General anesthetics predicted to block the GLIC pore with micromolar affinity

Although general anesthetics are known to modulate the activity of ligand-gated ion channels in the Cys-loop superfamily, there is at present neither consensus on the underlying mechanisms, nor predictive models of this modulation. Viable models need to offer quantitative assessment of the relative...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PLoS computational biology 2012-05, Vol.8 (5), p.e1002532-e1002532
Hauptverfasser: LeBard, David N, Hénin, Jérôme, Eckenhoff, Roderic G, Klein, Michael L, Brannigan, Grace
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e1002532
container_issue 5
container_start_page e1002532
container_title PLoS computational biology
container_volume 8
creator LeBard, David N
Hénin, Jérôme
Eckenhoff, Roderic G
Klein, Michael L
Brannigan, Grace
description Although general anesthetics are known to modulate the activity of ligand-gated ion channels in the Cys-loop superfamily, there is at present neither consensus on the underlying mechanisms, nor predictive models of this modulation. Viable models need to offer quantitative assessment of the relative importance of several identified anesthetic binding sites. However, to date, precise affinity data for individual sites has been challenging to obtain by biophysical means. Here, the likely role of pore block inhibition by the general anesthetics isoflurane and propofol of the prokaryotic pentameric channel GLIC is investigated by molecular simulations. Microscopic affinities are calculated for both single and double occupancy binding of isoflurane and propofol to the GLIC pore. Computations are carried out for an open-pore conformation in which the pore is restrained to crystallographic radius, and a closed-pore conformation that results from unrestrained molecular dynamics equilibration of the structure. The GLIC pore is predicted to be blocked at the micromolar concentrations for which inhibition by isofluorane and propofol is observed experimentally. Calculated affinities suggest that pore block by propofol occurs at signifcantly lower concentrations than those for which inhibition is observed: we argue that this discrepancy may result from binding of propofol to an allosteric site recently identified by X-ray crystallography, which may cause a competing gain-of-function effect. Affinities of isoflurane and propofol to the allosteric site are also calculated, and shown to be 3 mM for isoflurane and 10 μM for propofol; both anesthetics have a lower affinity for the allosteric site than for the unoccupied pore.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002532
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1313185851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A293812976</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6189513b39334f1ba4e13dd9a82ce48a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A293812976</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c695t-fe49264a61c80d69531b7e0ebd9bd3e9db9e62ee5084ba167ffa047de7597a993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVUk2P0zAQjRCI_YB_gCASF_bQYsdOYl-Qqgq6lQpIfJwtx560Lmkc7HTZ_fdMaHa1Xe0F-WBr_N6bmTeTJK8omVJW0vdbvw-tbqadqdyUEpLlLHuSnNI8Z5OS5eLpvfdJchbjlhB8yuJ5cpJlhWScidPk8wJaCLpJdQux30DvTEy7ANaZHmza-7RqvPmV4le6WC3naecDpH9cv0l3zgS_840Oqa5r17r-5kXyrNZNhJfjfZ78_PTxx_xysvq6WM5nq4kpZN5PauAyK7guqBHEYojRqgQClZWVZSBtJaHIAHIieKVpUda1Jry0UOay1FKy8-TNQbdrfFSjE1FRhkfkIqeIWB4Q1uut6oLb6XCjvHbqX8CHtdIBm21AFVRIZFRMMsZrWmkOlFkrtcgMcKFR68OYbV_twBpoe3TsSPT4p3UbtfZXirGCS1agwMVBYPOAdjlbqSFGKJeCEn41FP5uTBb87z3ORO1cNNA0OCC_xx5JRgZfCEPo2wfQx50YUWuNzbq29lijGUTVLJNM0EyWQ4nTR1B4LOCcfQu1w_gR4eKIgJgervu13seolt-__Qf2yzGWH7C4XDEGqO8Mo0QNi3_bpBoWX42Lj7TX92d0R7rddPYXipz8gQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1313185851</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>General anesthetics predicted to block the GLIC pore with micromolar affinity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>LeBard, David N ; Hénin, Jérôme ; Eckenhoff, Roderic G ; Klein, Michael L ; Brannigan, Grace</creator><contributor>Pohorille, Andrew</contributor><creatorcontrib>LeBard, David N ; Hénin, Jérôme ; Eckenhoff, Roderic G ; Klein, Michael L ; Brannigan, Grace ; Pohorille, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Although general anesthetics are known to modulate the activity of ligand-gated ion channels in the Cys-loop superfamily, there is at present neither consensus on the underlying mechanisms, nor predictive models of this modulation. Viable models need to offer quantitative assessment of the relative importance of several identified anesthetic binding sites. However, to date, precise affinity data for individual sites has been challenging to obtain by biophysical