Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States
Reliable estimates of the impacts and costs of biological invasions are critical to developing credible management, trade and regulatory policies. Worldwide, forests and urban trees provide important ecosystem services as well as economic and social benefits, but are threatened by non-native insects...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2011-09, Vol.6 (9), p.e24587-e24587 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e24587 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e24587 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Aukema, Juliann E Leung, Brian Kovacs, Kent Chivers, Corey Britton, Kerry O Englin, Jeffrey Frankel, Susan J Haight, Robert G Holmes, Thomas P Liebhold, Andrew M McCullough, Deborah G Von Holle, Betsy |
description | Reliable estimates of the impacts and costs of biological invasions are critical to developing credible management, trade and regulatory policies. Worldwide, forests and urban trees provide important ecosystem services as well as economic and social benefits, but are threatened by non-native insects. More than 450 non-native forest insects are established in the United States but estimates of broad-scale economic impacts associated with these species are largely unavailable. We developed a novel modeling approach that maximizes the use of available data, accounts for multiple sources of uncertainty, and provides cost estimates for three major feeding guilds of non-native forest insects. For each guild, we calculated the economic damages for five cost categories and we estimated the probability of future introductions of damaging pests. We found that costs are largely borne by homeowners and municipal governments. Wood- and phloem-boring insects are anticipated to cause the largest economic impacts by annually inducing nearly $1.7 billion in local government expenditures and approximately $830 million in lost residential property values. Given observations of new species, there is a 32% chance that another highly destructive borer species will invade the U.S. in the next 10 years. Our damage estimates provide a crucial but previously missing component of cost-benefit analyses to evaluate policies and management options intended to reduce species introductions. The modeling approach we developed is highly flexible and could be similarly employed to estimate damages in other countries or natural resource sectors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0024587 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1308905227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A476880583</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1b0f7450e6f44ce1a3948c3f95254eb4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A476880583</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-8855799cff4a9ee5b81b59121df932c49fd72c49ad9b78ea7fbbf9ef95c32a2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9EBQfFi13zOJDdCKVUXigVrvQ2ZzMluymyyTjJF_70Zd1p2pBeSi4Sc57wnOectipcYLTGt8YebMPRed8td8LBEiDAu6kfFMZaULCqC6OOD81HxLMYbhDgVVfW0OCI5guuqOi6-npvgw9aZ0m132qRYBlv64BdeJ3cLpQ09xFQ6H2EMOl-mDZQ5JzkPPumuvPYuQVteJZ0gPi-eWN1FeDHtJ8X1p_PvZ18WF5efV2enFwtTSZwWQnBeS2msZVoC8EbghktMcGvzkw2Ttq3HTbeyqQXo2jaNlWAlN5RoYulJ8Xqvu-tCVFMrosIUCYk4IXUmVnuiDfpG7Xq31f1vFbRTfy9Cv1a6T850oHCDbM04gsoyZgBrKpkwNFcjnEHDstbHqdrQbKE1-eO97mai84h3G7UOtyo3GdGKZIF3k0Affg65oWrrooGu0x7CEJWQlGKBK5rJN_-QD39uotY6v995G3JZM2qqU1ZXQiAuRq3lA1ReLeSBZ9tYl-9nCe9nCeOY4Vda6yFGtbr69v_s5Y85-_aA3YDu0iaGbkgu-DgH2R40fYixB3vfY4zU6Pq7bqjR9WpyfU57dTif-6Q7m9M_Sar89w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1308905227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Aukema, Juliann E ; Leung, Brian ; Kovacs, Kent ; Chivers, Corey ; Britton, Kerry O ; Englin, Jeffrey ; Frankel, Susan J ; Haight, Robert G ; Holmes, Thomas P ; Liebhold, Andrew M ; McCullough, Deborah G ; Von Holle, Betsy</creator><contributor>Gratwicke, Brian</contributor><creatorcontrib>Aukema, Juliann E ; Leung, Brian ; Kovacs, Kent ; Chivers, Corey ; Britton, Kerry O ; Englin, Jeffrey ; Frankel, Susan J ; Haight, Robert G ; Holmes, Thomas P ; Liebhold, Andrew M ; McCullough, Deborah G ; Von Holle, Betsy ; Gratwicke, Brian</creatorcontrib><description>Reliable estimates of the impacts and costs of biological invasions are critical to developing credible management, trade and regulatory policies. Worldwide, forests and urban trees provide important ecosystem services as well as economic and social benefits, but are threatened by non-native insects. More than 450 non-native forest insects are established in the United States but estimates of broad-scale economic impacts associated with these species are largely unavailable. We developed a novel modeling approach that maximizes the use of available data, accounts for multiple sources of uncertainty, and provides cost estimates for three major feeding guilds of non-native forest insects. For each guild, we calculated the economic damages for five cost categories and we estimated the probability of future introductions of damaging pests. We found that costs are largely borne by homeowners and municipal governments. Wood- and phloem-boring insects are anticipated to cause the largest economic impacts by annually inducing nearly $1.7 billion in local government expenditures and approximately $830 million in lost residential property values. Given observations of new species, there is a 32% chance that another highly destructive borer species will invade the U.S. in the next 10 years. Our damage estimates provide a crucial but previously missing component of cost-benefit analyses to evaluate policies and management options intended to reduce species introductions. The modeling approach we developed is highly flexible and could be similarly employed to estimate damages in other countries or natural resource sectors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024587</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21931766</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Analysis ; Animals ; Bayes Theorem ; Biology ; Borers ; Conservation of Natural Resources - economics ; Cost benefit analysis ; Cost estimates ; Damage ; Earth Sciences ; Economic aspects ; Economic impact ; Economics ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem biology ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Environment ; Estimates ; Expenditures ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest management ; Forests ; Geospatial data ; Guilds ; Health Expenditures ; Herbivores ; Insect pests ; Insecta ; Insects ; International trade ; Invasive species ; Leaves ; Local government ; Lyme disease ; Medium term notes ; Modelling ; Models, Economic ; Native species ; Natural resources ; Nonnative species ; Packaging industry ; Pests ; Policies ; Property values ; Public expenditures ; Public Policy ; R&D ; Real estate ; Research & development ; Science Policy ; Social and Behavioral Sciences ; Trees ; United States ; Wood</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2011-09, Vol.6 (9), p.e24587-e24587</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2011. This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-8855799cff4a9ee5b81b59121df932c49fd72c49ad9b78ea7fbbf9ef95c32a2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-8855799cff4a9ee5b81b59121df932c49fd72c49ad9b78ea7fbbf9ef95c32a2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170362/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170362/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21931766$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gratwicke, Brian</contributor><creatorcontrib>Aukema, Juliann E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovacs, Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chivers, Corey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Britton, Kerry O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Englin, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frankel, Susan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haight, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Thomas P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebhold, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, Deborah G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Holle, Betsy</creatorcontrib><title>Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Reliable estimates of the impacts and costs of biological invasions are critical to developing credible management, trade and regulatory policies. Worldwide, forests and urban trees provide important ecosystem services as well as economic and social benefits, but are threatened by non-native insects. More than 450 non-native forest insects are established in the United States but estimates of broad-scale economic impacts associated with these species are largely unavailable. We developed a novel modeling approach that maximizes the use of available data, accounts for multiple sources of uncertainty, and provides cost estimates for three major feeding guilds of non-native forest insects. For each guild, we calculated the economic damages for five cost categories and we estimated the probability of future introductions of damaging pests. We found that costs are largely borne by homeowners and municipal governments. Wood- and phloem-boring insects are anticipated to cause the largest economic impacts by annually inducing nearly $1.7 billion in local government expenditures and approximately $830 million in lost residential property values. Given observations of new species, there is a 32% chance that another highly destructive borer species will invade the U.S. in the next 10 years. Our damage estimates provide a crucial but previously missing component of cost-benefit analyses to evaluate policies and management options intended to reduce species introductions. The modeling approach we developed is highly flexible and could be similarly employed to estimate damages in other countries or natural resource sectors.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Borers</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem biology</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Geospatial data</subject><subject>Guilds</subject><subject>Health Expenditures</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Insect pests</subject><subject>Insecta</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Lyme disease</subject><subject>Medium term notes</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Models, Economic</subject><subject>Native species</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Packaging industry</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Property values</subject><subject>Public expenditures</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Real estate</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Social and Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Wood</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9EBQfFi13zOJDdCKVUXigVrvQ2ZzMluymyyTjJF_70Zd1p2pBeSi4Sc57wnOectipcYLTGt8YebMPRed8td8LBEiDAu6kfFMZaULCqC6OOD81HxLMYbhDgVVfW0OCI5guuqOi6-npvgw9aZ0m132qRYBlv64BdeJ3cLpQ09xFQ6H2EMOl-mDZQ5JzkPPumuvPYuQVteJZ0gPi-eWN1FeDHtJ8X1p_PvZ18WF5efV2enFwtTSZwWQnBeS2msZVoC8EbghktMcGvzkw2Ttq3HTbeyqQXo2jaNlWAlN5RoYulJ8Xqvu-tCVFMrosIUCYk4IXUmVnuiDfpG7Xq31f1vFbRTfy9Cv1a6T850oHCDbM04gsoyZgBrKpkwNFcjnEHDstbHqdrQbKE1-eO97mai84h3G7UOtyo3GdGKZIF3k0Affg65oWrrooGu0x7CEJWQlGKBK5rJN_-QD39uotY6v995G3JZM2qqU1ZXQiAuRq3lA1ReLeSBZ9tYl-9nCe9nCeOY4Vda6yFGtbr69v_s5Y85-_aA3YDu0iaGbkgu-DgH2R40fYixB3vfY4zU6Pq7bqjR9WpyfU57dTif-6Q7m9M_Sar89w</recordid><startdate>20110909</startdate><enddate>20110909</enddate><creator>Aukema, Juliann E</creator><creator>Leung, Brian</creator><creator>Kovacs, Kent</creator><creator>Chivers, Corey</creator><creator>Britton, Kerry O</creator><creator>Englin, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Frankel, Susan J</creator><creator>Haight, Robert G</creator><creator>Holmes, Thomas P</creator><creator>Liebhold, Andrew M</creator><creator>McCullough, Deborah G</creator><creator>Von