Multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis for Streptococcus pneumoniae: comparison with PFGE and MLST
In the era of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, surveillance of pneumococcal disease and carriage remains of utmost importance as important changes may occur in the population. To monitor these alterations reliable genotyping methods are required for large-scale applications. We introduced a high thr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2011-05, Vol.6 (5), p.e19668-e19668 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e19668 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e19668 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Elberse, Karin E M Nunes, Sónia Sá-Leão, Raquel van der Heide, Han G J Schouls, Leo M |
description | In the era of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, surveillance of pneumococcal disease and carriage remains of utmost importance as important changes may occur in the population. To monitor these alterations reliable genotyping methods are required for large-scale applications. We introduced a high throughput multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) and compared this method with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). The MLVA described here is based on 8 BOX loci that are amplified in two multiplex PCRs. The labeled PCR products are sized on an automated DNA sequencer to accurately determine the number of tandem repeats. The composite of the number of repeats of the BOX loci makes up a numerical profile that is used for identification and clustering. In this study, MLVA was performed on 263 carriage isolates that were previously characterized by MLST and PFGE. MLVA, MLST and PFGE (cut-off of 80%) yielded 164, 120, and 87 types, respectively. The three typing methods had Simpson's diversity indices of 98.5% or higher. Congruence between MLST and MLVA was high. The Wallace of MLVA to MLST was 0.874, meaning that if two strains had the same MLVA type they had an 88% chance of having the same MLST type. Furthermore, the Wallace of MLVA to clonal complex of MLST was even higher: 99.5%. For some isolates belonging to a single MLST clonal complex although displaying different serotypes, MLVA was more discriminatory, generating groups according to serotype or serogroup. Overall, MLVA is a promising genotyping method that is easy to perform and a relatively cheap alternative to PFGE and MLST. In the companion paper published simultaneously in this issue we applied the MLVA to assess the pneumococcal population structure of isolates causing invasive disease in The Netherlands before the introduction of the 7-valent conjugate vaccine. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0019668 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1298320806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A476889580</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_43236f1a06af482c8b7c4830d3d9ada0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A476889580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-4945f05b2a01449b0559aea6736b190d059c6617f1983942ef975d37e23d5c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk01v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBEQgJx2MUfiWP3gFRVbVlpqyJ2xdVyHGfXKydObafQf4_DptUG9YB8iDV53ncmM5kkeQvBHOICftnZ3rXCzDvbqjkAkBFCnyXHkGE0Iwjg5wf3o-SV9zsAckwJeZkcIUhwgXF-nNxe9ybozqiZsbL36Z1wWpRGpW3flMqlQbSValKnOiVCKmLCe699WluXrkKMBiutHIRdq_rGtlqo01Tapos-3rbpLx226ffLq4uordLr5Wr9OnlRC-PVm_F5kqwvL9bn32bLm6vF-dlyJgmDYZaxLK9BXiIBYJaxEuQ5E0qQApMSMlCBnElCYFFDRjHLkKpZkVe4UAhXuST4JHm_t-2M9XxslucQRRwBCgZisScqK3a8c7oR7p5bofnfgHUbLlzQ0iieYYRJDQUgos4okrQsZEYxqHDFRCVA9Po6ZuvLRlVStcEJMzGdvmn1lm_sHccQIJLn0eDTaODsba984I32UhkjWmV7z2kBUJwmopH88A_59MeN1EbE-nVb25hWDp78LCsIpSynQ9nzJ6h44sy1jD9WrWN8Ivg8EUQmqN9hI3rv-WL14__Zm59T9uMBu1XChK23pg_atn4KZntQOuu9U_VjjyHgw148dIMPe8HHvYiyd4fzeRQ9LAL-A7I8B8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1298320806</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis for Streptococcus pneumoniae: comparison with PFGE and MLST</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Public Library of Science</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Elberse, Karin E M ; Nunes, Sónia ; Sá-Leão, Raquel ; van der Heide, Han G J ; Schouls, Leo M</creator><creatorcontrib>Elberse, Karin E M ; Nunes, Sónia ; Sá-Leão, Raquel ; van der Heide, Han G J ; Schouls, Leo M</creatorcontrib><description>In the era of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, surveillance of pneumococcal disease and carriage remains of utmost importance as important changes may occur in the population. To monitor these alterations reliable genotyping methods are required for large-scale applications. We introduced a high throughput multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) and compared this method with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). The MLVA described here is based on 8 BOX loci that are amplified in two multiplex PCRs. The labeled PCR products are sized on an automated DNA sequencer to accurately determine the number of tandem repeats. The composite of the number of repeats of the BOX loci makes up a numerical profile that is used for identification and clustering. In this study, MLVA was performed on 263 carriage isolates that were previously characterized by MLST and PFGE. MLVA, MLST and PFGE (cut-off of 80%) yielded 164, 120, and 87 types, respectively. The three typing methods had Simpson's diversity indices of 98.5% or higher. Congruence between MLST and MLVA was high. The Wallace of MLVA to MLST was 0.874, meaning that if two strains had the same MLVA type they had an 88% chance of having the same MLST type. Furthermore, the Wallace of MLVA to clonal complex of MLST was even higher: 99.5%. For some isolates belonging to a single MLST clonal complex although displaying different serotypes, MLVA was more discriminatory, generating groups according to serotype or serogroup. Overall, MLVA is a