Culling-induced changes in badger (Meles meles) behaviour, social organisation and the epidemiology of bovine tuberculosis

In the UK, attempts since the 1970s to control the incidence of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in cattle by culling a wildlife host, the European badger (Meles meles), have produced equivocal results. Culling-induced social perturbation of badger populations may lead to unexpected outcomes. We test predi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2011-12, Vol.6 (12), p.e28904
Hauptverfasser: Riordan, Philip, Delahay, Richard John, Cheeseman, Chris, Johnson, Paul James, Macdonald, David Whyte
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page e28904
container_title PloS one
container_volume 6
creator Riordan, Philip
Delahay, Richard John
Cheeseman, Chris
Johnson, Paul James
Macdonald, David Whyte
description In the UK, attempts since the 1970s to control the incidence of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in cattle by culling a wildlife host, the European badger (Meles meles), have produced equivocal results. Culling-induced social perturbation of badger populations may lead to unexpected outcomes. We test predictions from the 'perturbation hypothesis', determining the impact of culling operations on badger populations, movement of surviving individuals and the influence on the epidemiology of bTB in badgers using data dervied from two study areas within the UK Government's Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT). Culling operations did not remove all individuals from setts, with between 34-43% of badgers removed from targeted social groups. After culling, bTB prevalence increased in badger social groups neighbouring removals, particularly amongst cubs. Seventy individual adult badgers were fitted with radio-collars, yielding 8,311 locational fixes from both sites between November 2001 and December 2003. Home range areas of animals surviving within removed groups increased by 43.5% in response to culling. Overlap between summer ranges of individuals from Neighbouring social groups in the treatment population increased by 73.3% in response to culling. The movement rate of individuals between social groups was low, but increased after culling, in Removed and Neighbouring social groups. Increased bTB prevalence in Neighbouring groups was associated with badger movements both into and out of these groups, although none of the moving individuals themselves tested positive for bTB. Significant increases in both the frequency of individual badger movements between groups and the emergence of bTB were observed in response to culling. However, no direct evidence was found to link the two phenomena. We hypothesise that the social disruption caused by culling may not only increase direct contact and thus disease transmission between surviving badgers, but may also increase social stress within the surviving population, causing immunosuppression and enhancing the expression of disease.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0028904
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1312183862</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A476860219</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d850c12f7bc845cdbbd5ba9139d83dcb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A476860219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-ba8c750272c2a518d8ec64176862aa89b58264e0fc1d8264103489eb12821a663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUtuKFDEQbURx19U_EA34oII95tKX9IuwDF4WVnzR51C5dE-GTDIm3QPr15t2epcdWQJJUTnnVKpyiuIlwSvCWvJxG6bowa32wZsVxpR3uHpUnJOO0bKhmD2-F58Vz1LaYlwz3jRPizNKSVd1VXNe_FlPzlk_lNbrSRmN1Ab8YBKyHknQg4no3XfjcmI37--RNBs42Fz7A0pBWXAoxAG8TTDa4BF4jcaNQWZvtdnZ4MJwg0KPZDhYb9A4SRPV5EKy6XnxpAeXzIvlvCh-ffn8c_2tvP7x9Wp9eV2quqNjKYGrtsa0pYpCTbjmRjUVaRveUADeyZrTpjK4V0TPEcGs4p2RhHJKoGnYRfH6qLvPZcUytiQII5TwPBCaEVdHhA6wFftodxBvRAAr_iVygwLiaJUzQvMaK0L7Vipe1UpLqWsJHWGd5kwrmbU-LdUmuTNaGT9GcCeipzfebsQQDoJR1tYNzgJvF4EYfk8mjWJnkzLOgTdhSqIjuUlWszYj3_yHfLi5BTVAfr_1fchl1awpLqt5ijibIaNWD6Dymn9RZYv1NudPCNWRoGJIKZr-rkWCxWzQ28eI2aBiMWimvbo_njvSrSPZX7qM47M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1312183862</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Culling-induced changes in badger (Meles meles) behaviour, social organisation and the epidemiology of bovine tuberculosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Riordan, Philip ; Delahay, Richard John ; Cheeseman, Chris ; Johnson, Paul James ; Macdonald, David Whyte</creator><contributor>Gordon, Deborah M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Riordan, Philip ; Delahay, Richard John ; Cheeseman, Chris ; Johnson, Paul James ; Macdonald, David Whyte ; Gordon, Deborah M.</creatorcontrib><description>In the UK, attempts since the 1970s to control the incidence of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in cattle by culling a wildlife host, the European badger (Meles meles), have produced equivocal results. Culling-induced social perturbation of badger populations may lead to unexpected outcomes. We test predictions from the 'perturbation hypothesis', determining the impact of culling operations on badger populations, movement of surviving individuals and the influence on the epidemiology of bTB in badgers using data dervied from two study areas within the UK Government's Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT). Culling operations did not remove all individuals from setts, with between 34-43% of badgers removed from targeted social groups. After culling, bTB prevalence increased in badger social groups neighbouring removals, particularly amongst cubs. Seventy individual adult badgers were fitted with radio-collars, yielding 8,311 locational fixes from both sites between November 2001 and December 2003. Home range areas of animals surviving within removed groups increased by 43.5% in response to culling. Overlap between summer ranges of individuals from Neighbouring social groups in the treatment population increased by 73.3% in response to culling. The movement rate of individuals between social groups was low, but increased after culling, in Removed and Neighbouring social groups. Increased bTB prevalence in Neighbouring groups was associated with badger movements both into and out of these groups, although none of the moving individuals themselves tested positive