Reliability and validity of quantifying absolute muscle hardness using ultrasound elastography

Muscle hardness is a mechanical property that represents transverse muscle stiffness. A quantitative method that uses ultrasound elastography for quantifying absolute human muscle hardness has been previously devised; however, its reliability and validity have not been completely verified. This stud...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2012-09, Vol.7 (9), p.e45764-e45764
Hauptverfasser: Chino, Kentaro, Akagi, Ryota, Dohi, Michiko, Fukashiro, Senshi, Takahashi, Hideyuki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e45764
container_issue 9
container_start_page e45764
container_title PloS one
container_volume 7
creator Chino, Kentaro
Akagi, Ryota
Dohi, Michiko
Fukashiro, Senshi
Takahashi, Hideyuki
description Muscle hardness is a mechanical property that represents transverse muscle stiffness. A quantitative method that uses ultrasound elastography for quantifying absolute human muscle hardness has been previously devised; however, its reliability and validity have not been completely verified. This study aimed to verify the reliability and validity of this quantitative method. The Young's moduli of seven tissue-mimicking materials (in vitro; Young's modulus range, 20-80 kPa; increments of 10 kPa) and the human medial gastrocnemius muscle (in vivo) were quantified using ultrasound elastography. On the basis of the strain/Young's modulus ratio of two reference materials, one hard and one soft (Young's moduli of 7 and 30 kPa, respectively), the Young's moduli of the tissue-mimicking materials and medial gastrocnemius muscle were calculated. The intra- and inter-investigator reliability of the method was confirmed on the basis of acceptably low coefficient of variations (≤6.9%) and substantially high intraclass correlation coefficients (≥0.77) obtained from all measurements. The correlation coefficient between the Young's moduli of the tissue-mimicking materials obtained using a mechanical method and ultrasound elastography was 0.996, which was equivalent to values previously obtained using magnetic resonance elastography. The Young's moduli of the medial gastrocnemius muscle obtained using ultrasound elastography were within the range of values previously obtained using magnetic resonance elastography. The reliability and validity of the quantitative method for measuring absolute muscle hardness using ultrasound elastography were thus verified.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0045764
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1326547451</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4816be9996584adab21d43601e114aaf</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1082405344</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-71d03c9ab324ae863e41533069a34e0f2c74e85ee88a4eb3ee2771529664a4253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUttq3DAQNaWlSdP-QWkNfenLbnQZyfZLoYReAoFCaF8rxvZ4V4vW2khWYP--2qwTkpInXeacM3OkUxTvOVtyWfHzjU9hRLfc-ZGWjIGqNLwoTnkjxUILJl8-2p8Ub2LcMKZkrfXr4kRIJhoh-Wnx95qcxdY6O-1LHPvyFp3tDwc_lDcJx8kOezuuSmyjd2micpti56hcY-hHirFM8VBObgoYfcoK5DBOfhVwt96_LV4N6CK9m9ez4s_3b78vfi6ufv24vPh6tehUI6ZFxXsmuwZbKQCp1pKAKymZblACsUF0FVCtiOoagVpJJKqKK9FoDQhCybPi41F353w089NEw6XQCipQPCMuj4je48bsgt1i2BuP1txd-LAyGCabrRmouW6paRqtasAeW8F7kJpx4hwQh6z1Ze6W2i31HY3ZvHsi-rQy2rVZ-VsjAeqKsyzweRYI_iZRnMzWxo6cw5F8ynOzWkD-LYAM_fQf9Hl3cER1wccYaHgYhjNziMs9yxziYua4ZNqHx0YeSPf5kP8AsuG_Ag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1326547451</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability and validity of quantifying absolute muscle hardness using ultrasound elastography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Chino, Kentaro ; Akagi, Ryota ; Dohi, Michiko ; Fukashiro, Senshi ; Takahashi, Hideyuki</creator><contributor>Aegerter, Christof Markus</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chino, Kentaro ; Akagi, Ryota ; Dohi, Michiko ; Fukashiro, Senshi ; Takahashi, Hideyuki ; Aegerter, Christof Markus</creatorcontrib><description>Muscle hardness is a mechanical property that represents transverse muscle stiffness. A quantitative method that uses ultrasound elastography for quantifying absolute human muscle hardness has been previously devised; however, its reliability and validity have not been completely verified. This study aimed to verify the reliability and validity of this quantitative method. The Young's moduli of seven tissue-mimicking materials (in vitro; Young's modulus range, 20-80 kPa; increments of 10 kPa) and the human medial gastrocnemius muscle (in vivo) were quantified using ultrasound elastography. On the basis of the strain/Young's modulus ratio of two reference materials, one hard and one soft (Young's moduli of 7 and 30 kPa, respectively), the Young's moduli of the tissue-mimicking materials and medial gastrocnemius muscle were calculated. The intra- and inter-investigator reliability of the method was confirmed on the basis of acceptably low coefficient of variations (≤6.9%) and substantially high intraclass correlation coefficients (≥0.77) obtained from all measurements. The correlation coefficient between the Young's moduli of the tissue-mimicking materials obtained using a mechanical method and ultrasound elastography was 0.996, which was equivalent to values previously obtained using magnetic resonance elastography. The Young's moduli of the medial gastrocnemius muscle obtained using ultrasound elastography were