Holle, Betsy</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110909</creationdate><title>Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States</title><author>Aukema, Juliann E ; Leung, Brian ; Kovacs, Kent ; Chivers, Corey ; Britton, Kerry O ; Englin, Jeffrey ; Frankel, Susan J ; Haight, Robert G ; Holmes, Thomas P ; Liebhold, Andrew M ; McCullough, Deborah G ; Von Holle, Betsy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-8855799cff4a9ee5b81b59121df932c49fd72c49ad9b78ea7fbbf9ef95c32a2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Borers</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem biology</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Geospatial data</topic><topic>Guilds</topic><topic>Health Expenditures</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Insect pests</topic><topic>Insecta</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Lyme disease</topic><topic>Medium term notes</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Models, Economic</topic><topic>Native species</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Packaging industry</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Property values</topic><topic>Public expenditures</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Real estate</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Social and Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Wood</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aukema, Juliann E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovacs, Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chivers, Corey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Britton, Kerry O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Englin, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frankel, Susan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haight, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Thomas P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebhold, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, Deborah G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Holle, Betsy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aukema, Juliann E</au><au>Leung, Brian</au><au>Kovacs, Kent</au><au>Chivers, Corey</au><au>Britton, Kerry O</au><au>Englin, Jeffrey</au><au>Frankel, Susan J</au><au>Haight, Robert G</au><au>Holmes, Thomas P</au><au>Liebhold, Andrew M</au><au>McCullough, Deborah G</au><au>Von Holle, Betsy</au><au>Gratwicke, Brian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2011-09-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e24587</spage><epage>e24587</epage><pages>e24587-e24587</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Reliable estimates of the impacts and costs of biological invasions are critical to developing credible management, trade and regulatory policies. Worldwide, forests and urban trees provide important ecosystem services as well as economic and social benefits, but are threatened by non-native insects. More than 450 non-native forest insects are established in the United States but estimates of broad-scale economic impacts associated with these species are largely unavailable. We developed a novel modeling approach that maximizes the use of available data, accounts for multiple sources of uncertainty, and provides cost estimates for three major feeding guilds of non-native forest insects. For each guild, we calculated the economic damages for five cost categories and we estimated the probability of future introductions of damaging pests. We found that costs are largely borne by homeowners and municipal governments. Wood- and phloem-boring insects are anticipated to cause the largest economic impacts by annually inducing nearly $1.7 billion in local government expenditures and approximately $830 million in lost residential property values. Given observations of new species, there is a 32% chance that another highly destructive borer species will invade the U.S. in the next 10 years. Our damage estimates provide a crucial but previously missing component of cost-benefit analyses to evaluate policies and management options intended to reduce species introductions. The modeling approach we developed is highly flexible and could be similarly employed to estimate damages in other countries or natural resource sectors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>21931766</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0024587</doi><tpages>e24587</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2011-09, Vol.6 (9), p.e24587-e24587 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1308905227 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Agriculture Analysis Animals Bayes Theorem Biology Borers Conservation of Natural Resources - economics Cost benefit analysis Cost estimates Damage Earth Sciences Economic aspects Economic impact Economics Ecosystem Ecosystem biology Ecosystem services Ecosystems Environment Estimates Expenditures Forest ecosystems Forest management Forests Geospatial data Guilds Health Expenditures Herbivores Insect pests Insecta Insects International trade Invasive species Leaves Local government Lyme disease Medium term notes Modelling Models, Economic Native species Natural resources Nonnative species Packaging industry Pests Policies Property values Public expenditures Public Policy R&D Real estate Research & development Science Policy Social and Behavioral Sciences Trees United States Wood |
title | Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T08%3A24%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20impacts%20of%20non-native%20forest%20insects%20in%20the%20continental%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Aukema,%20Juliann%20E&rft.date=2011-09-09&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e24587&rft.epage=e24587&rft.pages=e24587-e24587&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0024587&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA476880583%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1308905227&rft_id=info:pmid/21931766&rft_galeid=A476880583&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_1b0f7450e6f44ce1a3948c3f95254eb4&rfr_iscdi=true |