Satiating capacity and post-prandial relationships between appetite parameters and gut-peptide concentrations with solid and liquefied carbohydrate

Differences in satiating capacity of liquid and solid meals are unclear. Investigating appetite parameters, physiological measurements and within-subject relationships after consumption of a single macronutrient, subject-specific carbohydrate meal in liquefied versus solid form, controlled for energ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2012-07, Vol.7 (7), p.e42110
Hauptverfasser: Martens, Mieke J I, Lemmens, Sofie G T, Born, Jurriaan M, Westerterp-Plantenga, Margriet S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page e42110
container_title PloS one
container_volume 7
creator Martens, Mieke J I
Lemmens, Sofie G T
Born, Jurriaan M
Westerterp-Plantenga, Margriet S
description Differences in satiating capacity of liquid and solid meals are unclear. Investigating appetite parameters, physiological measurements and within-subject relationships after consumption of a single macronutrient, subject-specific carbohydrate meal in liquefied versus solid form, controlled for energy density, weight and volume. In a cross-over design, ten male subjects (age = 21.1±3.9 y, BMI = 22.4±1.2 kg/m(2)) consumed a solid (CS, whole peaches +750 ml water) and liquefied carbohydrate (CL, peach blended in 500 ml water +250 ml water) lunch. Appetite profiles, insulin-, glucose- and ghrelin concentrations were measured over three hours. Post-prandial relationships between appetite and blood parameters were calculated using subject-specific regression analyses. Fullness ratings were higher in the CL (85±5 mm) compared to the CS condition (73±8 mm) at 20 min (p
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0042110
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1330889745</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A477040213</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_dcfae955a23e41a5b641b4ee914c1b80</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A477040213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5b4e9ac4ee63e6dc14842ac41a7d81b03d095172d574a54da6d509736b8c77013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7jr6D0QLguDFjEmTft0sLIsfAwsLrnob0uRMm6XTxCR1nd_hH_bsTHeZgoK00DR93jenb3KS5CUlK8pK-v7Gjn6Q_crZAVaE8IxS8ig5pTXLlkVG2OOj8UnyLIQbQnJWFcXT5CTLKs5zzk6T39cyGryHNlXSSWXiLpWDTp0Ncek8Do3sUw89MnYInXEhbSDeAgypdA6iiZA66eUWIviw17YjSsFFoyFVdlAwRH-Qp7cmdmmwvdF7sjc_RtgY0Li4b2y30wjC8-TJRvYBXkzPRfLt44evF5-Xl1ef1hfnl0tV1Flc5g2HWioOUDAotKK84hm-U1nqijaEaVLntMx0XnKZcy0LnZO6ZEVTqbIklC2S1wdf19sgpjyDoIyRqqpLniOxPhDayhvhvNlKvxNWGrGfsL4V0kejehBabSTUeS4zBlhC3hScYoFQU65oUxH0OptWG5st6EMq_cx0_mUwnWjtT8E4KQjnaPBmMvAWYwvxHyVPVCuxKjNsLJqprQlKnHP8bU4ypBfJ6i8UXhq2BvcMNwXnZ4J3MwEyEX7FVo4hiPX1l_9nr77P2bdHbAeyjx2ej3F_XOYgP4DK2xA8bB6So0TcNcR9GuKuIcTUECh7dZz6g-i-A9gfElYJmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1330889745</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Satiating capacity and post-prandial relationships between appetite parameters and gut-peptide concentrations with solid and liquefied carbohydrate</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Martens, Mieke J I ; Lemmens, Sofie G T ; Born, Jurriaan M ; Westerterp-Plantenga, Margriet S</creator><contributor>Tomé, Daniel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Martens, Mieke J I ; Lemmens, Sofie G T ; Born, Jurriaan M ; Westerterp-Plantenga, Margriet S ; Tomé, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>Differences in satiating capacity of liquid and solid meals are unclear. Investigating appetite parameters, physiological measurements and within-subject relationships after consumption of a single macronutrient, subject-specific carbohydrate meal in liquefied versus solid form, controlled for energy density, weight and volume. In a cross-over design, ten male subjects (age = 21.1±3.9 y, BMI = 22.4±1.2 kg/m(2)) consumed a solid (CS, whole peaches +750 ml water) and liquefied carbohydrate (CL, peach blended in 500 ml water +250 ml water) lunch. Appetite profiles, insulin-, glucose- and ghrelin concentrations were measured over three hours. Post-prandial relationships between appetite and blood parameters were calculated using subject-specific regression analyses. Fullness ratings were higher in the CL (85±5 mm) compared to the CS condition (73±8 mm) at 20 min (p&lt;0.03). Glucose concentrations peaked 20 to 30 min after the start of the lunch in the CL condition, and 30 to 40 min after start of the CS condition. Correspondingly, insulin