Differential nutrient limitation of soil microbial biomass and metabolic quotients (qCO2): is there a biological stoichiometry of soil microbes?

Variation in microbial metabolism poses one of the greatest current uncertainties in models of global carbon cycling, and is particularly poorly understood in soils. Biological Stoichiometry theory describes biochemical mechanisms linking metabolic rates with variation in the elemental composition o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2013-03, Vol.8 (3), p.e57127-e57127
Hauptverfasser: Hartman, Wyatt H, Richardson, Curtis J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e57127
container_issue 3
container_start_page e57127
container_title PloS one
container_volume 8
creator Hartman, Wyatt H
Richardson, Curtis J
description Variation in microbial metabolism poses one of the greatest current uncertainties in models of global carbon cycling, and is particularly poorly understood in soils. Biological Stoichiometry theory describes biochemical mechanisms linking metabolic rates with variation in the elemental composition of cells and organisms, and has been widely observed in animals, plants, and plankton. However, this theory has not been widely tested in microbes, which are considered to have fixed ratios of major elements in soils. To determine whether Biological Stoichiometry underlies patterns of soil microbial metabolism, we compiled published data on microbial biomass carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) pools in soils spanning the global range of climate, vegetation, and land use types. We compared element ratios in microbial biomass pools to the metabolic quotient qCO2 (respiration per unit biomass), where soil C mineralization was simultaneously measured in controlled incubations. Although microbial C, N, and P stoichiometry appeared to follow somewhat constrained allometric relationships at the global scale, we found significant variation in the C∶N∶P ratios of soil microbes across land use and habitat types, and size-dependent scaling of microbial C∶N and C∶P (but not N∶P) ratios. Microbial stoichiometry and metabolic quotients were also weakly correlated as suggested by Biological Stoichiometry theory. Importantly, we found that while soil microbial biomass appeared constrained by soil N availability, microbial metabolic rates (qCO2) were most strongly associated with inorganic P availability. Our findings appear consistent with the model of cellular metabolism described by Biological Stoichiometry theory, where biomass is limited by N needed to build proteins, but rates of protein synthesis are limited by the high P demands of ribosomes. Incorporation of these physiological processes may improve models of carbon cycling and understanding of the effects of nutrient availability on soil C turnover across terrestrial and wetland habitats.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0057127
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1330882323</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478207763</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c72e33fe3ef44fd9ab64d88db67fe253</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478207763</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c626t-8cab2993625655b9d9e660e48aad75a57001e05f0e2d160a164172f7ad194583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1u3CAUha2qVZNO-wZVi9RNupgpPwZMF62i6V-kSNlkjzCGGUbYTABXylv0kYs7TpSJIlVeGMF3Dpdzb1W9RXCFCEefdmGMg_KrfRjMCkLKEebPqlMkCF4yDMnzB-uT6lVKuwKRhrGX1QkmFDNByGn155uz1kQzZKc8GMYcXVkD73qXVXZhAMGCFJwHvdMxtBPVutCrlIAaOtCbrNrgnQY3Y8iTNoGzm_UV_vgZuATytngDNUl82Dhd1CkHp7fFwuR4-8jdpK-vqxdW-WTezP9Fdf3j-_X61_Ly6ufF-vxyqRlmedlo1WIhCMOUUdqKThjGoKkbpTpOFeUQIgOphQZ3iEGFWI04tlx1SNS0IYvq_cF270OSc5ZJIkJg02CCSSEuDkQX1E7uo-tVvJVBOflvI8SNVDE77Y3UHBtCrCHG1rXthGpZ3TVN1zJuDaaT15f5trHtTadLTFH5I9Pjk8Ft5Sb8loRBTEsDF9XZbBDDzWhSlr1L2nivBhPGUndNBMaNaMT_UYIEQxxSVtAPj9Cng5ipjSpvdYMNpUQ9mcrzmjcYcs4mavUEVb7OlN6WGbWu7B8J6oOgND6laOx9HAjKacLvipHThMt5wovs3cMo70V3I03-AjJL-ak</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1330882323</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential nutrient limitation of soil microbial biomass and metabolic quotients (qCO2): is there a biological stoichiometry of soil microbes?</title><source>PubMed Central database</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Public Library of Science(OA)</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Hartman, Wyatt H ; Richardson, Curtis J</creator><contributor>Mormile, Melanie R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hartman, Wyatt H ; Richardson, Curtis J ; Mormile, Melanie R.