An experimental test of condition-dependent male and female mate choice in zebra finches
In mating systems with social monogamy and obligatory bi-parental care, such as found in many songbird species, male and female fitness depends on the combined parental investment. Hence, both sexes should gain from choosing mates in high rather than low condition. However, theory also predicts that...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2011-08, Vol.6 (8), p.e23974-e23974 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e23974 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | e23974 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Holveck, Marie-Jeanne Geberzahn, Nicole Riebel, Katharina |
description | In mating systems with social monogamy and obligatory bi-parental care, such as found in many songbird species, male and female fitness depends on the combined parental investment. Hence, both sexes should gain from choosing mates in high rather than low condition. However, theory also predicts that an individual's phenotypic quality can constrain choice, if low condition individuals cannot afford prolonged search efforts and/or face higher risk of rejection. In systems with mutual mate choice, the interaction between male and female condition should thus be a better predictor of choice than either factor in isolation. To address this prediction experimentally, we manipulated male and female condition and subsequently tested male and female mating preferences in zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata, a songbird species with mutual mate choice and obligatory bi-parental care. We experimentally altered phenotypic quality by manipulating the brood size in which the birds were reared. Patterns of association for high- or low-condition individuals of the opposite sex differed for male and female focal birds when tested in an 8-way choice arena. Females showed repeatable condition-assortative preferences for males matching their own rearing background. Male preferences were also repeatable, but not predicted by their own or females' rearing background. In combination with a brief review of the literature on condition-dependent mate choice in the zebra finch we discuss whether the observed sex differences and between-studies differences arise because males and females differ in context sensitivity (e.g. male-male competition suppressing male mating preferences), sampling strategies or susceptibility to rearing conditions (e.g. sex-specific effect on physiology). While a picture emerges that juvenile and current state indeed affect preferences, the development and context-dependency of mutual state-dependent mate choice warrants further study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0023974 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1318921097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A476881712</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0dfac1ce0b3f4a47b20f9ee20b4191d0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A476881712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-a9deb5e4f930e1511cc3ed9bb64d81f078e6bf8da00e672facb497a00dd4898e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk01r3DAQhk1padK0_6C0hkJLDruVLNuSLoUltM3CQqBf9CZkabRWsKWNZYe0v75y1gnrkEPxwfLomXfkdzRJ8hqjJSYUf7z0Q-dks9x5B0uEMsJp_iQ5xpxkizJD5OnB-ih5EcIlQgVhZfk8OcowRxjn9Dj5vXIp3Oygsy24XjZpD6FPvUmVd9r21ruFhh04HXfTVjaQSqdTA7fLVvaQqtpbBal16V-oOpka61QN4WXyzMgmwKvpfZL8_PL5x9n5YnPxdX222iwUzYp-IbmGqoDccIIAFxgrRUDzqipzzbBBlEFZGaYlQlDSzEhV5ZzGL61zxhmQk-TtXnfX-CAmU4LABDOeYcRpJNZ7Qnt5KXbxT2X3R3hpxW3Ad1shu96qBgTSsQBWgCpicpnTKkOGA2SoyjHHGkWtT1O1oWpBq-hKJ5uZ6HzH2Vps_bUgOPYBj4c53QvUD9LOVxsxxlBWlCyn_BpH9sNUrPNXQ-yLaG1Q0DTSgR-CYIwRUtJiVH33gHzciInaxuYJ64yPR1SjpljltGQMU5xFavkIFR8NrY23AoyN8VnC6SwhMj3c9Fs5hCDW37_9P3vxa86-P2BrkE1fB98M46UMczDfg6rzIXRg7o3FSIyzcueGGGdFTLMS094c9vI-6W44yD8ACQ6B</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1318921097</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An experimental test of condition-dependent male and female mate choice in zebra finches</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Holveck, Marie-Jeanne ; Geberzahn, Nicole ; Riebel, Katharina</creator><contributor>Liu, Zhanjiang</contributor><creatorcontrib>Holveck, Marie-Jeanne ; Geberzahn, Nicole ; Riebel, Katharina ; Liu, Zhanjiang</creatorcontrib><description>In mating systems with social monogamy and obligatory bi-parental care, such as found in many songbird species, male and female fitness depends on the combined parental investment. Hence, both sexes should gain from choosing mates in high rather than low condition. However, theory also predicts that an individual's phenotypic quality can constrain choice, if low condition individuals cannot afford prolonged search efforts and/or face higher risk of rejection. In systems with mutual mate choice, the interaction between male and female condition should thus be a better predictor of choice than either factor in isolation. To address this prediction experimentally, we manipulated male and female condition and subsequently tested male and female mating preferences in zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata, a songbird species with mutual mate choice and obligatory bi-parental care. We experimentally altered phenotypic quality by manipulating the brood size in which the birds were reared. Patterns of association for high- or low-condition individuals of the opposite sex differed for male and female focal birds when tested in an 8-way choice arena. Females showed repeatable condition-assortative preferences for males matching their