Out of mind, out of sight: language affects perceptual vividness in memory
We examined whether language affects the strength of a visual representation in memory. Participants studied a picture, read a story about the depicted object, and then selected out of two pictures the one whose transparency level most resembled that of the previously presented picture. The stories...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2012-04, Vol.7 (4), p.e36154-e36154 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e36154 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e36154 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Vandeberg, Lisa Eerland, Anita Zwaan, Rolf A |
description | We examined whether language affects the strength of a visual representation in memory. Participants studied a picture, read a story about the depicted object, and then selected out of two pictures the one whose transparency level most resembled that of the previously presented picture. The stories contained two linguistic manipulations that have been demonstrated to affect concept availability in memory, i.e., object presence and goal-relevance. The results show that described absence of an object caused people to select the most transparent picture more often than described presence of the object. This effect was not moderated by goal-relevance, suggesting that our paradigm tapped into the perceptual quality of representations rather than, for example, their linguistic availability. We discuss the implications of these findings within a framework of grounded cognition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0036154 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1324561371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A476999839</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_68bd7fbca4694765bfc28bcd0e0946ab</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A476999839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1d9c009979d38e0d66f556c7cb27811109f9741ee4f55db17278a20a02ffa1d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgig4Yz7atPFCWBY_RhYG_LoNaXLSydI2Y5IO7r8343SXqeyF9KLNyXPe9H1zsuwpRktMK_z2yo1-kN1y6wZYIkQZLot72SnmlCwYQfT-0fdJ9iiEK4RKWjP2MDshpCxryorT7Mt6jLkzeW8H_SZ3h0Ww7Sa-yzs5tKNsIZfGgIoh34JXsI2j7PKd3Vk9QAi5HfIeeuevH2cPjOwCPJneZ9mPjx--X3xeXK4_rS7OLxeKcRIXWHOFEOcV17QGpBkzZclUpRpS1RhjxA2vCgxQpLpucJXKkiCJiDES65qeZc8PutvOBTHFEASmpCjZPppErA6EdvJKbL3tpb8WTlrxt-B8K6SPVnUgWN3oyjRKFowXFSsbo0jdKI0A8YLJJmm9n04bmx60giF62c1E5zuD3YjW7QSlBaIlTQKvJgHvfo0QouhtUNCldMGN6b9RMs0JqnhCX_yD3u1uolqZDNjBuHSu2ouK82SBc17TvdbyDio9Gnqr0swYm-qzhtezhsRE-B1bOYYgVt--_j-7_jlnXx6xG5Bd3ATXjdG6IczB4gAq70LwYG5Dxkjsnd-kIfYjL6aRT23Pji_otulmxukfRgn6sQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1324561371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Out of mind, out of sight: language affects perceptual vividness in memory</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Vandeberg, Lisa ; Eerland, Anita ; Zwaan, Rolf A</creator><creatorcontrib>Vandeberg, Lisa ; Eerland, Anita ; Zwaan, Rolf A</creatorcontrib><description>We examined whether language affects the strength of a visual representation in memory. Participants studied a picture, read a story about the depicted object, and then selected out of two pictures the one whose transparency level most resembled that of the previously presented picture. The stories contained two linguistic manipulations that have been demonstrated to affect concept availability in memory, i.e., object presence and goal-relevance. The results show that described absence of an object caused people to select the most transparent picture more often than described presence of the object. This effect was not moderated by goal-relevance, suggesting that our paradigm tapped into the perceptual quality of representations rather than, for example, their linguistic availability. We discuss the implications of these findings within a framework of grounded cognition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036154</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22558364</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cognition ; Discourse analysis ; Female ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Language ; Male ; Memory ; Memory - physiology ; Natural language processing ; Perception - physiology ; Pictures ; Reading ; Representations ; Social and Behavioral Sciences ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2012-04, Vol.7 (4), p.e36154-e36154</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2012 Vandeberg et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Vandeberg et al. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1d9c009979d38e0d66f556c7cb27811109f9741ee4f55db17278a20a02ffa1d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1d9c009979d38e0d66f556c7cb27811109f9741ee4f55db17278a20a02ffa1d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3340353/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3340353/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22558364$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vandeberg, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eerland, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwaan, Rolf A</creatorcontrib><title>Out of mind, out of sight: language affects perceptual vividness in memory</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>We examined whether language affects the strength of a visual representation in memory. Participants studied a picture, read a story about the depicted object, and then selected out of two pictures the one whose transparency level most resembled that of the previously presented picture. The stories contained two linguistic manipulations that have been demonstrated to affect concept availability in memory, i.e., object presence and goal-relevance. The results show that described absence of an object caused people to select the most transparent picture more often than described presence of the object. This effect was not moderated by goal-relevance, suggesting that our paradigm tapped into the perceptual quality of representations rather than, for example, their linguistic availability. We discuss the implications of these findings within a framework of grounded cognition.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>Natural language processing</subject><subject>Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Pictures</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Representations</subject><subject>Social and Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgig4Yz7atPFCWBY_RhYG_LoNaXLSydI2Y5IO7r8343SXqeyF9KLNyXPe9H1zsuwpRktMK_z2yo1-kN1y6wZYIkQZLot72SnmlCwYQfT-0fdJ9iiEK4RKWjP2MDshpCxryorT7Mt6jLkzeW8H_SZ3h0Ww7Sa-yzs5tKNsIZfGgIoh34JXsI2j7PKd3Vk9QAi5HfIeeuevH2cPjOwCPJneZ9mPjx--X3xeXK4_rS7OLxeKcRIXWHOFEOcV17QGpBkzZclUpRpS1RhjxA2vCgxQpLpucJXKkiCJiDES65qeZc8PutvOBTHFEASmpCjZPppErA6EdvJKbL3tpb8WTlrxt-B8K6SPVnUgWN3oyjRKFowXFSsbo0jdKI0A8YLJJmm9n04bmx60giF62c1E5zuD3YjW7QSlBaIlTQKvJgHvfo0QouhtUNCldMGN6b9RMs0JqnhCX_yD3u1uolqZDNjBuHSu2ouK82SBc17TvdbyDio9Gnqr0swYm-qzhtezhsRE-B1bOYYgVt--_j-7_jlnXx6xG5Bd3ATXjdG6IczB4gAq70LwYG5Dxkjsnd-kIfYjL6aRT23Pji_otulmxukfRgn6sQ</recordid><startdate>20120430</startdate><enddate>20120430</enddate><creator>Vandeberg, Lisa</creator><creator>Eerland, Anita</creator><creator>Zwaan, Rolf A</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120430</creationdate><title>Out of mind, out of sight: language affects perceptual vividness in memory</title><author>Vandeberg, Lisa ; Eerland, Anita ; Zwaan, Rolf A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1d9c009979d38e0d66f556c7cb27811109f9741ee4f55db17278a20a02ffa1d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>Natural language processing</topic><topic>Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Pictures</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Representations</topic><topic>Social and Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vandeberg, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eerland, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwaan, Rolf A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vandeberg, Lisa</au><au>Eerland, Anita</au><au>Zwaan, Rolf A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Out of mind, out of sight: language affects perceptual vividness in memory</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2012-04-30</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e36154</spage><epage>e36154</epage><pages>e36154-e36154</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>We examined whether language affects the strength of a visual representation in memory. Participants studied a picture, read a story about the depicted object, and then selected out of two pictures the one whose transparency level most resembled that of the previously presented picture. The stories contained two linguistic manipulations that have been demonstrated to affect concept availability in memory, i.e., object presence and goal-relevance. The results show that described absence of an object caused people to select the most transparent picture more often than described presence of the object. This effect was not moderated by goal-relevance, suggesting that our paradigm tapped into the perceptual quality of representations rather than, for example, their linguistic availability. We discuss the implications of these findings within a framework of grounded cognition.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>22558364</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0036154</doi><tpages>e36154</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2012-04, Vol.7 (4), p.e36154-e36154 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1324561371 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Adult Cognition Discourse analysis Female Humans Hypotheses Language Male Memory Memory - physiology Natural language processing Perception - physiology Pictures Reading Representations Social and Behavioral Sciences Transparency |
title | Out of mind, out of sight: language affects perceptual vividness in memory |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T00%3A26%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Out%20of%20mind,%20out%20of%20sight:%20language%20affects%20perceptual%20vividness%20in%20memory&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Vandeberg,%20Lisa&rft.date=2012-04-30&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e36154&rft.epage=e36154&rft.pages=e36154-e36154&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0036154&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA476999839%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1324561371&rft_id=info:pmid/22558364&rft_galeid=A476999839&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_68bd7fbca4694765bfc28bcd0e0946ab&rfr_iscdi=true |