concentrations were peaked at 20-30 min in the CL condition, and at 30-40 min in the CS condition. AUC or condition x time interactions were not different comparing the CL and the CS condition. Insulin was significantly higher in the CS compared to the CL condition 40 min after the start of the lunch (p&lt;0.05). Fullness scores were significantly related to insulin concentrations but not to glucose concentrations; desire to eat scores were significantly associated with ghrelin concentrations in both, the CL and the CS condition. The relationship between fullness scores and glucose concentrations was not statistically significant. Liquefied and solid carbohydrate meals do not differ in satiating capacity, supported by appetite profile and relevant blood parameters. Postprandially, fullness and desire to eat were associated with respectively insulin and ghrelin concentrations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042110</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22844543</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Appetite - drug effects ; Appetite - physiology ; Beverages ; Biology ; Biometrics ; Blood ; Blood Chemical Analysis ; Body mass ; Carbohydrates ; Conditioned stimulus ; Dietary Carbohydrates - pharmacology ; Energy ; Flux density ; Food ; Ghrelin ; Glucose ; Homeostasis ; Humans ; Insulin ; Intestines - drug effects ; Intestines - metabolism ; Male ; Meals ; Medicine ; Metabolism ; Nutrition ; Obesity ; Peaches ; Peptides ; Peptides - metabolism ; Physiological aspects ; Physiology ; Postprandial Period - drug effects ; Postprandial Period - physiology ; Proteins ; Ratings &amp; rankings ; Regression analysis ; Satiation - drug effects ; Satiation - physiology ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Toxicology ; Young Adult ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2012-07, Vol.7 (7), p.e42110</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2012 Martens et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Martens et al. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5b4e9ac4ee63e6dc14842ac41a7d81b03d095172d574a54da6d509736b8c77013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5b4e9ac4ee63e6dc14842ac41a7d81b03d095172d574a54da6d509736b8c77013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3406044/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3406044/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23864,27922,27923,53789,53791,79370,79371</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22844543$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Tomé, Daniel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Martens, Mieke J I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemmens, Sofie G T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Born, Jurriaan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westerterp-Plantenga, Margriet S</creatorcontrib><title>Satiating capacity and post-prandial relationships between appetite parameters and gut-peptide concentrations with solid and liquefied carbohydrate</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Differences in satiating capacity of liquid and solid meals are unclear. Investigating appetite parameters, physiological measurements and within-subject relationships after consumption of a single macronutrient, subject-specific carbohydrate meal in liquefied versus solid form, controlled for energy density, weight and volume. In a cross-over design, ten male subjects (age = 21.1±3.9 y, BMI = 22.4±1.2 kg/m(2)) consumed a solid (CS, whole peaches +750 ml water) and liquefied carbohydrate (CL, peach blended in 500 ml water +250 ml water) lunch. Appetite profiles, insulin-, glucose- and ghrelin concentrations were measured over three hours. Post-prandial relationships between appetite and blood parameters were calculated using subject-specific regression analyses. Fullness ratings were higher in the CL (85±5 mm) compared to the CS condition (73±8 mm) at 20 min (p&lt;0.03). Glucose concentrations peaked 20 to 30 min after the start of the lunch in the CL condition, and 30 to 40 min after start of the CS condition. Correspondingly, insulin concentrations were peaked at 20-30 min in the CL condition, and at 30-40 min in the CS condition. AUC or condition x time interactions were not different comparing the CL and the CS condition. Insulin was significantly higher in the CS compared to the CL condition 40 min after the start of the lunch (p&lt;0.05). Fullness scores were significantly related to insulin concentrations but not to glucose concentrations; desire to eat scores were significantly associated with ghrelin concentrations in both, the CL and the CS condition. The relationship between fullness scores and glucose concentrations was not statistically significant. Liquefied and solid carbohydrate meals do not differ in satiating capacity, supported by appetite profile and relevant blood parameters. Postprandially, fullness and desire to eat were associated with respectively insulin and ghrelin concentrations.