Influence of emotionally charged information on category-based induction

Categories help us make predictions, or inductions, about new objects. However, we cannot always be certain that a novel object belongs to the category we are using to make predictions. In such cases, people should use multiple categories to make inductions. Past research finds that people often use...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2013-01, Vol.8 (1), p.e54286-e54286
Hauptverfasser: Zhu, Jennifer, Murphy, Gregory L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e54286
container_issue 1
container_start_page e54286
container_title PloS one
container_volume 8
creator Zhu, Jennifer
Murphy, Gregory L
description Categories help us make predictions, or inductions, about new objects. However, we cannot always be certain that a novel object belongs to the category we are using to make predictions. In such cases, people should use multiple categories to make inductions. Past research finds that people often use only the most likely category to make inductions, even if it is not certain. In two experiments, subjects read stories and answered questions about items whose categorization was uncertain. In Experiment 1, the less likely category was either emotionally neutral or dangerous (emotionally charged or likely to pose a threat). Subjects used multiple categories in induction when one of the categories was dangerous but not when they were all neutral. In Experiment 2, the most likely category was dangerous. Here, people used multiple categories, but there was also an effect of avoidance, in which people denied that dangerous categories were the most likely. The attention-grabbing power of dangerous categories may be balanced by a higher-level strategy to reject them.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0054286
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1327799892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478148687</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_16f14094ed0a40d18312a89a72bacde1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478148687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b8d55f7d97f538ce8cdb94cf4430858e9a1528f05c79bf5e52c2ab4da0e68c373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkluL1DAUx4so7jr6DUQHBNGHGXNpm-RFWBZ1BxYWvL2GNDnpdEibMWnF-famO91lKvsgLbSc8zv_c82ylxitMWX4w84PoVNuvfcdrBEqcsLLR9k5FpSsSoLo45P_s-xZjLsEUV6WT7MzQikjDKHz7GrTWTdAp2Hp7RJa3zc-qbrDUm9VqMEsm8760KrRvkyvVj3UPhxWlYq3XjPo0fc8e2KVi_Bi-i6yH58_fb-8Wl3ffNlcXlyvdClIv6q4KQrLjGA2FaOBa1OJXNs8p4gXHITCBeEWFZqJyhZQEE1UlRuFoOSaMrrIXh91985HOQ0hSkwJY0JwQRKxORLGq53ch6ZV4SC9auStwYdaqtA32oHEpcU5EjkYpHJkMKeYKC4UI5XSBnDS-jhlG6oWjIauD8rNROeertnK2v-WtCiS1ljuu0kg-F8DxF62TdTgnOrAD6luwlNTdFzNInvzD_pwdxNVq9TAuJyUV4-i8iJnHOe85GPa9QNUegy0jU4XY5tknwW8nwUkpoc_fa2GGOXm29f_Z29-ztm3J-wWlOu30bthPJk4B_MjqIOPMYC9HzJGcjz4u2nI8eDldPAp7NXpgu6D7i6c_gUIV_s3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1327799892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of emotionally charged information on category-based induction</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Zhu, Jennifer ; Murphy, Gregory L</creator><contributor>Sinigaglia, Corrado</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jennifer ; Murphy, Gregory L ; Sinigaglia, Corrado</creatorcontrib><description>Categories help us make predictions, or inductions, about new objects. However, we cannot always be certain that a novel object belongs to the category we are using to make predictions. In such cases, people should use multiple categories to make inductions. Past research finds that people often use only the most likely category to make inductions, even if it is not certain. In two experiments, subjects read stories and answered questions about items whose categorization was uncertain. In Experiment 1, the less likely category was either emotionally neutral or dangerous (emotionally charged or likely to pose a threat). Subjects used multiple categories in induction when one of the categories was dangerous but not when they were all neutral. In Experiment 2, the most likely category was dangerous. Here, people used multiple categories, but there was also an effect of avoidance, in which people denied that dangerous categories were the most likely. The attention-grabbing power of dangerous categories may be balanced by a higher-level strategy to reject them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054286</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23372700</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Association Learning - physiology ; Attention - physiology ; Categories ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Concept Formation - physiology ; Emotions ; Emotions - physiology ; Experiments ; Generalization (Psychology) - physiology ; Humans ; Influence ; Intelligence tests ; Judgment - physiology ; Medicine ; Social and Behavioral Sciences ; Students ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2013-01, Vol.8 (1), p.e54286-e54286</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2013 Zhu, Murphy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2013 Zhu, Murphy 2013 Zhu, Murphy</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b8d55f7d97f538ce8cdb94cf4430858e9a1528f05c79bf5e52c2ab4da0e68c373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b8d55f7d97f538ce8cdb94cf4430858e9a1528f05c79bf5e52c2ab4da0e68c373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3553127/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3553127/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23372700$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Sinigaglia, Corrado</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Gregory L</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of emotionally charged information on category-based induction</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Categories help us make predictions, or inductions, about new objects. However, we cannot always be certain that a novel object belongs to the category we are using to make predictions. In such cases, people should use multiple categories to make inductions. Past research finds that people often use only the most likely category to make inductions, even if it is not certain. In two experiments, subjects read stories and answered questions about items whose categorization was uncertain. In Experiment 1, the less likely category was either emotionally neutral or dangerous (emotionally charged or likely to pose a threat). Subjects used multiple categories in induction when one of the categories was dangerous but not when they were all neutral. In Experiment 2, the most likely category was dangerous. Here, people used multiple categories, but there was also an effect of avoidance, in which people denied that dangerous categories were the most likely. The attention-grabbing power of dangerous categories may be balanced by a higher-level strategy to reject them.