The effective population size of malaria mosquitoes: large impact of vector control
Malaria vectors in sub-Saharan Africa have proven themselves very difficult adversaries in the global struggle against malaria. Decades of anti-vector interventions have yielded mixed results--with successful reductions in transmission in some areas and limited impacts in others. These varying succe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PLoS genetics 2012-12, Vol.8 (12), p.e1003097 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e1003097 |
container_title | PLoS genetics |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Athrey, Giridhar Hodges, Theresa K Reddy, Michael R Overgaard, Hans J Matias, Abrahan Ridl, Frances C Kleinschmidt, Immo Caccone, Adalgisa Slotman, Michel A |
description | Malaria vectors in sub-Saharan Africa have proven themselves very difficult adversaries in the global struggle against malaria. Decades of anti-vector interventions have yielded mixed results--with successful reductions in transmission in some areas and limited impacts in others. These varying successes can be ascribed to a lack of universally effective vector control tools, as well as the development of insecticide resistance in mosquito populations. Understanding the impact of vector control on mosquito populations is crucial for planning new interventions and evaluating existing ones. However, estimates of population size changes in response to control efforts are often inaccurate because of limitations and biases in collection methods. Attempts to evaluate the impact of vector control on mosquito effective population size (N(e)) have produced inconclusive results thus far. Therefore, we obtained data for 13-15 microsatellite markers for more than 1,500 mosquitoes representing multiple time points for seven populations of three important vector species--Anopheles gambiae, An. melas, and An. moucheti--in Equatorial Guinea. These populations were exposed to indoor residual spraying or long-lasting insecticidal nets in recent years. For comparison, we also analyzed data from two populations that have no history of organized vector control. We used Approximate Bayesian Computation to reconstruct their demographic history, allowing us to evaluate the impact of these interventions on the effective population size. In six of the seven study populations, vector control had a dramatic impact on the effective population size, reducing N(e) between 55%-87%, the exception being a single An. melas population. In contrast, the two negative control populations did not experience a reduction in effective population size. This study is the first to conclusively link anti-vector intervention programs in Africa to sharply reduced effective population sizes of malaria vectors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003097 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1313537736</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A314564562</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_630b3d016cef4a8fb1b120d63bb21439</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A314564562</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-b3f3bc92534f4b5019bc04c7c7b9ff733a221c779a9a093a6524ce6a53c60e753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkl-L1DAUxYso7rr6DUQLguDDjElu02z2QVgW_wwsLrirryHJJJ0MbdNN2kH99KZOd5mCgtJCw83vnCb3nix7jtESA8Nvt34IrayXXWXaJUYIEGcPsmNMKSxYgYqHB-uj7EmM28TQU84eZ0cECMOcwXF2fbMxubHW6N7tTN75bqhl73ybR_fT5N7mjaxlcDJvfLwdXO9NPMtTpTK5azqp-5HZJbkPufZtH3z9NHtkZR3Ns-l7kn398P7m4tPi8urj6uL8cqEZKfuFAgtKc0KhsIWiCHOlUaGZZopbywAkIVgzxiWXiIMsKSm0KSUFXSLDKJxkL_e-Xe2jmPoRBQYMFBiDMhGrPbH2ciu64BoZfggvnfhd8KESMvRO10aUgBSsES61sYU8tQorTNC6BKUILoAnr3fT3wbVmLU26a6ynpnOd1q3EZXfCaAEM0KSwavJIPjbwcT-L0eeqEqmU7nW-mSmGxe1OAdc0DK9o9fyD1R61qZxaQzGulSfCd7MBOOozPe-kkOMYnX95T_Yz__OXn2bs68P2I2Rdb-Jvh7GuMU5WOxBHXyMwdj7LmMkxvDfdU6M4RdT-JPsxeGE7kV3aYdfWf390g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1313537736</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effective population size of malaria mosquitoes: large impact of vector control</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Athrey, Giridhar ; Hodges, Theresa K ; Reddy, Michael R ; Overgaard, Hans J ; Matias, Abrahan ; Ridl, Frances C ; Kleinschmidt, Immo ; Caccone, Adalgisa ; Slotman, Michel A</creator><contributor>Petrov, Dmitri A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Athrey, Giridhar ; Hodges, Theresa K ; Reddy, Michael R ; Overgaard, Hans J ; Matias, Abrahan ; Ridl, Frances C ; Kleinschmidt, Immo ; Caccone, Adalgisa ; Slotman, Michel A ; Petrov, Dmitri A.