Diet Segregation between Cohabiting Builder and Inquiline Termite Species
How do termite inquilines manage to cohabit termitaria along with the termite builder species? With this in mind, we analysed one of the several strategies that inquilines could use to circumvent conflicts with their hosts, namely, the use of distinct diets. We inspected overlapping patterns for the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2013-06, Vol.8 (6), p.e66535-e66535 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e66535 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e66535 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Florencio, Daniela Faria Marins, Alessandra Rosa, Cassiano Sousa Cristaldo, Paulo Fellipe Araújo, Ana Paula Albano Silva, Ivo Ribeiro Desouza, Og |
description | How do termite inquilines manage to cohabit termitaria along with the termite builder species? With this in mind, we analysed one of the several strategies that inquilines could use to circumvent conflicts with their hosts, namely, the use of distinct diets. We inspected overlapping patterns for the diets of several cohabiting Neotropical termite species, as inferred from carbon and nitrogen isotopic signatures for termite individuals. Cohabitant communities from distinct termitaria presented overlapping diet spaces, indicating that they exploited similar diets at the regional scale. When such communities were split into their components, full diet segregation could be observed between builders and inquilines, at regional (environment-wide) and local (termitarium) scales. Additionally, diet segregation among inquilines themselves was also observed in the vast majority of inspected termitaria. Inquiline species distribution among termitaria was not random. Environmental-wide diet similarity, coupled with local diet segregation and deterministic inquiline distribution, could denounce interactions for feeding resources. However, inquilines and builders not sharing the same termitarium, and thus not subject to potential conflicts, still exhibited distinct diets. Moreover, the areas of the builder's diet space and that of its inquilines did not correlate negatively. Accordingly, the diet areas of builders which hosted inquilines were in average as large as the areas of builders hosting no inquilines. Such results indicate the possibility that dietary partitioning by these cohabiting termites was not majorly driven by current interactive constraints. Rather, it seems to be a result of traits previously fixed in the evolutionary past of cohabitants. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0066535 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1370366485</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478182447</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_14f54ed85366484ab11e178a83500c1e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478182447</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d5034388b3cc2e50d9dabd749ed0a4ff5814b2ccf355382640fcd6e2d99607c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eLvODeTRvmqNGkSHdxajn2Sukrjzk74-Pe4NJsatAvkizjO877H5-TNsucYzTEt8LuNH0Kn2_nOdzBHSAhO-YPsFJeUzARB9OHR_iR7EuMGIU6lEI-zE0Il4oSUp9nyg4M-X0EToNG9811eQf8ToMsXfq0r17uuyd8PrrUQct3ZfNndpDfXQX4NYet6yFc7MA7i0-xRrdsIz8bnWfbt08frxZfZ5dXn5eLicmZESfqZ5YgyKmVFjSHAkS2trmzBSrBIs7rmErOKGFNTnm5LBEO1sQKILUuBCkPpWfby4LtrfVTjFKJKM0FUCCZ5IpYHwnq9Ubvgtjr8Vl479ffAh0bp0DvTgsKs5gxsEu2lTFcYAy6klpQjZDAkr_Ox2lBtwRro-qDbien0S-fWqvE_FBWylIwkgzejQfA3A8RebV000La6Az-kexclLrgsmEjoq3_Q-7sbqUanBlxX-1TX7E3VBSskloSxIlHze6i0LGydSZGpXTqfCN5OBInp4Vff6CFGtVx9_X_26vuUfX3ErkG3_Tr6dthnLU5BdgBN8DEGqO-GjNG-f3w7DbVPvBoTn2Qvjn_Qneg24vQPW2755w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1370366485</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diet Segregation between Cohabiting Builder and Inquiline Termite Species</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Florencio, Daniela Faria ; Marins, Alessandra ; Rosa, Cassiano Sousa ; Cristaldo, Paulo Fellipe ; Araújo, Ana Paula Albano ; Silva, Ivo Ribeiro ; Desouza, Og</creator><creatorcontrib>Florencio, Daniela Faria ; Marins, Alessandra ; Rosa, Cassiano Sousa ; Cristaldo, Paulo Fellipe ; Araújo, Ana Paula Albano ; Silva, Ivo Ribeiro ; Desouza, Og</creatorcontrib><description>How do termite inquilines manage to cohabit termitaria along with the termite builder species? With this in mind, we analysed one of the several strategies that inquilines could use to circumvent conflicts with their hosts, namely, the use of distinct diets. We inspected overlapping patterns for the diets of several cohabiting Neotropical termite species, as inferred from carbon and nitrogen isotopic signatures for termite individuals. Cohabitant communities from distinct termitaria presented overlapping diet spaces, indicating that they exploited similar diets at the regional scale. When such communities were split into their components, full diet segregation could be observed between builders and inquilines, at regional (environment-wide) and local (termitarium) scales. Additionally, diet segregation among inquilines themselves was also observed in the vast majority of inspected termitaria. Inquiline species distribution among termitaria was not random. Environmental-wide diet