Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States

Reliable estimates of the impacts and costs of biological invasions are critical to developing credible management, trade and regulatory policies. Worldwide, forests and urban trees provide important ecosystem services as well as economic and social benefits, but are threatened by non-native insects...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2011-09, Vol.6 (9), p.e24587-e24587
Hauptverfasser: Aukema, Juliann E, Leung, Brian, Kovacs, Kent, Chivers, Corey, Britton, Kerry O, Englin, Jeffrey, Frankel, Susan J, Haight, Robert G, Holmes, Thomas P, Liebhold, Andrew M, McCullough, Deborah G, Von Holle, Betsy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e24587
container_issue 9
container_start_page e24587
container_title PloS one
container_volume 6
creator Aukema, Juliann E
Leung, Brian
Kovacs, Kent
Chivers, Corey
Britton, Kerry O
Englin, Jeffrey
Frankel, Susan J
Haight, Robert G
Holmes, Thomas P
Liebhold, Andrew M
McCullough, Deborah G
Von Holle, Betsy
description Reliable estimates of the impacts and costs of biological invasions are critical to developing credible management, trade and regulatory policies. Worldwide, forests and urban trees provide important ecosystem services as well as economic and social benefits, but are threatened by non-native insects. More than 450 non-native forest insects are established in the United States but estimates of broad-scale economic impacts associated with these species are largely unavailable. We developed a novel modeling approach that maximizes the use of available data, accounts for multiple sources of uncertainty, and provides cost estimates for three major feeding guilds of non-native forest insects. For each guild, we calculated the economic damages for five cost categories and we estimated the probability of future introductions of damaging pests. We found that costs are largely borne by homeowners and municipal governments. Wood- and phloem-boring insects are anticipated to cause the largest economic impacts by annually inducing nearly $1.7 billion in local government expenditures and approximately $830 million in lost residential property values. Given observations of new species, there is a 32% chance that another highly destructive borer species will invade the U.S. in the next 10 years. Our damage estimates provide a crucial but previously missing component of cost-benefit analyses to evaluate policies and management options intended to reduce species introductions. The modeling approach we developed is highly flexible and could be similarly employed to estimate damages in other countries or natural resource sectors.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0024587
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1308905227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A476880583</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1b0f7450e6f44ce1a3948c3f95254eb4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A476880583</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-8855799cff4a9ee5b81b59121df932c49fd72c49ad9b78ea7fbbf9ef95c32a2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9EBQfFi13zOJDdCKVUXigVrvQ2ZzMluymyyTjJF_70Zd1p2pBeSi4Sc57wnOectipcYLTGt8YebMPRed8td8LBEiDAu6kfFMZaULCqC6OOD81HxLMYbhDgVVfW0OCI5guuqOi6-npvgw9aZ0m132qRYBlv64BdeJ3cLpQ09xFQ6H2EMOl-mDZQ5JzkPPumuvPYuQVteJZ0gPi-eWN1FeDHtJ8X1p_PvZ18WF5efV2enFwtTSZwWQnBeS2msZVoC8EbghktMcGvzkw2Ttq3HTbeyqQXo2jaNlWAlN5RoYulJ8Xqvu-tCVFMrosIUCYk4IXUmVnuiDfpG7Xq31f1vFbRTfy9Cv1a6T850oHCDbM04gsoyZgBrKpkwNFcjnEHDstbHqdrQbKE1-eO97mai84h3G7UOtyo3GdGKZIF3k0Affg65oWrrooGu0x7CEJWQlGKBK5rJN_-QD39uotY6v995G3JZM2qqU1ZXQiAuRq3lA1ReLeSBZ9tYl-9nCe9nCeOY4Vda6yFGtbr69v_s5Y85-_aA3YDu0iaGbkgu-DgH2R40fYixB3vfY4zU6Pq7bqjR9WpyfU57dTif-6Q7m9M_Sar89w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1308905227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Aukema, Juliann E ; Leung, Brian ; Kovacs, Kent ; Chivers, Corey ; Britton, Kerry O ; Englin, Jeffrey ; Frankel, Susan J ; Haight, Robert G ; Holmes, Thomas P ; Liebhold, Andrew M ; McCullough, Deborah G ; Von Holle, Betsy</creator><contributor>Gratwicke, Brian</contributor><creatorcontrib>Aukema, Juliann E ; Leung, Brian ; Kovacs, Kent ; Chivers, Corey ; Britton, Kerry O ; Englin, Jeffrey ; Frankel, Susan J ; Haight, Robert G ; Holmes, Thomas P ; Liebhold, Andrew M ; McCullough, Deborah G ; Von Holle, Betsy ; Gratwicke, Brian</creatorcontrib><description>Reliable estimates of the impacts and costs of biological invasions are critical to developing credible management, trade and regulatory policies. Worldwide, forests and urban trees provide important ecosystem services as well as economic and social benefits, but are threatened by non-native insects. More than 450 non-native forest insects are established in the United States but estimates of broad-scale economic impacts associated with these species are largely unavailable. We developed a novel modeling approach that maximizes the use of available data, accounts for multiple sources of uncertainty, and provides cost estimates for three major feeding guilds of non-native forest insects. For each guild, we calculated the economic damages for five cost categories and we estimated the probability of future introductions of damaging pests. We found that costs are largely borne by homeowners and municipal governments. Wood- and phloem-boring insects are anticipated to cause the largest economic impacts by annually inducing nearly $1.7 billion in local government expenditures and approximately $830 million in lost residential property values. Given observations of new species, there is a 32% chance that another highly destructive borer species will invade the U.S. in the next 10 years. Our damage estimates provide a crucial but previously missing component of cost-benefit analyses to evaluate policies and management options intended to reduce species introductions. The modeling approach we developed is highly flexible and could be similarly employed to estimate damages in other countries or natural resource sectors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024587</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21931766</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Analysis ; Animals ; Bayes Theorem ; Biology ; Borers ; Conservation of Natural Resources - economics ; Cost benefit analysis ; Cost estimates ; Damage ; Earth Sciences ; Economic aspects ; Economic impact ; Economics ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem biology ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Environment ; Estimates ; Expenditures ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest management ; Forests ; Geospatial data ; Guilds ; Health Expenditures ; Herbivores ; Insect pests ; Insecta ; Insects ; International trade ; Invasive species ; Leaves ; Local government ; Lyme disease ; Medium term notes ; Modelling ; Models, Economic ; Native species ; Natural resources ; Nonnative species ; Packaging industry ; Pests ; Policies ; Property values ; Public expenditures ; Public Policy ; R&amp;D ; Real estate ; Research &amp; development ; Science Policy ; Social and Behavioral Sciences ; Trees ; United States ; Wood</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2011-09, Vol.6 (9), p.e24587-e24587</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2011. This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-8855799cff4a9ee5b81b59121df932c49fd72c49ad9b78ea7fbbf9ef95c32a2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-8855799cff4a9ee5b81b59121df932c49fd72c49ad9b78ea7fbbf9ef95c32a2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170362/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170362/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21931766$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gratwicke, Brian</contributor><creatorcontrib>Aukema, Juliann E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovacs, Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chivers, Corey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Britton, Kerry O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Englin, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frankel, Susan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haight, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Thomas P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebhold, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, Deborah G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Holle, Betsy</creatorcontrib><title>Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Reliable estimates of the impacts and costs of biological invasions are critical to developing credible management, trade and regulatory policies. Worldwide, forests and urban trees provide important ecosystem services as well as economic and social benefits, but are threatened by non-native insects. More than 450 non-native forest insects are established in the United States but estimates of broad-scale economic impacts associated with these species are largely unavailable. We developed a novel modeling approach that maximizes the use of available data, accounts for multiple sources of uncertainty, and provides cost estimates for three major feeding guilds of non-native forest insects. For each guild, we calculated the economic damages for five cost categories and we estimated the probability of future introductions of damaging pests. We found that costs are largely borne by homeowners and municipal governments. Wood- and phloem-boring insects are anticipated to cause the largest economic impacts by annually inducing nearly $1.7 billion in local government expenditures and approximately $830 million in lost residential property values. Given observations of new species, there is a 32% chance that another highly destructive borer species will invade the U.S. in the next 10 years. Our damage estimates provide a crucial but previously missing component of cost-benefit analyses to evaluate policies and management options intended to reduce species introductions. The modeling approach we developed is highly flexible and could be similarly employed to estimate damages in other countries or natural resource sectors.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Borers</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem biology</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Geospatial data</subject><subject>Guilds</subject><subject>Health Expenditures</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Insect pests</subject><subject>Insecta</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Lyme disease</subject><subject>Medium term notes</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Models, Economic</subject><subject>Native species</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Packaging industry</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Property values</subject><subject>Public expenditures</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Real estate</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Social and Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Wood</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9EBQfFi13zOJDdCKVUXigVrvQ2ZzMluymyyTjJF_70Zd1p2pBeSi4Sc57wnOectipcYLTGt8YebMPRed8td8LBEiDAu6kfFMZaULCqC6OOD81HxLMYbhDgVVfW0OCI5guuqOi6-npvgw9aZ0m132qRYBlv64BdeJ3cLpQ09xFQ6H2EMOl-mDZQ5JzkPPumuvPYuQVteJZ0gPi-eWN1FeDHtJ8X1p_PvZ18WF5efV2enFwtTSZwWQnBeS2msZVoC8EbghktMcGvzkw2Ttq3HTbeyqQXo2jaNlWAlN5RoYulJ8Xqvu-tCVFMrosIUCYk4IXUmVnuiDfpG7Xq31f1vFbRTfy9Cv1a6T850oHCDbM04gsoyZgBrKpkwNFcjnEHDstbHqdrQbKE1-eO97mai84h3G7UOtyo3GdGKZIF3k0Affg65oWrrooGu0x7CEJWQlGKBK5rJN_-QD39uotY6v995G3JZM2qqU1ZXQiAuRq3lA1ReLeSBZ9tYl-9nCe9nCeOY4Vda6yFGtbr69v_s5Y85-_aA3YDu0iaGbkgu-DgH2R40fYixB3vfY4zU6Pq7bqjR9WpyfU57dTif-6Q7m9M_Sar89w</recordid><startdate>20110909</startdate><enddate>20110909</enddate><creator>Aukema, Juliann E</creator><creator>Leung, Brian</creator><creator>Kovacs, Kent</creator><creator>Chivers, Corey</creator><creator>Britton, Kerry O</creator><creator>Englin, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Frankel, Susan J</creator><creator>Haight, Robert G</creator><creator>Holmes, Thomas P</creator><creator>Liebhold, Andrew M</creator><creator>McCullough, Deborah G</creator><creator>Von