</creatorcontrib><description>Malaria vectors in sub-Saharan Africa have proven themselves very difficult adversaries in the global struggle against malaria. Decades of anti-vector interventions have yielded mixed results--with successful reductions in transmission in some areas and limited impacts in others. These varying successes can be ascribed to a lack of universally effective vector control tools, as well as the development of insecticide resistance in mosquito populations. Understanding the impact of vector control on mosquito populations is crucial for planning new interventions and evaluating existing ones. However, estimates of population size changes in response to control efforts are often inaccurate because of limitations and biases in collection methods. Attempts to evaluate the impact of vector control on mosquito effective population size (N(e)) have produced inconclusive results thus far. Therefore, we obtained data for 13-15 microsatellite markers for more than 1,500 mosquitoes representing multiple time points for seven populations of three important vector species--Anopheles gambiae, An. melas, and An. moucheti--in Equatorial Guinea. These populations were exposed to indoor residual spraying or long-lasting insecticidal nets in recent years. For comparison, we also analyzed data from two populations that have no history of organized vector control. We used Approximate Bayesian Computation to reconstruct their demographic history, allowing us to evaluate the impact of these interventions on the effective population size. In six of the seven study populations, vector control had a dramatic impact on the effective population size, reducing N(e) between 55%-87%, the exception being a single An. melas population. In contrast, the two negative control populations did not experience a reduction in effective population size. This study is the first to conclusively link anti-vector intervention programs in Africa to sharply reduced effective population sizes of malaria vectors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-7404</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1553-7390</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-7404</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003097</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23271973</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Africa South of the Sahara ; Animal genetics ; Animal populations ; Animals ; Anopheles - drug effects ; Anopheles - genetics ; Biology ; Distribution ; Equatorial Guinea ; Genetic aspects ; Genetic vectors ; Genetics ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Insect Vectors - genetics ; Insecticide Resistance - genetics ; Insecticides - pharmacology ; Intervention ; Malaria ; Malaria - epidemiology ; Malaria - genetics ; Malaria - parasitology ; Medicine ; Mosquito Control ; Mosquitoes ; Pest Control ; Physiological aspects ; Population ; Population Density ; Population genetics ; Probability ; Pyrethrins - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>PLoS genetics, 2012-12, Vol.8 (12), p.e1003097</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2012 Athrey et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Athrey G, Hodges TK, Reddy MR, Overgaard HJ, Matias A, et al. (2012) The Effective Population Size of Malaria Mosquitoes: Large Impact of Vector Control. PLoS Genet 8(12): e1003097. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003097</rights><rights>2012 Athrey et al 2012 Athrey et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-b3f3bc92534f4b5019bc04c7c7b9ff733a221c779a9a093a6524ce6a53c60e753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-b3f3bc92534f4b5019bc04c7c7b9ff733a221c779a9a093a6524ce6a53c60e753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3521722/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3521722/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23271973$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Petrov, Dmitri A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Athrey, Giridhar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Theresa K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overgaard, Hans J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matias, Abrahan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ridl, Frances C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinschmidt, Immo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caccone, Adalgisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slotman, Michel A</creatorcontrib><title>The effective population size of malaria mosquitoes: large impact of vector control</title><title>PLoS genetics</title><addtitle>PLoS Genet</addtitle><description>Malaria vectors in sub-Saharan Africa have proven themselves very difficult adversaries in the global struggle against malaria. Decades of anti-vector interventions have yielded mixed results--with successful reductions in transmission in some areas and limited impacts in others. These varying successes can be ascribed to a lack of universally effective vector control tools, as well as the development of insecticide resistance in mosquito populations. Understanding the impact of vector control on mosquito populations is crucial for