promising genotyping method that is easy to perform and a relatively cheap alternative to PFGE and MLST. In the companion paper published simultaneously in this issue we applied the MLVA to assess the pneumococcal population structure of isolates causing invasive disease in The Netherlands before the introduction of the 7-valent conjugate vaccine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019668</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21637335</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Bacterial Typing Techniques - methods ; Biology ; Child ; Clustering ; Confidence intervals ; Day care centers ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Diversity indices ; DNA ; DNA sequencing ; Drug resistance ; Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field - methods ; Epidemiology ; Gel electrophoresis ; Genetic diversity ; Genetic Loci - genetics ; Genome, Bacterial - genetics ; Genotyping ; Health surveillance ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Laboratories ; Loci ; Methods ; Microorganisms ; Minisatellite Repeats - genetics ; Multilocus sequence typing ; Multilocus Sequence Typing - methods ; Multiplexing ; Nucleotide sequence ; Pneumonia ; Population structure ; Public health ; Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis ; Serotypes ; Serotyping ; Streptococcus infections ; Streptococcus pneumoniae ; Streptococcus pneumoniae - classification ; Streptococcus pneumoniae - genetics ; Streptococcus pneumoniae - isolation & purification ; Streptococcus pyogenes ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2011-05, Vol.6 (5), p.e19668-e19668</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2011 Elberse et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Elberse et al. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-4945f05b2a01449b0559aea6736b190d059c6617f1983942ef975d37e23d5c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-4945f05b2a01449b0559aea6736b190d059c6617f1983942ef975d37e23d5c63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3102655/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3102655/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21637335$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elberse, Karin E M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Sónia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sá-Leão, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Heide, Han G J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schouls, Leo M</creatorcontrib><title>Multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis for Streptococcus pneumoniae: comparison with PFGE and MLST</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>In the era of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, surveillance of pneumococcal disease and carriage remains of utmost importance as important changes may occur in the population. To monitor these alterations reliable genotyping methods are required for large-scale applications. We introduced a high throughput multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) and compared this method with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). The MLVA described here is based on 8 BOX loci that are amplified in two multiplex PCRs. The labeled PCR products are sized on an automated DNA sequencer to accurately determine the number of tandem repeats. The composite of the number of repeats of the BOX loci makes up a numerical profile that is used for identification and clustering. In this study, MLVA was performed on 263 carriage isolates that were previously characterized by MLST and PFGE. MLVA, MLST and PFGE (cut-off of 80%) yielded 164, 120, and 87 types, respectively. The three typing methods had Simpson's diversity indices of 98.5% or higher. Congruence between MLST and MLVA was high. The Wallace of MLVA to MLST was 0.874, meaning that if two strains had the same MLVA type they had an 88% chance of having the same MLST type. Furthermore, the Wallace of MLVA to clonal complex of MLST was even higher: 99.5%. For some isolates belonging to a single MLST clonal complex although displaying different serotypes, MLVA was more discriminatory, generating groups according to serotype or serogroup. Overall, MLVA is a promising genotyping method that is easy to perform and a relatively cheap alternative to PFGE and MLST. In the companion paper published simultaneously in this issue we applied the MLVA to assess the pneumococcal population structure of isolates causing invasive disease in The Netherlands before the introduction of the 7-valent conjugate vaccine.</description><subject>Bacterial Typing Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Day care centers</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Diversity indices</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA sequencing</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field - methods</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Gel electrophoresis</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetic Loci - genetics</subject><subject>Genome, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>Genotyping</subject><subject>Health surveillance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Loci</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Minisatellite Repeats - genetics</subject><subject>Multilocus sequence typing</subject><subject>Multilocus Sequence Typing - methods</subject><subject>Multiplexing</subject><subject>Nucleotide sequence</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Population structure</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis</subject><subject>Serotypes</subject><subject>Serotyping</subject><subject>Streptococcus infections</subject><subject>Streptococcus pneumoniae</subject><subject>Streptococcus pneumoniae - classification</subject><subject>Streptococcus pneumoniae - genetics</subject><subject>Streptococcus pneumoniae - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Streptococcus