Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement
Value estimates of ecosystem goods and services are useful to justify the allocation of resources towards conservation, but inconclusive estimates risk unsustainable resource allocations. Here we present replacement costs as a more accurate value estimate of insect pollination as an ecosystem servic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2008-09, Vol.3 (9), p.e3128-e3128 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e3128 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e3128 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Allsopp, Mike H de Lange, Willem J Veldtman, Ruan |
description | Value estimates of ecosystem goods and services are useful to justify the allocation of resources towards conservation, but inconclusive estimates risk unsustainable resource allocations. Here we present replacement costs as a more accurate value estimate of insect pollination as an ecosystem service, although this method could also be applied to other services. The importance of insect pollination to agriculture is unequivocal. However, whether this service is largely provided by wild pollinators (genuine ecosystem service) or managed pollinators (commercial service), and which of these requires immediate action amidst reports of pollinator decline, remains contested. If crop pollination is used to argue for biodiversity conservation, clear distinction should be made between values of managed- and wild pollination services. Current methods either under-estimate or over-estimate the pollination service value, and make use of criticised general insect and managed pollinator dependence factors. We apply the theoretical concept of ascribing a value to a service by calculating the cost to replace it, as a novel way of valuing wild and managed pollination services. Adjusted insect and managed pollinator dependence factors were used to estimate the cost of replacing insect- and managed pollination services for the Western Cape deciduous fruit industry of South Africa. Using pollen dusting and hand pollination as suitable replacements, we value pollination services significantly higher than current market prices for commercial pollination, although lower than traditional proportional estimates. The complexity associated with inclusive value estimation of pollination services required several defendable assumptions, but made estimates more inclusive than previous attempts. Consequently this study provides the basis for continued improvement in context specific pollination service value estimates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0003128 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1312319552</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A472625147</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a79152e906cd4864a5d2e33b1279213d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A472625147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-f724e4871731000dd31e1e31a4698df1d9b94a53d1084a0c2cdd4e60444b09cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLwoIXM-YkadqACMvix8DCgh97GzLJ6UyGTDObtKv-ezNO1al4Ib1ISZ7znvMmb1E8BTIHVsOrTRhip_18FzqcE0IY0OZecQqS0ZmghN0_-j8pHqW0IaRijRAPixNo6gZAitPi9Y32g-tWpesSmr7cBe9dp3sXujJhvHMGU_nV9evShNSXoS0j7rw2uMWuf1w8aLVP-GRcz4ov795-vvwwu7p-v7i8uJoZIWg_a2vKkTc11AzyoNYyQEAGmgvZ2BasXEquK2aBNFwTQ421HAXhnC-JNC07K54fdHc-JDUaTwqyZQayqmgmFgfCBr1Ru-i2On5XQTv1cyPEldKxd8aj0rWEiqIkwljeiNzYUmRsCbSWFJjNWm_GbsNyi9Zko1H7iej0pHNrtQp3ilYga0mywPkoEMPtgKlXW5cMeq87DENSQlasAsEz-OIv8N_e5gdqpfP4rmtD7mryZ3HrTH791uX9C15TkSfgdS54OSnITI_f-pUeUlKLTx__n72-mbLnR-wate_XKfhhH5Y0BfkBNDGkFLH9fXlA1D68v3yqfXjVGN5c9uz44v8UjWllPwA_a-kJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1312319552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Allsopp, Mike H ; de Lange, Willem J ; Veldtman, Ruan</creator><creatorcontrib>Allsopp, Mike H ; de Lange, Willem J ; Veldtman, Ruan</creatorcontrib><description>Value estimates of ecosystem goods and services are useful to justify the allocation of resources towards conservation, but inconclusive estimates risk unsustainable resource allocations. Here we present replacement costs as a more accurate value estimate of insect pollination as an ecosystem service, although this method could also be applied to other services. The importance of insect pollination to agriculture is unequivocal. However, whether this service is largely provided by wild pollinators (genuine ecosystem service) or managed pollinators (commercial service), and which of these requires immediate action amidst reports of pollinator decline, remains contested. If crop pollination is used to argue for biodiversity conservation, clear distinction should be made between values of managed- and wild pollination services. Current methods either under-estimate or over-estimate the pollination service value, and make use of criticised general insect and managed pollinator dependence factors. We apply the theoretical concept of ascribing a value to a service by calculating the cost to replace it, as a novel way of valuing wild and managed pollination services. Adjusted insect and managed pollinator dependence factors were used to estimate the cost of replacing insect- and managed pollination services for the Western Cape deciduous fruit industry of South Africa. Using pollen dusting and hand pollination as suitable replacements, we value pollination services significantly higher than current market prices for commercial pollination, although lower than traditional proportional estimates. The complexity associated with inclusive value estimation of pollination services required several defendable assumptions, but made estimates more inclusive than previous