Plant DNA barcodes can accurately estimate species richness in poorly known floras

Widespread uptake of DNA barcoding technology for vascular plants has been slow due to the relatively poor resolution of species discrimination (∼70%) and low sequencing and amplification success of one of the two official barcoding loci, matK. Studies to date have mostly focused on finding a soluti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2011-11, Vol.6 (11), p.e26841-e26841
Hauptverfasser: Costion, Craig, Ford, Andrew, Cross, Hugh, Crayn, Darren, Harrington, Mark, Lowe, Andrew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e26841
container_issue 11
container_start_page e26841
container_title PloS one
container_volume 6
creator Costion, Craig
Ford, Andrew
Cross, Hugh
Crayn, Darren
Harrington, Mark
Lowe, Andrew
description Widespread uptake of DNA barcoding technology for vascular plants has been slow due to the relatively poor resolution of species discrimination (∼70%) and low sequencing and amplification success of one of the two official barcoding loci, matK. Studies to date have mostly focused on finding a solution to these intrinsic limitations of the markers, rather than posing questions that can maximize the utility of DNA barcodes for plants with the current technology. Here we test the ability of plant DNA barcodes using the two official barcoding loci, rbcLa and matK, plus an alternative barcoding locus, trnH-psbA, to estimate the species diversity of trees in a tropical rainforest plot. Species discrimination accuracy was similar to findings from previous studies but species richness estimation accuracy proved higher, up to 89%. All combinations which included the trnH-psbA locus performed better at both species discrimination and richness estimation than matK, which showed little enhanced species discriminatory power when concatenated with rbcLa. The utility of the trnH-psbA locus is limited however, by the occurrence of intraspecific variation observed in some angiosperm families to occur as an inversion that obscures the monophyly of species. We demonstrate for the first time, using a case study, the potential of plant DNA barcodes for the rapid estimation of species richness in taxonomically poorly known areas or cryptic populations revealing a powerful new tool for rapid biodiversity assessment. The combination of the rbcLa and trnH-psbA loci performed better for this purpose than any two-locus combination that included matK. We show that although DNA barcodes fail to discriminate all species of plants, new perspectives and methods on biodiversity value and quantification may overshadow some of these shortcomings by applying barcode data in new ways.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0026841
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1312157858</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A476863173</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_175d6ece6dbd4b8884a97766d6251289</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A476863173</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-10feb49a7de2886155af69a62b88a5196a01357106365b0c4a13a813bf44b0a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQgJx0eJjx45zg1SNr0oTQ-Pj1jpxnNYjtYudAPv3uDSbGrQL5Atb9nNeH79-s-wxkDmwEl5d-iE47OZb78ycECpkAXeyY6gYnQlK2N2D9VH2IMZLQjiTQtzPjiglleAEjrOLTx26Pn_zcZHXGLRvTMw1uhy1HgL2prvKTeztJi3zuDXapvNg9dqZGHPr8q33ITHfnf_l8rbzAePD7F6LXTSPxvkk-_ru7ZfTD7Oz8_fL08XZTIsK-hmQ1tRFhWVjqJQCOMdWVChoLSVyqAQSYLwEIpjgNdEFAkMJrG6LoiZI2En2dK-77XxUox1RAQMKvJRcJmK5JxqPl2ob0jPClfJo1d8NH1YKQ291ZxSUvBFGG9HUTZE6kAVWZSlEIygHKquk9Xq8bag3ptHG9QG7iej0xNm1WvmfilEoCN0182IUCP7HkExVGxu16ZL_xg9RVYSLsiQFJPLZP-TtjxupFab-rWt9ulbvNNWiKIUUDEqWqPktVBqN2VidotPatD8peDkpSExvfvcrHGJUy88X_8-ef5uyzw_YtcGuX0ffDb31Lk7BYg_q4GMMpr3xGIjaJf_aDbVLvhqTn8qeHP7PTdF11NkfBjv8Qg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1312157858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plant DNA barcodes can accurately estimate species richness in poorly known floras</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Costion, Craig ; Ford, Andrew ; Cross, Hugh ; Crayn, Darren ; Harrington, Mark ; Lowe, Andrew</creator><contributor>Gilbert, Jack Anthony</contributor><creatorcontrib>Costion, Craig ; Ford, Andrew ; Cross, Hugh ; Crayn, Darren ; Harrington, Mark ; Lowe, Andrew ; Gilbert, Jack Anthony</creatorcontrib><description>Widespread uptake of DNA barcoding technology for vascular plants has been slow due to the relatively poor resolution of species discrimination (∼70%) and low sequencing and amplification success of one of the two official barcoding loci, matK. Studies to date have mostly focused on finding a solution to these intrinsic limitations of the markers, rather than posing questions that can maximize the utility of DNA barcodes for plants with the current technology. Here we test the ability of plant DNA barcodes using the two official barcoding loci, rbcLa and matK, plus an alternative barcoding locus, trnH-psbA, to estimate the species diversity of trees in a tropical rainforest plot. Species discrimination accuracy was similar to findings from previous studies but species richness estimation accuracy proved higher, up to 89%. All combinations which included the trnH-psbA locus performed better at both species discrimination and richness estimation than matK, which showed little enhanced species discriminatory power when concatenated with rbcLa. The utility of the trnH-psbA locus is limited however, by the occurrence of intraspecific variation observed in some angiosperm families to occur as an inversion that obscures the monophyly of species. We demonstrate for the first time, using a case study, the potential of plant DNA barcodes for the rapid estimation of species richness in taxonomically poorly known areas or cryptic populations revealing a powerful new tool for rapid biodiversity assessment. The combination of the rbcLa and trnH-psbA loci performed better for this purpose than any two-locus combination that included matK. We show that although DNA barcodes fail to discriminate all species of plants, new perspectives and methods on biodiversity value and quantification may overshadow some of these shortcomings by applying barcode data in new ways.