Evaluation of epidemic intelligence systems integrated in the early alerting and reporting project for the detection of A/H5N1 influenza events
The objective of Web-based expert epidemic intelligence systems is to detect health threats. The Global Health Security Initiative (GHSI) Early Alerting and Reporting (EAR) project was launched to assess the feasibility and opportunity for pooling epidemic intelligence data from seven expert systems...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2013-03, Vol.8 (3), p.e57252-e57252 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e57252 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e57252 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Barboza, Philippe Vaillant, Laetitia Mawudeku, Abla Nelson, Noele P Hartley, David M Madoff, Lawrence C Linge, Jens P Collier, Nigel Brownstein, John S Yangarber, Roman Astagneau, Pascal |
description | The objective of Web-based expert epidemic intelligence systems is to detect health threats. The Global Health Security Initiative (GHSI) Early Alerting and Reporting (EAR) project was launched to assess the feasibility and opportunity for pooling epidemic intelligence data from seven expert systems. EAR participants completed a qualitative survey to document epidemic intelligence strategies and to assess perceptions regarding the systems performance. Timeliness and sensitivity were rated highly illustrating the value of the systems for epidemic intelligence. Weaknesses identified included representativeness, completeness and flexibility. These findings were corroborated by the quantitative analysis performed on signals potentially related to influenza A/H5N1 events occurring in March 2010. For the six systems for which this information was available, the detection rate ranged from 31% to 38%, and increased to 72% when considering the virtual combined system. The effective positive predictive values ranged from 3% to 24% and F1-scores ranged from 6% to 27%. System sensitivity ranged from 38% to 72%. An average difference of 23% was observed between the sensitivities calculated for human cases and epizootics, underlining the difficulties in developing an efficient algorithm for a single pathology. However, the sensitivity increased to 93% when the virtual combined system was considered, clearly illustrating complementarities between individual systems. The average delay between the detection of A/H5N1 events by the systems and their official reporting by WHO or OIE was 10.2 days (95% CI: 6.7-13.8). This work illustrates the diversity in implemented epidemic intelligence activities, differences in system's designs, and the potential added values and opportunities for synergy between systems, between users and between systems and users. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0057252 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1330880667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478416266</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_521c84577b0e459781001af14364be9e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478416266</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-ee5f8168060ca81f5d2b84fcdeec5afa593f3aa73dacf35092d2fa4c1335b48c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk91u0zAUxyMEYmPwBggiISF20c6O7Ti5QaqmQStVTOLr1nKd4zSVGxfbqSgvwSvjtNnUTrtAuYh9_Dt_-3wlyWuMxphwfLWynWulGW9sC2OEGM9Y9iQ5xyXJRnmGyNOj9VnywvtVhEiR58-Ts4xQniHOz5O_N1tpOhka26ZWp7BpKlg3Km3aAMY0NbQKUr_zAdZ-b6ydDFDFZRqWkIJ0ZpdKAy40bZ3KtkodbOxht3F2BSqk2ro9XEGI2-GmydWUfcFRR5sO2j8yhS20wb9MnmlpPLwa_hfJj08336-no_nt59n1ZD5SPMvDCIDpAucFypGSBdasyhYF1aoCUExqyUqiiZScVFJpwlCZVZmWVGFC2IIWilwkbw-6G2O9GHLpRTxHRVTNeSRmB6KyciU2rllLtxNWNmJvsK4WMsapDAiWYVVQxvkCAWUlLzBCWGpMSU4XUELU-jjc1i3WUKkYqZPmRPT0pG2WorZbQVhRUl5GgcuDwPKB23QyF70NYRabgqEtjuyH4TJnf3Xgg1g3XsVqyhZs18eIWU4wpX2M7x6gj2dioOpYaBErZuMbVS8qJpQXFOdZnkdq_AgVv31DxSbVTbSfOFyeOEQmwO9Qy857Mfv29f_Z25-n7PsjdgnShKW3pus7z5-C9AAqZ713oO8zi5HoZ-wuG6KfMTHMWHR7c1zMe6e7oSL_AJVgInI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1330880667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of epidemic intelligence systems integrated in the early alerting and reporting project for the detection of A/H5N1 influenza events</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Barboza, Philippe ; Vaillant, Laetitia ; Mawudeku, Abla ; Nelson, Noele P ; Hartley, David M ; Madoff, Lawrence C ; Linge, Jens P ; Collier, Nigel ; Brownstein, John S ; Yangarber, Roman ; Astagneau, Pascal</creator><creatorcontrib>Barboza, Philippe ; Vaillant, Laetitia ; Mawudeku, Abla ; Nelson, Noele P ; Hartley, David M ; Madoff, Lawrence C ; Linge, Jens P ; Collier, Nigel ; Brownstein, John S ; Yangarber, Roman ; Astagneau, Pascal ; Early Alerting Reporting Project Of The Global Health Security Initiative ; on behalf of the Early Alerting, Reporting Project of the Global Health Security Initiative</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of Web-based expert epidemic intelligence systems is to detect health threats. The Global Health Security Initiative (GHSI) Early Alerting and Reporting (EAR) project