Risk factors of porcine cysticercosis in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa

There is a high prevalence of Taenia solium taeniosis/cysticercosis in humans and pigs in the Eastern Cape Province (ECP) of South Africa. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors of porcine cysticercosis in select districts of the ECP. Data were collected in 2003 by interviewing 217...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2012-05, Vol.7 (5), p.e37718-e37718
Hauptverfasser: Krecek, Rosina Claudia, Mohammed, Hamish, Michael, Lynne Margaret, Schantz, Peter Mullineaux, Ntanjana, Lulama, Morey, Liesl, Werre, Stephen Rakem, Willingham, 3rd, Arve Lee
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e37718
container_issue 5
container_start_page e37718
container_title PloS one
container_volume 7
creator Krecek, Rosina Claudia
Mohammed, Hamish
Michael, Lynne Margaret
Schantz, Peter Mullineaux
Ntanjana, Lulama
Morey, Liesl
Werre, Stephen Rakem
Willingham, 3rd, Arve Lee
description There is a high prevalence of Taenia solium taeniosis/cysticercosis in humans and pigs in the Eastern Cape Province (ECP) of South Africa. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors of porcine cysticercosis in select districts of the ECP. Data were collected in 2003 by interviewing 217 pig producers from the area. Blood samples were collected from 261 of their pigs, which were tested using two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for the presence of antibodies to cysticercosis. Frequencies of both owner- and pig-level characteristics were determined. For pig-level analysis, all bivariable and multivariable associations were determined using the surveylogistic procedure of the SAS/STAT® software to accommodate for the intraclass correlation that exists for clusters of pigs within one owner and for clusters of owners within a district. All tests for significance were performed at the α = 0.05 level, and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined. Among the respondents, 48% of their households lacked a latrine, 98% slaughtered pigs at home, and 99% indicated that meat inspection services were not available. On bivariable analysis, there was a significant association between porcine infection and district (p = 0.003), breed (p = 0.041) and the absence of a latrine (p = 0.006). On multivariable analysis, the absence of a latrine was the only variable significantly associated with porcine infection (aOR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.07, 3.35) (p = 0.028). The increased odds of porcine infection with households lacking a latrine contributes to our understanding of the transmission of this parasite in the ECP. Determining and addressing the risk factors for T. solium infection can potentially lower the very high prevalence in humans and pigs in this endemic area.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0037718
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1325008456</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A477045788</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_deeda87d526b4a86aaf6c40aa0975645</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A477045788</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4d0d2f7670da8d6b5ab2d837fe32b7f6402e6f3164016dce3c648c1df76c58433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkIgrcXfTm-QqmpApUmbNuDWcv3RuqR2sZ2J_Xtcmk3NtAvii1jO874-5-StqtcQjCHm8NM6dNHLdrwN3owBwJzD5kl1DCcYjRgC-OnB_qh6kdIaAIobxp5XRwgxSgGjx9XllUu_aitVDjHVwdbbEJXzpla3KTtlogrJpdr5Oq9MfSZTNtHXM7k19WUMN84rc1pfhy6v6qmNTsmX1TMr22Re9e-T6seXs--zb6Pzi6_z2fR8pNgE5RHRQCPLGQdaNpotqFwg3WBuDUYLbhkByDCLYdlAppXBipFGQV0kijYE45Pq7d5324Yk-mEkATGiADSEskLM94QOci220W1kvBVBOvHvIMSlkLH02BqhjSllcE0RWxDZMCktUwRICSacMkKL1-f-tm6xMaUen6NsB6bDL96txDLcCIzppDzF4ENvEMPvzqQsNi4p07bSm9CVugFsMJkwzgv67gH6eHc9tZSlAedtKPeqnamYEs4BobxpCjV-hCpLm41TJTnWlfOB4ONAUJhs_uSl7FIS8-ur_2cvfg7Z9wfsysg2r1Jou-yCT0OQ7EEVQ0rR2PshQyB2wb-bhtgFX_TBL7I3hz_oXnSXdPwXwtf88Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1325008456</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk factors of porcine cysticercosis in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Krecek, Rosina Claudia ; Mohammed, Hamish ; Michael, Lynne Margaret ; Schantz, Peter Mullineaux ; Ntanjana, Lulama ; Morey, Liesl ; Werre, Stephen Rakem ; Willingham, 3rd, Arve Lee</creator><contributor>Woodrow, Charles Jonathan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Krecek, Rosina Claudia ; Mohammed, Hamish ; Michael, Lynne Margaret ; Schantz, Peter Mullineaux ; Ntanjana, Lulama ; Morey, Liesl ; Werre, Stephen Rakem ; Willingham, 3rd, Arve Lee ; Woodrow, Charles Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>There is a high prevalence of Taenia solium taeniosis/cysticercosis in humans and pigs in the Eastern Cape Province (ECP) of South Africa. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors of porcine cysticercosis in select districts of the ECP. Data were collected in 2003 by interviewing 217 pig producers from the area. Blood samples were collected from 261 of their pigs, which were tested using two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for the presence of antibodies to cysticercosis. Frequencies of both owner- and pig-level characteristics were determined. For pig-level analysis, all bivariable and multivariable associations were determined using the surveylogistic procedure of the SAS/STAT® software to accommodate for the intraclass correlation that exists for clusters of pigs within one owner and for clusters of owners within a district. All tests for significance were performed at the α = 0.05 level, and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined. Among the respondents, 48% of their households lacked a latrine, 98% slaughtered pigs at home, and 99% indicated that meat inspection services were not available. On bivariable analysis, there was a significant association between porcine infection and district (p = 0.003), breed (p = 0.041) and the absence of a latrine (p = 0.006). On multivariable analysis, the absence of a latrine was the only variable significantly associated with porcine infection (aOR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.07, 3.35) (p = 0.028). The increased odds of porcine infection with households lacking a latrine contributes to our understanding of the transmission of this parasite in the ECP. Determining and addressing the risk factors for T. solium infection can potentially lower the very high prevalence in humans and pigs in this endemic area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037718</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22655065</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Animals ; Antibodies ; Antibodies - blood ; Biology ; Clusters ; Confidence intervals ; Cysticercosis ; Cysticercosis - blood ; Cysticercosis - epidemiology ; Cysticercosis - immunology ; Cysticercosis - veterinary ; Cysticercus - immunology ; Cysticercus - isolation &amp; purification ; Disease transmission ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Enzymes ; Female ; Health education ; Health risks ; Hogs ; Households ; Humans ; Immunoassays ; Infections ; Inspection ; International economic relations ; Male ; Meat ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Middle Aged ; Parasites ; Pork industry ; Questionnaires ; Risk analysis ; Risk Factors ; Rural areas ; South Africa - epidemiology ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Swine ; Swine - blood ; Swine - immunology ; Swine - parasitology ; Taenia solium ; Teaching methods ; Towns ; Veterinary colleges ; Veterinary medicine ; Veterinary Science ; Zoonoses</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2012-05, Vol.7 (5), p.e37718-e37718</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2012 Krecek et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Krecek et al. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4d0d2f7670da8d6b5ab2d837fe32b7f6402e6f3164016dce3c648c1df76c58433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4d0d2f7670da8d6b5ab2d837fe32b7f6402e6f3164016dce3c648c1df76c58433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3359999/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3359999/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79371,79372</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22655065$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Woodrow, Charles Jonathan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Krecek, Rosina Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammed, Hamish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michael, Lynne Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schantz, Peter Mullineaux</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ntanjana, Lulama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morey, Liesl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werre, Stephen Rakem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willingham, 3rd, Arve Lee</creatorcontrib><title>Risk factors of porcine cysticercosis in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>There is a high prevalence of Taenia solium taeniosis/cysticercosis in humans and pigs in the Eastern Cape Province (ECP) of South Africa. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors of porcine cysticercosis in select districts of the ECP. Data were collected in 2003 by interviewing 217 pig producers from the area. Blood samples were collected from 261 of their pigs, which were tested using two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for the presence of antibodies to cysticercosis. Frequencies of both owner- and pig-level characteristics were determined. For pig-level analysis, all bivariable and multivariable associations were determined using the surveylogistic procedure of the SAS/STAT® software to accommodate for the intraclass correlation that exists for clusters of pigs within one owner and for clusters of owners within a district. All tests for significance were performed at the α = 0.05 level, and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined. Among the respondents, 48% of their households lacked a latrine, 98% slaughtered pigs at home, and 99% indicated that meat inspection services were not available. On bivariable analysis, there was a significant association between porcine infection and district (p = 0.003), breed (p = 0.041) and the absence of a latrine (p = 0.006). On multivariable analysis, the absence of a latrine was the only variable significantly associated with porcine infection (aOR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.07, 3.35) (p = 0.028). The increased odds of porcine infection with households lacking a latrine contributes to our understanding of the transmission of this parasite in the ECP. Determining and addressing the risk factors for T. solium infection can potentially lower the very high prevalence in humans and pigs in this endemic area.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Antibodies - blood</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Clusters</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Cysticercosis</subject><subject>Cysticercosis - blood</subject><subject>Cysticercosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cysticercosis - immunology</subject><subject>Cysticercosis - veterinary</subject><subject>Cysticercus - immunology</subject><subject>Cysticercus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoassays</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>International economic relations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Pork industry</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>South Africa - epidemiology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Swine - blood</subject><subject>Swine - immunology</subject><subject>Swine - parasitology</subject><subject>Taenia solium</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Towns</subject><subject>Veterinary colleges</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><subject>Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkIgrcXfTm-QqmpApUmbNuDWcv3RuqR2sZ2J_Xtcmk3NtAvii1jO874-5-StqtcQjCHm8NM6dNHLdrwN3owBwJzD5kl1DCcYjRgC-OnB_qh6kdIaAIobxp5XRwgxSgGjx9XllUu_aitVDjHVwdbbEJXzpla3KTtlogrJpdr5Oq9MfSZTNtHXM7k19WUMN84rc1pfhy6v6qmNTsmX1TMr22Re9e-T6seXs--zb6Pzi6_z2fR8pNgE5RHRQCPLGQdaNpotqFwg3WBuDUYLbhkByDCLYdlAppXBipFGQV0kijYE45Pq7d5324Yk-mEkATGiADSEskLM94QOci220W1kvBVBOvHvIMSlkLH02BqhjSllcE0RWxDZMCktUwRICSacMkKL1-f-tm6xMaUen6NsB6bDL96txDLcCIzppDzF4ENvEMPvzqQsNi4p07bSm9CVugFsMJkwzgv67gH6eHc9tZSlAedtKPeqnamYEs4BobxpCjV-hCpLm41TJTnWlfOB4ONAUJhs_uSl7FIS8-ur_2cvfg7Z9wfsysg2r1Jou-yCT0OQ7EEVQ0rR2PshQyB2wb-bhtgFX_TBL7I3hz_oXnSXdPwXwtf88Q</recordid><startdate>20120524</startdate><enddate>20120524</enddate><creator>Krecek, Rosina Claudia</creator><creator>Mohammed, Hamish</creator><creator>Michael, Lynne Margaret</creator><creator>Schantz, Peter Mullineaux</creator><creator>Ntanjana, Lulama</creator><creator>Morey, Liesl</creator><creator>Werre, Stephen Rakem</creator><creator>Willingham, 3rd, Arve Lee</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120524</creationdate><title>Risk factors of porcine cysticercosis in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa</title><author>Krecek, Rosina Claudia ; Mohammed, Hamish ; Michael, Lynne Margaret ; Schantz, Peter Mullineaux ; Ntanjana, Lulama ; Morey, Liesl ; Werre, Stephen Rakem ; Willingham, 3rd, Arve Lee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4d0d2f7670da8d6b5ab2d837fe32b7f6402e6f3164016dce3c648c1df76c58433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Antibodies - blood</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Clusters</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Cysticercosis</topic><topic>Cysticercosis - blood</topic><topic>Cysticercosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cysticercosis - immunology</topic><topic>Cysticercosis - veterinary</topic><topic>Cysticercus - immunology</topic><topic>Cysticercus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoassays</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>International economic relations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Pork industry</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>South Africa - epidemiology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Swine - blood</topic><topic>Swine - immunology</topic><topic>Swine - parasitology</topic><topic>Taenia solium</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Towns</topic><topic>Veterinary