Evaluation and use of in-silico structure-based epitope prediction with foot-and-mouth disease virus
Understanding virus antigenicity is of fundamental importance for the development of better, more cross-reactive vaccines. However, as far as we are aware, no systematic work has yet been conducted using the 3D structure of a virus to identify novel epitopes. Therefore we have extended several exist...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2013-05, Vol.8 (5), p.e61122-e61122 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e61122 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e61122 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Borley, Daryl W Mahapatra, Mana Paton, David J Esnouf, Robert M Stuart, David I Fry, Elizabeth E |
description | Understanding virus antigenicity is of fundamental importance for the development of better, more cross-reactive vaccines. However, as far as we are aware, no systematic work has yet been conducted using the 3D structure of a virus to identify novel epitopes. Therefore we have extended several existing structural prediction algorithms to build a method for identifying epitopes on the appropriate outer surface of intact virus capsids (which are structurally different from globular proteins in both shape and arrangement of multiple repeated elements) and applied it here as a proof of principle concept to the capsid of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). We have analysed how reliably several freely available structure-based B cell epitope prediction programs can identify already known viral epitopes of FMDV in the context of the viral capsid. To do this we constructed a simple objective metric to measure the sensitivity and discrimination of such algorithms. After optimising the parameters for five methods using an independent training set we used this measure to evaluate the methods. Individually any one algorithm performed rather poorly (three performing better than the other two) suggesting that there may be value in developing virus-specific software. Taking a very conservative approach requiring a consensus between all three top methods predicts a number of previously described antigenic residues as potential epitopes on more than one serotype of FMDV, consistent with experimental results. The consensus results identified novel residues as potential epitopes on more than one serotype. These include residues 190-192 of VP2 (not previously determined to be antigenic), residues 69-71 and 193-197 of VP3 spanning the pentamer-pentamer interface, and another region incorporating residues 83, 84 and 169-174 of VP1 (all only previously experimentally defined on serotype A). The computer programs needed to create a semi-automated procedure for carrying out this epitope prediction method are presented. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0061122 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1350972559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478393860</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6b83471f69464865b495a412a7d9cbdf</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478393860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2a9949259f5a2b8368912bbed6eb59053236950e5cbb56fee679232b947738033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLguhFxzZfbW6EZVl1YGHBr9uQJqczGTpNNx-j_nszO91lKnshvUiTPO-bk3NysuxlVS4qXFcfNja6QfaL0Q6wKEtWVQg9yk4rjlHBUIkfH_2fZM-835QlxQ1jT7MThBmrCSanmb7cyT7KYOyQy0Hn0UNuu9wMhTe9UTb3wUUVooOilR50DqMJdoR8dKCNutX9MmGdd9aGIjkUWxvTVBsPic93xkX_PHvSyd7Di2k8y358uvx-8aW4uv68vDi_KhTjKBRIck44oryjErUNZg2vUNuCZtBSnoJPYXNaAlVtS1kHwGqOMGo5qWvclBifZa8PvmNvvZgS5EWFaclrRClPxPJAaCs3YnRmK90fYaURtwvWrYR0wageBEsRkLrqGCeMNIy2hFNJKiRrzVWru-T1cTottlvQCobgZD8zne8MZi1WdicwI6xBTTJ4Nxk4exPBB7E1XkHfywFsPMTdcExIndA3_6AP326iVjJdwAydTeeqvak4J3WDeSp_majFA1T6NGxTxQfoTFqfCd7PBIkJ8DusZPReLL99_X_2-uecfXvErkH2Ye1tH_ePys9BcgCVs9476O6TXJVi3wx32RD7ZhBTMyTZq-MC3YvuXj_-CzLVA8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1350972559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation and use of in-silico structure-based epitope prediction with foot-and-mouth disease virus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Borley, Daryl W ; Mahapatra, Mana ; Paton, David J ; Esnouf, Robert M ; Stuart, David I ; Fry, Elizabeth E</creator><contributor>Raghava, Gajendra P. S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Borley, Daryl W ; Mahapatra, Mana ; Paton, David J ; Esnouf, Robert M ; Stuart, David I ; Fry, Elizabeth E ; Raghava, Gajendra P. S.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding virus antigenicity is of fundamental importance for the development of better, more cross-reactive vaccines. However, as far as we are aware, no systematic work has yet been conducted using the 3D structure of a virus to identify novel epitopes. Therefore we have extended several existing structural prediction algorithms to build a method for identifying epitopes on the appropriate outer surface of intact virus capsids (which are structurally different from globular proteins in both shape and arrangement of multiple repeated elements) and applied it here as a proof of principle concept to the capsid of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). We have analysed how reliably several freely available structure-based B cell epitope prediction programs can identify already known viral epitopes of FMDV in the context of the viral capsid. To do this we constructed a simple objective metric to measure the sensitivity and discrimination of such algorithms. After optimising the parameters for five methods using an independent training set we used this measure to evaluate the methods. Individually any one algorithm performed rather poorly (three performing better than the other two) suggesting that there may be value in developing virus-specific software. Taking a very conservative approach requiring a consensus between all three top methods predicts a number of previously described antigenic residues as potential epitopes on more than one serotype of FMDV, consistent with experimental results. The consensus results identified novel residues as potential epitopes on more than one serotype. These include residues 190-192 of VP2 (not previously determined to be