Individual differences and metacognitive knowledge of visual search strategy
A crucial ability for an organism is to orient toward important objects and to ignore temporarily irrelevant objects. Attention provides the perceptual selectivity necessary to filter an overwhelming input of sensory information to allow for efficient object detection. Although much research has exa...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2011-10, Vol.6 (10), p.e27043-e27043 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e27043 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | e27043 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 6 |
| creator | Proulx, Michael J |
| description | A crucial ability for an organism is to orient toward important objects and to ignore temporarily irrelevant objects. Attention provides the perceptual selectivity necessary to filter an overwhelming input of sensory information to allow for efficient object detection. Although much research has examined visual search and the 'template' of attentional set that allows for target detection, the behavior of individual subjects often reveals the limits of experimental control of attention. Few studies have examined important aspects such as individual differences and metacognitive strategies. The present study analyzes the data from two visual search experiments for a conjunctively defined target (Proulx, 2007). The data revealed attentional capture blindness, individual differences in search strategies, and a significant rate of metacognitive errors for the assessment of the strategies employed. These results highlight a challenge for visual attention studies to account for individual differences in search behavior and distractibility, and participants that do not (or are unable to) follow instructions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0027043 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1309933873</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A476863769</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5f1b0280c6be4652980dc4520b5d0706</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A476863769</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-5df50960fb2fe2a7aa15543c0b91febddf4d13eb8a1ecbc7eebe74378423db943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkuL2zAUhU1p6Tzaf1BaQ6Gli6RXki3bm8Iw9BEIDPS1FbJ05Sh1pIxlpzP_vkrjGeIyi6KFhPSdc6WrkyQvCMwJK8j7tR86J9v51jucA9ACMvYoOSUVozNOgT0-Wp8kZyGsAXJWcv40OaEUOAcGp8ly4bTdWT3INtXWGOzQKQypdDrdYC-Vb5zt7Q7TX87_blE3mHqT7mzYKwLKTq3S0Heyx-b2WfLEyDbg83E-T358-vj98stsefV5cXmxnClekX6Wa5NDxcHU1CCVhZQkzzOmoK6IwVprk2nCsC4lQVWrArHGImNFmVGm6ypj58mrg--29UGMjQiCMKgqxsqCRWJxILSXa7Ht7EZ2t8JLK_5u-K4RsuutalHkhtRAS1C8xozntCpBqyynUOcaCuDR68NYbag3qBW6-Nx2Yjo9cXYlGr8TjEIOsL_M29Gg89cDhl5sbFDYttKhH4KoYnlCGS0i-fof8uHHjVQj4_2tMz6WVXtPcZEVvOSs4FWk5g9QcWjcWBVDY2zcnwjeTQSR6fGmb-QQglh8-_r_7NXPKfvmiF2hbPtV8O3QW-_CFMwOoOp8CB2a-x4TEPvM33VD7DMvxsxH2cvj_7kX3YWc_QGd6Pyx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1309933873</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Individual differences and metacognitive knowledge of visual search strategy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Proulx, Michael J</creator><contributor>Suzuki, Satoru</contributor><creatorcontrib>Proulx, Michael J ; Suzuki, Satoru</creatorcontrib><description>A crucial ability for an organism is to orient toward important objects and to ignore temporarily irrelevant objects. Attention provides the perceptual selectivity necessary to filter an overwhelming input of sensory information to allow for efficient object detection. Although much research has examined visual search and the 'template' of attentional set that allows for target detection, the behavior of individual subjects often reveals the limits of experimental control of attention. Few studies have examined important aspects such as individual differences and metacognitive strategies. The present study analyzes the data from two visual search experiments for a conjunctively defined target (Proulx, 2007). The data revealed attentional capture blindness, individual differences in search strategies, and a significant rate of metacognitive errors for the assessment of the strategies employed. These results highlight a challenge for visual attention studies to account for individual differences in search behavior and distractibility, and participants that do not (or are unable to) follow instructions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22066030</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Attention ; Attentional bias ; Behavior ; Biology ; Blindness ; Cognition - physiology ; Data processing ; Exploratory behavior ; Eye movements ; Guideline Adherence ; Humans ; Knowledge ; Memory ; Metacognition ; Neurosciences ; Object recognition ; Search methods ; Selectivity ; Social and Behavioral Sciences ; Target detection ; Topography ; Visual perception ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Visual task performance</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2011-10, Vol.6 (10), p.e27043-e27043</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2011 Michael J. Proulx. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Michael J. Proulx. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-5df50960fb2fe2a7aa15543c0b91febddf4d13eb8a1ecbc7eebe74378423db943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-5df50960fb2fe2a7aa15543c0b91febddf4d13eb8a1ecbc7eebe74378423db943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3205003/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3205003/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22066030$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Suzuki, Satoru</contributor><creatorcontrib>Proulx, Michael J</creatorcontrib><title>Individual differences and metacognitive knowledge of visual search strategy</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>A crucial ability for an organism is to orient toward important objects and to ignore temporarily irrelevant objects. Attention provides the perceptual selectivity necessary to filter an overwhelming input of sensory information to allow for efficient object detection. Although much research has examined visual search and the 'template' of attentional set that allows for target detection, the behavior of individual subjects often reveals the limits of experimental control of attention. Few studies have examined important aspects such as individual differences and metacognitive strategies. The present study analyzes the data from two visual search experiments for a conjunctively defined target (Proulx, 2007). The data revealed attentional capture blindness, individual differences in search strategies, and a significant rate of metacognitive errors for the assessment of the strategies employed. These results highlight a challenge for visual attention studies to account for individual differences in search behavior and distractibility, and participants that do not (or are unable to) follow instructions.