Decision-making in multiple sclerosis consultations in Italy: third observer and patient assessments
To assess decision-making in multiple sclerosis (MS) from third observer and patient perspectives. Audio recordings of first-ever consultations with a participating physician (88 outpatients, 10 physicians) at four tertiary MS care clinics in Italy, were rated by a third observer using the Observing...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2013-04, Vol.8 (4), p.e60721 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e60721 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Pietrolongo, Erika Giordano, Andrea Kleinefeld, Monica Confalonieri, Paolo Lugaresi, Alessandra Tortorella, Carla Pugliatti, Maura Radice, Davide Goss, Claudia Heesen, Christoph Solari, Alessandra |
description | To assess decision-making in multiple sclerosis (MS) from third observer and patient perspectives.
Audio recordings of first-ever consultations with a participating physician (88 outpatients, 10 physicians) at four tertiary MS care clinics in Italy, were rated by a third observer using the Observing Patient Involvement in Shared Decision Making (OPTION) and by patients using the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS).
Mean patient age was 37.5, 66% were women, 72% had MS, and 28% had possible MS or other disease. Mean PICS subscale scores (range 0 poor, 100 best possible) were 71.9 (SD 24.3) for "physician facilitation" (PICS-F); 74.6 (SD 22.9) for "patient information exchange" (PICS-I); and only 22.5 (SD 16.2) for "patient decision making" (PICS-DM). Mean OPTION total score (0 poor, 100 best possible) was 29.6 (SD 10.3). Poorest OPTION scores were found for items assessing "preferred patient approach to receiving information" and "preferred patient level of involvement." Highest scores were for "clinician drawing attention to identified problem", "indicating need for decision making," and "need to review the decision." Consultation time, woman physician, patient-physician gender concordance and PICS-F were associated with higher OPTION total score; older physician and second opinion consultation were associated with lower OPTION score.
In line with findings in other settings, our third observer findings indicated limited patient involvement abilities of MS physicians during first consultations. Patient perceptions of physician skills were better than third observers', although they correlated. Consultations with women physicians, and younger physicians, were associated with higher third observer and patient-based scores. Our findings reveal a need to empower Italian MS physicians with better communication and shared decision-making skills, and show in particular that attention to MS patient preferences for reception of information and involvement in health decisions, need to be improved. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0060721 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1330911077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478446530</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_62187cf5dd3e4da9ba7840cf527c380c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478446530</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2b77dc3c3734472d2ccd1471a88103b8b65d790427ac2296f88bdad9bff9c0ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk0tv1DAQxyMEoqXwDRBEQkJw2MWPxE44IFXltVKlSryulmM7u16ceOtxKvrtcbpptUE9IB9sjX_zH894JsueY7TElON3Wz-EXrrlzvdmiRBDnOAH2TGuKVkwgujDg_NR9gRgi1BJK8YeZ0eElqwkHB1n-qNRFqzvF538bft1bvu8G1y0O2dyUM4EDxZy5XtIVhkTCSOzitJdv8_jxgad-wZMuDIhl73OdwkyfcwlgAHo0hGeZo9a6cA8m_aT7OfnTz_Ovi7OL76szk7PF4rVJC5Iw7lWVFFOi4ITTZTSuOBYVhVGtKkaVmpeo4JwqQipWVtVjZa6btq2VkhJepK93OvunAcxFQgEphTVGCPOE7HaE9rLrdgF28lwLby04sbgw1rIEG3KWzCCK67aUmtqCi3rRvKqQMlAuKIVUknrwxRtaDqjVco0SDcTnd_0diPW_kpQhouyrJPAm0kg-MvBQBSdBWWck73xw_huUtQMEYYS-uof9P7sJmotUwK2b32Kq0ZRcVqk1xespKPW8h4qLW06mz7atDbZZw5vZw6JieZPXMsBQKy-f_t_9uLXnH19wG6MdHED3g03TTYHiz2oUjdCMO1dkTES4zDcVkOMwyCmYUhuLw4_6M7ptvvpX9ObBag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1330911077</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decision-making in multiple sclerosis consultations in Italy: third observer and patient assessments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Pietrolongo, Erika ; Giordano, Andrea ; Kleinefeld, Monica ; Confalonieri, Paolo ; Lugaresi, Alessandra ; Tortorella, Carla ; Pugliatti, Maura ; Radice, Davide ; Goss, Claudia ; Heesen, Christoph ; Solari, Alessandra</creator><contributor>Oreja-Guevara, Celia</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pietrolongo, Erika ; Giordano, Andrea ; Kleinefeld, Monica ; Confalonieri, Paolo ; Lugaresi, Alessandra ; Tortorella, Carla ; Pugliatti, Maura ; Radice, Davide ; Goss, Claudia ; Heesen, Christoph ; Solari, Alessandra ; AutoMS group ; the AutoMS group ; Oreja-Guevara, Celia</creatorcontrib><description>To assess decision-making in multiple sclerosis (MS) from third observer and patient perspectives.
