Understanding barriers to routine HIV screening: knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare providers in King County, Washington

In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended routine HIV screening in healthcare settings for persons between 13 and 64 years old. In 2010, the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) was changed to align testing rules with these recommendations. We designed this survey to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2012-09, Vol.7 (9), p.e44417-e44417
Hauptverfasser: Shirreffs, Alexandra, Lee, David P, Henry, Jsani, Golden, Matthew R, Stekler, Joanne D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e44417
container_issue 9
container_start_page e44417
container_title PloS one
container_volume 7
creator Shirreffs, Alexandra
Lee, David P
Henry, Jsani
Golden, Matthew R
Stekler, Joanne D
description In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended routine HIV screening in healthcare settings for persons between 13 and 64 years old. In 2010, the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) was changed to align testing rules with these recommendations. We designed this survey to ascertain the current state of HIV testing and barriers to routine screening in King County, Washington. Between March 23 and April 16, 2010, a convenience sample of healthcare providers completed an online survey. Providers answered true-false and multiple choice questions about national recommendations and the WAC, policies in their primary clinical settings, and their personal HIV testing practices. Providers were asked to agree or disagree whether commonly reported barriers limited their implementation of routine HIV screening. Although 76% of the 221 respondents knew that the CDC recommended routine HIV screening for persons regardless of their risk, 99 (45%) providers reported that their primary clinical setting had a policy to target testing based on patient risk factors. Forty-four (20%) providers reported that their primary clinical setting had a policy of routine HIV screening, 54 (25%) reported no official policy, and 15 (7%) did not know whether a policy existed. Only 11 (5%) providers offer HIV testing to all patients at initial visits. When asked about barriers to routine screening, 57% of providers agreed that perception that their patient population is low risk limits the number of HIV tests they perform. Only 26 (13%) providers agreed that concern about reimbursement posed a barrier to testing. Most providers participating in this survey continue to target HIV testing, despite knowledge of national recommendations. Efforts are still needed to educate providers and policymakers, clarify the recent WAC revisions, and implement structural changes in order to increase HIV testing in Washington State.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0044417
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1326544661</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A543310330</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1bb3e0db17654cc8a05eb984c96d55ba</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A543310330</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-891c22e264a57a65f4aed272a7e9da1fdbf7ed1a6a1b511496295968e1dc126e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99v0zAQxyMEYmPwHyCwhIRAWkv8I07DA9JUAauYNAnYeLQu9qX1SO1iO4P9BfzbuLSbVrQHlAfb5899z3e5K4qntBxTXtM3F34IDvrxyjscl6UQgtb3in3acDaSrOT3b-33ikcxXpRlxSdSPiz2GGvqktFqv_h95gyGmMAZ6-akhRBsPpPkSfBDsg7J8eycRB0QXSbeku_O_-zRzPGQQEo2DQZj3jpDVgF0shoj8R1ZIPRpoSFgtvtLu45CrCOf1mGmfnDp6pB8g7jI5-Td4-JBB33EJ9v1oDj78P7r9Hh0cvpxNj06GWnZsDSaNFQzhkwKqGqQVScADasZ1NgYoJ1puxoNBQm0rSgVjWRN1cgJUqMpk8gPiucb3VXvo9rWMCrKmayEkJJmYrYhjIcLtQp2CeFKebDqr8GHuYKQ0-xR0bblWJqW1tlZ6wmUFbbNROhGmqpqIWu920Yb2iUajS4F6HdEd2-cXai5v1Rc8IpNyizwaisQ_I8BY1JLGzX2PTj0Q353yRsuBKvqjL74B707uy01h5yAdZ3PcfVaVB1VgvMsyNdhx3dQ-TO4tDo3XGezfcfh9Y5DZhL-SnMYYlSzL5__nz0932Vf3mI3PRV9nxvTu7gLig2og48xYHdTZFqq9bxcV0Ot50Vt5yW7Pbv9g26crgeE_wGi0RGU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1326544661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding barriers to routine HIV screening: knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare providers in King County, Washington</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Shirreffs, Alexandra ; Lee, David P ; Henry, Jsani ; Golden, Matthew R ; Stekler, Joanne D</creator><creatorcontrib>Shirreffs, Alexandra ; Lee, David P ; Henry, Jsani ; Golden, Matthew R ; Stekler, Joanne D</creatorcontrib><description>In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended routine HIV screening in healthcare settings for persons between 13 and 64 years old. In 2010, the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) was changed to align testing rules with these recommendations. We designed this survey to ascertain the current state of HIV testing and barriers to routine screening in King County, Washington. Between March 23 and April 16, 2010, a convenience sample of healthcare providers completed an online survey. Providers answered true-false and multiple choice questions about national recommendations and the WAC, policies in their primary clinical settings, and their personal HIV testing practices. Providers were asked to agree or disagree whether commonly reported barriers limited their implementation of routine HIV screening. Although 76% of the 221 respondents knew that the CDC recommended routine HIV screening for persons regardless of their risk, 99 (45%) providers reported that their primary clinical setting had a policy to target testing based on patient risk factors. Forty-four (20%) providers reported that their primary clinical setting had a policy of routine HIV screening, 54 (25%) reported no official policy, and 15 (7%) did not know whether a policy existed. Only 11 (5%) providers offer HIV testing to all patients at initial visits. When asked about barriers to routine screening, 57% of providers agreed that perception that their patient population is low risk limits the number of HIV tests they perform. Only 26 (13%) providers agreed that concern about reimbursement posed a barrier to testing. Most providers participating in this survey continue to target HIV testing, despite knowledge of national recommendations. Efforts are still needed to educate providers and policymakers, clarify the recent WAC revisions, and implement structural changes in order to increase HIV testing in Washington State.