The role of stimulus salience and attentional capture across the neural hierarchy in a stop-signal task
Inhibitory motor control is a core function of cognitive control. Evidence from diverse experimental approaches has linked this function to a mostly right-lateralized network of cortical and subcortical areas, wherein a signal from the frontal cortex to the basal ganglia is believed to trigger motor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2011-10, Vol.6 (10), p.e26386-e26386 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e26386 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e26386 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Boehler, Carsten N Appelbaum, Lawrence G Krebs, Ruth M Chen, Ling-Chia Woldorff, Marty G |
description | Inhibitory motor control is a core function of cognitive control. Evidence from diverse experimental approaches has linked this function to a mostly right-lateralized network of cortical and subcortical areas, wherein a signal from the frontal cortex to the basal ganglia is believed to trigger motor-response cancellation. Recently, however, it has been recognized that in the context of typical motor-control paradigms those processes related to actual response inhibition and those related to the attentional processing of the relevant stimuli are highly interrelated and thus difficult to distinguish. Here, we used fMRI and a modified Stop-signal task to specifically examine the role of perceptual and attentional processes triggered by the different stimuli in such tasks, thus seeking to further distinguish other cognitive processes that may precede or otherwise accompany the implementation of response inhibition. In order to establish which brain areas respond to sensory stimulation differences by rare Stop-stimuli, as well as to the associated attentional capture that these may trigger irrespective of their task-relevance, we compared brain activity evoked by Stop-trials to that evoked by Go-trials in task blocks where Stop-stimuli were to be ignored. In addition, region-of-interest analyses comparing the responses to these task-irrelevant Stop-trials, with those to typical relevant Stop-trials, identified separable activity profiles as a function of the task-relevance of the Stop-signal. While occipital areas were mostly blind to the task-relevance of Stop-stimuli, activity in temporo-parietal areas dissociated between task-irrelevant and task-relevant ones. Activity profiles in frontal areas, in turn, were activated mainly by task-relevant Stop-trials, presumably reflecting a combination of triggered top-down attentional influences and inhibitory motor-control processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0026386 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1310231428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A476867643</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_56e072f4cae2407a90d6fd5be0c1a14e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A476867643</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-8677b7609bdd7feb6b7260cb467d1406a4eb38fdf73ead0ee1a9f03146d74b9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7of-A9GCsOLFjPmaZHojLIsfAwsLunob0uSkzdhpZpNU3H9vZqe7TGUvpBctJ8_7nvbtOUXxCqM5pgJ_WPsh9Kqbb30Pc4QIp0v-pDjGFSUzThB9evB8VJzEuEZokRn-vDgiBBHCMT4umusWyuA7KL0tY3KboRtiGVXnoNdQqt6UKiXok_O5WanVNg0h13XwMZYpi3sYQj5pHQQVdHtbur5U2cpvZ9E1O1FS8deL4plVXYSX4_20-PH50_XF19nl1ZfVxfnlTPMKp9mSC1ELjqraGGGh5rUgHOmacWEwQ1wxqOnSGisoKIMAsKosophxI1hdWXpavNn7bjsf5ZhRlJhiRDJGlplY7Qnj1Vpug9uocCu9cvKu4EMjVUhOdyAXHJAglmkFhCGhKmS4NYsakMYKM8heH8duQ70Bo3NOOYuJ6fSkd61s_G9JcbXgFcoG70aD4G8GiEluXNTQdaoHP0RZIcQpY0ueybf_kI9_3Eg1Kr-_663PbfXOU54zwXO8nNFMzR-h8mVg43SeJ-tyfSJ4PxFkJsGf1KghRrn6_u3_2aufU_bsgG1BdamNvht20xanINuDd3MXwD5kjJHcrcN9GnK3DnJchyx7ffh_HkT380__AjwNBlI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1310231428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of stimulus salience and attentional capture across the neural hierarchy in a stop-signal task</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Boehler, Carsten N ; Appelbaum, Lawrence G ; Krebs, Ruth M ; Chen, Ling-Chia ; Woldorff, Marty G</creator><creatorcontrib>Boehler, Carsten N ; Appelbaum, Lawrence G ; Krebs, Ruth M ; Chen, Ling-Chia ; Woldorff, Marty G</creatorcontrib><description>Inhibitory motor control is a core function of cognitive control. Evidence from diverse experimental approaches has linked this function to a mostly right-lateralized network of cortical and subcortical areas, wherein a signal from the frontal cortex to the basal ganglia is believed to trigger motor-response cancellation. Recently, however, it has been recognized that in the context of typical motor-control paradigms those processes related to actual response inhibition and those related to the attentional processing of the relevant stimuli are highly interrelated and thus difficult to distinguish. Here, we used fMRI and a modified Stop-signal task to specifically examine the role of perceptual and attentional processes triggered by the different stimuli in such tasks, thus seeking to further distinguish other cognitive processes that may precede or otherwise accompany the implementation of response inhibition. In order to establish which brain areas respond to sensory stimulation differences by rare Stop-stimuli, as well as to the associated attentional capture that these may trigger irrespective of their task-relevance, we compared brain activity evoked by Stop-trials to that evoked by Go-trials in task blocks where Stop-stimuli were to be ignored. In addition, region-of-interest analyses comparing the responses to these task-irrelevant Stop-trials, with those to typical relevant Stop-trials, identified separable activity profiles as a function of the task-relevance of the Stop-signal. While occipital areas were mostly blind to the task-relevance of Stop-stimuli, activity in temporo-parietal areas dissociated between task-irrelevant