Audio recordings of first-ever consultations with a participating physician (88 outpatients, 10 physicians) at four tertiary MS care clinics in Italy, were rated by a third observer using the Observing Patient Involvement in Shared Decision Making (OPTION) and by patients using the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS).
Mean patient age was 37.5, 66% were women, 72% had MS, and 28% had possible MS or other disease. Mean PICS subscale scores (range 0 poor, 100 best possible) were 71.9 (SD 24.3) for "physician facilitation" (PICS-F); 74.6 (SD 22.9) for "patient information exchange" (PICS-I); and only 22.5 (SD 16.2) for "patient decision making" (PICS-DM). Mean OPTION total score (0 poor, 100 best possible) was 29.6 (SD 10.3). Poorest OPTION scores were found for items assessing "preferred patient approach to receiving information" and "preferred patient level of involvement." Highest scores were for "clinician drawing attention to identified problem", "indicating need for decision making," and "need to review the decision." Consultation time, woman physician, patient-physician gender concordance and PICS-F were associated with higher OPTION total score; older physician and second opinion consultation were associated with lower OPTION score.
In line with findings in other settings, our third observer findings indicated limited patient involvement abilities of MS physicians during first consultations. Patient perceptions of physician skills were better than third observers', although they correlated. Consultations with women physicians, and younger physicians, were associated with higher third observer and patient-based scores. Our findings reveal a need to empower Italian MS physicians with better communication and shared decision-making skills, and show in particular that attention to MS patient preferences for reception of information and involvement in health decisions, need to be improved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060721</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23565270</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Clinical trials ; Communication ; Consent ; Consultation ; Decision making ; Decision Making - physiology ; Female ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Interviews ; Italy ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Middle Aged ; Multiple sclerosis ; Multiple Sclerosis - psychology ; Neuromuscular diseases ; Neurosciences ; Patient assessment ; Patient Participation ; Patient satisfaction ; Perspectivism ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Physicians ; Psychological aspects ; Public health ; Referral and Consultation ; Risk factors ; Skills ; Studies</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2013-04, Vol.8 (4), p.e60721</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2013 Pietrolongo et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2013 Pietrolongo et al 2013 Pietrolongo et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2b77dc3c3734472d2ccd1471a88103b8b65d790427ac2296f88bdad9bff9c0ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2b77dc3c3734472d2ccd1471a88103b8b65d790427ac2296f88bdad9bff9c0ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614559/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614559/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23565270$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Oreja-Guevara, Celia</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pietrolongo, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinefeld, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Confalonieri, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lugaresi, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tortorella, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugliatti, Maura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radice, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goss, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heesen, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solari, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AutoMS group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the AutoMS group</creatorcontrib><title>Decision-making in multiple sclerosis consultations in Italy: third observer and patient assessments</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>To assess decision-making in multiple sclerosis (MS) from third observer and patient perspectives.