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026841</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22096501</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acacia ; Aspalathus ; Bar codes ; Biodiversity ; Biology ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic - methods ; DNA, Plant - genetics ; Ecology ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Estimation accuracy ; Evolutionary biology ; Extinction ; Fabaceae ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Gene sequencing ; Genetic research ; Identification ; Loci ; Mimosoideae ; Natural resources ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Plant diversity ; Plant Proteins - genetics ; Plant species introduction ; Plants ; Plants (botany) ; Plants - classification ; Plants - genetics ; Potamogetonaceae ; Rain forests ; Rainforests ; Species diversity ; Species richness ; Studies ; Taxonomy ; Technology ; Trees - classification ; Trees - genetics ; Trends ; Working groups</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2011-11, Vol.6 (11), p.e26841-e26841</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2011 Costion et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Costion et al. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-10feb49a7de2886155af69a62b88a5196a01357106365b0c4a13a813bf44b0a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-10feb49a7de2886155af69a62b88a5196a01357106365b0c4a13a813bf44b0a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214028/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214028/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22096501$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gilbert, Jack Anthony</contributor><creatorcontrib>Costion, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crayn, Darren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrington, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Plant DNA barcodes can accurately estimate species richness in poorly known floras</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Widespread uptake of DNA barcoding technology for vascular plants has been slow due to the relatively poor resolution of species discrimination (∼70%) and low sequencing and amplification success of one of the two official barcoding loci, matK. Studies to date have mostly focused on finding a solution to these intrinsic limitations of the markers, rather than posing questions that can maximize the utility of DNA barcodes for plants with the current technology. Here we test the ability of plant DNA barcodes using the two official barcoding loci, rbcLa and matK, plus an alternative barcoding locus, trnH-psbA, to estimate the species diversity of trees in a tropical rainforest plot. Species discrimination accuracy was similar to findings from previous studies but species richness estimation accuracy proved higher, up to 89%. All combinations which included the trnH-psbA locus performed better at both species discrimination and richness estimation than matK, which showed little enhanced species discriminatory power when concatenated with rbcLa. The utility of the trnH-psbA locus is limited however, by the occurrence of intraspecific variation observed in some angiosperm families to occur as an inversion that obscures the monophyly of species. We demonstrate for the first time, using a case study, the potential of plant DNA barcodes for the rapid estimation of species richness in taxonomically poorly known areas or cryptic populations revealing a powerful new tool for rapid biodiversity assessment. The combination of the rbcLa and trnH-psbA loci performed better for this purpose than any two-locus combination that included matK. We show that although DNA barcodes fail to discriminate all species of plants, new perspectives and methods on biodiversity value and quantification may overshadow some of these shortcomings by applying barcode data in new ways.</description><subject>Acacia</subject><subject>Aspalathus</subject><subject>Bar codes</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic - methods</subject><subject>DNA, Plant - genetics</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Estimation accuracy</subject><subject>Evolutionary biology</subject><subject>Extinction</subject><subject>Fabaceae</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Genetic research</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Loci</subject><subject>Mimosoideae</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plant diversity</subject><subject>Plant Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Plant species introduction</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Plants - classification</subject><subject>Plants - genetics</subject><subject>Potamogetonaceae</subject><subject>Rain forests</subject><subject>Rainforests</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Trees - classification</subject><subject>Trees - genetics</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Working groups</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQgJx0eJjx45zg1SNr0oTQ-Pj1jpxnNYjtYudAPv3uDSbGrQL5Atb9nNeH79-s-wxkDmwEl5d-iE47OZb78ycECpkAXeyY6gYnQlK2N2D9VH2IMZLQjiTQtzPjiglleAEjrOLTx26Pn_zcZHXGLRvTMw1uhy1HgL2prvKTeztJi3zuDXapvNg9dqZGHPr8q33ITHfnf_l8rbzAePD7F6LXTSPxvkk-_ru7ZfTD7Oz8_fL08XZTIsK-hmQ1tRFhWVjqJQCOMdWVChoLSVyqAQSYLwEIpjgNdEFAkMJrG6LoiZI2En2dK-77XxUox1RAQMKvJRcJmK5JxqPl2ob0jPClfJo1d8NH1YKQ291ZxSUvBFGG9HUTZE6kAVWZSlEIygHKquk9Xq8bag3ptHG9QG7iej0xNm1WvmfilEoCN0182IUCP7HkExVGxu16ZL_xg9RVYSLsiQFJPLZP-TtjxupFab-rWt9ulbvNNWiKIUUDEqWqPktVBqN2VidotPatD8peDkpSExvfvcrHGJUy88X_8-ef5uyzw_YtcGuX0ffDb31Lk7BYg_q4GMMpr3xGIjaJf_aDbVLvhqTn8qeHP7PTdF11NkfBjv8Qg</recordid><startdate>20111111</startdate><enddate>20111111</enddate><creator>Costion, Craig</creator><creator>Ford, Andrew</creator><creator>Cross, Hugh</creator><creator>Crayn, Darren</creator><creator>Harrington, Mark</creator><creator>Lowe, Andrew</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111111</creationdate><title>Plant