was launched to assess the feasibility and opportunity for pooling epidemic intelligence data from seven expert systems. EAR participants completed a qualitative survey to document epidemic intelligence strategies and to assess perceptions regarding the systems performance. Timeliness and sensitivity were rated highly illustrating the value of the systems for epidemic intelligence. Weaknesses identified included representativeness, completeness and flexibility. These findings were corroborated by the quantitative analysis performed on signals potentially related to influenza A/H5N1 events occurring in March 2010. For the six systems for which this information was available, the detection rate ranged from 31% to 38%, and increased to 72% when considering the virtual combined system. The effective positive predictive values ranged from 3% to 24% and F1-scores ranged from 6% to 27%. System sensitivity ranged from 38% to 72%. An average difference of 23% was observed between the sensitivities calculated for human cases and epizootics, underlining the difficulties in developing an efficient algorithm for a single pathology. However, the sensitivity increased to 93% when the virtual combined system was considered, clearly illustrating complementarities between individual systems. The average delay between the detection of A/H5N1 events by the systems and their official reporting by WHO or OIE was 10.2 days (95% CI: 6.7-13.8). This work illustrates the diversity in implemented epidemic intelligence activities, differences in system's designs, and the potential added values and opportunities for synergy between systems, between users and between systems and users.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057252</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23472077</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Avian flu ; Computer Systems ; Databases, Factual ; Disease Outbreaks ; Epidemics ; Epizootics ; Expert systems ; Feasibility studies ; Global Health ; Health aspects ; Health risks ; Human health and pathology ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Influenza ; Influenza A ; Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype ; Influenza, Human - diagnosis ; Influenza, Human - epidemiology ; Intelligence ; Internet ; Life Sciences ; Medicine ; Pandemics ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Public Health ; Public Health Surveillance ; Qualitative analysis ; Quantitative analysis ; Questionnaires ; Santé publique et épidémiologie ; Security ; Sensitivity ; Sensitivity analysis ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2013-03, Vol.8 (3), p.e57252-e57252</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2013 Barboza et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><rights>2013 Barboza et al 2013 Barboza et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-ee5f8168060ca81f5d2b84fcdeec5afa593f3aa73dacf35092d2fa4c1335b48c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3589479/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3589479/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23472077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01537150$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barboza, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaillant, Laetitia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mawudeku, Abla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Noele P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartley, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madoff, Lawrence C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linge, Jens P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collier, Nigel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brownstein, John S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yangarber, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Astagneau, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Early Alerting Reporting Project Of The Global Health Security Initiative</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the Early Alerting, Reporting Project of the Global Health Security Initiative</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of epidemic intelligence systems integrated in the early alerting and reporting project for the detection of A/H5N1 influenza events</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The objective of Web-based expert epidemic intelligence systems is to detect health threats. The Global Health Security Initiative (GHSI) Early Alerting and Reporting (EAR) project was launched to assess the feasibility and opportunity for pooling epidemic intelligence data from seven expert systems. EAR participants completed a qualitative survey to document epidemic intelligence strategies and to assess perceptions regarding the systems performance. Timeliness and sensitivity were rated highly illustrating the value of the systems for epidemic intelligence. Weaknesses identified included representativeness, completeness and flexibility. These findings were corroborated by the quantitative