Nematode spatial and ecological patterns from tropical and temperate rainforests
Large scale diversity patterns are well established for terrestrial macrobiota (e.g. plants and vertebrates), but not for microscopic organisms (e.g. nematodes). Due to small size, high abundance, and extensive dispersal, microbiota are assumed to exhibit cosmopolitan distributions with no biogeogra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2012-09, Vol.7 (9), p.e44641-e44641 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e44641 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e44641 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Porazinska, Dorota L Giblin-Davis, Robin M Powers, Thomas O Thomas, W Kelley |
description | Large scale diversity patterns are well established for terrestrial macrobiota (e.g. plants and vertebrates), but not for microscopic organisms (e.g. nematodes). Due to small size, high abundance, and extensive dispersal, microbiota are assumed to exhibit cosmopolitan distributions with no biogeographical patterns. This assumption has been extrapolated from local spatial scale studies of a few taxonomic groups utilizing morphological approaches. Recent molecularly-based studies, however, suggest something quite opposite. Nematodes are the most abundant metazoans on earth, but their diversity patterns are largely unknown. We conducted a survey of nematode diversity within three vertical strata (soil, litter, and canopy) of rainforests at two contrasting latitudes in the North American meridian (temperate: the Olympic National Forest, WA, U.S.A and tropical: La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica) using standardized sampling designs and sample processing protocols. To describe nematode diversity, we applied an ecometagenetic approach using 454 pyrosequencing. We observed that: 1) nematode communities were unique without even a single common species between the two rainforests, 2) nematode communities were unique among habitats in both rainforests, 3) total species richness was 300% more in the tropical than in the temperate rainforest, 4) 80% of the species in the temperate rainforest resided in the soil, whereas only 20% in the tropics, 5) more than 90% of identified species were novel. Overall, our data provided no support for cosmopolitanism at both local (habitats) and large (rainforests) spatial scales. In addition, our data indicated that biogeographical patterns typical of macrobiota also exist for microbiota. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0044641 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1326545026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A543313544</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5cf53a78c678447d9d7fdc3b957187f9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A543313544</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-30ec5b547e38d8e02c247cfbb6efea19de58473d0f4d1383dd6b9d23a0353ba43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjEmTNM2NsCx-DCyu-HUb0uR0pkPa1CQV_femO91lKnshvWhz8pw3PW_eLHuK0RoTjt_s3eh7ZdeD62GNEKUlxfeyUyxIsSoLRO4ffZ9kj0LYI8RIVZYPs5OiEBVlpDzNPn-CTkVnIA-Diq2yuepNDtpZt211WqZqBN-HvPGuy6N3w3V5oiJ0A3gVIfeq7RvnIcTwOHvQKBvgyfw-y76_f_ft4uPq8urD5uL8cqVLUcQVQaBZzSgHUpkKUKELynVT1yU0oLAwwCrKiUENNZhUxJiyFqYgChFGakXJWfb8oDtYF-RsRpCYFCWjDBVlIjYHwji1l4NvO-X_SKdaeV1wfiuVj622IJluGFG80iWvKOVGGN4YTWrBOK54I5LW2_m0se7AaOijV3Yhutzp253cul-SUCIoLpLAq1nAu59jMkp2bdBgrerBjem_EUVCcMGmyV78g9493UxtVRpgsj-dqydReZ5ECCaMTlrrO6j0GOhanZLTtKm-aHi9aEhMhN9xq8YQ5Obrl_9nr34s2ZdH7A6Ujbvg7Bhb14clSA-g9i4ED82tyRjJKfg3bsgp-HIOfmp7dnxBt003SSd_ATgY_es</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1326545026</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nematode spatial and ecological patterns from tropical and temperate rainforests</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Porazinska, Dorota L ; Giblin-Davis, Robin M ; Powers, Thomas O ; Thomas, W Kelley</creator><contributor>Neufeld, Josh</contributor><creatorcontrib>Porazinska, Dorota L ; Giblin-Davis, Robin M ; Powers, Thomas O ; Thomas, W Kelley ; Neufeld, Josh</creatorcontrib><description>Large scale diversity patterns are well established for terrestrial macrobiota (e.g. plants and vertebrates), but not for microscopic organisms (e.g. nematodes). Due to small size, high abundance, and extensive dispersal, microbiota are assumed to exhibit cosmopolitan distributions with no biogeographical patterns. This assumption has been extrapolated from local spatial scale studies of a few taxonomic groups utilizing morphological approaches. Recent molecularly-based studies, however, suggest something quite opposite. Nematodes are the most abundant metazoans on earth, but their diversity patterns are largely unknown. We conducted a survey of nematode diversity within three vertical strata (soil, litter, and canopy) of rainforests at two contrasting latitudes in the North American meridian (temperate: the Olympic National Forest, WA, U.S.A and tropical: La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica) using standardized sampling designs and sample processing protocols. To describe nematode diversity, we applied an ecometagenetic approach using 454 pyrosequencing. We observed that: 1) nematode communities were unique without even a single common species between the two rainforests, 2) nematode communities were unique among habitats in both rainforests, 3) total species richness was 300% more in the tropical than in the temperate rainforest, 4) 80% of the species in the temperate rainforest resided in the soil, whereas only 20% in the tropics, 5) more than 90% of identified species were novel. Overall, our data provided no support for cosmopolitanism at both local (habitats) and large (rainforests) spatial scales. In addition, our data indicated that biogeographical patterns typical of macrobiota also exist for microbiota.