attempts. Consequently this study provides the basis for continued improvement in context specific pollination service value estimates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003128</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18781196</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agricultural management ; Agriculture ; Agriculture - economics ; Animals ; Apis mellifera ; Bees ; Bees - physiology ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity conservation ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources - economics ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Crops, Agricultural - economics ; Decision making ; Ecology ; Ecology/Conservation and Restoration Ecology ; Ecology/Ecosystem Ecology ; Ecology/Global Change Ecology ; Economic aspects ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem management ; Ecosystems ; Estimates ; Fruit - economics ; Fruits ; Insecta - metabolism ; Insecta - physiology ; Insects ; Models, Biological ; Models, Economic ; Models, Theoretical ; Plant reproduction ; Pollen ; Pollination ; Pollinators ; Pricing ; Protection and preservation ; Resource allocation ; Risk allocation ; South Africa ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2008-09, Vol.3 (9), p.e3128-e3128</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2008 Allsopp et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Allsopp et al. 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-f724e4871731000dd31e1e31a4698df1d9b94a53d1084a0c2cdd4e60444b09cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-f724e4871731000dd31e1e31a4698df1d9b94a53d1084a0c2cdd4e60444b09cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2519790/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2519790/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18781196$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allsopp, Mike H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lange, Willem J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veldtman, Ruan</creatorcontrib><title>Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Value estimates of ecosystem goods and services are useful to justify the allocation of resources towards conservation, but inconclusive estimates risk unsustainable resource allocations. Here we present replacement costs as a more accurate value estimate of insect pollination as an ecosystem service, although this method could also be applied to other services. The importance of insect pollination to agriculture is unequivocal. However, whether this service is largely provided by wild pollinators (genuine ecosystem service) or managed pollinators (commercial service), and which of these requires immediate action amidst reports of pollinator decline, remains contested. If crop pollination is used to argue for biodiversity conservation, clear distinction should be made between values of managed- and wild pollination services. Current methods either under-estimate or over-estimate the pollination service value, and make use of criticised general insect and managed pollinator dependence factors. We apply the theoretical concept of ascribing a value to a service by calculating the cost to replace it, as a novel way of valuing wild and managed pollination services. Adjusted insect and managed pollinator dependence factors were used to estimate the cost of replacing insect- and managed pollination services for the Western Cape deciduous fruit industry of South Africa. Using pollen dusting and hand pollination as suitable replacements, we value pollination services significantly higher than current market prices for commercial pollination, although lower than traditional proportional estimates. The complexity associated with inclusive value estimation of pollination services required several defendable assumptions, but made estimates more inclusive than previous attempts. Consequently this study provides the basis for continued improvement in context specific pollination service value estimates.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agriculture - economics</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apis mellifera</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Bees - physiology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Crops, Agricultural - economics</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecology/Conservation and Restoration Ecology</subject><subject>Ecology/Ecosystem Ecology</subject><subject>Ecology/Global Change Ecology</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem management</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Fruit - economics</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Insecta - metabolism</subject><subject>Insecta - physiology</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Models, Economic</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Pricing</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Resource allocation</subject><subject>Risk allocation</subject><subject>South Africa</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLwoIXM-YkadqACMvix8DCgh97GzLJ6UyGTDObtKv-ezNO1al4Ib1ISZ7znvMmb1E8BTIHVsOrTRhip_18FzqcE0IY0OZecQqS0ZmghN0_-j8pHqW0IaRijRAPixNo6gZAitPi9Y32g-tWpesSmr7cBe9dp3sXujJhvHMGU_nV9evShNSXoS0j7rw2uMWuf1w8aLVP-GRcz4ov795-vvwwu7p-v7i8uJoZIWg_a2vKkTc11AzyoNYyQEAGmgvZ2BasXEquK2aBNFwTQ421HAXhnC-JNC07K54fdHc-JDUaTwqyZQayqmgmFgfCBr1Ru-i2On5XQTv1cyPEldKxd8aj0rWEiqIkwljeiNzYUmRsCbSWFJjNWm_GbsNyi9Zko1H7iej0pHNrtQp3ilYga0mywPkoEMPtgKlXW5cMeq87DENSQlasAsEz-OIv8N_e5gdqpfP4rmtD7mryZ3HrTH791uX9C15TkSfgdS54OSnITI_f-pUeUlKLTx__n72-mbLnR-wate_XKfhhH5Y0BfkBNDGkFLH9fXlA1D68v3yqfXjVGN5c9uz44v8UjWllPwA_a-kJ</recordid><startdate>20080910</startdate><enddate>20080910</enddate><creator>Allsopp, Mike