for bTB. Significant increases in both the frequency of individual badger movements between groups and the emergence of bTB were observed in response to culling. However, no direct evidence was found to link the two phenomena. We hypothesise that the social disruption caused by culling may not only increase direct contact and thus disease transmission between surviving badgers, but may also increase social stress within the surviving population, causing immunosuppression and enhancing the expression of disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028904</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22194946</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animal behavior ; Animals ; Badgers ; Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Biology ; Bovidae ; Bovine tuberculosis ; Cattle ; Collars ; Culling ; Development and progression ; Disease transmission ; Disruption ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Home range ; Immunosuppression ; Male ; Meles meles ; Mustelidae - physiology ; Mycobacterium bovis ; Organizational aspects ; Perturbation ; Populations ; Prevalence ; Social aspects ; Social Behavior ; Social interactions ; Tuberculosis ; Tuberculosis, Bovine - epidemiology ; United Kingdom - epidemiology ; Veterinary Science ; Wildlife ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife radiolocation</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2011-12, Vol.6 (12), p.e28904</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2011 Riordan et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Riordan et al. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-ba8c750272c2a518d8ec64176862aa89b58264e0fc1d8264103489eb12821a663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-ba8c750272c2a518d8ec64176862aa89b58264e0fc1d8264103489eb12821a663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3237560/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3237560/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22194946$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gordon, Deborah M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Riordan, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delahay, Richard John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheeseman, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Paul James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, David Whyte</creatorcontrib><title>Culling-induced changes in badger (Meles meles) behaviour, social organisation and the epidemiology of bovine tuberculosis</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>In the UK, attempts since the 1970s to control the incidence of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in cattle by culling a wildlife host, the European badger (Meles meles), have produced equivocal results. Culling-induced social perturbation of badger populations may lead to unexpected outcomes. We test predictions from the 'perturbation hypothesis', determining the impact of culling operations on badger populations, movement of surviving individuals and the influence on the epidemiology of bTB in badgers using data dervied from two study areas within the UK Government's Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT). Culling operations did not remove all individuals from setts, with between 34-43% of badgers removed from targeted social groups. After culling, bTB prevalence increased in badger social groups neighbouring removals, particularly amongst cubs. Seventy individual adult badgers were fitted with radio-collars, yielding 8,311 locational fixes from both sites between November 2001 and December 2003. Home range areas of animals surviving within removed groups increased by 43.5% in response to culling. Overlap between summer ranges of individuals from Neighbouring social groups in the treatment population increased by 73.3% in response to culling. The movement rate of individuals between social groups was low, but increased after culling, in Removed and Neighbouring social groups. Increased bTB prevalence in Neighbouring groups was associated with badger movements both into and out of these groups, although none of the moving individuals themselves tested positive for bTB. Significant increases in both the frequency of individual badger movements between groups and the emergence of bTB were observed in response to culling. However, no direct evidence was found to link the two phenomena. We hypothesise that the social disruption caused by culling may not only increase direct contact and thus disease transmission between surviving badgers, but may also increase social stress within the surviving population, causing immunosuppression and enhancing the expression of disease.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Badgers</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Bovidae</subject><subject>Bovine tuberculosis</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Collars</subject><subject>Culling</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Disruption</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Home range</subject><subject>Immunosuppression</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meles meles</subject><subject>Mustelidae - physiology</subject><subject>Mycobacterium bovis</subject><subject>Organizational aspects</subject><subject>Perturbation</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis, Bovine - epidemiology</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><subject>Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife radiolocation</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUtuKFDEQbURx19U_EA34oII95tKX9IuwDF4WVnzR51C5dE-GTDIm3QPr15t2epcdWQJJUTnnVKpyiuIlwSvCWvJxG6bowa32wZsVxpR3uHpUnJOO0bKhmD2-F58Vz1LaYlwz3jRPizNKSVd1VXNe_FlPzlk_lNbrSRmN1Ab8YBKyHknQg4no3XfjcmI37--RNBs42Fz7A0pBWXAoxAG8TTDa4BF4jcaNQWZvtdnZ4MJwg0KPZDhYb9A4SRPV5EKy6XnxpAeXzIvlvCh-ffn8c_2tvP7x9Wp9eV2quqNjKYGrtsa0pYpCTbjmRjUVaRveUADeyZrTpjK4V0TPEcGs4p2RhHJKoGnYRfH6qLvPZcUytiQII5TwPBCaEVdHhA6wFftodxBvRAAr_iVygwLiaJUzQvMaK0L7Vipe1UpLqWsJHWGd5kwrmbU-LdUmuTNaGT9GcCeipzfebsQQDoJR1tYNzgJvF4EYfk8mjWJnkzLOgTdhSqIjuUlWszYj3_yHfLi5BTVAfr_1fchl1awpLqt5ijibIaNWD6Dymn9RZYv1NudPCNWRoGJIKZr-rkWCxWzQ28eI2aBiMWimvbo_njvSrSPZX7qM47M</recordid><startdate>20111214</startdate><enddate>20111214</enddate><creator>Riordan, Philip</creator><creator>Delahay, Richard