</description><subject>Association Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Categories</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Concept Formation - physiology</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Emotions - physiology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Generalization (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Intelligence tests</subject><subject>Judgment - physiology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Social and Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkluL1DAUx4so7jr6DUQHBNGHGXNpm-RFWBZ1BxYWvL2GNDnpdEibMWnF-famO91lKvsgLbSc8zv_c82ylxitMWX4w84PoVNuvfcdrBEqcsLLR9k5FpSsSoLo45P_s-xZjLsEUV6WT7MzQikjDKHz7GrTWTdAp2Hp7RJa3zc-qbrDUm9VqMEsm8760KrRvkyvVj3UPhxWlYq3XjPo0fc8e2KVi_Bi-i6yH58_fb-8Wl3ffNlcXlyvdClIv6q4KQrLjGA2FaOBa1OJXNs8p4gXHITCBeEWFZqJyhZQEE1UlRuFoOSaMrrIXh91985HOQ0hSkwJY0JwQRKxORLGq53ch6ZV4SC9auStwYdaqtA32oHEpcU5EjkYpHJkMKeYKC4UI5XSBnDS-jhlG6oWjIauD8rNROeertnK2v-WtCiS1ljuu0kg-F8DxF62TdTgnOrAD6luwlNTdFzNInvzD_pwdxNVq9TAuJyUV4-i8iJnHOe85GPa9QNUegy0jU4XY5tknwW8nwUkpoc_fa2GGOXm29f_Z29-ztm3J-wWlOu30bthPJk4B_MjqIOPMYC9HzJGcjz4u2nI8eDldPAp7NXpgu6D7i6c_gUIV_s3</recordid><startdate>20130123</startdate><enddate>20130123</enddate><creator>Zhu, Jennifer</creator><creator>Murphy, Gregory L</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130123</creationdate><title>Influence of emotionally charged information on category-based induction</title><author>Zhu, Jennifer ; Murphy, Gregory L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b8d55f7d97f538ce8cdb94cf4430858e9a1528f05c79bf5e52c2ab4da0e68c373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Association Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Categories</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Concept Formation - physiology</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Emotions - physiology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Generalization (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Intelligence tests</topic><topic>Judgment - physiology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Social and Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Gregory L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhu, Jennifer</au><au>Murphy, Gregory L</au><au>Sinigaglia, Corrado</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of emotionally charged information on category-based induction</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2013-01-23</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e54286</spage><epage>e54286</epage><pages>e54286-e54286</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Categories help us make predictions, or inductions, about new objects. However, we cannot always be certain that a novel object belongs to the category we are using to make predictions. In such cases, people should use multiple categories to make inductions. Past research finds that people often use only the most likely category to make inductions, even if it is not certain. In two experiments, subjects read stories and answered questions about items whose categorization was uncertain. In Experiment 1, the less likely category was either emotionally neutral or dangerous (emotionally charged or likely to pose a threat). Subjects used multiple categories in induction when one of the categories was dangerous but not when they were all neutral. In Experiment 2, the most likely category was dangerous. Here, people used multiple categories, but there was also an effect of avoidance, in which people denied that dangerous categories were the most likely. The attention-grabbing power of dangerous categories may be balanced by a higher-level strategy to reject them.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>23372700</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0054286</doi><tpages>e54286</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2013-01, Vol.8 (1), p.e54286-e54286
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1327799892
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Association Learning - physiology
Attention - physiology
Categories
Cognition & reasoning
Concept Formation - physiology
Emotions
Emotions - physiology
Experiments
Generalization (Psychology) - physiology
Humans
Influence
Intelligence tests
Judgment - physiology
Medicine
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Students
Uncertainty
title Influence of emotionally charged information on category-based induction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T12%3A22%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20emotionally%20charged%20information%20on%20category-based%20induction&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Zhu,%20Jennifer&rft.date=2013-01-23&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e54286&rft.epage=e54286&rft.pages=e54286-e54286&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0054286&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478148687%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1327799892&rft_id=info:pmid/23372700&rft_galeid=A478148687&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_16f14094ed0a40d18312a89a72bacde1&rfr_iscdi=true