Nematode spatial and ecological patterns from tropical and temperate rainforests

Large scale diversity patterns are well established for terrestrial macrobiota (e.g. plants and vertebrates), but not for microscopic organisms (e.g. nematodes). Due to small size, high abundance, and extensive dispersal, microbiota are assumed to exhibit cosmopolitan distributions with no biogeogra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2012-09, Vol.7 (9), p.e44641-e44641
Hauptverfasser: Porazinska, Dorota L, Giblin-Davis, Robin M, Powers, Thomas O, Thomas, W Kelley
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e44641
container_issue 9
container_start_page e44641
container_title PloS one
container_volume 7
creator Porazinska, Dorota L
Giblin-Davis, Robin M
Powers, Thomas O
Thomas, W Kelley
description Large scale diversity patterns are well established for terrestrial macrobiota (e.g. plants and vertebrates), but not for microscopic organisms (e.g. nematodes). Due to small size, high abundance, and extensive dispersal, microbiota are assumed to exhibit cosmopolitan distributions with no biogeographical patterns. This assumption has been extrapolated from local spatial scale studies of a few taxonomic groups utilizing morphological approaches. Recent molecularly-based studies, however, suggest something quite opposite. Nematodes are the most abundant metazoans on earth, but their diversity patterns are largely unknown. We conducted a survey of nematode diversity within three vertical strata (soil, litter, and canopy) of rainforests at two contrasting latitudes in the North American meridian (temperate: the Olympic National Forest, WA, U.S.A and tropical: La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica) using standardized sampling designs and sample processing protocols. To describe nematode diversity, we applied an ecometagenetic approach using 454 pyrosequencing. We observed that: 1) nematode communities were unique without even a single common species between the two rainforests, 2) nematode communities were unique among habitats in both rainforests, 3) total species richness was 300% more in the tropical than in the temperate rainforest, 4) 80% of the species in the temperate rainforest resided in the soil, whereas only 20% in the tropics, 5) more than 90% of identified species were novel. Overall, our data provided no support for cosmopolitanism at both local (habitats) and large (rainforests) spatial scales. In addition, our data indicated that biogeographical patterns typical of macrobiota also exist for microbiota.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0044641
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1326545026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A543313544</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5cf53a78c678447d9d7fdc3b957187f9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A543313544</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-30ec5b547e38d8e02c247cfbb6efea19de58473d0f4d1383dd6b9d23a0353ba43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjEmTNM2NsCx-DCyu-HUb0uR0pkPa1CQV_femO91lKnshvWhz8pw3PW_eLHuK0RoTjt_s3eh7ZdeD62GNEKUlxfeyUyxIsSoLRO4ffZ9kj0LYI8RIVZYPs5OiEBVlpDzNPn-CTkVnIA-Diq2yuepNDtpZt211WqZqBN-HvPGuy6N3w3V5oiJ0A3gVIfeq7RvnIcTwOHvQKBvgyfw-y76_f_ft4uPq8urD5uL8cqVLUcQVQaBZzSgHUpkKUKELynVT1yU0oLAwwCrKiUENNZhUxJiyFqYgChFGakXJWfb8oDtYF-RsRpCYFCWjDBVlIjYHwji1l4NvO-X_SKdaeV1wfiuVj622IJluGFG80iWvKOVGGN4YTWrBOK54I5LW2_m0se7AaOijV3Yhutzp253cul-SUCIoLpLAq1nAu59jMkp2bdBgrerBjem_EUVCcMGmyV78g9493UxtVRpgsj-dqydReZ5ECCaMTlrrO6j0GOhanZLTtKm-aHi9aEhMhN9xq8YQ5Obrl_9nr34s2ZdH7A6Ujbvg7Bhb14clSA-g9i4ED82tyRjJKfg3bsgp-HIOfmp7dnxBt003SSd_ATgY_es</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1326545026</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nematode spatial and ecological patterns from tropical and temperate rainforests</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Porazinska, Dorota L ; Giblin-Davis, Robin M ; Powers, Thomas O ; Thomas, W Kelley</creator><contributor>Neufeld, Josh</contributor><creatorcontrib>Porazinska, Dorota L ; Giblin-Davis, Robin M ; Powers, Thomas O ; Thomas, W Kelley ; Neufeld, Josh</creatorcontrib><description>Large scale diversity patterns are well established for terrestrial macrobiota (e.g. plants and vertebrates), but not for microscopic organisms (e.g. nematodes). Due to small size, high abundance, and extensive dispersal, microbiota are assumed to exhibit cosmopolitan distributions with no biogeographical patterns. This assumption has been extrapolated from local spatial scale studies of a few taxonomic groups utilizing morphological approaches. Recent molecularly-based studies, however, suggest something quite opposite. Nematodes are the most abundant metazoans on earth, but their diversity patterns are largely unknown. We conducted a survey of nematode diversity within three vertical strata (soil, litter, and canopy) of rainforests at two contrasting latitudes in the North American meridian (temperate: the Olympic National Forest, WA, U.S.A and tropical: La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica) using standardized sampling designs and sample processing protocols. To describe nematode diversity, we applied an ecometagenetic approach using 454 pyrosequencing. We observed that: 1) nematode communities were unique without even a single common species between the two rainforests, 2) nematode communities were unique among habitats in both rainforests, 3) total species richness was 300% more in the tropical than in the temperate rainforest, 4) 80% of the species in the temperate rainforest resided in the soil, whereas only 20% in the tropics, 5) more than 90% of identified species were novel. Overall, our data provided no support for cosmopolitanism at both local (habitats) and large (rainforests) spatial scales. In addition, our data indicated that biogeographical patterns typical of macrobiota also exist for microbiota.