Reduction in predator defense in the presence of neighbors in a colonial fish
Predation pressure has long been considered a leading explanation of colonies, where close neighbors may reduce predation via dilution, alarming or group predator attacks. Attacking predators may be costly in terms of energy and survival, leading to the question of how neighbors contribute to predat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2012-05, Vol.7 (5), p.e35833-e35833 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e35833 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e35833 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Schädelin, Franziska C Fischer, Stefan Wagner, Richard H |
description | Predation pressure has long been considered a leading explanation of colonies, where close neighbors may reduce predation via dilution, alarming or group predator attacks. Attacking predators may be costly in terms of energy and survival, leading to the question of how neighbors contribute to predator deterrence in relationship to each other. Two hypotheses explaining the relative efforts made by neighbors are byproduct-mutualism, which occurs when breeders inadvertently attack predators by defending their nests, and reciprocity, which occurs when breeders deliberately exchange predator defense efforts with neighbors. Most studies investigating group nest defense have been performed with birds. However, colonial fish may constitute a more practical model system for an experimental approach because of the greater ability of researchers to manipulate their environment. We investigated in the colonial fish, Neolamprologus caudopunctatus, whether prospecting pairs preferred to breed near conspecifics or solitarily, and how breeders invested in anti-predator defense in relation to neighbors. In a simple choice test, prospecting pairs selected breeding sites close to neighbors versus a solitary site. Predators were then sequentially presented to the newly established test pairs, the previously established stimulus pairs or in between the two pairs. Test pairs attacked the predator eight times more frequently when they were presented on their non-neighbor side compared to between the two breeding sites, where stimulus pairs maintained high attack rates. Thus, by joining an established pair, test pairs were able to reduce their anti-predator efforts near neighbors, at no apparent cost to the stimulus pairs. These findings are unlikely to be explained by reciprocity or byproduct-mutualism. Our results instead suggest a commensal relationship in which new pairs exploit the high anti-predator efforts of established pairs, which invest similarly with or without neighbors. Further studies are needed to determine the scope of commensalism as an anti-predator strategy in colonial animals. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0035833 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1324557558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A477077209</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_43fa92bb786d4ac79c18f41a4a85f55a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A477077209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-10fc1ac38af6e443cad06c2ae7f1d560156d05b93fc3fcbfbf8b0b220bb640253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7u7oPxAtCItezJjvtjfCsvgxsLKwftyG0zSZZugks0kr-u9Nne4ylb2QBBJOnvMm5-TNshcYrTAt8LutH4KDbrX3Tq8Qoryk9FF2iitKloIg-vhof5KdxbhFiNNSiKfZCSEC84Lh0-zLjW4G1VvvcuvyfdAN9D7kjTbaRT3G-laP8aid0rk3udN209Y-xPEQcuU77yx0ubGxfZY9MdBF_XxaF9n3jx--XX5eXl1_Wl9eXC2VqEi_xMgoDIqWYIRmjCpokFAEdGFwwwXCXDSI1xU1Ks3a1KasUU0IqmvBEOF0kb066O47H-XUiSgxJYzzgqdWLLL1gWg8bOU-2B2E39KDlX8DPmwkhN6qTktGDVSkrotSNAxUUSlcGoaBQckN55C03k-3DfVON0q7PkA3E52fONvKjf8pKeW04iIJvJkEgr8ddOzlzkaluw6c9kN6d6qYiQoLktDX_6APVzdRG0gFWGd8uleNovKCFQUqCoKqRK0eoNJo9M6qZBtjU3yW8HaWkJhe_-o3MMQo119v_p-9_jFnz4_YVkPXt9F3w2i7OAfZAVTBxxi0uW8yRnJ0_V035Oh6Obk-pb08_qD7pDub0z_9ifxj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1324557558</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reduction in predator defense in the presence of neighbors in a colonial fish</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Schädelin, Franziska C ; Fischer, Stefan ; Wagner, Richard H</creator><contributor>Adler, Frederick R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Schädelin, Franziska C ; Fischer, Stefan ; Wagner, Richard H ; Adler, Frederick R.</creatorcontrib><description>Predation pressure has long been considered a leading explanation of colonies, where close neighbors may reduce predation via dilution, alarming or group predator attacks. Attacking predators may be costly in terms of energy and survival, leading to the question of how neighbors contribute to predator deterrence in relationship to each other. Two hypotheses explaining the relative efforts made by neighbors are byproduct-mutualism, which occurs when breeders inadvertently attack predators by defending their nests, and reciprocity, which occurs when breeders deliberately exchange predator defense efforts with neighbors. Most studies investigating group nest defense have been performed with birds. However, colonial fish may constitute a more practical model system for an experimental approach because of the greater ability of researchers to manipulate their environment. We investigated in the colonial fish, Neolamprologus caudopunctatus, whether prospecting pairs preferred to breed near conspecifics or solitarily, and how breeders invested in anti-predator defense in relation to neighbors. In a simple choice test, prospecting pairs selected breeding sites close to neighbors versus a solitary site. Predators were then sequentially presented to the newly established test pairs, the previously established stimulus pairs or in between the