planning new interventions and evaluating existing ones. However, estimates of population size changes in response to control efforts are often inaccurate because of limitations and biases in collection methods. Attempts to evaluate the impact of vector control on mosquito effective population size (N(e)) have produced inconclusive results thus far. Therefore, we obtained data for 13-15 microsatellite markers for more than 1,500 mosquitoes representing multiple time points for seven populations of three important vector species--Anopheles gambiae, An. melas, and An. moucheti--in Equatorial Guinea. These populations were exposed to indoor residual spraying or long-lasting insecticidal nets in recent years. For comparison, we also analyzed data from two populations that have no history of organized vector control. We used Approximate Bayesian Computation to reconstruct their demographic history, allowing us to evaluate the impact of these interventions on the effective population size. In six of the seven study populations, vector control had a dramatic impact on the effective population size, reducing N(e) between 55%-87%, the exception being a single An. melas population. In contrast, the two negative control populations did not experience a reduction in effective population size. This study is the first to conclusively link anti-vector intervention programs in Africa to sharply reduced effective population sizes of malaria vectors.</description><subject>Africa South of the Sahara</subject><subject>Animal genetics</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anopheles - drug effects</subject><subject>Anopheles - genetics</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Equatorial Guinea</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genetic vectors</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insect Vectors - genetics</subject><subject>Insecticide Resistance - genetics</subject><subject>Insecticides - pharmacology</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Malaria</subject><subject>Malaria - epidemiology</subject><subject>Malaria - genetics</subject><subject>Malaria - parasitology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Mosquito Control</subject><subject>Mosquitoes</subject><subject>Pest Control</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Pyrethrins - pharmacology</subject><issn>1553-7404</issn><issn>1553-7390</issn><issn>1553-7404</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkl-L1DAUxYso7rr6DUQLguDDjElu02z2QVgW_wwsLrirryHJJJ0MbdNN2kH99KZOd5mCgtJCw83vnCb3nix7jtESA8Nvt34IrayXXWXaJUYIEGcPsmNMKSxYgYqHB-uj7EmM28TQU84eZ0cECMOcwXF2fbMxubHW6N7tTN75bqhl73ybR_fT5N7mjaxlcDJvfLwdXO9NPMtTpTK5azqp-5HZJbkPufZtH3z9NHtkZR3Ns-l7kn398P7m4tPi8urj6uL8cqEZKfuFAgtKc0KhsIWiCHOlUaGZZopbywAkIVgzxiWXiIMsKSm0KSUFXSLDKJxkL_e-Xe2jmPoRBQYMFBiDMhGrPbH2ciu64BoZfggvnfhd8KESMvRO10aUgBSsES61sYU8tQorTNC6BKUILoAnr3fT3wbVmLU26a6ynpnOd1q3EZXfCaAEM0KSwavJIPjbwcT-L0eeqEqmU7nW-mSmGxe1OAdc0DK9o9fyD1R61qZxaQzGulSfCd7MBOOozPe-kkOMYnX95T_Yz__OXn2bs68P2I2Rdb-Jvh7GuMU5WOxBHXyMwdj7LmMkxvDfdU6M4RdT-JPsxeGE7kV3aYdfWf390g</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Athrey, Giridhar</creator><creator>Hodges, Theresa K</creator><creator>Reddy, Michael R</creator><creator>Overgaard, Hans J</creator><creator>Matias, Abrahan</creator><creator>Ridl, Frances C</creator><creator>Kleinschmidt, Immo</creator><creator>Caccone, Adalgisa</creator><creator>Slotman, Michel A</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>The effective population size of malaria mosquitoes: large impact of vector control</title><author>Athrey, Giridhar ; Hodges, Theresa K ; Reddy, Michael R ; Overgaard, Hans J ; Matias, Abrahan ; Ridl, Frances C ; Kleinschmidt, Immo ; Caccone, Adalgisa ; Slotman, Michel A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-b3f3bc92534f4b5019bc04c7c7b9ff733a221c779a9a093a6524ce6a53c60e753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Africa South of the Sahara</topic><topic>Animal genetics</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anopheles - drug effects</topic><topic>Anopheles - genetics</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Equatorial Guinea</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genetic vectors</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insect Vectors - genetics</topic><topic>Insecticide Resistance - genetics</topic><topic>Insecticides - pharmacology</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Malaria</topic><topic>Malaria - epidemiology</topic><topic>Malaria - genetics</topic><topic>Malaria - parasitology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Mosquito Control</topic><topic>Mosquitoes</topic><topic>Pest Control</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Pyrethrins - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Athrey, Giridhar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Theresa