antigenic), residues 69-71 and 193-197 of VP3 spanning the pentamer-pentamer interface, and another region incorporating residues 83, 84 and 169-174 of VP1 (all only previously experimentally defined on serotype A). The computer programs needed to create a semi-automated procedure for carrying out this epitope prediction method are presented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061122</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23667434</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Amino acids ; Antigenic determinants ; Antigenicity ; Antigens ; Antigens, Viral - immunology ; Biology ; Capsid - chemistry ; Capsid - immunology ; Capsids ; Computer programs ; Computer Simulation ; Epitope Mapping - methods ; Epitopes ; Foot & mouth disease ; Foot and mouth disease ; Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus - immunology ; Immunoglobulins ; Lymphocytes B ; Medicine ; Models, Molecular ; Parameter sensitivity ; Protein Conformation ; Proteins ; Residues ; Software ; Vaccines ; Veterinary Science ; Viruses ; VP1 protein ; VP3 protein</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2013-05, Vol.8 (5), p.e61122-e61122</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2013 Borley et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2013 Borley et al 2013 Borley et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2a9949259f5a2b8368912bbed6eb59053236950e5cbb56fee679232b947738033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2a9949259f5a2b8368912bbed6eb59053236950e5cbb56fee679232b947738033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3646828/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3646828/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23667434$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Raghava, Gajendra P. S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Borley, Daryl W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahapatra, Mana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paton, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esnouf, Robert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuart, David I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fry, Elizabeth E</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation and use of in-silico structure-based epitope prediction with foot-and-mouth disease virus</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Understanding virus antigenicity is of fundamental importance for the development of better, more cross-reactive vaccines. However, as far as we are aware, no systematic work has yet been conducted using the 3D structure of a virus to identify novel epitopes. Therefore we have extended several existing structural prediction algorithms to build a method for identifying epitopes on the appropriate outer surface of intact virus capsids (which are structurally different from globular proteins in both shape and arrangement of multiple repeated elements) and applied it here as a proof of principle concept to the capsid of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). We have analysed how reliably several freely available structure-based B cell epitope prediction programs can identify already known viral epitopes of FMDV in the context of the viral capsid. To do this we constructed a simple objective metric to measure the sensitivity and discrimination of such algorithms. After optimising the parameters for five methods using an independent training set we used this measure to evaluate the methods. Individually any one algorithm performed rather poorly (three performing better than the other two) suggesting that there may be value in developing virus-specific software. Taking a very conservative approach requiring a consensus between all three top methods predicts a number of previously described antigenic residues as potential epitopes on more than one serotype of FMDV, consistent with experimental results. The consensus results identified novel residues as potential epitopes on more than one serotype. These include residues 190-192 of VP2 (not previously determined to be antigenic), residues 69-71 and 193-197 of VP3 spanning the pentamer-pentamer interface, and another region incorporating residues 83, 84 and 169-174 of VP1 (all only previously experimentally defined on serotype A). The computer programs needed to create a semi-automated procedure for carrying out this epitope prediction method are presented.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Antigenic determinants</subject><subject>Antigenicity</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Antigens, Viral - immunology</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Capsid - chemistry</subject><subject>Capsid - immunology</subject><subject>Capsids</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Epitope Mapping - methods</subject><subject>Epitopes</subject><subject>Foot & mouth disease</subject><subject>Foot and mouth disease</subject><subject>Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus - immunology</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins</subject><subject>Lymphocytes B</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Models, Molecular</subject><subject>Parameter sensitivity</subject><subject>Protein Conformation</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Residues</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><subject>VP1 protein</subject><subject>VP3 protein</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLguhFxzZfbW6EZVl1YGHBr9uQJqczGTpNNx-j_nszO91lKnshvUiTPO-bk3NysuxlVS4qXFcfNja6QfaL0Q6wKEtWVQg9yk4rjlHBUIkfH_2fZM-835QlxQ1jT7MThBmrCSanmb7cyT7KYOyQy0Hn0UNuu9wMhTe9UTb3wUUVooOilR50DqMJdoR8dKCNutX9MmGdd9aGIjkUWxvTVBsPic93xkX_PHvSyd7Di2k8y358uvx-8aW4uv68vDi_KhTjKBRIck44oryjErUNZg2vUNuCZtBSnoJPYXNaAlVtS1kHwGqOMGo5qWvclBifZa8PvmNvvZgS5EWFaclrRClPxPJAaCs3YnRmK90fYaURtwvWrYR0wageBEsRkLrqGCeMNIy2hFNJKiRrzVWru-T1cTottlvQCobgZD8zne8MZi1WdicwI6xBTTJ4Nxk4exPBB7E1XkHfywFsPMTdcExIndA3_6AP326iVjJdwAydTeeqvak4J3WDeSp_majFA1T6NGxTxQfoTFqfCd7PBIkJ8DusZPReLL99_X_2-uecfXvErkH2Ye1tH_ePys9BcgCVs9476O6TXJVi3wx32RD7ZhBTMyTZq-MC3YvuXj_-CzLVA8g</recordid><startdate>20130507</startdate><enddate>20130507</enddate><creator>Borley, Daryl W</creator><creator>Mahapatra, Mana</creator><creator>Paton, David