Audio recordings of first-ever consultations with a participating physician (88 outpatients, 10 physicians) at four tertiary MS care clinics in Italy, were rated by a third observer using the Observing Patient Involvement in Shared Decision Making (OPTION) and by patients using the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS).
Mean patient age was 37.5, 66% were women, 72% had MS, and 28% had possible MS or other disease. Mean PICS subscale scores (range 0 poor, 100 best possible) were 71.9 (SD 24.3) for "physician facilitation" (PICS-F); 74.6 (SD 22.9) for "patient information exchange" (PICS-I); and only 22.5 (SD 16.2) for "patient decision making" (PICS-DM). Mean OPTION total score (0 poor, 100 best possible) was 29.6 (SD 10.3). Poorest OPTION scores were found for items assessing "preferred patient approach to receiving information" and "preferred patient level of involvement." Highest scores were for "clinician drawing attention to identified problem", "indicating need for decision making," and "need to review the decision." Consultation time, woman physician, patient-physician gender concordance and PICS-F were associated with higher OPTION total score; older physician and second opinion consultation were associated with lower OPTION score.
In line with findings in other settings, our third observer findings indicated limited patient involvement abilities of MS physicians during first consultations. Patient perceptions of physician skills were better than third observers', although they correlated. Consultations with women physicians, and younger physicians, were associated with higher third observer and patient-based scores. Our findings reveal a need to empower Italian MS physicians with better communication and shared decision-making skills, and show in particular that attention to MS patient preferences for reception of information and involvement in health decisions, need to be improved.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Consultation</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision Making - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple sclerosis</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - psychology</subject><subject>Neuromuscular diseases</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Patient assessment</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Perspectivism</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk0tv1DAQxyMEoqXwDRBEQkJw2MWPxE44IFXltVKlSryulmM7u16ceOtxKvrtcbpptUE9IB9sjX_zH894JsueY7TElON3Wz-EXrrlzvdmiRBDnOAH2TGuKVkwgujDg_NR9gRgi1BJK8YeZ0eElqwkHB1n-qNRFqzvF538bft1bvu8G1y0O2dyUM4EDxZy5XtIVhkTCSOzitJdv8_jxgad-wZMuDIhl73OdwkyfcwlgAHo0hGeZo9a6cA8m_aT7OfnTz_Ovi7OL76szk7PF4rVJC5Iw7lWVFFOi4ITTZTSuOBYVhVGtKkaVmpeo4JwqQipWVtVjZa6btq2VkhJepK93OvunAcxFQgEphTVGCPOE7HaE9rLrdgF28lwLby04sbgw1rIEG3KWzCCK67aUmtqCi3rRvKqQMlAuKIVUknrwxRtaDqjVco0SDcTnd_0diPW_kpQhouyrJPAm0kg-MvBQBSdBWWck73xw_huUtQMEYYS-uof9P7sJmotUwK2b32Kq0ZRcVqk1xespKPW8h4qLW06mz7atDbZZw5vZw6JieZPXMsBQKy-f_t_9uLXnH19wG6MdHED3g03TTYHiz2oUjdCMO1dkTES4zDcVkOMwyCmYUhuLw4_6M7ptvvpX9ObBag</recordid><startdate>20130402</startdate><enddate>20130402</enddate><creator>Pietrolongo, Erika</creator><creator>Giordano, Andrea</creator><creator>Kleinefeld, Monica</creator><creator>Confalonieri, Paolo</creator><creator>Lugaresi, Alessandra</creator><creator>Tortorella, Carla</creator><creator>Pugliatti, Maura</creator><creator>Radice, Davide</creator><creator>Goss, Claudia</creator><creator>Heesen, Christoph</creator><creator>Solari, Alessandra</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130402</creationdate><title>Decision-making in multiple sclerosis consultations in Italy: third observer and patient assessments</title><author>Pietrolongo, Erika ; Giordano, Andrea ; Kleinefeld, Monica ; Confalonieri, Paolo ; Lugaresi, Alessandra ; Tortorella, Carla ; Pugliatti, Maura ; Radice, Davide ; Goss, Claudia ; Heesen, Christoph ; Solari, Alessandra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2b77dc3c3734472d2ccd1471a88103b8b65d790427ac2296f88bdad9bff9c0ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Consultation</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision Making - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple sclerosis</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - psychology</topic><topic>Neuromuscular diseases</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Patient assessment</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Perspectivism</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pietrolongo, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinefeld, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Confalonieri, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lugaresi, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tortorella, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugliatti, Maura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radice, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goss, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heesen, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solari, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AutoMS