means. Here, the likely role of pore block inhibition by the general anesthetics isoflurane and propofol of the prokaryotic pentameric channel GLIC is investigated by molecular simulations. Microscopic affinities are calculated for both single and double occupancy binding of isoflurane and propofol to the GLIC pore. Computations are carried out for an open-pore conformation in which the pore is restrained to crystallographic radius, and a closed-pore conformation that results from unrestrained molecular dynamics equilibration of the structure. The GLIC pore is predicted to be blocked at the micromolar concentrations for which inhibition by isofluorane and propofol is observed experimentally. Calculated affinities suggest that pore block by propofol occurs at signifcantly lower concentrations than those for which inhibition is observed: we argue that this discrepancy may result from binding of propofol to an allosteric site recently identified by X-ray crystallography, which may cause a competing gain-of-function effect. Affinities of isoflurane and propofol to the allosteric site are also calculated, and shown to be 3 mM for isoflurane and 10 μM for propofol; both anesthetics have a lower affinity for the allosteric site than for the unoccupied pore.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-7358</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1553-734X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-7358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002532</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22693438</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Allosteric Site ; Analysis ; Anesthetics ; Anesthetics, General - chemistry ; Anesthetics, General - pharmacology ; Bacterial Proteins - chemistry ; Bacterial Proteins - metabolism ; Binding Sites ; Biochemistry, Molecular Biology ; Biology ; Biophysics ; Computer Simulation ; Crystallography ; Cysteine Loop Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptors - antagonists &amp; inhibitors ; Cysteine Loop Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptors - chemistry ; Cysteine Loop Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptors - metabolism ; Experiments ; Ion channels ; Life Sciences ; Ligands ; Medicine ; Models, Molecular ; Physiological aspects ; Protein binding ; Protein Conformation ; Proteins ; Structure ; Studies ; Thermodynamics</subject><ispartof>PLoS computational biology, 2012-05, Vol.8 (5), p.e1002532-e1002532</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2012 LeBard et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: LeBard DN, Hénin J, Eckenhoff RG, Klein ML, Brannigan G (2012) General Anesthetics Predicted to Block the GLIC Pore with Micromolar Affinity. PLoS Comput Biol 8(5): e1002532. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002532</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>LeBard et al. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c695t-fe49264a61c80d69531b7e0ebd9bd3e9db9e62ee5084ba167ffa047de7597a993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c695t-fe49264a61c80d69531b7e0ebd9bd3e9db9e62ee5084ba167ffa047de7597a993</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2540-4098</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364936/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364936/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22693438$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01498104$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Pohorille, Andrew</contributor><creatorcontrib>LeBard, David N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hénin, Jérôme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckenhoff, Roderic G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brannigan, Grace</creatorcontrib><title>General anesthetics predicted to block the GLIC pore with micromolar affinity</title><title>PLoS computational biology</title><addtitle>PLoS Comput Biol</addtitle><description>Although general anesthetics are known to modulate the activity of ligand-gated ion channels in the Cys-loop superfamily, there is at present neither consensus on the underlying mechanisms, nor predictive models of this modulation. Viable models need to offer quantitative assessment of the relative importance of several identified anesthetic binding sites. However, to date, precise affinity data for individual sites has been challenging to obtain by biophysical means. Here, the likely role of pore block inhibition by the general anesthetics isoflurane and propofol of the prokaryotic pentameric channel GLIC is investigated by molecular simulations. Microscopic affinities are calculated for both single and double occupancy binding of isoflurane and propofol to the GLIC pore. Computations are carried out