Quantifying Uncertainties in N2O Emission Due to N Fertilizer Application in Cultivated Areas

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a greenhouse gas with a global warming potential approximately 298 times greater than that of CO2. In 2006, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimated N2O emission due to synthetic and organic nitrogen (N) fertilization at 1% of applied N. We investigated t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2012-11, Vol.7 (11), p.e50950
Hauptverfasser: Philibert, Aurore, Loyce, Chantal, Makowski, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page e50950
container_title PloS one
container_volume 7
creator Philibert, Aurore
Loyce, Chantal
Makowski, David
description Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a greenhouse gas with a global warming potential approximately 298 times greater than that of CO2. In 2006, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimated N2O emission due to synthetic and organic nitrogen (N) fertilization at 1% of applied N. We investigated the uncertainty on this estimated value, by fitting 13 different models to a published dataset including 985 N2O measurements. These models were characterized by (i) the presence or absence of the explanatory variable “applied N”, (ii) the function relating N2O emission to applied N (exponential or linear function), (iii) fixed or random background (i.e. in the absence of N application) N2O emission and (iv) fixed or random applied N effect. We calculated ranges of uncertainty on N2O emissions from a subset of these models, and compared them with the uncertainty ranges currently used in the IPCC-Tier 1 method. The exponential models outperformed the linear models, and models including one or two random effects outperformed those including fixed effects only. The use of an exponential function rather than a linear function has an important practical consequence: the emission factor is not constant and increases as a function of applied N. Emission factors estimated using the exponential function were lower than 1% when the amount of N applied was below 160 kg N ha−1. Our uncertainty analysis shows that the uncertainty range currently used by the IPCC-Tier 1 method could be reduced.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0050950
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1351052333</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2970600531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-39765bc3a5867d45b0e26990af4308327171cbc02dbb4a17d4dcbbd695468e1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV9LwzAUxYMobk6_gWDA5838adP1RRhzU2FsCO5RQppmM6NLapIO5qc3Y1X0wfuSy72_nBNyALjGaIBphu82tnFGVIPaGjVAKEV5ik5AF-eU9BlB9PRX3wEX3m8iRIeMnYMOoYSwhKIueHtphAl6tddmDZdGKheEjgPloTZwThZwstXea2vgQ6NgsHAOpxHSlf5UDo7qutJShMM-8uOmCnongirhyCnhL8HZSlReXbVnDyynk9fxU3-2eHwej2Z9mWQo9GmesbSQVKRDlpVJWiBFWJ4jsYpvHFKS4QzLQiJSFkUicERKWRQly9OEDRVWtAdujrp1ZT1vf8ZzTFOMUkJj9cB9SzTFVpVSmeBExWunt8LtuRWa_90Y_c7XdsejBKY5iwK3rYCzH43y4R-b5EhJZ713avXjgBE_xPZ9ix9i421s9Atwn4zT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1351052333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying Uncertainties in N2O Emission Due to N Fertilizer Application in Cultivated Areas</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Philibert, Aurore ; Loyce, Chantal ; Makowski, David</creator><contributor>Bernacchi, Carl J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Philibert, Aurore ; Loyce, Chantal ; Makowski, David ; Bernacchi, Carl J.</creatorcontrib><description>Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a greenhouse gas with a global warming potential approximately 298 times greater than that of CO2. In 2006, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimated N2O emission due to synthetic and organic nitrogen (N) fertilization at 1% of applied N. We investigated the uncertainty on this estimated value, by fitting 13 different models to a published dataset including 985 N2O measurements. These models were characterized by (i) the presence or absence of the explanatory variable “applied N”, (ii) the function relating N2O emission to applied N (exponential or linear function), (iii) fixed or random background (i.e. in the absence of N application) N2O emission and (iv) fixed or random applied N effect. We calculated ranges of uncertainty on N2O emissions from a subset of these models, and compared them with the uncertainty ranges currently used in the IPCC-Tier 1 method. The exponential models outperformed the linear models, and models including one or two random effects outperformed those including fixed effects only. The use of an exponential function rather than a linear function has an important practical consequence: the emission factor is not constant and increases as a function of applied N. Emission factors estimated using the exponential function were lower than 1% when the amount of N applied was below 160 kg N ha−1. Our uncertainty analysis shows that the uncertainty range currently used by the IPCC-Tier 1 method could be reduced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050950</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23226430</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Biology ; Carbon dioxide ; Climate change ; Corn ; Crops ; Emission ; Emissions ; Exponential functions ; Fertilization ; Fertilizer application ; Fertilizers ; Global warming ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ; Linear functions ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematics ; Methods ; Nitrogen ; Nitrous oxide ; Nitrous oxides ; Organic nitrogen ; Oryza ; Rain ; Statistical analysis ; Statistics ; Uncertainty analysis</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2012-11, Vol.7 (11), p.e50950</ispartof><rights>2012 Philibert et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2012 Philibert et al 2012 Philibert et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-39765bc3a5867d45b0e26990af4308327171cbc02dbb4a17d4dcbbd695468e1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-39765bc3a5867d45b0e26990af4308327171cbc02dbb4a17d4dcbbd695468e1e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3511396/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3511396/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Bernacchi, Carl J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Philibert, Aurore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loyce, Chantal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makowski, David</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying Uncertainties in N2O Emission Due to N Fertilizer Application in Cultivated Areas</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a greenhouse gas with a global warming potential approximately 298 times greater than that of CO2. In 2006, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimated N2O