within the range of values previously obtained using magnetic resonance elastography. The reliability and validity of the quantitative method for measuring absolute muscle hardness using ultrasound elastography were thus verified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045764</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23029231</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biology ; Biomimetic Materials - analysis ; Correlation ; Correlation analysis ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Elastic Modulus ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques ; Experiments ; Gastrocnemius muscle ; Hardness ; Hardness Tests - standards ; Humans ; Life sciences ; Magnetic resonance ; Male ; Mathematical analysis ; Mechanical properties ; Medicine ; Methods ; Mimicry ; Modulus of elasticity ; Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Muscles ; Physics ; Reference materials ; Reference Standards ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Resonance ; Stiffness ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonic methods ; Ultrasonic testing ; Ultrasound ; Validity ; Velocity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2012-09, Vol.7 (9), p.e45764-e45764</ispartof><rights>Chino et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2012 Chino et al 2012 Chino et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-71d03c9ab324ae863e41533069a34e0f2c74e85ee88a4eb3ee2771529664a4253</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3448710/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3448710/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,866,887,2104,2930,23873,27931,27932,53798,53800</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23029231$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Aegerter, Christof Markus</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chino, Kentaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akagi, Ryota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohi, Michiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukashiro, Senshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Hideyuki</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability and validity of quantifying absolute muscle hardness using ultrasound elastography</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Muscle hardness is a mechanical property that represents transverse muscle stiffness. A quantitative method that uses ultrasound elastography for quantifying absolute human muscle hardness has been previously devised; however, its reliability and validity have not been completely verified. This study aimed to verify the reliability and validity of this quantitative method. The Young's moduli of seven tissue-mimicking materials (in vitro; Young's modulus range, 20-80 kPa; increments of 10 kPa) and the human medial gastrocnemius muscle (in vivo) were quantified using ultrasound elastography. On the basis of the strain/Young's modulus ratio of two reference materials, one hard and one soft (Young's moduli of 7 and 30 kPa, respectively), the Young's moduli of the tissue-mimicking materials and medial gastrocnemius muscle were calculated. The intra- and inter-investigator reliability of the method was confirmed on the basis of acceptably low coefficient of variations (≤6.9%) and substantially high intraclass correlation coefficients (≥0.77) obtained from all measurements. The correlation coefficient between the Young's moduli of the tissue-mimicking materials obtained using a mechanical method and ultrasound elastography was 0.996, which was equivalent to values previously obtained using magnetic resonance elastography. The Young's moduli of the medial gastrocnemius muscle obtained using ultrasound elastography were within the range of values previously obtained using magnetic resonance elastography. The reliability and validity of the quantitative method for measuring absolute muscle hardness using ultrasound elastography were thus verified.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biomimetic Materials - analysis</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Elastic Modulus</subject><subject>Elasticity Imaging Techniques</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Gastrocnemius muscle</subject><subject>Hardness</subject><subject>Hardness Tests - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life sciences</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mimicry</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Reference materials</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Resonance</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonic methods</subject><subject>Ultrasonic testing</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUttq3DAQNaWlSdP-QWkNfenLbnQZyfZLoYReAoFCaF8rxvZ4V4vW2khWYP--2qwTkpInXeacM3OkUxTvOVtyWfHzjU9hRLfc-ZGWjIGqNLwoTnkjxUILJl8-2p8Ub2LcMKZkrfXr4kRIJhoh-Wnx95qcxdY6O-1LHPvyFp3tDwc_lDcJx8kOezuuSmyjd2micpti56hcY-hHirFM8VBObgoYfcoK5DBOfhVwt96_LV4N6CK9m9ez4s_3b78vfi6ufv24vPh6tehUI6ZFxXsmuwZbKQCp1pKAKymZblACsUF0FVCtiOoagVpJJKqKK9FoDQhCybPi41F353w089NEw6XQCipQPCMuj4je48bsgt1i2BuP1txd-LAyGCabrRmouW6paRqtasAeW8F7kJpx4hwQh6z1Ze6W2i31HY3ZvHsi-rQy2rVZ-VsjAeqKsyzweRYI_iZRnMzWxo6cw5F8ynOzWkD-LYAM_fQf9Hl3cER1wccYaHgYhjNziMs9yxziYua4ZNqHx0YeSPf5kP8AsuG_Ag</recordid><startdate>20120921</startdate><enddate>20120921</enddate><creator>Chino, Kentaro</creator><creator>Akagi, Ryota</creator><creator>Dohi, Michiko</creator><creator>Fukashiro, Senshi</creator><creator>Takahashi, Hideyuki</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120921</creationdate><title>Reliability