K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overgaard, Hans J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matias, Abrahan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ridl, Frances C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinschmidt, Immo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caccone, Adalgisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slotman, Michel A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PLoS genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Athrey, Giridhar</au><au>Hodges, Theresa K</au><au>Reddy, Michael R</au><au>Overgaard, Hans J</au><au>Matias, Abrahan</au><au>Ridl, Frances C</au><au>Kleinschmidt, Immo</au><au>Caccone, Adalgisa</au><au>Slotman, Michel A</au><au>Petrov, Dmitri A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effective population size of malaria mosquitoes: large impact of vector control</atitle><jtitle>PLoS genetics</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Genet</addtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e1003097</spage><pages>e1003097-</pages><issn>1553-7404</issn><issn>1553-7390</issn><eissn>1553-7404</eissn><abstract>Malaria vectors in sub-Saharan Africa have proven themselves very difficult adversaries in the global struggle against malaria. Decades of anti-vector interventions have yielded mixed results--with successful reductions in transmission in some areas and limited impacts in others. These varying successes can be ascribed to a lack of universally effective vector control tools, as well as the development of insecticide resistance in mosquito populations. Understanding the impact of vector control on mosquito populations is crucial for planning new interventions and evaluating existing ones. However, estimates of population size changes in response to control efforts are often inaccurate because of limitations and biases in collection methods. Attempts to evaluate the impact of vector control on mosquito effective population size (N(e)) have produced inconclusive results thus far. Therefore, we obtained data for 13-15 microsatellite markers for more than 1,500 mosquitoes representing multiple time points for seven populations of three important vector species--Anopheles gambiae, An. melas, and An. moucheti--in Equatorial Guinea. These populations were exposed to indoor residual spraying or long-lasting insecticidal nets in recent years. For comparison, we also analyzed data from two populations that have no history of organized vector control. We used Approximate Bayesian Computation to reconstruct their demographic history, allowing us to evaluate the impact of these interventions on the effective population size. In six of the seven study populations, vector control had a dramatic impact on the effective population size, reducing N(e) between 55%-87%, the exception being a single An. melas population. In contrast, the two negative control populations did not experience a reduction in effective population size. This study is the first to conclusively link anti-vector intervention programs in Africa to sharply reduced effective population sizes of malaria vectors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>23271973</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pgen.1003097</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1553-7404 |
ispartof | PLoS genetics, 2012-12, Vol.8 (12), p.e1003097 |
issn | 1553-7404 1553-7390 1553-7404 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1313537736 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Africa South of the Sahara Animal genetics Animal populations Animals Anopheles - drug effects Anopheles - genetics Biology Distribution Equatorial Guinea Genetic aspects Genetic vectors Genetics Health aspects Humans Insect Vectors - genetics Insecticide Resistance - genetics Insecticides - pharmacology Intervention Malaria Malaria - epidemiology Malaria - genetics Malaria - parasitology Medicine Mosquito Control Mosquitoes Pest Control Physiological aspects Population Population Density Population genetics Probability Pyrethrins - pharmacology |
title | The effective population size of malaria mosquitoes: large impact of vector control |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T02%3A50%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effective%20population%20size%20of%20malaria%20mosquitoes:%20large%20impact%20of%20vector%20control&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20genetics&rft.au=Athrey,%20Giridhar&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e1003097&rft.pages=e1003097-&rft.issn=1553-7404&rft.eissn=1553-7404&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003097&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA314564562%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1313537736&rft_id=info:pmid/23271973&rft_galeid=A314564562&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_630b3d016cef4a8fb1b120d63bb21439&rfr_iscdi=true |