</creatorcontrib><description>Variation in microbial metabolism poses one of the greatest current uncertainties in models of global carbon cycling, and is particularly poorly understood in soils. Biological Stoichiometry theory describes biochemical mechanisms linking metabolic rates with variation in the elemental composition of cells and organisms, and has been widely observed in animals, plants, and plankton. However, this theory has not been widely tested in microbes, which are considered to have fixed ratios of major elements in soils. To determine whether Biological Stoichiometry underlies patterns of soil microbial metabolism, we compiled published data on microbial biomass carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) pools in soils spanning the global range of climate, vegetation, and land use types. We compared element ratios in microbial biomass pools to the metabolic quotient qCO2 (respiration per unit biomass), where soil C mineralization was simultaneously measured in controlled incubations. Although microbial C, N, and P stoichiometry appeared to follow somewhat constrained allometric relationships at the global scale, we found significant variation in the C∶N∶P ratios of soil microbes across land use and habitat types, and size-dependent scaling of microbial C∶N and C∶P (but not N∶P) ratios. Microbial stoichiometry and metabolic quotients were also weakly correlated as suggested by Biological Stoichiometry theory. Importantly, we found that while soil microbial biomass appeared constrained by soil N availability, microbial metabolic rates (qCO2) were most strongly associated with inorganic P availability. Our findings appear consistent with the model of cellular metabolism described by Biological Stoichiometry theory, where biomass is limited by N needed to build proteins, but rates of protein synthesis are limited by the high P demands of ribosomes. Incorporation of these physiological processes may improve models of carbon cycling and understanding of the effects of nutrient availability on soil C turnover across terrestrial and wetland habitats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057127</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23526933</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Analysis ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Aquatic habitats ; Availability ; Biochemistry ; Biology ; Biomass ; Carbon ; Carbon - analysis ; Carbon - metabolism ; Carbon Cycle ; Carbon Dioxide - metabolism ; Chemical composition ; Chemistry ; Climate and land use ; Climate and vegetation ; Cycles ; Decomposition ; Earth Sciences ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem biology ; Enzymes ; Forests ; Growth rate ; Influence ; Land use ; Mediation ; Metabolism ; Microorganisms ; Mineralization ; Models, Biological ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen - analysis ; Nitrogen - metabolism ; Nutrient availability ; Nutrient cycles ; Nutrients ; Nutrients in soil ; Phosphorus ; Phosphorus - analysis ; Phosphorus - metabolism ; Phylogenetics ; Physiological aspects ; Physiology ; Plankton ; Pools ; Protein biosynthesis ; Protein synthesis ; Proteins ; Quotients ; Ratios ; Ribosomes ; Scaling ; Soil - chemistry ; Soil carbon ; Soil fertility ; Soil Microbiology ; Soil microorganisms ; Soil nutrients ; Soil sciences ; Soils ; Stoichiometry ; Studies ; Terrestrial environments ; Variation ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2013-03, Vol.8 (3), p.e57127-e57127</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2013 Hartman, Richardson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2013 Hartman, Richardson 2013 Hartman, Richardson</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c626t-8cab2993625655b9d9e660e48aad75a57001e05f0e2d160a164172f7ad194583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c626t-8cab2993625655b9d9e660e48aad75a57001e05f0e2d160a164172f7ad194583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3602520/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3602520/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23526933$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mormile, Melanie R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hartman, Wyatt H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Curtis J</creatorcontrib><title>Differential nutrient limitation of soil microbial biomass and metabolic quotients (qCO2): is there a biological stoichiometry of soil microbes?</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Variation in microbial metabolism poses one of the greatest current uncertainties in models of global carbon cycling, and is particularly poorly understood in soils. Biological Stoichiometry theory describes biochemical mechanisms linking metabolic rates with variation in the elemental composition of cells and organisms, and has been widely observed in animals, plants, and plankton. However, this theory has not been widely tested in microbes, which are considered to have fixed ratios of major elements in soils. To determine whether Biological Stoichiometry underlies patterns of soil microbial metabolism, we compiled published data on microbial biomass carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) pools in soils spanning the global range of climate, vegetation, and land use types. We compared element ratios in microbial biomass pools to the metabolic quotient qCO2 (respiration per unit biomass), where soil C mineralization was simultaneously measured in controlled incubations. Although microbial C, N, and P stoichiometry appeared to follow somewhat constrained allometric relationships at the global scale, we found significant variation in the