analysis performed on signals potentially related to influenza A/H5N1 events occurring in March 2010. For the six systems for which this information was available, the detection rate ranged from 31% to 38%, and increased to 72% when considering the virtual combined system. The effective positive predictive values ranged from 3% to 24% and F1-scores ranged from 6% to 27%. System sensitivity ranged from 38% to 72%. An average difference of 23% was observed between the sensitivities calculated for human cases and epizootics, underlining the difficulties in developing an efficient algorithm for a single pathology. However, the sensitivity increased to 93% when the virtual combined system was considered, clearly illustrating complementarities between individual systems. The average delay between the detection of A/H5N1 events by the systems and their official reporting by WHO or OIE was 10.2 days (95% CI: 6.7-13.8). This work illustrates the diversity in implemented epidemic intelligence activities, differences in system's designs, and the potential added values and opportunities for synergy between systems, between users and between systems and users.</description><subject>Avian flu</subject><subject>Computer Systems</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Disease Outbreaks</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Epizootics</subject><subject>Expert systems</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Global Health</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Influenza A</subject><subject>Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype</subject><subject>Influenza, Human - diagnosis</subject><subject>Influenza, Human - epidemiology</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public Health Surveillance</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Santé publique et épidémiologie</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk91u0zAUxyMEYmPwBggiISF20c6O7Ti5QaqmQStVTOLr1nKd4zSVGxfbqSgvwSvjtNnUTrtAuYh9_Dt_-3wlyWuMxphwfLWynWulGW9sC2OEGM9Y9iQ5xyXJRnmGyNOj9VnywvtVhEiR58-Ts4xQniHOz5O_N1tpOhka26ZWp7BpKlg3Km3aAMY0NbQKUr_zAdZ-b6ydDFDFZRqWkIJ0ZpdKAy40bZ3KtkodbOxht3F2BSqk2ro9XEGI2-GmydWUfcFRR5sO2j8yhS20wb9MnmlpPLwa_hfJj08336-no_nt59n1ZD5SPMvDCIDpAucFypGSBdasyhYF1aoCUExqyUqiiZScVFJpwlCZVZmWVGFC2IIWilwkbw-6G2O9GHLpRTxHRVTNeSRmB6KyciU2rllLtxNWNmJvsK4WMsapDAiWYVVQxvkCAWUlLzBCWGpMSU4XUELU-jjc1i3WUKkYqZPmRPT0pG2WorZbQVhRUl5GgcuDwPKB23QyF70NYRabgqEtjuyH4TJnf3Xgg1g3XsVqyhZs18eIWU4wpX2M7x6gj2dioOpYaBErZuMbVS8qJpQXFOdZnkdq_AgVv31DxSbVTbSfOFyeOEQmwO9Qy857Mfv29f_Z25-n7PsjdgnShKW3pus7z5-C9AAqZ713oO8zi5HoZ-wuG6KfMTHMWHR7c1zMe6e7oSL_AJVgInI</recordid><startdate>20130305</startdate><enddate>20130305</enddate><creator>Barboza, Philippe</creator><creator>Vaillant, Laetitia</creator><creator>Mawudeku, Abla</creator><creator>Nelson, Noele P</creator><creator>Hartley, David M</creator><creator>Madoff, Lawrence C</creator><creator>Linge, Jens P</creator><creator>Collier, Nigel</creator><creator>Brownstein, John S</creator><creator>Yangarber, Roman</creator><creator>Astagneau, Pascal</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130305</creationdate><title>Evaluation of epidemic intelligence systems integrated in the early alerting and reporting project for the detection of A/H5N1 influenza events</title><author>Barboza, Philippe ; Vaillant, Laetitia ; Mawudeku, Abla ; Nelson, Noele P ; Hartley, David M ; Madoff, Lawrence C ; Linge, Jens P ; Collier, Nigel ; Brownstein, John S ; Yangarber, Roman ; Astagneau, Pascal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-ee5f8168060ca81f5d2b84fcdeec5afa593f3aa73dacf35092d2fa4c1335b48c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Avian flu</topic><topic>Computer Systems</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Disease Outbreaks</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Epizootics</topic><topic>Expert systems</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Global Health</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Influenza A</topic><topic>Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype</topic><topic>Influenza, Human - diagnosis</topic><topic>Influenza, Human - epidemiology</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public Health Surveillance</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Santé publique et épidémiologie</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barboza, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaillant, Laetitia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mawudeku, Abla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Noele P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartley, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madoff, Lawrence C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linge, Jens P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collier, Nigel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brownstein, John S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yangarber, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Astagneau, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Early