two pairs. Test pairs attacked the predator eight times more frequently when they were presented on their non-neighbor side compared to between the two breeding sites, where stimulus pairs maintained high attack rates. Thus, by joining an established pair, test pairs were able to reduce their anti-predator efforts near neighbors, at no apparent cost to the stimulus pairs. These findings are unlikely to be explained by reciprocity or byproduct-mutualism. Our results instead suggest a commensal relationship in which new pairs exploit the high anti-predator efforts of established pairs, which invest similarly with or without neighbors. Further studies are needed to determine the scope of commensalism as an anti-predator strategy in colonial animals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035833</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22615741</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Altruism ; Animal behavior ; Animal reproduction ; Animals ; Biology ; Birds ; Breeding sites ; Byproducts ; Cichlids - physiology ; Circus pygargus ; Circuses ; Colonies ; Commensalism ; Conspecifics ; Cooperation ; Dilution ; Evolution ; Experiments ; Exploration ; Females ; Fish ; Group dynamics ; Hypotheses ; Medical research ; Mutualism ; Neolamprologus caudopunctatus ; Nests ; Predation ; Predators ; Predatory Behavior ; Prospecting ; Reciprocity ; Studies ; Taxonomy ; Veterinary medicine ; World Wide Web</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2012-05, Vol.7 (5), p.e35833-e35833</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2012 Schädelin et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Schädelin et al. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-10fc1ac38af6e443cad06c2ae7f1d560156d05b93fc3fcbfbf8b0b220bb640253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-10fc1ac38af6e443cad06c2ae7f1d560156d05b93fc3fcbfbf8b0b220bb640253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3353956/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3353956/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22615741$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Adler, Frederick R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Schädelin, Franziska C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Richard H</creatorcontrib><title>Reduction in predator defense in the presence of neighbors in a colonial fish</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Predation pressure has long been considered a leading explanation of colonies, where close neighbors may reduce predation via dilution, alarming or group predator attacks. Attacking predators may be costly in terms of energy and survival, leading to the question of how neighbors contribute to predator deterrence in relationship to each other. Two hypotheses explaining the relative efforts made by neighbors are byproduct-mutualism, which occurs when breeders inadvertently attack predators by defending their nests, and reciprocity, which occurs when breeders deliberately exchange predator defense efforts with neighbors. Most studies investigating group nest defense have been performed with birds. However, colonial fish may constitute a more practical model system for an experimental approach because of the greater ability of researchers to manipulate their environment. We investigated in the colonial fish, Neolamprologus caudopunctatus, whether prospecting pairs preferred to breed near conspecifics or solitarily, and how breeders invested in anti-predator defense in relation to neighbors. In a simple choice test, prospecting pairs selected breeding sites close to neighbors versus a solitary site. Predators were then sequentially presented to the newly established test pairs, the previously established stimulus pairs or in between the two pairs. Test pairs attacked the predator eight times more frequently when they were presented on their non-neighbor side compared to between the two breeding sites, where stimulus pairs maintained high attack rates. Thus, by joining an established pair, test pairs were able to reduce their anti-predator efforts near neighbors, at no apparent cost to the stimulus pairs. These findings are unlikely to be explained by reciprocity or byproduct-mutualism. Our results instead suggest a commensal relationship in which new pairs exploit the high anti-predator efforts of established pairs, which invest similarly with or without neighbors. Further studies are needed to determine the scope of commensalism as an anti-predator strategy in colonial animals.</description><subject>Altruism</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding sites</subject><subject>Byproducts</subject><subject>Cichlids - physiology</subject><subject>Circus pygargus</subject><subject>Circuses</subject><subject>Colonies</subject><subject>Commensalism</subject><subject>Conspecifics</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Dilution</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Exploration</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Mutualism</subject><subject>Neolamprologus caudopunctatus</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>Prospecting</subject><subject>Reciprocity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><subject>World Wide Web</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7u7oPxAtCItezJjvtjfCsvgxsLKwftyG0zSZZugks0kr-u9Nne4ylb2QBBJOnvMm5-TNshcYrTAt8LutH4KDbrX3Tq8Qoryk9FF2iitKloIg-vhof5KdxbhFiNNSiKfZCSEC84Lh0-zLjW4G1VvvcuvyfdAN9D7kjTbaRT3G-laP8aid0rk3udN209Y-xPEQcuU77yx0ubGxfZY9MdBF_XxaF9n3jx--XX5eXl1_Wl9eXC2VqEi_xMgoDIqWYIRmjCpokFAEdGFwwwXCXDSI1xU1Ks3a1KasUU0IqmvBEOF0kb066O47H-XUiSgxJYzzgqdWLLL1gWg8bOU-2B2E39KDlX8DPmwkhN6qTktGDVSkrotSNAxUUSlcGoaBQckN55C03k-3DfVON0q7PkA3E52fONvKjf8pKeW04iIJvJkEgr8ddOzlzkaluw6c9kN6d6qYiQoLktDX_6APVzdRG0gFWGd8uleNovKCFQUqCoKqRK0eoNJo9M6qZBtjU3yW8HaWkJhe_-o3MMQo119v_p-9_jFnz4_YVkPXt9F3w2i7OAfZAVTBxxi0uW8yRnJ0_V035Oh6Obk-pb08_qD7pDub0z_9ifxj</recordid><startdate>20120516</startdate><enddate>20120516</enddate><creator>Schädelin, Franziska