emission due to synthetic and organic nitrogen (N) fertilization at 1% of applied N. We investigated the uncertainty on this estimated value, by fitting 13 different models to a published dataset including 985 N2O measurements. These models were characterized by (i) the presence or absence of the explanatory variable “applied N”, (ii) the function relating N2O emission to applied N (exponential or linear function), (iii) fixed or random background (i.e. in the absence of N application) N2O emission and (iv) fixed or random applied N effect. We calculated ranges of uncertainty on N2O emissions from a subset of these models, and compared them with the uncertainty ranges currently used in the IPCC-Tier 1 method. The exponential models outperformed the linear models, and models including one or two random effects outperformed those including fixed effects only. The use of an exponential function rather than a linear function has an important practical consequence: the emission factor is not constant and increases as a function of applied N. Emission factors estimated using the exponential function were lower than 1% when the amount of N applied was below 160 kg N ha−1. Our uncertainty analysis shows that the uncertainty range currently used by the IPCC-Tier 1 method could be reduced.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Emission</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Exponential functions</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Fertilizer application</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</subject><subject>Linear functions</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Nitrous oxides</subject><subject>Organic nitrogen</subject><subject>Oryza</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Uncertainty analysis</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV9LwzAUxYMobk6_gWDA5838adP1RRhzU2FsCO5RQppmM6NLapIO5qc3Y1X0wfuSy72_nBNyALjGaIBphu82tnFGVIPaGjVAKEV5ik5AF-eU9BlB9PRX3wEX3m8iRIeMnYMOoYSwhKIueHtphAl6tddmDZdGKheEjgPloTZwThZwstXea2vgQ6NgsHAOpxHSlf5UDo7qutJShMM-8uOmCnongirhyCnhL8HZSlReXbVnDyynk9fxU3-2eHwej2Z9mWQo9GmesbSQVKRDlpVJWiBFWJ4jsYpvHFKS4QzLQiJSFkUicERKWRQly9OEDRVWtAdujrp1ZT1vf8ZzTFOMUkJj9cB9SzTFVpVSmeBExWunt8LtuRWa_90Y_c7XdsejBKY5iwK3rYCzH43y4R-b5EhJZ713avXjgBE_xPZ9ix9i421s9Atwn4zT</recordid><startdate>20121130</startdate><enddate>20121130</enddate><creator>Philibert, Aurore</creator><creator>Loyce, Chantal</creator><creator>Makowski, David</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121130</creationdate><title>Quantifying Uncertainties in N2O Emission Due to N Fertilizer Application in Cultivated Areas</title><author>Philibert, Aurore ; Loyce, Chantal ; Makowski, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-39765bc3a5867d45b0e26990af4308327171cbc02dbb4a17d4dcbbd695468e1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Emission</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Exponential functions</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Fertilizer application</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</topic><topic>Linear functions</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Nitrous oxides</topic><topic>Organic nitrogen</topic><topic>Oryza</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Uncertainty analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Philibert, Aurore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loyce, Chantal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makowski, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Philibert, Aurore</au><au>Loyce, Chantal</au><au>Makowski, David</au><au>Bernacchi, Carl J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying Uncertainties in N2O Emission Due to N Fertilizer Application in Cultivated Areas</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2012-11-30</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e50950</spage><pages>e50950-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a greenhouse gas with a global warming potential approximately 298 times greater than that of CO2. In 2006, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimated N2O emission due to synthetic and organic nitrogen (N) fertilization at 1% of applied N. We investigated the uncertainty on this estimated value, by fitting 13 different models to a published dataset including 985 N2O measurements. These models were characterized by (i) the presence or absence of the explanatory variable “applied N”, (ii) the function relating N2O emission to applied N (exponential or linear function), (iii) fixed or random background (i.e. in the absence of N application) N2O emission and (iv) fixed or random applied N effect. We calculated ranges of uncertainty on N2O emissions from a subset of these models, and compared them with the uncertainty ranges currently used in the IPCC-Tier 1 method. The exponential models outperformed the linear models, and models including one or two random effects outperformed those including fixed effects only. The use of an exponential function rather than a linear function has an important practical consequence: the emission factor is not constant and increases as a function of applied N. Emission factors estimated using the exponential function were lower than 1% when the amount of N applied was below 160 kg N ha−1. Our uncertainty analysis shows that the uncertainty range currently used by the IPCC-Tier 1 method could be reduced.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>23226430</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0050950</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2012-11, Vol.7 (11), p.e50950
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1351052333
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Agriculture
Biology
Carbon dioxide
Climate change
Corn
Crops
Emission
Emissions
Exponential functions
Fertilization
Fertilizer application
Fertilizers
Global warming
Greenhouse effect
Greenhouse gases
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Linear functions
Mathematical analysis
Mathematics
Methods
Nitrogen
Nitrous oxide
Nitrous oxides
Organic nitrogen
Oryza
Rain
Statistical analysis
Statistics
Uncertainty analysis
title Quantifying Uncertainties in N2O Emission Due to N Fertilizer Application in Cultivated Areas
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T10%3A29%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20Uncertainties%20in%20N2O%20Emission%20Due%20to%20N%20Fertilizer%20Application%20in%20Cultivated%20Areas&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Philibert,%20Aurore&rft.date=2012-11-30&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e50950&rft.pages=e50950-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0050950&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E2970600531%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1351052333&rft_id=info:pmid/23226430&rfr_iscdi=true