group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the AutoMS group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pietrolongo, Erika</au><au>Giordano, Andrea</au><au>Kleinefeld, Monica</au><au>Confalonieri, Paolo</au><au>Lugaresi, Alessandra</au><au>Tortorella, Carla</au><au>Pugliatti, Maura</au><au>Radice, Davide</au><au>Goss, Claudia</au><au>Heesen, Christoph</au><au>Solari, Alessandra</au><au>Oreja-Guevara, Celia</au><aucorp>AutoMS group</aucorp><aucorp>the AutoMS group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decision-making in multiple sclerosis consultations in Italy: third observer and patient assessments</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2013-04-02</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e60721</spage><pages>e60721-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>To assess decision-making in multiple sclerosis (MS) from third observer and patient perspectives.
Audio recordings of first-ever consultations with a participating physician (88 outpatients, 10 physicians) at four tertiary MS care clinics in Italy, were rated by a third observer using the Observing Patient Involvement in Shared Decision Making (OPTION) and by patients using the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS).
Mean patient age was 37.5, 66% were women, 72% had MS, and 28% had possible MS or other disease. Mean PICS subscale scores (range 0 poor, 100 best possible) were 71.9 (SD 24.3) for "physician facilitation" (PICS-F); 74.6 (SD 22.9) for "patient information exchange" (PICS-I); and only 22.5 (SD 16.2) for "patient decision making" (PICS-DM). Mean OPTION total score (0 poor, 100 best possible) was 29.6 (SD 10.3). Poorest OPTION scores were found for items assessing "preferred patient approach to receiving information" and "preferred patient level of involvement." Highest scores were for "clinician drawing attention to identified problem", "indicating need for decision making," and "need to review the decision." Consultation time, woman physician, patient-physician gender concordance and PICS-F were associated with higher OPTION total score; older physician and second opinion consultation were associated with lower OPTION score.
In line with findings in other settings, our third observer findings indicated limited patient involvement abilities of MS physicians during first consultations. Patient perceptions of physician skills were better than third observers', although they correlated. Consultations with women physicians, and younger physicians, were associated with higher third observer and patient-based scores. Our findings reveal a need to empower Italian MS physicians with better communication and shared decision-making skills, and show in particular that attention to MS patient preferences for reception of information and involvement in health decisions, need to be improved.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>23565270</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0060721</doi><tpages>e60721</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2013-04, Vol.8 (4), p.e60721 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1330911077 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adult Analysis Clinical trials Communication Consent Consultation Decision making Decision Making - physiology Female Hospitals Humans Interviews Italy Male Medical personnel Medical research Medicine Middle Aged Multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis - psychology Neuromuscular diseases Neurosciences Patient assessment Patient Participation Patient satisfaction Perspectivism Physician-Patient Relations Physicians Psychological aspects Public health Referral and Consultation Risk factors Skills Studies |
title | Decision-making in multiple sclerosis consultations in Italy: third observer and patient assessments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T04%3A11%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decision-making%20in%20multiple%20sclerosis%20consultations%20in%20Italy:%20third%20observer%20and%20patient%20assessments&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Pietrolongo,%20Erika&rft.aucorp=AutoMS%20group&rft.date=2013-04-02&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e60721&rft.pages=e60721-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0060721&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478446530%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1330911077&rft_id=info:pmid/23565270&rft_galeid=A478446530&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_62187cf5dd3e4da9ba7840cf527c380c&rfr_iscdi=true |