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Appetite - drug effects</subject><subject>Appetite - physiology</subject><subject>Beverages</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biometrics</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood Chemical Analysis</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Conditioned stimulus</subject><subject>Dietary Carbohydrates - pharmacology</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Flux density</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Ghrelin</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Homeostasis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Intestines - drug effects</subject><subject>Intestines - metabolism</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meals</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Peaches</subject><subject>Peptides</subject><subject>Peptides - metabolism</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Postprandial Period - drug effects</subject><subject>Postprandial Period - physiology</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Ratings &amp; rankings</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Satiation - drug effects</subject><subject>Satiation - physiology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7jr6D0QLguDFjEmTft0sLIsfAwsLrnob0uRMm6XTxCR1nd_hH_bsTHeZgoK00DR93jenb3KS5CUlK8pK-v7Gjn6Q_crZAVaE8IxS8ig5pTXLlkVG2OOj8UnyLIQbQnJWFcXT5CTLKs5zzk6T39cyGryHNlXSSWXiLpWDTp0Ncek8Do3sUw89MnYInXEhbSDeAgypdA6iiZA66eUWIviw17YjSsFFoyFVdlAwRH-Qp7cmdmmwvdF7sjc_RtgY0Li4b2y30wjC8-TJRvYBXkzPRfLt44evF5-Xl1ef1hfnl0tV1Flc5g2HWioOUDAotKK84hm-U1nqijaEaVLntMx0XnKZcy0LnZO6ZEVTqbIklC2S1wdf19sgpjyDoIyRqqpLniOxPhDayhvhvNlKvxNWGrGfsL4V0kejehBabSTUeS4zBlhC3hScYoFQU65oUxH0OptWG5st6EMq_cx0_mUwnWjtT8E4KQjnaPBmMvAWYwvxHyVPVCuxKjNsLJqprQlKnHP8bU4ypBfJ6i8UXhq2BvcMNwXnZ4J3MwEyEX7FVo4hiPX1l_9nr77P2bdHbAeyjx2ej3F_XOYgP4DK2xA8bB6So0TcNcR9GuKuIcTUECh7dZz6g-i-A9gfElYJmg</recordid><startdate>20120726</startdate><enddate>20120726</enddate><creator>Martens, Mieke J I</creator><creator>Lemmens, Sofie G T</creator><creator>Born, Jurriaan M</creator><creator>Westerterp-Plantenga, Margriet S</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120726</creationdate><title>Satiating capacity and post-prandial relationships between appetite parameters and gut-peptide concentrations with solid and liquefied carbohydrate</title><author>Martens, Mieke J I ; Lemmens, Sofie G T ; Born, Jurriaan M ; Westerterp-Plantenga, Margriet S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5b4e9ac4ee63e6dc14842ac41a7d81b03d095172d574a54da6d509736b8c77013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Appetite - drug effects</topic><topic>Appetite - physiology</topic><topic>Beverages</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biometrics</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood Chemical Analysis</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Conditioned stimulus</topic><topic>Dietary Carbohydrates - pharmacology</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Flux density</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Ghrelin</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Homeostasis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Intestines - drug effects</topic><topic>Intestines - metabolism</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meals</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Peaches</topic><topic>Peptides</topic><topic>Peptides - metabolism</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Postprandial Period - drug effects</topic><topic>Postprandial Period - physiology</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Ratings &amp; rankings</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Satiation - drug effects</topic><topic>Satiation - physiology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martens, Mieke J I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemmens, Sofie G