C∶N∶P ratios of soil microbes across land use and habitat types, and size-dependent scaling of microbial C∶N and C∶P (but not N∶P) ratios. Microbial stoichiometry and metabolic quotients were also weakly correlated as suggested by Biological Stoichiometry theory. Importantly, we found that while soil microbial biomass appeared constrained by soil N availability, microbial metabolic rates (qCO2) were most strongly associated with inorganic P availability. Our findings appear consistent with the model of cellular metabolism described by Biological Stoichiometry theory, where biomass is limited by N needed to build proteins, but rates of protein synthesis are limited by the high P demands of ribosomes. Incorporation of these physiological processes may improve models of carbon cycling and understanding of the effects of nutrient availability on soil C turnover across terrestrial and wetland habitats.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon - analysis</subject><subject>Carbon - metabolism</subject><subject>Carbon Cycle</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - metabolism</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Climate and land use</subject><subject>Climate and vegetation</subject><subject>Cycles</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem biology</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Mediation</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Mineralization</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen - analysis</subject><subject>Nitrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Nutrient availability</subject><subject>Nutrient cycles</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Nutrients in soil</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Phosphorus - analysis</subject><subject>Phosphorus - metabolism</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Pools</subject><subject>Protein biosynthesis</subject><subject>Protein synthesis</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Quotients</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Ribosomes</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Soil - chemistry</subject><subject>Soil carbon</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil Microbiology</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Soil nutrients</subject><subject>Soil sciences</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Stoichiometry</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Variation</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1u3CAUha2qVZNO-wZVi9RNupgpPwZMF62i6V-kSNlkjzCGGUbYTABXylv0kYs7TpSJIlVeGMF3Dpdzb1W9RXCFCEefdmGMg_KrfRjMCkLKEebPqlMkCF4yDMnzB-uT6lVKuwKRhrGX1QkmFDNByGn155uz1kQzZKc8GMYcXVkD73qXVXZhAMGCFJwHvdMxtBPVutCrlIAaOtCbrNrgnQY3Y8iTNoGzm_UV_vgZuATytngDNUl82Dhd1CkHp7fFwuR4-8jdpK-vqxdW-WTezP9Fdf3j-_X61_Ly6ufF-vxyqRlmedlo1WIhCMOUUdqKThjGoKkbpTpOFeUQIgOphQZ3iEGFWI04tlx1SNS0IYvq_cF270OSc5ZJIkJg02CCSSEuDkQX1E7uo-tVvJVBOflvI8SNVDE77Y3UHBtCrCHG1rXthGpZ3TVN1zJuDaaT15f5trHtTadLTFH5I9Pjk8Ft5Sb8loRBTEsDF9XZbBDDzWhSlr1L2nivBhPGUndNBMaNaMT_UYIEQxxSVtAPj9Cng5ipjSpvdYMNpUQ9mcrzmjcYcs4mavUEVb7OlN6WGbWu7B8J6oOgND6laOx9HAjKacLvipHThMt5wovs3cMo70V3I03-AjJL-ak</recordid><startdate>20130319</startdate><enddate>20130319</enddate><creator>Hartman, Wyatt H</creator><creator>Richardson, Curtis J</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130319</creationdate><title>Differential nutrient limitation of soil microbial biomass and metabolic quotients (qCO2): is there a biological stoichiometry of soil microbes?</title><author>Hartman, Wyatt H ; Richardson, Curtis J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c626t-8cab2993625655b9d9e660e48aad75a57001e05f0e2d160a164172f7ad194583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon - analysis</topic><topic>Carbon - metabolism</topic><topic>Carbon Cycle</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - metabolism</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Climate and land use</topic><topic>Climate and vegetation</topic><topic>Cycles</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem biology</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Mediation</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Mineralization</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen - analysis</topic><topic>Nitrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Nutrient availability</topic><topic>Nutrient cycles</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Nutrients in soil</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Phosphorus - analysis</topic><topic>Phosphorus - metabolism</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Pools</topic><topic>Protein biosynthesis</topic><topic>Protein synthesis</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Quotients</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Ribosomes</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Soil - chemistry</topic><topic>Soil carbon</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil Microbiology</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Soil nutrients</topic><topic>Soil sciences</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Stoichiometry</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Variation</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hartman, Wyatt H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Curtis J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hartman, Wyatt H</au><au>Richardson, Curtis J</au><au>Mormile, Melanie R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential nutrient limitation of soil microbial biomass and metabolic quotients (qCO2): is there a biological stoichiometry of soil microbes?