C</creator><creator>Fischer, Stefan</creator><creator>Wagner, Richard H</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120516</creationdate><title>Reduction in predator defense in the presence of neighbors in a colonial fish</title><author>Schädelin, Franziska C ; Fischer, Stefan ; Wagner, Richard H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-10fc1ac38af6e443cad06c2ae7f1d560156d05b93fc3fcbfbf8b0b220bb640253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Altruism</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding sites</topic><topic>Byproducts</topic><topic>Cichlids - physiology</topic><topic>Circus pygargus</topic><topic>Circuses</topic><topic>Colonies</topic><topic>Commensalism</topic><topic>Conspecifics</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Dilution</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Exploration</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Mutualism</topic><topic>Neolamprologus caudopunctatus</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>Prospecting</topic><topic>Reciprocity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><topic>World Wide Web</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schädelin, Franziska C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Richard H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schädelin, Franziska C</au><au>Fischer, Stefan</au><au>Wagner, Richard H</au><au>Adler, Frederick R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reduction in predator defense in the presence of neighbors in a colonial fish</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2012-05-16</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e35833</spage><epage>e35833</epage><pages>e35833-e35833</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Predation pressure has long been considered a leading explanation of colonies, where close neighbors may reduce predation via dilution, alarming or group predator attacks. Attacking predators may be costly in terms of energy and survival, leading to the question of how neighbors contribute to predator deterrence in relationship to each other. Two hypotheses explaining the relative efforts made by neighbors are byproduct-mutualism, which occurs when breeders inadvertently attack predators by defending their nests, and reciprocity, which occurs when breeders deliberately exchange predator defense efforts with neighbors. Most studies investigating group nest defense have been performed with birds. However, colonial fish may constitute a more practical model system for an experimental approach because of the greater ability of researchers to manipulate their environment. We investigated in the colonial fish, Neolamprologus caudopunctatus, whether prospecting pairs preferred to breed near conspecifics or solitarily, and how breeders invested in anti-predator defense in relation to neighbors. In a simple choice test, prospecting pairs selected breeding sites close to neighbors versus a solitary site. Predators were then sequentially presented to the newly established test pairs, the previously established stimulus pairs or in between the two pairs. Test pairs attacked the predator eight times more frequently when they were presented on their non-neighbor side compared to between the two breeding sites, where stimulus pairs maintained high attack rates. Thus, by joining an established pair, test pairs were able to reduce their anti-predator efforts near neighbors, at no apparent cost to the stimulus pairs. These findings are unlikely to be explained by reciprocity or byproduct-mutualism. Our results instead suggest a commensal relationship in which new pairs exploit the high anti-predator efforts of established pairs, which invest similarly with or without neighbors. Further studies are needed to determine the scope of commensalism as an anti-predator strategy in colonial animals.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>22615741</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0035833</doi><tpages>e35833</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2012-05, Vol.7 (5), p.e35833-e35833 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1324557558 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Altruism Animal behavior Animal reproduction Animals Biology Birds Breeding sites Byproducts Cichlids - physiology Circus pygargus Circuses Colonies Commensalism Conspecifics Cooperation Dilution Evolution Experiments Exploration Females Fish Group dynamics Hypotheses Medical research Mutualism Neolamprologus caudopunctatus Nests Predation Predators Predatory Behavior Prospecting Reciprocity Studies Taxonomy Veterinary medicine World Wide Web |
title | Reduction in predator defense in the presence of neighbors in a colonial fish |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A05%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reduction%20in%20predator%20defense%20in%20the%20presence%20of%20neighbors%20in%20a%20colonial%20fish&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Sch%C3%A4delin,%20Franziska%20C&rft.date=2012-05-16&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e35833&rft.epage=e35833&rft.pages=e35833-e35833&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035833&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA477077209%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1324557558&rft_id=info:pmid/22615741&rft_galeid=A477077209&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_43fa92bb786d4ac79c18f41a4a85f55a&rfr_iscdi=true |