DNA barcodes can accurately estimate species richness in poorly known floras</title><author>Costion, Craig ; Ford, Andrew ; Cross, Hugh ; Crayn, Darren ; Harrington, Mark ; Lowe, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-10feb49a7de2886155af69a62b88a5196a01357106365b0c4a13a813bf44b0a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acacia</topic><topic>Aspalathus</topic><topic>Bar codes</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic - methods</topic><topic>DNA, Plant - genetics</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Estimation accuracy</topic><topic>Evolutionary biology</topic><topic>Extinction</topic><topic>Fabaceae</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Genetic research</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Loci</topic><topic>Mimosoideae</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plant diversity</topic><topic>Plant Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Plant species introduction</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Plants - classification</topic><topic>Plants - genetics</topic><topic>Potamogetonaceae</topic><topic>Rain forests</topic><topic>Rainforests</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Trees - classification</topic><topic>Trees - genetics</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Working groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Costion, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crayn, Darren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrington, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Costion, Craig</au><au>Ford, Andrew</au><au>Cross, Hugh</au><au>Crayn, Darren</au><au>Harrington, Mark</au><au>Lowe, Andrew</au><au>Gilbert, Jack Anthony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plant DNA barcodes can accurately estimate species richness in poorly known floras</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2011-11-11</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e26841</spage><epage>e26841</epage><pages>e26841-e26841</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Widespread uptake of DNA barcoding technology for vascular plants has been slow due to the relatively poor resolution of species discrimination (∼70%) and low sequencing and amplification success of one of the two official barcoding loci, matK. Studies to date have mostly focused on finding a solution to these intrinsic limitations of the markers, rather than posing questions that can maximize the utility of DNA barcodes for plants with the current technology. Here we test the ability of plant DNA barcodes using the two official barcoding loci, rbcLa and matK, plus an alternative barcoding locus, trnH-psbA, to estimate the species diversity of trees in a tropical rainforest plot. Species discrimination accuracy was similar to findings from previous studies but species richness estimation accuracy proved higher, up to 89%. All combinations which included the trnH-psbA locus performed better at both species discrimination and richness estimation than matK, which showed little enhanced species discriminatory power when concatenated with rbcLa. The utility of the trnH-psbA locus is limited however, by the occurrence of intraspecific variation observed in some angiosperm families to occur as an inversion that obscures the monophyly of species. We demonstrate for the first time, using a case study, the potential of plant DNA barcodes for the rapid estimation of species richness in taxonomically poorly known areas or cryptic populations revealing a powerful new tool for rapid biodiversity assessment. The combination of the rbcLa and trnH-psbA loci performed better for this purpose than any two-locus combination that included matK. We show that although DNA barcodes fail to discriminate all species of plants, new perspectives and methods on biodiversity value and quantification may overshadow some of these shortcomings by applying barcode data in new ways.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>22096501</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0026841</doi><tpages>e26841</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2011-11, Vol.6 (11), p.e26841-e26841
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1312157858
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Acacia
Aspalathus
Bar codes
Biodiversity
Biology
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic - methods
DNA, Plant - genetics
Ecology
Endangered & extinct species
Estimation accuracy
Evolutionary biology
Extinction
Fabaceae
Flowers & plants
Gene sequencing
Genetic research
Identification
Loci
Mimosoideae
Natural resources
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
Plant diversity
Plant Proteins - genetics
Plant species introduction
Plants
Plants (botany)
Plants - classification
Plants - genetics
Potamogetonaceae
Rain forests
Rainforests
Species diversity
Species richness
Studies
Taxonomy
Technology
Trees - classification
Trees - genetics
Trends
Working groups
title Plant DNA barcodes can accurately estimate species richness in poorly known floras
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T10%3A31%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plant%20DNA%20barcodes%20can%20accurately%20estimate%20species%20richness%20in%20poorly%20known%20floras&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Costion,%20Craig&rft.date=2011-11-11&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e26841&rft.epage=e26841&rft.pages=e26841-e26841&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026841&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA476863173%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1312157858&rft_id=info:pmid/22096501&rft_galeid=A476863173&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_175d6ece6dbd4b8884a97766d6251289&rfr_iscdi=true