and validity of quantifying absolute muscle hardness using ultrasound elastography</title><author>Chino, Kentaro ; Akagi, Ryota ; Dohi, Michiko ; Fukashiro, Senshi ; Takahashi, Hideyuki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-71d03c9ab324ae863e41533069a34e0f2c74e85ee88a4eb3ee2771529664a4253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biomimetic Materials - analysis</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Elastic Modulus</topic><topic>Elasticity Imaging Techniques</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Gastrocnemius muscle</topic><topic>Hardness</topic><topic>Hardness Tests - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life sciences</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mimicry</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Reference materials</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Resonance</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonic methods</topic><topic>Ultrasonic testing</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chino, Kentaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akagi, Ryota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohi, Michiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukashiro, Senshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Hideyuki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chino, Kentaro</au><au>Akagi, Ryota</au><au>Dohi, Michiko</au><au>Fukashiro, Senshi</au><au>Takahashi, Hideyuki</au><au>Aegerter, Christof Markus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability and validity of quantifying absolute muscle hardness using ultrasound elastography</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2012-09-21</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e45764</spage><epage>e45764</epage><pages>e45764-e45764</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Muscle hardness is a mechanical property that represents transverse muscle stiffness. A quantitative method that uses ultrasound elastography for quantifying absolute human muscle hardness has been previously devised; however, its reliability and validity have not been completely verified. This study aimed to verify the reliability and validity of this quantitative method. The Young's moduli of seven tissue-mimicking materials (in vitro; Young's modulus range, 20-80 kPa; increments of 10 kPa) and the human medial gastrocnemius muscle (in vivo) were quantified using ultrasound elastography. On the basis of the strain/Young's modulus ratio of two reference materials, one hard and one soft (Young's moduli of 7 and 30 kPa, respectively), the Young's moduli of the tissue-mimicking materials and medial gastrocnemius muscle were calculated. The intra- and inter-investigator reliability of the method was confirmed on the basis of acceptably low coefficient of variations (≤6.9%) and substantially high intraclass correlation coefficients (≥0.77) obtained from all measurements. The correlation coefficient between the Young's moduli of the tissue-mimicking materials obtained using a mechanical method and ultrasound elastography was 0.996, which was equivalent to values previously obtained using magnetic resonance elastography. The Young's moduli of the medial gastrocnemius muscle obtained using ultrasound elastography were within the range of values previously obtained using magnetic resonance elastography. The reliability and validity of the quantitative method for measuring absolute muscle hardness using ultrasound elastography were thus verified.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>23029231</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0045764</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2012-09, Vol.7 (9), p.e45764-e45764
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1326547451
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adult
Biology
Biomimetic Materials - analysis
Correlation
Correlation analysis
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
Elastic Modulus
Elasticity Imaging Techniques
Experiments
Gastrocnemius muscle
Hardness
Hardness Tests - standards
Humans
Life sciences
Magnetic resonance
Male
Mathematical analysis
Mechanical properties
Medicine
Methods
Mimicry
Modulus of elasticity
Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Muscles
Physics
Reference materials
Reference Standards
Reliability
Reproducibility of Results
Resonance
Stiffness
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonic methods
Ultrasonic testing
Ultrasound
Validity
Velocity
Young Adult
title Reliability and validity of quantifying absolute muscle hardness using ultrasound elastography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T21%3A00%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20and%20validity%20of%20quantifying%20absolute%20muscle%20hardness%20using%20ultrasound%20elastography&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Chino,%20Kentaro&rft.date=2012-09-21&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e45764&rft.epage=e45764&rft.pages=e45764-e45764&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0045764&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E1082405344%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1326547451&rft_id=info:pmid/23029231&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4816be9996584adab21d43601e114aaf&rfr_iscdi=true