Alerting Reporting Project Of The Global Health Security Initiative</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the Early Alerting, Reporting Project of the Global Health Security Initiative</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barboza, Philippe</au><au>Vaillant, Laetitia</au><au>Mawudeku, Abla</au><au>Nelson, Noele P</au><au>Hartley, David M</au><au>Madoff, Lawrence C</au><au>Linge, Jens P</au><au>Collier, Nigel</au><au>Brownstein, John S</au><au>Yangarber, Roman</au><au>Astagneau, Pascal</au><aucorp>Early Alerting Reporting Project Of The Global Health Security Initiative</aucorp><aucorp>on behalf of the Early Alerting, Reporting Project of the Global Health Security Initiative</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of epidemic intelligence systems integrated in the early alerting and reporting project for the detection of A/H5N1 influenza events</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2013-03-05</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e57252</spage><epage>e57252</epage><pages>e57252-e57252</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The objective of Web-based expert epidemic intelligence systems is to detect health threats. The Global Health Security Initiative (GHSI) Early Alerting and Reporting (EAR) project was launched to assess the feasibility and opportunity for pooling epidemic intelligence data from seven expert systems. EAR participants completed a qualitative survey to document epidemic intelligence strategies and to assess perceptions regarding the systems performance. Timeliness and sensitivity were rated highly illustrating the value of the systems for epidemic intelligence. Weaknesses identified included representativeness, completeness and flexibility. These findings were corroborated by the quantitative analysis performed on signals potentially related to influenza A/H5N1 events occurring in March 2010. For the six systems for which this information was available, the detection rate ranged from 31% to 38%, and increased to 72% when considering the virtual combined system. The effective positive predictive values ranged from 3% to 24% and F1-scores ranged from 6% to 27%. System sensitivity ranged from 38% to 72%. An average difference of 23% was observed between the sensitivities calculated for human cases and epizootics, underlining the difficulties in developing an efficient algorithm for a single pathology. However, the sensitivity increased to 93% when the virtual combined system was considered, clearly illustrating complementarities between individual systems. The average delay between the detection of A/H5N1 events by the systems and their official reporting by WHO or OIE was 10.2 days (95% CI: 6.7-13.8). This work illustrates the diversity in implemented epidemic intelligence activities, differences in system's designs, and the potential added values and opportunities for synergy between systems, between users and between systems and users.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>23472077</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0057252</doi><tpages>e57252</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2013-03, Vol.8 (3), p.e57252-e57252 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1330880667 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Avian flu Computer Systems Databases, Factual Disease Outbreaks Epidemics Epizootics Expert systems Feasibility studies Global Health Health aspects Health risks Human health and pathology Humans Infectious diseases Influenza Influenza A Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype Influenza, Human - diagnosis Influenza, Human - epidemiology Intelligence Internet Life Sciences Medicine Pandemics Predictive Value of Tests Public Health Public Health Surveillance Qualitative analysis Quantitative analysis Questionnaires Santé publique et épidémiologie Security Sensitivity Sensitivity analysis Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Evaluation of epidemic intelligence systems integrated in the early alerting and reporting project for the detection of A/H5N1 influenza events |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T12%3A04%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20epidemic%20intelligence%20systems%20integrated%20in%20the%20early%20alerting%20and%20reporting%20project%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20A/H5N1%20influenza%20events&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Barboza,%20Philippe&rft.aucorp=Early%20Alerting%20Reporting%20Project%20Of%20The%20Global%20Health%20Security%20Initiative&rft.date=2013-03-05&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e57252&rft.epage=e57252&rft.pages=e57252-e57252&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0057252&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478416266%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1330880667&rft_id=info:pmid/23472077&rft_galeid=A478416266&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_521c84577b0e459781001af14364be9e&rfr_iscdi=true |