H</creator><creator>de Lange, Willem J</creator><creator>Veldtman, Ruan</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080910</creationdate><title>Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement</title><author>Allsopp, Mike H ; de Lange, Willem J ; Veldtman, Ruan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-f724e4871731000dd31e1e31a4698df1d9b94a53d1084a0c2cdd4e60444b09cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agriculture - economics</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apis mellifera</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Bees - physiology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Crops, Agricultural - economics</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecology/Conservation and Restoration Ecology</topic><topic>Ecology/Ecosystem Ecology</topic><topic>Ecology/Global Change Ecology</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem management</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Fruit - economics</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Insecta - metabolism</topic><topic>Insecta - physiology</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Models, Economic</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Pricing</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Resource allocation</topic><topic>Risk allocation</topic><topic>South Africa</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allsopp, Mike H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lange, Willem J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veldtman, Ruan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allsopp, Mike H</au><au>de Lange, Willem J</au><au>Veldtman, Ruan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2008-09-10</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e3128</spage><epage>e3128</epage><pages>e3128-e3128</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Value estimates of ecosystem goods and services are useful to justify the allocation of resources towards conservation, but inconclusive estimates risk unsustainable resource allocations. Here we present replacement costs as a more accurate value estimate of insect pollination as an ecosystem service, although this method could also be applied to other services. The importance of insect pollination to agriculture is unequivocal. However, whether this service is largely provided by wild pollinators (genuine ecosystem service) or managed pollinators (commercial service), and which of these requires immediate action amidst reports of pollinator decline, remains contested. If crop pollination is used to argue for biodiversity conservation, clear distinction should be made between values of managed- and wild pollination services. Current methods either under-estimate or over-estimate the pollination service value, and make use of criticised general insect and managed pollinator dependence factors. We apply the theoretical concept of ascribing a value to a service by calculating the cost to replace it, as a novel way of valuing wild and managed pollination services. Adjusted insect and managed pollinator dependence factors were used to estimate the cost of replacing insect- and managed pollination services for the Western Cape deciduous fruit industry of South Africa. Using pollen dusting and hand pollination as suitable replacements, we value pollination services significantly higher than current market prices for commercial pollination, although lower than traditional proportional estimates. The complexity associated with inclusive value estimation of pollination services required several defendable assumptions, but made estimates more inclusive than previous attempts. Consequently this study provides the basis for continued improvement in context specific pollination service value estimates.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>18781196</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0003128</doi><tpages>e3128</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2008-09, Vol.3 (9), p.e3128-e3128 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1312319552 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Agricultural economics Agricultural management Agriculture Agriculture - economics Animals Apis mellifera Bees Bees - physiology Biodiversity Biodiversity conservation Conservation Conservation of Natural Resources - economics Conservation of Natural Resources - methods Crops, Agricultural - economics Decision making Ecology Ecology/Conservation and Restoration Ecology Ecology/Ecosystem Ecology Ecology/Global Change Ecology Economic aspects Ecosystem Ecosystem management Ecosystems Estimates Fruit - economics Fruits Insecta - metabolism Insecta - physiology Insects Models, Biological Models, Economic Models, Theoretical Plant reproduction Pollen Pollination Pollinators Pricing Protection and preservation Resource allocation Risk allocation South Africa Wildlife conservation |
title | Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T12%3A43%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Valuing%20insect%20pollination%20services%20with%20cost%20of%20replacement&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Allsopp,%20Mike%20H&rft.date=2008-09-10&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e3128&rft.epage=e3128&rft.pages=e3128-e3128&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0003128&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA472625147%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1312319552&rft_id=info:pmid/18781196&rft_galeid=A472625147&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_a79152e906cd4864a5d2e33b1279213d&rfr_iscdi=true |