for an open-pore conformation in which the pore is restrained to crystallographic radius, and a closed-pore conformation that results from unrestrained molecular dynamics equilibration of the structure. The GLIC pore is predicted to be blocked at the micromolar concentrations for which inhibition by isofluorane and propofol is observed experimentally. Calculated affinities suggest that pore block by propofol occurs at signifcantly lower concentrations than those for which inhibition is observed: we argue that this discrepancy may result from binding of propofol to an allosteric site recently identified by X-ray crystallography, which may cause a competing gain-of-function effect. Affinities of isoflurane and propofol to the allosteric site are also calculated, and shown to be 3 mM for isoflurane and 10 μM for propofol; both anesthetics have a lower affinity for the allosteric site than for the unoccupied pore.</description><subject>Allosteric Site</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anesthetics</subject><subject>Anesthetics, General - chemistry</subject><subject>Anesthetics, General - pharmacology</subject><subject>Bacterial Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Bacterial Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Binding Sites</subject><subject>Biochemistry, Molecular Biology</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Crystallography</subject><subject>Cysteine Loop Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptors - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</subject><subject>Cysteine Loop Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptors - chemistry</subject><subject>Cysteine Loop Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptors - metabolism</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Ion channels</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Models, Molecular</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Protein binding</subject><subject>Protein Conformation</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Structure</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Thermodynamics</subject><issn>1553-7358</issn><issn>1553-734X</issn><issn>1553-7358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVUk2P0zAQjRCI_YB_gCASF_bQYsdOYl-Qqgq6lQpIfJwtx560Lmkc7HTZ_fdMaHa1Xe0F-WBr_N6bmTeTJK8omVJW0vdbvw-tbqadqdyUEpLlLHuSnNI8Z5OS5eLpvfdJchbjlhB8yuJ5cpJlhWScidPk8wJaCLpJdQux30DvTEy7ANaZHmza-7RqvPmV4le6WC3naecDpH9cv0l3zgS_840Oqa5r17r-5kXyrNZNhJfjfZ78_PTxx_xysvq6WM5nq4kpZN5PauAyK7guqBHEYojRqgQClZWVZSBtJaHIAHIieKVpUda1Jry0UOay1FKy8-TNQbdrfFSjE1FRhkfkIqeIWB4Q1uut6oLb6XCjvHbqX8CHtdIBm21AFVRIZFRMMsZrWmkOlFkrtcgMcKFR68OYbV_twBpoe3TsSPT4p3UbtfZXirGCS1agwMVBYPOAdjlbqSFGKJeCEn41FP5uTBb87z3ORO1cNNA0OCC_xx5JRgZfCEPo2wfQx50YUWuNzbq29lijGUTVLJNM0EyWQ4nTR1B4LOCcfQu1w_gR4eKIgJgervu13seolt-__Qf2yzGWH7C4XDEGqO8Mo0QNi3_bpBoWX42Lj7TX92d0R7rddPYXipz8gQ</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>LeBard, David N</creator><creator>Hénin, Jérôme</creator><creator>Eckenhoff, Roderic G</creator><creator>Klein, Michael L</creator><creator>Brannigan, Grace</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>PLOS</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2540-4098</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>General anesthetics predicted to block the GLIC pore with micromolar affinity</title><author>LeBard, David N ; Hénin, Jérôme ; Eckenhoff, Roderic G ; Klein, Michael L ; Brannigan, Grace</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c695t-fe49264a61c80d69531b7e0ebd9bd3e9db9e62ee5084ba167ffa047de7597a993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Allosteric Site</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anesthetics</topic><topic>Anesthetics, General - chemistry</topic><topic>Anesthetics, General - pharmacology</topic><topic>Bacterial Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Bacterial Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Binding Sites</topic><topic>Biochemistry, Molecular Biology</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Crystallography</topic><topic>Cysteine Loop Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptors - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</topic><topic>Cysteine Loop Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptors - chemistry</topic><topic>Cysteine Loop Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptors - metabolism</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Ion channels</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Models, Molecular</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Protein binding</topic><topic>Protein Conformation</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Structure</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Thermodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LeBard, David