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044641</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22984536</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biodiversity ; Biology ; Communities ; Costa Rica ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Dispersal ; DNA ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystems ; Eukaryotes ; Forest reserves ; Geography ; Microbiota ; Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) ; Models, Genetic ; Morphology ; Nematoda ; Nematoda - physiology ; Nematodes ; North America ; Rain forests ; Rainforests ; Roundworms ; Sampling designs ; Sequence Analysis, DNA ; Soil ; Spatial distribution ; Species richness ; Species Specificity ; Surveys ; Tardigrada ; Taxonomy ; Terrestrial environments ; Trees ; Tropical Climate ; Tropical environments ; Tropical forests ; Uniqueness ; Vertebrates ; Washington</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2012-09, Vol.7 (9), p.e44641-e44641</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>Porazinska et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2012 Porazinska et al 2012 Porazinska et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-30ec5b547e38d8e02c247cfbb6efea19de58473d0f4d1383dd6b9d23a0353ba43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439412/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439412/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22984536$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Neufeld, Josh</contributor><creatorcontrib>Porazinska, Dorota L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giblin-Davis, Robin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powers, Thomas O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, W Kelley</creatorcontrib><title>Nematode spatial and ecological patterns from tropical and temperate rainforests</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Large scale diversity patterns are well established for terrestrial macrobiota (e.g. plants and vertebrates), but not for microscopic organisms (e.g. nematodes). Due to small size, high abundance, and extensive dispersal, microbiota are assumed to exhibit cosmopolitan distributions with no biogeographical patterns. This assumption has been extrapolated from local spatial scale studies of a few taxonomic groups utilizing morphological approaches. Recent molecularly-based studies, however, suggest something quite opposite. Nematodes are the most abundant metazoans on earth, but their diversity patterns are largely unknown. We conducted a survey of nematode diversity within three vertical strata (soil, litter, and canopy) of rainforests at two contrasting latitudes in the North American meridian (temperate: the Olympic National Forest, WA, U.S.A and tropical: La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica) using standardized sampling designs and sample processing protocols. To describe nematode diversity, we applied an ecometagenetic approach using 454 pyrosequencing. We observed that: 1) nematode communities were unique without even a single common species between the two rainforests, 2) nematode communities were unique among habitats in both rainforests, 3) total species richness was 300% more in the tropical than in the temperate rainforest, 4) 80% of the species in the temperate rainforest resided in the soil, whereas only 20% in the tropics, 5) more than 90% of identified species were novel. Overall, our data provided no support for cosmopolitanism at both local (habitats) and large (rainforests) spatial scales. In addition, our data indicated that biogeographical patterns typical of macrobiota also exist for microbiota.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Costa Rica</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Eukaryotes</subject><subject>Forest reserves</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Nematoda</subject><subject>Nematoda - physiology</subject><subject>Nematodes</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Rain forests</subject><subject>Rainforests</subject><subject>Roundworms</subject><subject>Sampling designs</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Tardigrada</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Tropical Climate</subject><subject>Tropical environments</subject><subject>Tropical forests</subject><subject>Uniqueness</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Washington</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjEmTNM2NsCx-DCyu-HUb0uR0pkPa1CQV_femO91lKnshvWhz8pw3PW_eLHuK0RoTjt_s3eh7ZdeD62GNEKUlxfeyUyxIsSoLRO4ffZ9kj0LYI8RIVZYPs5OiEBVlpDzNPn-CTkVnIA-Diq2yuepNDtpZt211WqZqBN-HvPGuy6N3w3V5oiJ0A3gVIfeq7RvnIcTwOHvQKBvgyfw-y76_f_ft4uPq8urD5uL8cqVLUcQVQaBZzSgHUpkKUKELynVT1yU0oLAwwCrKiUENNZhUxJiyFqYgChFGakXJWfb8oDtYF-RsRpCYFCWjDBVlIjYHwji1l4NvO-X_SKdaeV1wfiuVj622IJluGFG80iWvKOVGGN4YTWrBOK54I5LW2_m0se7AaOijV3Yhutzp253cul-SUCIoLpLAq1nAu59jMkp2bdBgrerBjem_EUVCcMGmyV78g9493UxtVRpgsj-dqydReZ5ECCaMTlrrO6j0GOhanZLTtKm-aHi9aEhMhN9xq8YQ5Obrl_9nr34s2ZdH7A6Ujbvg7Bhb14clSA-g9i4ED82tyRjJKfg3bsgp-HIOfmp7dnxBt003SSd_ATgY_es</recordid><startdate>20120911</startdate><enddate>20120911</enddate><creator>Porazinska, Dorota