John</creator><creator>Cheeseman, Chris</creator><creator>Johnson, Paul James</creator><creator>Macdonald, David Whyte</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111214</creationdate><title>Culling-induced changes in badger (Meles meles) behaviour, social organisation and the epidemiology of bovine tuberculosis</title><author>Riordan, Philip ; Delahay, Richard John ; Cheeseman, Chris ; Johnson, Paul James ; Macdonald, David Whyte</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-ba8c750272c2a518d8ec64176862aa89b58264e0fc1d8264103489eb12821a663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Badgers</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Bovidae</topic><topic>Bovine tuberculosis</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Collars</topic><topic>Culling</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Disruption</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Home range</topic><topic>Immunosuppression</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meles meles</topic><topic>Mustelidae - physiology</topic><topic>Mycobacterium bovis</topic><topic>Organizational aspects</topic><topic>Perturbation</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis, Bovine - epidemiology</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><topic>Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife radiolocation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riordan, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delahay, Richard John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheeseman, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Paul James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, David Whyte</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riordan, Philip</au><au>Delahay, Richard John</au><au>Cheeseman, Chris</au><au>Johnson, Paul James</au><au>Macdonald, David Whyte</au><au>Gordon, Deborah M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Culling-induced changes in badger (Meles meles) behaviour, social organisation and the epidemiology of bovine tuberculosis</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2011-12-14</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e28904</spage><pages>e28904-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>In the UK, attempts since the 1970s to control the incidence of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in cattle by culling a wildlife host, the European badger (Meles meles), have produced equivocal results. Culling-induced social perturbation of badger populations may lead to unexpected outcomes. We test predictions from the 'perturbation hypothesis', determining the impact of culling operations on badger populations, movement of surviving individuals and the influence on the epidemiology of bTB in badgers using data dervied from two study areas within the UK Government's Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT). Culling operations did not remove all individuals from setts, with between 34-43% of badgers removed from targeted social groups. After culling, bTB prevalence increased in badger social groups neighbouring removals, particularly amongst cubs. Seventy individual adult badgers were fitted with radio-collars, yielding 8,311 locational fixes from both sites between November 2001 and December 2003. Home range areas of animals surviving within removed groups increased by 43.5% in response to culling. Overlap between summer ranges of individuals from Neighbouring social groups in the treatment population increased by 73.3% in response to culling. The movement rate of individuals between social groups was low, but increased after culling, in Removed and Neighbouring social groups. Increased bTB prevalence in Neighbouring groups was associated with badger movements both into and out of these groups, although none of the moving individuals themselves tested positive for bTB. Significant increases in both the frequency of individual badger movements between groups and the emergence of bTB were observed in response to culling. However, no direct evidence was found to link the two phenomena. We hypothesise that the social disruption caused by culling may not only increase direct contact and thus disease transmission between surviving badgers, but may also increase social stress within the surviving population, causing immunosuppression and enhancing the expression of disease.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>22194946</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0028904</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2011-12, Vol.6 (12), p.e28904
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1312183862
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central(OpenAccess); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ); Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Analysis
Animal behavior
Animals
Badgers
Behavior, Animal - physiology
Biology
Bovidae
Bovine tuberculosis
Cattle
Collars
Culling
Development and progression
Disease transmission
Disruption
Epidemiology
Female
Global positioning systems
GPS
Home range
Immunosuppression
Male
Meles meles
Mustelidae - physiology
Mycobacterium bovis
Organizational aspects
Perturbation
Populations
Prevalence
Social aspects
Social Behavior
Social interactions
Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis, Bovine - epidemiology
United Kingdom - epidemiology
Veterinary Science
Wildlife
Wildlife conservation
Wildlife radiolocation
title Culling-induced changes in badger (Meles meles) behaviour, social organisation and the epidemiology of bovine tuberculosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A24%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Culling-induced%20changes%20in%20badger%20(Meles%20meles)%20behaviour,%20social%20organisation%20and%20the%20epidemiology%20of%20bovine%20tuberculosis&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Riordan,%20Philip&rft.date=2011-12-14&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e28904&rft.pages=e28904-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028904&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA476860219%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1312183862&rft_id=info:pmid/22194946&rft_galeid=A476860219&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_d850c12f7bc845cdbbd5ba9139d83dcb&rfr_iscdi=true