T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Born, Jurriaan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westerterp-Plantenga, Margriet S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martens, Mieke J I</au><au>Lemmens, Sofie G T</au><au>Born, Jurriaan M</au><au>Westerterp-Plantenga, Margriet S</au><au>Tomé, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Satiating capacity and post-prandial relationships between appetite parameters and gut-peptide concentrations with solid and liquefied carbohydrate</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2012-07-26</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e42110</spage><pages>e42110-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Differences in satiating capacity of liquid and solid meals are unclear. Investigating appetite parameters, physiological measurements and within-subject relationships after consumption of a single macronutrient, subject-specific carbohydrate meal in liquefied versus solid form, controlled for energy density, weight and volume. In a cross-over design, ten male subjects (age = 21.1±3.9 y, BMI = 22.4±1.2 kg/m(2)) consumed a solid (CS, whole peaches +750 ml water) and liquefied carbohydrate (CL, peach blended in 500 ml water +250 ml water) lunch. Appetite profiles, insulin-, glucose- and ghrelin concentrations were measured over three hours. Post-prandial relationships between appetite and blood parameters were calculated using subject-specific regression analyses. Fullness ratings were higher in the CL (85±5 mm) compared to the CS condition (73±8 mm) at 20 min (p&lt;0.03). Glucose concentrations peaked 20 to 30 min after the start of the lunch in the CL condition, and 30 to 40 min after start of the CS condition. Correspondingly, insulin concentrations were peaked at 20-30 min in the CL condition, and at 30-40 min in the CS condition. AUC or condition x time interactions were not different comparing the CL and the CS condition. Insulin was significantly higher in the CS compared to the CL condition 40 min after the start of the lunch (p&lt;0.05). Fullness scores were significantly related to insulin concentrations but not to glucose concentrations; desire to eat scores were significantly associated with ghrelin concentrations in both, the CL and the CS condition. The relationship between fullness scores and glucose concentrations was not statistically significant. Liquefied and solid carbohydrate meals do not differ in satiating capacity, supported by appetite profile and relevant blood parameters. Postprandially, fullness and desire to eat were associated with respectively insulin and ghrelin concentrations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>22844543</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0042110</doi><tpages>e42110</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2012-07, Vol.7 (7), p.e42110
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1330889745
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Analysis
Appetite - drug effects
Appetite - physiology
Beverages
Biology
Biometrics
Blood
Blood Chemical Analysis
Body mass
Carbohydrates
Conditioned stimulus
Dietary Carbohydrates - pharmacology
Energy
Flux density
Food
Ghrelin
Glucose
Homeostasis
Humans
Insulin
Intestines - drug effects
Intestines - metabolism
Male
Meals
Medicine
Metabolism
Nutrition
Obesity
Peaches
Peptides
Peptides - metabolism
Physiological aspects
Physiology
Postprandial Period - drug effects
Postprandial Period - physiology
Proteins
Ratings & rankings
Regression analysis
Satiation - drug effects
Satiation - physiology
Statistical analysis
Studies
Toxicology
Young Adult
Young adults
title Satiating capacity and post-prandial relationships between appetite parameters and gut-peptide concentrations with solid and liquefied carbohydrate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T08%3A48%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Satiating%20capacity%20and%20post-prandial%20relationships%20between%20appetite%20parameters%20and%20gut-peptide%20concentrations%20with%20solid%20and%20liquefied%20carbohydrate&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Martens,%20Mieke%20J%20I&rft.date=2012-07-26&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e42110&rft.pages=e42110-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0042110&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA477040213%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1330889745&rft_id=info:pmid/22844543&rft_galeid=A477040213&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_dcfae955a23e41a5b641b4ee914c1b80&rfr_iscdi=true