRK1VvoB1nc959WgqT3lVs4aKavRa3kHlx8DW6txOnc37M8HrmSAzCX6ntRpilKsvn_-fvfg2Z18esBtQfdpE3w9jK8Y5yPegDj7GAN1tkQmW4zTcVEOO0yCnaciyZ4c_6FZ00_7sD8tRBbc</recordid><startdate>20131107</startdate><enddate>20131107</enddate><creator>Dodell-Feder, David</creator><creator>Lincoln, Sarah Hope</creator><creator>Coulson, Joseph P</creator><creator>Hooker, Christine I</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131107</creationdate><title>Using fiction to assess mental state understanding: a new task for assessing theory of mind in adults</title><author>Dodell-Feder, David ; Lincoln, Sarah Hope ; Coulson, Joseph P ; Hooker, Christine I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2c5f30dbb86e95da55fca561cc4251b857f335a35aa8ad2e0d70ee1ede452fac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Autism</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive tasks</topic><topic>Emotional behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>Theory of Mind - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dodell-Feder, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lincoln, Sarah Hope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulson, Joseph P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooker, Christine I</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dodell-Feder, David</au><au>Lincoln, Sarah Hope</au><au>Coulson, Joseph P</au><au>Hooker, Christine I</au><au>Young, Liane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using fiction to assess mental state understanding: a new task for assessing theory of mind in adults</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2013-11-07</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e81279</spage><epage>e81279</epage><pages>e81279-e81279</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Social functioning depends on the ability to attribute and reason about the mental states of others--an ability known as theory of mind (ToM). Research in this field is limited by the use of tasks in which ceiling effects are ubiquitous, rendering them insensitive to individual differences in ToM ability and instances of subtle ToM impairment. Here, we present data from a new ToM task--the Short Story Task (SST)--intended to improve upon many aspects of existing ToM measures. More specifically, the SST was designed to: (a) assess the full range of individual differences in ToM ability without suffering from ceiling effects; (b) incorporate a range of mental states of differing complexity, including epistemic states, affective states, and intentions to be inferred from a first- and second-order level; (c) use ToM stimuli representative of real-world social interactions; (d) require participants to utilize social context when making mental state inferences; (e) exhibit adequate psychometric properties; and (f) be quick and easy to administer and score. In the task, participants read a short story and were asked questions that assessed explicit mental state reasoning, spontaneous mental state inference, and comprehension of the non-mental aspects of the story. Responses were scored according to a rubric that assigned greater points for accurate mental state attributions that included multiple characters' mental states. Results demonstrate that the SST is sensitive to variation in ToM ability, can be accurately scored by multiple raters, and exhibits concurrent validity with other social cognitive tasks. The results support the effectiveness of this new measure of ToM in the study of social cognition. The findings are also consistent with studies demonstrating significant relationships among narrative transportation, ToM, and the reading of fiction. Together, the data indicate that reading fiction may be an avenue for improving ToM ability.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24244736</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0081279</doi><tpages>e81279</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2013-11, Vol.8 (11), p.e81279-e81279
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1449331733
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Accuracy
Adult
Adults
Autism
Children & youth
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive ability
Cognitive tasks
Emotional behavior
Female
Humans
Language
Male
Memory
Middle Aged
Neuropsychological Tests
Psychiatry
Reading
Researchers
Schizophrenia
Social aspects
Social factors
Social interactions
Social Perception
Theory of Mind - physiology
Young Adult
title Using fiction to assess mental state understanding: a new task for assessing theory of mind in adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A45%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20fiction%20to%20assess%20mental%20state%20understanding:%20a%20new%20task%20for%20assessing%20theory%20of%20mind%20in%20adults&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Dodell-Feder,%20David&rft.date=2013-11-07&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e81279&rft.epage=e81279&rft.pages=e81279-e81279&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0081279&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478392571%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1449331733&rft_id=info:pmid/24244736&rft_galeid=A478392571&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_2b4bcee0114044399735b0f7c4dbe491&rfr_iscdi=true