J</creator><creator>Esnouf, Robert M</creator><creator>Stuart, David I</creator><creator>Fry, Elizabeth E</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130507</creationdate><title>Evaluation and use of in-silico structure-based epitope prediction with foot-and-mouth disease virus</title><author>Borley, Daryl W ; Mahapatra, Mana ; Paton, David J ; Esnouf, Robert M ; Stuart, David I ; Fry, Elizabeth E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2a9949259f5a2b8368912bbed6eb59053236950e5cbb56fee679232b947738033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Antigenic determinants</topic><topic>Antigenicity</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Antigens, Viral - immunology</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Capsid - chemistry</topic><topic>Capsid - immunology</topic><topic>Capsids</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Epitope Mapping - methods</topic><topic>Epitopes</topic><topic>Foot & mouth disease</topic><topic>Foot and mouth disease</topic><topic>Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus - immunology</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins</topic><topic>Lymphocytes B</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Models, Molecular</topic><topic>Parameter sensitivity</topic><topic>Protein Conformation</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Residues</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><topic>VP1 protein</topic><topic>VP3 protein</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borley, Daryl W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahapatra, Mana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paton, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esnouf, Robert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuart, David I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fry, Elizabeth E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borley, Daryl W</au><au>Mahapatra, Mana</au><au>Paton, David J</au><au>Esnouf, Robert M</au><au>Stuart, David I</au><au>Fry, Elizabeth E</au><au>Raghava, Gajendra P. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation and use of in-silico structure-based epitope prediction with foot-and-mouth disease virus</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2013-05-07</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e61122</spage><epage>e61122</epage><pages>e61122-e61122</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Understanding virus antigenicity is of fundamental importance for the development of better, more cross-reactive vaccines. However, as far as we are aware, no systematic work has yet been conducted using the 3D structure of a virus to identify novel epitopes. Therefore we have extended several existing structural prediction algorithms to build a method for identifying epitopes on the appropriate outer surface of intact virus capsids (which are structurally different from globular proteins in both shape and arrangement of multiple repeated elements) and applied it here as a proof of principle concept to the capsid of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). We have analysed how reliably several freely available structure-based B cell epitope prediction programs can identify already known viral epitopes of FMDV in the context of the viral capsid. To do this we constructed a simple objective metric to measure the sensitivity and discrimination of such algorithms. After optimising the parameters for five methods using an independent training set we used this measure to evaluate the methods. Individually any one algorithm performed rather poorly (three performing better than the other two) suggesting that there may be value in developing virus-specific software. Taking a very conservative approach requiring a consensus between all three top methods predicts a number of previously described antigenic residues as potential epitopes on more than one serotype of FMDV, consistent with experimental results. The consensus results identified novel residues as potential epitopes on more than one serotype. These include residues 190-192 of VP2 (not previously determined to be antigenic), residues 69-71 and 193-197 of VP3 spanning the pentamer-pentamer interface, and another region incorporating residues 83, 84 and 169-174 of VP1 (all only previously experimentally defined on serotype A). The computer programs needed to create a semi-automated procedure for carrying out this epitope prediction method are presented.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>23667434</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0061122</doi><tpages>e61122</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2013-05, Vol.8 (5), p.e61122-e61122 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1350972559 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Algorithms Amino acids Antigenic determinants Antigenicity Antigens Antigens, Viral - immunology Biology Capsid - chemistry Capsid - immunology Capsids Computer programs Computer Simulation Epitope Mapping - methods Epitopes Foot & mouth disease Foot and mouth disease Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus - immunology Immunoglobulins Lymphocytes B Medicine Models, Molecular Parameter sensitivity Protein Conformation Proteins Residues Software Vaccines Veterinary Science Viruses VP1 protein VP3 protein |
title | Evaluation and use of in-silico structure-based epitope prediction with foot-and-mouth disease virus |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T13%3A11%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20and%20use%20of%20in-silico%20structure-based%20epitope%20prediction%20with%20foot-and-mouth%20disease%20virus&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Borley,%20Daryl%20W&rft.date=2013-05-07&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e61122&rft.epage=e61122&rft.pages=e61122-e61122&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0061122&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478393860%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1350972559&rft_id=info:pmid/23667434&rft_galeid=A478393860&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_6b83471f69464865b495a412a7d9cbdf&rfr_iscdi=true |