and task-relevant ones. Activity profiles in frontal areas, in turn, were activated mainly by task-relevant Stop-trials, presumably reflecting a combination of triggered top-down attentional influences and inhibitory motor-control processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026386</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22022611</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Attention - physiology ; Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ; Basal ganglia ; Behavior ; Behavior - physiology ; Biology ; Brain ; Brain - anatomy & histology ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping ; Cognitive ability ; Cortex (frontal) ; Cortex (occipital) ; Cortex (parietal) ; Cortex (somatosensory) ; Experimental psychology ; Eye movements ; Female ; Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Ganglia ; Humans ; Inhibition ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medicine ; Motor task performance ; Nerve Net - physiology ; Neurosciences ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Physical Stimulation ; Sensory evaluation ; Sensory perception ; Sensory stimulation ; Signal processing ; Somatosensory cortex ; Stimulus salience ; Studies ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Topography ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2011-10, Vol.6 (10), p.e26386-e26386</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2011 Boehler et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Boehler et al. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-8677b7609bdd7feb6b7260cb467d1406a4eb38fdf73ead0ee1a9f03146d74b9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-8677b7609bdd7feb6b7260cb467d1406a4eb38fdf73ead0ee1a9f03146d74b9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3195690/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3195690/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022611$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boehler, Carsten N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appelbaum, Lawrence G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krebs, Ruth M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ling-Chia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woldorff, Marty G</creatorcontrib><title>The role of stimulus salience and attentional capture across the neural hierarchy in a stop-signal task</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Inhibitory motor control is a core function of cognitive control. Evidence from diverse experimental approaches has linked this function to a mostly right-lateralized network of cortical and subcortical areas, wherein a signal from the frontal cortex to the basal ganglia is believed to trigger motor-response cancellation. Recently, however, it has been recognized that in the context of typical motor-control paradigms those processes related to actual response inhibition and those related to the attentional processing of the relevant stimuli are highly interrelated and thus difficult to distinguish. Here, we used fMRI and a modified Stop-signal task to specifically examine the role of perceptual and attentional processes triggered by the different stimuli in such tasks, thus seeking to further distinguish other cognitive processes that may precede or otherwise accompany the implementation of response inhibition. In order to establish which brain areas respond to sensory stimulation differences by rare Stop-stimuli, as well as to the associated attentional capture that these may trigger irrespective of their task-relevance, we compared brain activity evoked by Stop-trials to that evoked by Go-trials in task blocks where Stop-stimuli were to be ignored. In addition, region-of-interest analyses comparing the responses to these task-irrelevant Stop-trials, with those to typical relevant Stop-trials, identified separable activity profiles as a function of the task-relevance of the Stop-signal. While occipital areas were mostly blind to the task-relevance of Stop-stimuli, activity in temporo-parietal areas dissociated between task-irrelevant and task-relevant ones. Activity profiles in frontal areas, in turn, were activated mainly by task-relevant Stop-trials, presumably reflecting a combination of triggered top-down attentional influences and inhibitory motor-control processes.</description><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder</subject><subject>Basal ganglia</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cortex (frontal)</subject><subject>Cortex (occipital)</subject><subject>Cortex (parietal)</subject><subject>Cortex (somatosensory)</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Ganglia</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Motor task performance</subject><subject>Nerve Net - physiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Physical Stimulation</subject><subject>Sensory evaluation</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Sensory stimulation</subject><subject>Signal processing</subject><subject>Somatosensory cortex</subject><subject>Stimulus salience</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7of-A9GCsOLFjPmaZHojLIsfAwsLunob0uSkzdhpZpNU3H9vZqe7TGUvpBctJ8_7nvbtOUXxCqM5pgJ_WPsh9Kqbb30Pc4QIp0v-pDjGFSUzThB9evB8VJzEuEZokRn-vDgiBBHCMT4umusWyuA7KL0tY3KboRtiGVXnoNdQqt6UKiXok_O5WanVNg0h13XwMZYpi3sYQj5pHQQVdHtbur5U2cpvZ9E1O1FS8deL4plVXYSX4_20-PH50_XF19nl1ZfVxfnlTPMKp9mSC1ELjqraGGGh5rUgHOmacWEwQ1wxqOnSGisoKIMAsKosophxI1hdWXpavNn7bjsf5ZhRlJhiRDJGlplY7Qnj1Vpug9uocCu9cvKu4EMjVUhOdyAXHJAglmkFhCGhKmS4NYsakMYKM8heH8duQ70Bo3NOOYuJ6fSkd61s_G9JcbXgFcoG70aD4G8GiEluXNTQdaoHP0RZIcQpY0ueybf_kI9_3Eg1Kr-_663PbfXOU54zwXO8nNFMzR-h8mVg43SeJ-tyfSJ4PxFkJsGf1KghRrn6_u3_2aufU_bsgG1BdamNvht20xanINuDd3MXwD5kjJHcrcN9GnK3DnJchyx7ffh_HkT380__AjwNBlI</recordid><startdate>20111017</startdate><enddate>20111017</enddate><creator>Boehler, Carsten N</creator><creator>Appelbaum, Lawrence G</creator><creator>Krebs, Ruth