colleges</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><topic>Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krecek, Rosina Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammed, Hamish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michael, Lynne Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schantz, Peter Mullineaux</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ntanjana, Lulama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morey, Liesl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werre, Stephen Rakem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willingham, 3rd, Arve Lee</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krecek, Rosina Claudia</au><au>Mohammed, Hamish</au><au>Michael, Lynne Margaret</au><au>Schantz, Peter Mullineaux</au><au>Ntanjana, Lulama</au><au>Morey, Liesl</au><au>Werre, Stephen Rakem</au><au>Willingham, 3rd, Arve Lee</au><au>Woodrow, Charles Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk factors of porcine cysticercosis in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2012-05-24</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e37718</spage><epage>e37718</epage><pages>e37718-e37718</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>There is a high prevalence of Taenia solium taeniosis/cysticercosis in humans and pigs in the Eastern Cape Province (ECP) of South Africa. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors of porcine cysticercosis in select districts of the ECP. Data were collected in 2003 by interviewing 217 pig producers from the area. Blood samples were collected from 261 of their pigs, which were tested using two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for the presence of antibodies to cysticercosis. Frequencies of both owner- and pig-level characteristics were determined. For pig-level analysis, all bivariable and multivariable associations were determined using the surveylogistic procedure of the SAS/STAT® software to accommodate for the intraclass correlation that exists for clusters of pigs within one owner and for clusters of owners within a district. All tests for significance were performed at the α = 0.05 level, and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined. Among the respondents, 48% of their households lacked a latrine, 98% slaughtered pigs at home, and 99% indicated that meat inspection services were not available. On bivariable analysis, there was a significant association between porcine infection and district (p = 0.003), breed (p = 0.041) and the absence of a latrine (p = 0.006). On multivariable analysis, the absence of a latrine was the only variable significantly associated with porcine infection (aOR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.07, 3.35) (p = 0.028). The increased odds of porcine infection with households lacking a latrine contributes to our understanding of the transmission of this parasite in the ECP. Determining and addressing the risk factors for T. solium infection can potentially lower the very high prevalence in humans and pigs in this endemic area.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>22655065</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0037718</doi><tpages>e37718</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2012-05, Vol.7 (5), p.e37718-e37718
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1325008456
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Agriculture
Animals
Antibodies
Antibodies - blood
Biology
Clusters
Confidence intervals
Cysticercosis
Cysticercosis - blood
Cysticercosis - epidemiology
Cysticercosis - immunology
Cysticercosis - veterinary
Cysticercus - immunology
Cysticercus - isolation & purification
Disease transmission
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Enzymes
Female
Health education
Health risks
Hogs
Households
Humans
Immunoassays
Infections
Inspection
International economic relations
Male
Meat
Medical research
Medicine
Middle Aged
Parasites
Pork industry
Questionnaires
Risk analysis
Risk Factors
Rural areas
South Africa - epidemiology
Statistical analysis
Studies
Swine
Swine - blood
Swine - immunology
Swine - parasitology
Taenia solium
Teaching methods
Towns
Veterinary colleges
Veterinary medicine
Veterinary Science
Zoonoses
title Risk factors of porcine cysticercosis in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T22%3A12%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20factors%20of%20porcine%20cysticercosis%20in%20the%20Eastern%20Cape%20Province,%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Krecek,%20Rosina%20Claudia&rft.date=2012-05-24&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e37718&rft.epage=e37718&rft.pages=e37718-e37718&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0037718&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA477045788%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1325008456&rft_id=info:pmid/22655065&rft_galeid=A477045788&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_deeda87d526b4a86aaf6c40aa0975645&rfr_iscdi=true