own rearing background. Male preferences were also repeatable, but not predicted by their own or females' rearing background. In combination with a brief review of the literature on condition-dependent mate choice in the zebra finch we discuss whether the observed sex differences and between-studies differences arise because males and females differ in context sensitivity (e.g. male-male competition suppressing male mating preferences), sampling strategies or susceptibility to rearing conditions (e.g. sex-specific effect on physiology). While a picture emerges that juvenile and current state indeed affect preferences, the development and context-dependency of mutual state-dependent mate choice warrants further study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023974</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21901147</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Animal behavior ; Animals ; Biology ; Birds ; Cognitive science ; Competition ; Female ; Females ; Finches - physiology ; Fitness ; Gender aspects ; Life Sciences ; Literature reviews ; Male ; Males ; Mate selection ; Mating ; Mating Preference, Animal - physiology ; Monogamy ; Neuroscience ; Neurosciences ; Predictions ; Preferences ; Quality ; Sex ; Sex differences ; Taeniopygia guttata ; Veterinary Science ; Zebra finch</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2011-08, Vol.6 (8), p.e23974-e23974</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2011 Holveck et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>Holveck et al. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-a9deb5e4f930e1511cc3ed9bb64d81f078e6bf8da00e672facb497a00dd4898e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-a9deb5e4f930e1511cc3ed9bb64d81f078e6bf8da00e672facb497a00dd4898e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9945-7067</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162017/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162017/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79371,79372</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21901147$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02568479$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Liu, Zhanjiang</contributor><creatorcontrib>Holveck, Marie-Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geberzahn, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riebel, Katharina</creatorcontrib><title>An experimental test of condition-dependent male and female mate choice in zebra finches</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>In mating systems with social monogamy and obligatory bi-parental care, such as found in many songbird species, male and female fitness depends on the combined parental investment. Hence, both sexes should gain from choosing mates in high rather than low condition. However, theory also predicts that an individual's phenotypic quality can constrain choice, if low condition individuals cannot afford prolonged search efforts and/or face higher risk of rejection. In systems with mutual mate choice, the interaction between male and female condition should thus be a better predictor of choice than either factor in isolation. To address this prediction experimentally, we manipulated male and female condition and subsequently tested male and female mating preferences in zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata, a songbird species with mutual mate choice and obligatory bi-parental care. We experimentally altered phenotypic quality by manipulating the brood size in which the birds were reared. Patterns of association for high- or low-condition individuals of the opposite sex differed for male and female focal birds when tested in an 8-way choice arena. Females showed repeatable condition-assortative preferences for males matching their own rearing background. Male preferences were also repeatable, but not predicted by their own or females' rearing background. In combination with a brief review of the literature on condition-dependent mate choice in the zebra finch we discuss whether the observed sex differences and between-studies differences arise because males and females differ in context sensitivity (e.g. male-male competition suppressing male mating preferences), sampling strategies or susceptibility to rearing conditions (e.g. sex-specific effect on physiology). While a picture emerges that juvenile and current state indeed affect preferences, the development and context-dependency of mutual state-dependent mate choice warrants further study.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Finches - physiology</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>Gender aspects</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mate selection</subject><subject>Mating</subject><subject>Mating Preference, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Monogamy</subject><subject>Neuroscience</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Taeniopygia guttata</subject><subject>Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Zebra finch</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk01r3DAQhk1padK0_6C0hkJLDruVLNuSLoUltM3CQqBf9CZkabRWsKWNZYe0v75y1gnrkEPxwfLomXfkdzRJ8hqjJSYUf7z0Q-dks9x5B0uEMsJp_iQ5xpxkizJD5OnB-ih5EcIlQgVhZfk8OcowRxjn9Dj5vXIp3Oygsy24XjZpD6FPvUmVd9r21ruFhh04HXfTVjaQSqdTA7fLVvaQqtpbBal16V-oOpka61QN4WXyzMgmwKvpfZL8_PL5x9n5YnPxdX222iwUzYp-IbmGqoDccIIAFxgrRUDzqipzzbBBlEFZGaYlQlDSzEhV5ZzGL61zxhmQk-TtXnfX-CAmU4LABDOeYcRpJNZ7Qnt5KXbxT2X3R3hpxW3Ad1shu96qBgTSsQBWgCpicpnTKkOGA2SoyjHHGkWtT1O1oWpBq-hKJ5uZ6HzH2Vps_bUgOPYBj4c53QvUD9LOVxsxxlBWlCyn_BpH9sNUrPNXQ-yLaG1Q0DTSgR-CYIwRUtJiVH33gHzciInaxuYJ64yPR1SjpljltGQMU5xFavkIFR8NrY23AoyN8VnC6SwhMj3c9Fs5hCDW37_9P3vxa86-P2BrkE1fB98M46UMczDfg6rzIXRg7o3FSIyzcueGGGdFTLMS094c9vI-6W44yD8ACQ6B</recordid><startdate>20110825</startdate><enddate>20110825</enddate><creator>Holveck, Marie-Jeanne</creator><creator>Geberzahn, Nicole</creator><creator>Riebel, Katharina</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9945-7067</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20110825</creationdate><title>An