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044417</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22970215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome ; AIDS ; AIDS Serodiagnosis - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Disease control ; Female ; Health care ; Health care industry ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Health Personnel - psychology ; Health risk assessment ; Health risks ; Health screening ; Health Services Accessibility ; HIV ; HIV Infections - diagnosis ; HIV tests ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Humans ; Male ; Medical diagnosis ; Medicine ; Multiple choice ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Screening ; Surveys ; Washington</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2012-09, Vol.7 (9), p.e44417-e44417</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>Shirreffs et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2012 Shirreffs et al 2012 Shirreffs et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-891c22e264a57a65f4aed272a7e9da1fdbf7ed1a6a1b511496295968e1dc126e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3435280/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3435280/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22970215$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shirreffs, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Jsani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golden, Matthew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stekler, Joanne D</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding barriers to routine HIV screening: knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare providers in King County, Washington</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended routine HIV screening in healthcare settings for persons between 13 and 64 years old. In 2010, the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) was changed to align testing rules with these recommendations. We designed this survey to ascertain the current state of HIV testing and barriers to routine screening in King County, Washington. Between March 23 and April 16, 2010, a convenience sample of healthcare providers completed an online survey. Providers answered true-false and multiple choice questions about national recommendations and the WAC, policies in their primary clinical settings, and their personal HIV testing practices. Providers were asked to agree or disagree whether commonly reported barriers limited their implementation of routine HIV screening. Although 76% of the 221 respondents knew that the CDC recommended routine HIV screening for persons regardless of their risk, 99 (45%) providers reported that their primary clinical setting had a policy to target testing based on patient risk factors. Forty-four (20%) providers reported that their primary clinical setting had a policy of routine HIV screening, 54 (25%) reported no official policy, and 15 (7%) did not know whether a policy existed. Only 11 (5%) providers offer HIV testing to all patients at initial visits. When asked about barriers to routine screening, 57% of providers agreed that perception that their patient population is low risk limits the number of HIV tests they perform. Only 26 (13%) providers agreed that concern about reimbursement posed a barrier to testing. Most providers participating in this survey continue to target HIV testing, despite knowledge of national recommendations. Efforts are still needed to educate providers and policymakers, clarify the recent WAC revisions, and implement structural changes in order to increase HIV testing in Washington State.</description><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</subject><subject>AIDS</subject><subject>AIDS Serodiagnosis - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Health Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Health screening</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>HIV Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>HIV tests</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Multiple choice</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Washington</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99v0zAQxyMEYmPwHyCwhIRAWkv8I07DA9JUAauYNAnYeLQu9qX1SO1iO4P9BfzbuLSbVrQHlAfb5899z3e5K4qntBxTXtM3F34IDvrxyjscl6UQgtb3in3acDaSrOT3b-33ikcxXpRlxSdSPiz2GGvqktFqv_h95gyGmMAZ6-akhRBsPpPkSfBDsg7J8eycRB0QXSbeku_O_-zRzPGQQEo2DQZj3jpDVgF0shoj8R1ZIPRpoSFgtvtLu45CrCOf1mGmfnDp6pB8g7jI5-Td4-JBB33EJ9v1oDj78P7r9Hh0cvpxNj06GWnZsDSaNFQzhkwKqGqQVScADasZ1NgYoJ1puxoNBQm0rSgVjWRN1cgJUqMpk8gPiucb3VXvo9rWMCrKmayEkJJmYrYhjIcLtQp2CeFKebDqr8GHuYKQ0-xR0bblWJqW1tlZ6wmUFbbNROhGmqpqIWu920Yb2iUajS4F6HdEd2-cXai5v1Rc8IpNyizwaisQ_I8BY1JLGzX2PTj0Q353yRsuBKvqjL74B707uy01h5yAdZ3PcfVaVB1VgvMsyNdhx3dQ-TO4tDo3XGezfcfh9Y5DZhL-SnMYYlSzL5__nz0932Vf3mI3PRV9nxvTu7gLig2og48xYHdTZFqq9bxcV0Ot50Vt5yW7Pbv9g26crgeE_wGi0RGU</recordid><startdate>20120906</startdate><enddate>20120906</enddate><creator>Shirreffs, Alexandra</creator><creator>Lee, David