N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hénin, Jérôme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckenhoff, Roderic G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brannigan, Grace</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PLoS computational biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LeBard, David N</au><au>Hénin, Jérôme</au><au>Eckenhoff, Roderic G</au><au>Klein, Michael L</au><au>Brannigan, Grace</au><au>Pohorille, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>General anesthetics predicted to block the GLIC pore with micromolar affinity</atitle><jtitle>PLoS computational biology</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Comput Biol</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e1002532</spage><epage>e1002532</epage><pages>e1002532-e1002532</pages><issn>1553-7358</issn><issn>1553-734X</issn><eissn>1553-7358</eissn><abstract>Although general anesthetics are known to modulate the activity of ligand-gated ion channels in the Cys-loop superfamily, there is at present neither consensus on the underlying mechanisms, nor predictive models of this modulation. Viable models need to offer quantitative assessment of the relative importance of several identified anesthetic binding sites. However, to date, precise affinity data for individual sites has been challenging to obtain by biophysical means. Here, the likely role of pore block inhibition by the general anesthetics isoflurane and propofol of the prokaryotic pentameric channel GLIC is investigated by molecular simulations. Microscopic affinities are calculated for both single and double occupancy binding of isoflurane and propofol to the GLIC pore. Computations are carried out for an open-pore conformation in which the pore is restrained to crystallographic radius, and a closed-pore conformation that results from unrestrained molecular dynamics equilibration of the structure. The GLIC pore is predicted to be blocked at the micromolar concentrations for which inhibition by isofluorane and propofol is observed experimentally. Calculated affinities suggest that pore block by propofol occurs at signifcantly lower concentrations than those for which inhibition is observed: we argue that this discrepancy may result from binding of propofol to an allosteric site recently identified by X-ray crystallography, which may cause a competing gain-of-function effect. Affinities of isoflurane and propofol to the allosteric site are also calculated, and shown to be 3 mM for isoflurane and 10 μM for propofol; both anesthetics have a lower affinity for the allosteric site than for the unoccupied pore.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>22693438</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002532</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2540-4098</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1553-7358
ispartof PLoS computational biology, 2012-05, Vol.8 (5), p.e1002532-e1002532
issn 1553-7358
1553-734X
1553-7358
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1313185851
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Allosteric Site
Analysis
Anesthetics
Anesthetics, General - chemistry
Anesthetics, General - pharmacology
Bacterial Proteins - chemistry
Bacterial Proteins - metabolism
Binding Sites
Biochemistry, Molecular Biology
Biology
Biophysics
Computer Simulation
Crystallography
Cysteine Loop Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptors - antagonists & inhibitors
Cysteine Loop Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptors - chemistry
Cysteine Loop Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptors - metabolism
Experiments
Ion channels
Life Sciences
Ligands
Medicine
Models, Molecular
Physiological aspects
Protein binding
Protein Conformation
Proteins
Structure
Studies
Thermodynamics
title General anesthetics predicted to block the GLIC pore with micromolar affinity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T04%3A28%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=General%20anesthetics%20predicted%20to%20block%20the%20GLIC%20pore%20with%20micromolar%20affinity&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20computational%20biology&rft.au=LeBard,%20David%20N&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e1002532&rft.epage=e1002532&rft.pages=e1002532-e1002532&rft.issn=1553-7358&rft.eissn=1553-7358&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002532&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA293812976%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1313185851&rft_id=info:pmid/22693438&rft_galeid=A293812976&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_6189513b39334f1ba4e13dd9a82ce48a&rfr_iscdi=true