experimental test of condition-dependent male and female mate choice in zebra finches</title><author>Holveck, Marie-Jeanne ; Geberzahn, Nicole ; Riebel, Katharina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-a9deb5e4f930e1511cc3ed9bb64d81f078e6bf8da00e672facb497a00dd4898e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Finches - physiology</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>Gender aspects</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mate selection</topic><topic>Mating</topic><topic>Mating Preference, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Monogamy</topic><topic>Neuroscience</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Taeniopygia guttata</topic><topic>Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Zebra finch</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holveck, Marie-Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geberzahn, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riebel, Katharina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holveck, Marie-Jeanne</au><au>Geberzahn, Nicole</au><au>Riebel, Katharina</au><au>Liu, Zhanjiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An experimental test of condition-dependent male and female mate choice in zebra finches</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2011-08-25</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e23974</spage><epage>e23974</epage><pages>e23974-e23974</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>In mating systems with social monogamy and obligatory bi-parental care, such as found in many songbird species, male and female fitness depends on the combined parental investment. Hence, both sexes should gain from choosing mates in high rather than low condition. However, theory also predicts that an individual's phenotypic quality can constrain choice, if low condition individuals cannot afford prolonged search efforts and/or face higher risk of rejection. In systems with mutual mate choice, the interaction between male and female condition should thus be a better predictor of choice than either factor in isolation. To address this prediction experimentally, we manipulated male and female condition and subsequently tested male and female mating preferences in zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata, a songbird species with mutual mate choice and obligatory bi-parental care. We experimentally altered phenotypic quality by manipulating the brood size in which the birds were reared. Patterns of association for high- or low-condition individuals of the opposite sex differed for male and female focal birds when tested in an 8-way choice arena. Females showed repeatable condition-assortative preferences for males matching their own rearing background. Male preferences were also repeatable, but not predicted by their own or females' rearing background. In combination with a brief review of the literature on condition-dependent mate choice in the zebra finch we discuss whether the observed sex differences and between-studies differences arise because males and females differ in context sensitivity (e.g. male-male competition suppressing male mating preferences), sampling strategies or susceptibility to rearing conditions (e.g. sex-specific effect on physiology). While a picture emerges that juvenile and current state indeed affect preferences, the development and context-dependency of mutual state-dependent mate choice warrants further study.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>21901147</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0023974</doi><tpages>e23974</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9945-7067</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2011-08, Vol.6 (8), p.e23974-e23974 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1318921097 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Agriculture Animal behavior Animals Biology Birds Cognitive science Competition Female Females Finches - physiology Fitness Gender aspects Life Sciences Literature reviews Male Males Mate selection Mating Mating Preference, Animal - physiology Monogamy Neuroscience Neurosciences Predictions Preferences Quality Sex Sex differences Taeniopygia guttata Veterinary Science Zebra finch |
title | An experimental test of condition-dependent male and female mate choice in zebra finches |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T10%3A49%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20experimental%20test%20of%20condition-dependent%20male%20and%20female%20mate%20choice%20in%20zebra%20finches&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Holveck,%20Marie-Jeanne&rft.date=2011-08-25&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e23974&rft.epage=e23974&rft.pages=e23974-e23974&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0023974&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA476881712%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1318921097&rft_id=info:pmid/21901147&rft_galeid=A476881712&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_0dfac1ce0b3f4a47b20f9ee20b4191d0&rfr_iscdi=true |