P</creator><creator>Henry, Jsani</creator><creator>Golden, Matthew R</creator><creator>Stekler, Joanne D</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120906</creationdate><title>Understanding barriers to routine HIV screening: knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare providers in King County, Washington</title><author>Shirreffs, Alexandra ; Lee, David P ; Henry, Jsani ; Golden, Matthew R ; Stekler, Joanne D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-891c22e264a57a65f4aed272a7e9da1fdbf7ed1a6a1b511496295968e1dc126e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</topic><topic>AIDS</topic><topic>AIDS Serodiagnosis - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Health Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Health screening</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>HIV Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>HIV tests</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Multiple choice</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Washington</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shirreffs, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Jsani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golden, Matthew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stekler, Joanne D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shirreffs, Alexandra</au><au>Lee, David P</au><au>Henry, Jsani</au><au>Golden, Matthew R</au><au>Stekler, Joanne D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding barriers to routine HIV screening: knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare providers in King County, Washington</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2012-09-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e44417</spage><epage>e44417</epage><pages>e44417-e44417</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended routine HIV screening in healthcare settings for persons between 13 and 64 years old. In 2010, the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) was changed to align testing rules with these recommendations. We designed this survey to ascertain the current state of HIV testing and barriers to routine screening in King County, Washington. Between March 23 and April 16, 2010, a convenience sample of healthcare providers completed an online survey. Providers answered true-false and multiple choice questions about national recommendations and the WAC, policies in their primary clinical settings, and their personal HIV testing practices. Providers were asked to agree or disagree whether commonly reported barriers limited their implementation of routine HIV screening. Although 76% of the 221 respondents knew that the CDC recommended routine HIV screening for persons regardless of their risk, 99 (45%) providers reported that their primary clinical setting had a policy to target testing based on patient risk factors. Forty-four (20%) providers reported that their primary clinical setting had a policy of routine HIV screening, 54 (25%) reported no official policy, and 15 (7%) did not know whether a policy existed. Only 11 (5%) providers offer HIV testing to all patients at initial visits. When asked about barriers to routine screening, 57% of providers agreed that perception that their patient population is low risk limits the number of HIV tests they perform. Only 26 (13%) providers agreed that concern about reimbursement posed a barrier to testing. Most providers participating in this survey continue to target HIV testing, despite knowledge of national recommendations. Efforts are still needed to educate providers and policymakers, clarify the recent WAC revisions, and implement structural changes in order to increase HIV testing in Washington State.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>22970215</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0044417</doi><tpages>e44417</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2012-09, Vol.7 (9), p.e44417-e44417
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1326544661
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Acquired immune deficiency syndrome
AIDS
AIDS Serodiagnosis - statistics & numerical data
Disease control
Female
Health care
Health care industry
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Personnel - psychology
Health risk assessment
Health risks
Health screening
Health Services Accessibility
HIV
HIV Infections - diagnosis
HIV tests
Human immunodeficiency virus
Humans
Male
Medical diagnosis
Medicine
Multiple choice
Risk analysis
Risk factors
Screening
Surveys
Washington
title Understanding barriers to routine HIV screening: knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare providers in King County, Washington
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T20%3A49%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20barriers%20to%20routine%20HIV%20screening:%20knowledge,%20attitudes,%20and%20practices%20of%20healthcare%20providers%20in%20King%20County,%20Washington&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Shirreffs,%20Alexandra&rft.date=2012-09-06&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e44417&rft.epage=e44417&rft.pages=e44417-e44417&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0044417&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA543310330%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1326544661&rft_id=info:pmid/22970215&rft_galeid=A543310330&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_1bb3e0db17654cc8a05eb984c96d55ba&rfr_iscdi=true