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044641</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22984536</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biodiversity ; Biology ; Communities ; Costa Rica ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Dispersal ; DNA ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystems ; Eukaryotes ; Forest reserves ; Geography ; Microbiota ; Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) ; Models, Genetic ; Morphology ; Nematoda ; Nematoda - physiology ; Nematodes ; North America ; Rain forests ; Rainforests ; Roundworms ; Sampling designs ; Sequence Analysis, DNA ; Soil ; Spatial distribution ; Species richness ; Species Specificity ; Surveys ; Tardigrada ; Taxonomy ; Terrestrial environments ; Trees ; Tropical Climate ; Tropical environments ; Tropical forests ; Uniqueness ; Vertebrates ; Washington</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2012-09, Vol.7 (9), p.e44641-e44641</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>Porazinska et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2012 Porazinska et al 2012 Porazinska et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-30ec5b547e38d8e02c247cfbb6efea19de58473d0f4d1383dd6b9d23a0353ba43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439412/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439412/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22984536$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Neufeld, Josh</contributor><creatorcontrib>Porazinska, Dorota L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giblin-Davis, Robin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powers, Thomas O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, W Kelley</creatorcontrib><title>Nematode spatial and ecological patterns from tropical and temperate rainforests</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Large scale diversity patterns are well established for terrestrial macrobiota (e.g. plants and vertebrates), but not for microscopic organisms (e.g. nematodes). Due to small size, high abundance, and extensive dispersal, microbiota are assumed to exhibit cosmopolitan distributions with no biogeographical patterns. This assumption has been extrapolated from local spatial scale studies of a few taxonomic groups utilizing morphological approaches. Recent molecularly-based studies, however, suggest something quite opposite. Nematodes are the most abundant metazoans on earth, but their diversity patterns are largely unknown. We conducted a survey of nematode diversity within three vertical strata (soil, litter, and canopy) of rainforests at two contrasting latitudes in the North American meridian (temperate: the Olympic National Forest, WA, U.S.A and tropical: La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica) using standardized sampling designs and sample processing protocols. To describe nematode diversity, we applied an ecometagenetic approach using 454 pyrosequencing. We observed that: 1) nematode communities were unique without even a single common species between the two rainforests, 2) nematode communities were unique among habitats in both rainforests, 3) total species richness was 300% more in the tropical than in the temperate rainforest, 4) 80% of the species in the temperate rainforest resided in the soil, whereas only 20% in the tropics, 5) more than 90% of identified species were novel. Overall, our data provided no support for cosmopolitanism at both local (habitats) and large (rainforests) spatial scales. In addition, our data indicated that biogeographical patterns typical of macrobiota also exist for microbiota.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Costa Rica</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Eukaryotes</subject><subject>Forest reserves</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Nematoda</subject><subject>Nematoda - physiology</subject><subject>Nematodes</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Rain forests</subject><subject>Rainforests</subject><subject>Roundworms</subject><subject>Sampling designs</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Tardigrada</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Tropical Climate</subject><subject>Tropical environments</subject><subject>Tropical forests</subject><subject>Uniqueness</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Washington</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjEmTNM2NsCx-DCyu-HUb0uR0pkPa1CQV_femO91lKnshvWhz8pw3PW_eLHuK0RoTjt_s3eh7ZdeD62GNEKUlxfeyUyxIsSoLRO4ffZ9kj0LYI8RIVZYPs5OiEBVlpDzNPn-CTkVnIA-Diq2yuepNDtpZt211WqZqBN-HvPGuy6N3w3V5oiJ0A3gVIfeq7RvnIcTwOHvQKBvgyfw-y76_f_ft4uPq8urD5uL8cqVLUcQVQaBZzSgHUpkKUKELynVT1yU0oLAwwCrKiUENNZhUxJiyFqYgChFGakXJWfb8oDtYF-RsRpCYFCWjDBVlIjYHwji1l4NvO-X_SKdaeV1wfiuVj622IJluGFG80iWvKOVGGN4YTWrBOK54I5LW2_m0se7AaOijV3Yhutzp253cul-SUCIoLpLAq1nAu59jMkp2bdBgrerBjem_EUVCcMGmyV78g9493UxtVRpgsj-dqydReZ5ECCaMTlrrO6j0GOhanZLTtKm-aHi9aEhMhN9xq8YQ5Obrl_9nr34s2ZdH7A6Ujbvg7Bhb14clSA-g9i4ED82tyRjJKfg3bsgp-HIOfmp7dnxBt003SSd_ATgY_es</recordid><startdate>20120911</startdate><enddate>20120911</enddate><creator>Porazinska, Dorota