M</creator><creator>Chen, Ling-Chia</creator><creator>Woldorff, Marty G</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111017</creationdate><title>The role of stimulus salience and attentional capture across the neural hierarchy in a stop-signal task</title><author>Boehler, Carsten N ; Appelbaum, Lawrence G ; Krebs, Ruth M ; Chen, Ling-Chia ; Woldorff, Marty G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-8677b7609bdd7feb6b7260cb467d1406a4eb38fdf73ead0ee1a9f03146d74b9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder</topic><topic>Basal ganglia</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cortex (frontal)</topic><topic>Cortex (occipital)</topic><topic>Cortex (parietal)</topic><topic>Cortex (somatosensory)</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Ganglia</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Motor task performance</topic><topic>Nerve Net - physiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Physical Stimulation</topic><topic>Sensory evaluation</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Sensory stimulation</topic><topic>Signal processing</topic><topic>Somatosensory cortex</topic><topic>Stimulus salience</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boehler, Carsten N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appelbaum, Lawrence G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krebs, Ruth M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ling-Chia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woldorff, Marty G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boehler, Carsten N</au><au>Appelbaum, Lawrence G</au><au>Krebs, Ruth M</au><au>Chen, Ling-Chia</au><au>Woldorff, Marty G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of stimulus salience and attentional capture across the neural hierarchy in a stop-signal task</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2011-10-17</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e26386</spage><epage>e26386</epage><pages>e26386-e26386</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Inhibitory motor control is a core function of cognitive control. Evidence from diverse experimental approaches has linked this function to a mostly right-lateralized network of cortical and subcortical areas, wherein a signal from the frontal cortex to the basal ganglia is believed to trigger motor-response cancellation. Recently, however, it has been recognized that in the context of typical motor-control paradigms those processes related to actual response inhibition and those related to the attentional processing of the relevant stimuli are highly interrelated and thus difficult to distinguish. Here, we used fMRI and a modified Stop-signal task to specifically examine the role of perceptual and attentional processes triggered by the different stimuli in such tasks, thus seeking to further distinguish other cognitive processes that may precede or otherwise accompany the implementation of response inhibition. In order to establish which brain areas respond to sensory stimulation differences by rare Stop-stimuli, as well as to the associated attentional capture that these may trigger irrespective of their task-relevance, we compared brain activity evoked by Stop-trials to that evoked by Go-trials in task blocks where Stop-stimuli were to be ignored. In addition, region-of-interest analyses comparing the responses to these task-irrelevant Stop-trials, with those to typical relevant Stop-trials, identified separable activity profiles as a function of the task-relevance of the Stop-signal. While occipital areas were mostly blind to the task-relevance of Stop-stimuli, activity in temporo-parietal areas dissociated between task-irrelevant and task-relevant ones. Activity profiles in frontal areas, in turn, were activated mainly by task-relevant Stop-trials, presumably reflecting a combination of triggered top-down attentional influences and inhibitory motor-control processes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>22022611</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0026386</doi><tpages>e26386</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2011-10, Vol.6 (10), p.e26386-e26386 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1310231428 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Attention - physiology Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Basal ganglia Behavior Behavior - physiology Biology Brain Brain - anatomy & histology Brain - physiology Brain Mapping Cognitive ability Cortex (frontal) Cortex (occipital) Cortex (parietal) Cortex (somatosensory) Experimental psychology Eye movements Female Functional magnetic resonance imaging Ganglia Humans Inhibition Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Medicine Motor task performance Nerve Net - physiology Neurosciences NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Physical Stimulation Sensory evaluation Sensory perception Sensory stimulation Signal processing Somatosensory cortex Stimulus salience Studies Task Performance and Analysis Topography Young Adult |
title | The role of stimulus salience and attentional capture across the neural hierarchy in a stop-signal task |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A39%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20stimulus%20salience%20and%20attentional%20capture%20across%20the%20neural%20hierarchy%20in%20a%20stop-signal%20task&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Boehler,%20Carsten%20N&rft.date=2011-10-17&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e26386&rft.epage=e26386&rft.pages=e26386-e26386&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026386&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA476867643%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1310231428&rft_id=info:pmid/22022611&rft_galeid=A476867643&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_56e072f4cae2407a90d6fd5be0c1a14e&rfr_iscdi=true |