</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2013-03-19</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e57127</spage><epage>e57127</epage><pages>e57127-e57127</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Variation in microbial metabolism poses one of the greatest current uncertainties in models of global carbon cycling, and is particularly poorly understood in soils. Biological Stoichiometry theory describes biochemical mechanisms linking metabolic rates with variation in the elemental composition of cells and organisms, and has been widely observed in animals, plants, and plankton. However, this theory has not been widely tested in microbes, which are considered to have fixed ratios of major elements in soils. To determine whether Biological Stoichiometry underlies patterns of soil microbial metabolism, we compiled published data on microbial biomass carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) pools in soils spanning the global range of climate, vegetation, and land use types. We compared element ratios in microbial biomass pools to the metabolic quotient qCO2 (respiration per unit biomass), where soil C mineralization was simultaneously measured in controlled incubations. Although microbial C, N, and P stoichiometry appeared to follow somewhat constrained allometric relationships at the global scale, we found significant variation in the C∶N∶P ratios of soil microbes across land use and habitat types, and size-dependent scaling of microbial C∶N and C∶P (but not N∶P) ratios. Microbial stoichiometry and metabolic quotients were also weakly correlated as suggested by Biological Stoichiometry theory. Importantly, we found that while soil microbial biomass appeared constrained by soil N availability, microbial metabolic rates (qCO2) were most strongly associated with inorganic P availability. Our findings appear consistent with the model of cellular metabolism described by Biological Stoichiometry theory, where biomass is limited by N needed to build proteins, but rates of protein synthesis are limited by the high P demands of ribosomes. Incorporation of these physiological processes may improve models of carbon cycling and understanding of the effects of nutrient availability on soil C turnover across terrestrial and wetland habitats.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>23526933</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0057127</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2013-03, Vol.8 (3), p.e57127-e57127
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1330882323
source PubMed Central database; MEDLINE; Public Library of Science(OA); Directory of Open Access Journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Agriculture
Analysis
Aquatic ecosystems
Aquatic habitats
Availability
Biochemistry
Biology
Biomass
Carbon
Carbon - analysis
Carbon - metabolism
Carbon Cycle
Carbon Dioxide - metabolism
Chemical composition
Chemistry
Climate and land use
Climate and vegetation
Cycles
Decomposition
Earth Sciences
Ecosystem
Ecosystem biology
Enzymes
Forests
Growth rate
Influence
Land use
Mediation
Metabolism
Microorganisms
Mineralization
Models, Biological
Nitrogen
Nitrogen - analysis
Nitrogen - metabolism
Nutrient availability
Nutrient cycles
Nutrients
Nutrients in soil
Phosphorus
Phosphorus - analysis
Phosphorus - metabolism
Phylogenetics
Physiological aspects
Physiology
Plankton
Pools
Protein biosynthesis
Protein synthesis
Proteins
Quotients
Ratios
Ribosomes
Scaling
Soil - chemistry
Soil carbon
Soil fertility
Soil Microbiology
Soil microorganisms
Soil nutrients
Soil sciences
Soils
Stoichiometry
Studies
Terrestrial environments
Variation
Wetlands
title Differential nutrient limitation of soil microbial biomass and metabolic quotients (qCO2): is there a biological stoichiometry of soil microbes?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T05%3A06%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20nutrient%20limitation%20of%20soil%20microbial%20biomass%20and%20metabolic%20quotients%20(qCO2):%20is%20there%20a%20biological%20stoichiometry%20of%20soil%20microbes?&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Hartman,%20Wyatt%20H&rft.date=2013-03-19&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e57127&rft.epage=e57127&rft.pages=e57127-e57127&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0057127&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478207763%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1330882323&rft_id=info:pmid/23526933&rft_galeid=A478207763&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_c72e33fe3ef44fd9ab64d88db67fe253&rfr_iscdi=true