L</creator><creator>Giblin-Davis, Robin M</creator><creator>Powers, Thomas O</creator><creator>Thomas, W Kelley</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120911</creationdate><title>Nematode spatial and ecological patterns from tropical and temperate rainforests</title><author>Porazinska, Dorota L ; Giblin-Davis, Robin M ; Powers, Thomas O ; Thomas, W Kelley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-30ec5b547e38d8e02c247cfbb6efea19de58473d0f4d1383dd6b9d23a0353ba43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Costa Rica</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Eukaryotes</topic><topic>Forest reserves</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Nematoda</topic><topic>Nematoda - physiology</topic><topic>Nematodes</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Rain forests</topic><topic>Rainforests</topic><topic>Roundworms</topic><topic>Sampling designs</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Tardigrada</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Tropical Climate</topic><topic>Tropical environments</topic><topic>Tropical forests</topic><topic>Uniqueness</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Washington</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Porazinska, Dorota L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giblin-Davis, Robin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powers, Thomas O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, W Kelley</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Porazinska, Dorota L</au><au>Giblin-Davis, Robin M</au><au>Powers, Thomas O</au><au>Thomas, W Kelley</au><au>Neufeld, Josh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nematode spatial and ecological patterns from tropical and temperate rainforests</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2012-09-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e44641</spage><epage>e44641</epage><pages>e44641-e44641</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Large scale diversity patterns are well established for terrestrial macrobiota (e.g. plants and vertebrates), but not for microscopic organisms (e.g. nematodes). Due to small size, high abundance, and extensive dispersal, microbiota are assumed to exhibit cosmopolitan distributions with no biogeographical patterns. This assumption has been extrapolated from local spatial scale studies of a few taxonomic groups utilizing morphological approaches. Recent molecularly-based studies, however, suggest something quite opposite. Nematodes are the most abundant metazoans on earth, but their diversity patterns are largely unknown. We conducted a survey of nematode diversity within three vertical strata (soil, litter, and canopy) of rainforests at two contrasting latitudes in the North American meridian (temperate: the Olympic National Forest, WA, U.S.A and tropical: La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica) using standardized sampling designs and sample processing protocols. To describe nematode diversity, we applied an ecometagenetic approach using 454 pyrosequencing. We observed that: 1) nematode communities were unique without even a single common species between the two rainforests, 2) nematode communities were unique among habitats in both rainforests, 3) total species richness was 300% more in the tropical than in the temperate rainforest, 4) 80% of the species in the temperate rainforest resided in the soil, whereas only 20% in the tropics, 5) more than 90% of identified species were novel. Overall, our data provided no support for cosmopolitanism at both local (habitats) and large (rainforests) spatial scales. In addition, our data indicated that biogeographical patterns typical of macrobiota also exist for microbiota.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>22984536</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0044641</doi><tpages>e44641</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2012-09, Vol.7 (9), p.e44641-e44641
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1326545026
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Animals
Biodiversity
Biology
Communities
Costa Rica
Deoxyribonucleic acid
Dispersal
DNA
Ecology
Ecosystem
Ecosystems
Eukaryotes
Forest reserves
Geography
Microbiota
Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)
Models, Genetic
Morphology
Nematoda
Nematoda - physiology
Nematodes
North America
Rain forests
Rainforests
Roundworms
Sampling designs
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Soil
Spatial distribution
Species richness
Species Specificity
Surveys
Tardigrada
Taxonomy
Terrestrial environments
Trees
Tropical Climate
Tropical environments
Tropical forests
Uniqueness
Vertebrates
Washington
title Nematode spatial and ecological patterns from tropical and temperate rainforests
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T11%3A55%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nematode%20spatial%20and%20ecological%20patterns%20from%20tropical%20and%20temperate%20rainforests&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Porazinska,%20Dorota%20L&rft.date=2012-09-11&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e44641&rft.epage=e44641&rft.pages=e44641-e44641&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0044641&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA543313544%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1326545026&rft_id=info:pmid/22984536&rft_galeid=A543313544&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5cf53a78c678447d9d7fdc3b957187f9&rfr_iscdi=true