similarity, coupled with local diet segregation and deterministic inquiline distribution, could denounce interactions for feeding resources. However, inquilines and builders not sharing the same termitarium, and thus not subject to potential conflicts, still exhibited distinct diets. Moreover, the areas of the builder's diet space and that of its inquilines did not correlate negatively. Accordingly, the diet areas of builders which hosted inquilines were in average as large as the areas of builders hosting no inquilines. Such results indicate the possibility that dietary partitioning by these cohabiting termites was not majorly driven by current interactive constraints. Rather, it seems to be a result of traits previously fixed in the evolutionary past of cohabitants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066535</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23805229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biology ; Communities ; Conflicts ; Diet ; Ecology ; Feeding Behavior - physiology ; Hypotheses ; Isoptera ; Isoptera - physiology ; National parks ; Predation ; Salvelinus namaycush ; Species ; Species Specificity ; Termitaria ; Termites</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2013-06, Vol.8 (6), p.e66535-e66535</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2013 Florencio et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2013 Florencio et al 2013 Florencio et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d5034388b3cc2e50d9dabd749ed0a4ff5814b2ccf355382640fcd6e2d99607c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d5034388b3cc2e50d9dabd749ed0a4ff5814b2ccf355382640fcd6e2d99607c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3689842/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3689842/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23805229$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Florencio, Daniela Faria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marins, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Cassiano Sousa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristaldo, Paulo Fellipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araújo, Ana Paula Albano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Ivo Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desouza, Og</creatorcontrib><title>Diet Segregation between Cohabiting Builder and Inquiline Termite Species</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>How do termite inquilines manage to cohabit termitaria along with the termite builder species? With this in mind, we analysed one of the several strategies that inquilines could use to circumvent conflicts with their hosts, namely, the use of distinct diets. We inspected overlapping patterns for the diets of several cohabiting Neotropical termite species, as inferred from carbon and nitrogen isotopic signatures for termite individuals. Cohabitant communities from distinct termitaria presented overlapping diet spaces, indicating that they exploited similar diets at the regional scale. When such communities were split into their components, full diet segregation could be observed between builders and inquilines, at regional (environment-wide) and local (termitarium) scales. Additionally, diet segregation among inquilines themselves was also observed in the vast majority of inspected termitaria. Inquiline species distribution among termitaria was not random. Environmental-wide diet similarity, coupled with local diet segregation and deterministic inquiline distribution, could denounce interactions for feeding resources. However, inquilines and builders not sharing the same termitarium, and thus not subject to potential conflicts, still exhibited distinct diets. Moreover, the areas of the builder's diet space and that of its inquilines did not correlate negatively. Accordingly, the diet areas of builders which hosted inquilines were in average as large as the areas of builders hosting no inquilines. Such results indicate the possibility that dietary partitioning by these cohabiting termites was not majorly driven by current interactive constraints. Rather, it seems to be a result of traits previously fixed in the evolutionary past of cohabitants.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Conflicts</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Isoptera</subject><subject>Isoptera - physiology</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Salvelinus namaycush</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Termitaria</subject><subject>Termites</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eLvODeTRvmqNGkSHdxajn2Sukrjzk74-Pe4NJsatAvkizjO877H5-TNsucYzTEt8LuNH0Kn2_nOdzBHSAhO-YPsFJeUzARB9OHR_iR7EuMGIU6lEI-zE0Il4oSUp9nyg4M-X0EToNG9811eQf8ToMsXfq0r17uuyd8PrrUQct3ZfNndpDfXQX4NYet6yFc7MA7i0-xRrdsIz8bnWfbt08frxZfZ5dXn5eLicmZESfqZ5YgyKmVFjSHAkS2trmzBSrBIs7rmErOKGFNTnm5LBEO1sQKILUuBCkPpWfby4LtrfVTjFKJKM0FUCCZ5IpYHwnq9Ubvgtjr8Vl479ffAh0bp0DvTgsKs5gxsEu2lTFcYAy6klpQjZDAkr_Ox2lBtwRro-qDbien0S-fWqvE_FBWylIwkgzejQfA3A8RebV000La6Az-kexclLrgsmEjoq3_Q-7sbqUanBlxX-1TX7E3VBSskloSxIlHze6i0LGydSZGpXTqfCN5OBInp4Vff6CFGtVx9_X_26vuUfX3ErkG3_Tr6dthnLU5BdgBN8DEGqO-GjNG-f3w7DbVPvBoTn2Qvjn_Qneg24vQPW2755w</recordid><startdate>20130621</startdate><enddate>20130621</enddate><creator>Florencio, Daniela