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attentional bias</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Blindness</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Exploratory behavior</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Object recognition</subject><subject>Search methods</subject><subject>Selectivity</subject><subject>Social and Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Target detection</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visual task performance</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkuL2zAUhU1p6Tzaf1BaQ6Gli6RXki3bm8Iw9BEIDPS1FbJ05Sh1pIxlpzP_vkrjGeIyi6KFhPSdc6WrkyQvCMwJK8j7tR86J9v51jucA9ACMvYoOSUVozNOgT0-Wp8kZyGsAXJWcv40OaEUOAcGp8ly4bTdWT3INtXWGOzQKQypdDrdYC-Vb5zt7Q7TX87_blE3mHqT7mzYKwLKTq3S0Heyx-b2WfLEyDbg83E-T358-vj98stsefV5cXmxnClekX6Wa5NDxcHU1CCVhZQkzzOmoK6IwVprk2nCsC4lQVWrArHGImNFmVGm6ypj58mrg--29UGMjQiCMKgqxsqCRWJxILSXa7Ht7EZ2t8JLK_5u-K4RsuutalHkhtRAS1C8xozntCpBqyynUOcaCuDR68NYbag3qBW6-Nx2Yjo9cXYlGr8TjEIOsL_M29Gg89cDhl5sbFDYttKhH4KoYnlCGS0i-fof8uHHjVQj4_2tMz6WVXtPcZEVvOSs4FWk5g9QcWjcWBVDY2zcnwjeTQSR6fGmb-QQglh8-_r_7NXPKfvmiF2hbPtV8O3QW-_CFMwOoOp8CB2a-x4TEPvM33VD7DMvxsxH2cvj_7kX3YWc_QGd6Pyx</recordid><startdate>20111031</startdate><enddate>20111031</enddate><creator>Proulx, Michael J</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111031</creationdate><title>Individual differences and metacognitive knowledge of visual search strategy</title><author>Proulx, Michael J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-5df50960fb2fe2a7aa15543c0b91febddf4d13eb8a1ecbc7eebe74378423db943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attentional bias</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Blindness</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Exploratory behavior</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Object recognition</topic><topic>Search methods</topic><topic>Selectivity</topic><topic>Social and Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Target detection</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visual task performance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Proulx, Michael J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Proulx, Michael J</au><au>Suzuki, Satoru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Individual differences and metacognitive knowledge of visual search strategy</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2011-10-31</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e27043</spage><epage>e27043</epage><pages>e27043-e27043</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>A crucial ability for an organism is to orient toward important objects and to ignore temporarily irrelevant objects. Attention provides the perceptual selectivity necessary to filter an overwhelming input of sensory information to allow for efficient object detection. Although much research has examined visual search and the 'template' of attentional set that allows for target detection, the behavior of individual subjects often reveals the limits of experimental control of attention. Few studies have examined important aspects such as individual differences and metacognitive strategies. The present study analyzes the data from two visual search experiments for a conjunctively defined target (Proulx, 2007). The data revealed attentional capture blindness, individual differences in search strategies, and a significant rate of metacognitive errors for the assessment of the strategies employed. These results highlight a challenge for visual attention studies to account for individual differences in search behavior and distractibility, and participants that do not (or are unable to) follow instructions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>22066030</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0027043</doi><tpages>e27043</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2011-10, Vol.6 (10), p.e27043-e27043 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1309933873 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Analysis Attention Attentional bias Behavior Biology Blindness Cognition - physiology Data processing Exploratory behavior Eye movements Guideline Adherence Humans Knowledge Memory Metacognition Neurosciences Object recognition Search methods Selectivity Social and Behavioral Sciences Target detection Topography Visual perception Visual Perception - physiology Visual task performance |
| title | Individual differences and metacognitive knowledge of visual search strategy |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T16%3A48%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Individual%20differences%20and%20metacognitive%20knowledge%20of%20visual%20search%20strategy&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Proulx,%20Michael%20J&rft.date=2011-10-31&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e27043&rft.epage=e27043&rft.pages=e27043-e27043&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0027043&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA476863769%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1309933873&rft_id=info:pmid/22066030&rft_galeid=A476863769&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5f1b0280c6be4652980dc4520b5d0706&rfr_iscdi=true |