L</creator><creator>Giblin-Davis, Robin M</creator><creator>Powers, Thomas O</creator><creator>Thomas, W Kelley</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120911</creationdate><title>Nematode spatial and ecological patterns from tropical and temperate rainforests</title><author>Porazinska, Dorota L ; Giblin-Davis, Robin M ; Powers, Thomas O ; Thomas, W Kelley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-30ec5b547e38d8e02c247cfbb6efea19de58473d0f4d1383dd6b9d23a0353ba43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Costa Rica</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Eukaryotes</topic><topic>Forest reserves</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Nematoda</topic><topic>Nematoda - physiology</topic><topic>Nematodes</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Rain forests</topic><topic>Rainforests</topic><topic>Roundworms</topic><topic>Sampling designs</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Tardigrada</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Tropical Climate</topic><topic>Tropical environments</topic><topic>Tropical forests</topic><topic>Uniqueness</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Washington</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Porazinska, Dorota L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giblin-Davis, Robin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powers, Thomas O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, W Kelley</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Porazinska, Dorota L</au><au>Giblin-Davis, Robin M</au><au>Powers, Thomas O</au><au>Thomas, W Kelley</au><au>Neufeld, Josh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nematode spatial and ecological patterns from tropical and temperate rainforests</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2012-09-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e44641</spage><epage>e44641</epage><pages>e44641-e44641</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Large scale diversity patterns are well established for terrestrial macrobiota (e.g. plants and vertebrates), but not for microscopic organisms (e.g. nematodes). Due to small size, high abundance, and extensive dispersal, microbiota are assumed to exhibit cosmopolitan distributions with no biogeographical patterns. This assumption has been extrapolated from local spatial scale studies of a few taxonomic groups utilizing morphological approaches. Recent molecularly-based studies, however, suggest something quite opposite. Nematodes are the most abundant metazoans on earth, but their diversity patterns are largely unknown. We conducted a survey of nematode diversity within three vertical strata (soil, litter, and canopy) of rainforests at two contrasting latitudes in the North American meridian (temperate: the Olympic National Forest, WA, U.S.A and tropical: La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica) using standardized sampling designs and sample processing protocols. To describe nematode diversity, we applied an ecometagenetic approach using 454 pyrosequencing. We observed that: 1) nematode communities were unique without even a single common species between the two rainforests, 2) nematode communities were unique among habitats in both rainforests, 3) total species richness was 300% more in the tropical than in the temperate rainforest, 4) 80% of the species in the temperate rainforest resided in the soil, whereas only 20% in the tropics, 5) more than 90% of identified species were novel. Overall, our data provided no support for cosmopolitanism at both local (habitats) and large (rainforests) spatial scales. In addition, our data indicated that biogeographical patterns typical of macrobiota also exist for microbiota.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>22984536</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0044641</doi><tpages>e44641</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2012-09, Vol.7 (9), p.e44641-e44641 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1326545026 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Animals Biodiversity Biology Communities Costa Rica Deoxyribonucleic acid Dispersal DNA Ecology Ecosystem Ecosystems Eukaryotes Forest reserves Geography Microbiota Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) Models, Genetic Morphology Nematoda Nematoda - physiology Nematodes North America Rain forests Rainforests Roundworms Sampling designs Sequence Analysis, DNA Soil Spatial distribution Species richness Species Specificity Surveys Tardigrada Taxonomy Terrestrial environments Trees Tropical Climate Tropical environments Tropical forests Uniqueness Vertebrates Washington |
title | Nematode spatial and ecological patterns from tropical and temperate rainforests |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T11%3A55%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nematode%20spatial%20and%20ecological%20patterns%20from%20tropical%20and%20temperate%20rainforests&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Porazinska,%20Dorota%20L&rft.date=2012-09-11&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e44641&rft.epage=e44641&rft.pages=e44641-e44641&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0044641&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA543313544%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1326545026&rft_id=info:pmid/22984536&rft_galeid=A543313544&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5cf53a78c678447d9d7fdc3b957187f9&rfr_iscdi=true |