Faria</creator><creator>Marins, Alessandra</creator><creator>Rosa, Cassiano Sousa</creator><creator>Cristaldo, Paulo Fellipe</creator><creator>Araújo, Ana Paula Albano</creator><creator>Silva, Ivo Ribeiro</creator><creator>Desouza, Og</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130621</creationdate><title>Diet Segregation between Cohabiting Builder and Inquiline Termite Species</title><author>Florencio, Daniela Faria ; Marins, Alessandra ; Rosa, Cassiano Sousa ; Cristaldo, Paulo Fellipe ; Araújo, Ana Paula Albano ; Silva, Ivo Ribeiro ; Desouza, Og</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d5034388b3cc2e50d9dabd749ed0a4ff5814b2ccf355382640fcd6e2d99607c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Conflicts</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Isoptera</topic><topic>Isoptera - physiology</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Salvelinus namaycush</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Termitaria</topic><topic>Termites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Florencio, Daniela Faria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marins, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Cassiano Sousa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristaldo, Paulo Fellipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araújo, Ana Paula Albano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Ivo Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desouza, Og</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Florencio, Daniela Faria</au><au>Marins, Alessandra</au><au>Rosa, Cassiano Sousa</au><au>Cristaldo, Paulo Fellipe</au><au>Araújo, Ana Paula Albano</au><au>Silva, Ivo Ribeiro</au><au>Desouza, Og</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diet Segregation between Cohabiting Builder and Inquiline Termite Species</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2013-06-21</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e66535</spage><epage>e66535</epage><pages>e66535-e66535</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>How do termite inquilines manage to cohabit termitaria along with the termite builder species? With this in mind, we analysed one of the several strategies that inquilines could use to circumvent conflicts with their hosts, namely, the use of distinct diets. We inspected overlapping patterns for the diets of several cohabiting Neotropical termite species, as inferred from carbon and nitrogen isotopic signatures for termite individuals. Cohabitant communities from distinct termitaria presented overlapping diet spaces, indicating that they exploited similar diets at the regional scale. When such communities were split into their components, full diet segregation could be observed between builders and inquilines, at regional (environment-wide) and local (termitarium) scales. Additionally, diet segregation among inquilines themselves was also observed in the vast majority of inspected termitaria. Inquiline species distribution among termitaria was not random. Environmental-wide diet similarity, coupled with local diet segregation and deterministic inquiline distribution, could denounce interactions for feeding resources. However, inquilines and builders not sharing the same termitarium, and thus not subject to potential conflicts, still exhibited distinct diets. Moreover, the areas of the builder's diet space and that of its inquilines did not correlate negatively. Accordingly, the diet areas of builders which hosted inquilines were in average as large as the areas of builders hosting no inquilines. Such results indicate the possibility that dietary partitioning by these cohabiting termites was not majorly driven by current interactive constraints. Rather, it seems to be a result of traits previously fixed in the evolutionary past of cohabitants.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>23805229</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0066535</doi><tpages>e66535</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2013-06, Vol.8 (6), p.e66535-e66535 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1370366485 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Animals Biology Communities Conflicts Diet Ecology Feeding Behavior - physiology Hypotheses Isoptera Isoptera - physiology National parks Predation Salvelinus namaycush Species Species Specificity Termitaria Termites |
title | Diet Segregation between Cohabiting Builder and Inquiline Termite Species |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T22%3A01%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diet%20Segregation%20between%20Cohabiting%20Builder%20and%20Inquiline%20Termite%20Species&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Florencio,%20Daniela%20Faria&rft.date=2013-06-21&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e66535&rft.epage=e66535&rft.pages=e66535-e66535&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0066535&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478182447%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1370366485&rft_id=info:pmid/23805229&rft_galeid=A478182447&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_14f54ed85366484ab11e178a83500c1e&rfr_iscdi=true |