Holle, Betsy</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110909</creationdate><title>Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States</title><author>Aukema, Juliann E ; Leung, Brian ; Kovacs, Kent ; Chivers, Corey ; Britton, Kerry O ; Englin, Jeffrey ; Frankel, Susan J ; Haight, Robert G ; Holmes, Thomas P ; Liebhold, Andrew M ; McCullough, Deborah G ; Von Holle, Betsy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-8855799cff4a9ee5b81b59121df932c49fd72c49ad9b78ea7fbbf9ef95c32a2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Borers</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem biology</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Geospatial data</topic><topic>Guilds</topic><topic>Health Expenditures</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Insect pests</topic><topic>Insecta</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Lyme disease</topic><topic>Medium term notes</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Models, Economic</topic><topic>Native species</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Packaging industry</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Property values</topic><topic>Public expenditures</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Real estate</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Social and Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Wood</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aukema, Juliann E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovacs, Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chivers, Corey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Britton, Kerry O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Englin, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frankel, Susan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haight, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Thomas P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebhold, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, Deborah G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Holle, Betsy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aukema, Juliann E</au><au>Leung, Brian</au><au>Kovacs, Kent</au><au>Chivers, Corey</au><au>Britton, Kerry O</au><au>Englin, Jeffrey</au><au>Frankel, Susan J</au><au>Haight, Robert G</au><au>Holmes, Thomas P</au><au>Liebhold, Andrew M</au><au>McCullough, Deborah G</au><au>Von Holle, Betsy</au><au>Gratwicke, Brian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2011-09-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e24587</spage><epage>e24587</epage><pages>e24587-e24587</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Reliable estimates of the impacts and costs of biological invasions are critical to developing credible management, trade and regulatory policies. Worldwide, forests and urban trees provide important ecosystem services as well as economic and social benefits, but are threatened by non-native insects. More than 450 non-native forest insects are established in the United States but estimates of broad-scale economic impacts associated with these species are largely unavailable. We developed a novel modeling approach that maximizes the use of available data, accounts for multiple sources of uncertainty, and provides cost estimates for three major feeding guilds of non-native forest insects. For each guild, we calculated the economic damages for five cost categories and we estimated the probability of future introductions of damaging pests. We found that costs are largely borne by homeowners and municipal governments. Wood- and phloem-boring insects are anticipated to cause the largest economic impacts by annually inducing nearly $1.7 billion in local government expenditures and approximately $830 million in lost residential property values. Given observations of new species, there is a 32% chance that another highly destructive borer species will invade the U.S. in the next 10 years. Our damage estimates provide a crucial but previously missing component of cost-benefit analyses to evaluate policies and management options intended to reduce species introductions. The modeling approach we developed is highly flexible and could be similarly employed to estimate damages in other countries or natural resource sectors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>21931766</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0024587</doi><tpages>e24587</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2011-09, Vol.6 (9), p.e24587-e24587
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1308905227
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Agriculture
Analysis
Animals
Bayes Theorem
Biology
Borers
Conservation of Natural Resources - economics
Cost benefit analysis
Cost estimates
Damage
Earth Sciences
Economic aspects
Economic impact
Economics
Ecosystem
Ecosystem biology
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Environment
Estimates
Expenditures
Forest ecosystems
Forest management
Forests
Geospatial data
Guilds
Health Expenditures
Herbivores
Insect pests
Insecta
Insects
International trade
Invasive species
Leaves
Local government
Lyme disease
Medium term notes
Modelling
Models, Economic
Native species
Natural resources
Nonnative species
Packaging industry
Pests
Policies
Property values
Public expenditures
Public Policy
R&D
Real estate
Research & development
Science Policy
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Trees
United States
Wood
title Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T08%3A24%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20impacts%20of%20non-native%20forest%20insects%20in%20the%20continental%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Aukema,%20Juliann%20E&rft.date=2011-09-09&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e24587&rft.epage=e24587&rft.pages=e24587-e24587&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0024587&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA476880583%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1308905227&rft_id=info:pmid/21931766&rft_galeid=A476880583&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_1b0f7450e6f44ce1a3948c3f95254eb4&rfr_iscdi=true