pyogenes</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk01v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBEQgJx2MUfiWP3gFRVbVlpqyJ2xdVyHGfXKydObafQf4_DptUG9YB8iDV53ncmM5kkeQvBHOICftnZ3rXCzDvbqjkAkBFCnyXHkGE0Iwjg5wf3o-SV9zsAckwJeZkcIUhwgXF-nNxe9ybozqiZsbL36Z1wWpRGpW3flMqlQbSValKnOiVCKmLCe699WluXrkKMBiutHIRdq_rGtlqo01Tapos-3rbpLx226ffLq4uordLr5Wr9OnlRC-PVm_F5kqwvL9bn32bLm6vF-dlyJgmDYZaxLK9BXiIBYJaxEuQ5E0qQApMSMlCBnElCYFFDRjHLkKpZkVe4UAhXuST4JHm_t-2M9XxslucQRRwBCgZisScqK3a8c7oR7p5bofnfgHUbLlzQ0iieYYRJDQUgos4okrQsZEYxqHDFRCVA9Po6ZuvLRlVStcEJMzGdvmn1lm_sHccQIJLn0eDTaODsba984I32UhkjWmV7z2kBUJwmopH88A_59MeN1EbE-nVb25hWDp78LCsIpSynQ9nzJ6h44sy1jD9WrWN8Ivg8EUQmqN9hI3rv-WL14__Zm59T9uMBu1XChK23pg_atn4KZntQOuu9U_VjjyHgw148dIMPe8HHvYiyd4fzeRQ9LAL-A7I8B8w</recordid><startdate>20110526</startdate><enddate>20110526</enddate><creator>Elberse, Karin E M</creator><creator>Nunes, Sónia</creator><creator>Sá-Leão, Raquel</creator><creator>van der Heide, Han G J</creator><creator>Schouls, Leo M</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110526</creationdate><title>Multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis for Streptococcus pneumoniae: comparison with PFGE and MLST</title><author>Elberse, Karin E M ; Nunes, Sónia ; Sá-Leão, Raquel ; van der Heide, Han G J ; Schouls, Leo M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-4945f05b2a01449b0559aea6736b190d059c6617f1983942ef975d37e23d5c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bacterial Typing Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Day care centers</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Diversity indices</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA sequencing</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field - methods</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Gel electrophoresis</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetic Loci - genetics</topic><topic>Genome, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>Genotyping</topic><topic>Health surveillance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Loci</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Minisatellite Repeats - genetics</topic><topic>Multilocus sequence typing</topic><topic>Multilocus Sequence Typing - methods</topic><topic>Multiplexing</topic><topic>Nucleotide sequence</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Population structure</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis</topic><topic>Serotypes</topic><topic>Serotyping</topic><topic>Streptococcus infections</topic><topic>Streptococcus pneumoniae</topic><topic>Streptococcus pneumoniae - classification</topic><topic>Streptococcus pneumoniae - genetics</topic><topic>Streptococcus pneumoniae - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Streptococcus pyogenes</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elberse, Karin E M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Sónia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sá-Leão, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Heide, Han G J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schouls, Leo M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elberse, Karin E M</au><au>Nunes, Sónia</au><au>Sá-Leão, Raquel</au><au>van der Heide, Han G J</au><au>Schouls, Leo M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis for Streptococcus pneumoniae: comparison with PFGE and MLST</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2011-05-26</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e19668</spage><epage>e19668</epage><pages>e19668-e19668</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>In the era of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, surveillance of pneumococcal disease and carriage remains of utmost importance as important changes may occur in the population. To monitor these alterations reliable genotyping methods are required for large-scale applications. We introduced a high throughput multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) and compared this method with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). The MLVA described here is based on 8 BOX loci that are amplified in two multiplex PCRs. The labeled PCR products are sized on an automated DNA sequencer to accurately determine the number of tandem repeats. The composite of the number of repeats of the BOX loci makes up a numerical profile that is used for identification and clustering. In this study, MLVA was performed on 263 carriage isolates that were previously characterized by MLST and PFGE. MLVA, MLST and PFGE (cut-off of 80%) yielded 164, 120, and 87 types, respectively. The three typing methods had Simpson's diversity indices of 98.5% or higher. Congruence between MLST and MLVA was high. The Wallace of MLVA to MLST was 0.874, meaning that if two strains had the same MLVA type they had an 88% chance of having the same MLST type. Furthermore, the Wallace of MLVA to clonal complex of MLST was even higher: 99.5%. For some isolates belonging to a single MLST clonal complex although displaying different serotypes, MLVA was more discriminatory, generating groups according to serotype or serogroup. Overall, MLVA is a promising genotyping method that is easy to perform and a relatively cheap alternative to PFGE and MLST. In the companion paper published simultaneously in this issue we applied the MLVA to assess the pneumococcal population structure of isolates causing invasive disease in The Netherlands before the introduction of the 7-valent conjugate vaccine.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>21637335</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0019668</doi><tpages>e19668</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2011-05, Vol.6 (5), p.e19668-e19668 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1298320806 |
source | PubMed Central (Open Access); MEDLINE; Public Library of Science; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Bacterial Typing Techniques - methods Biology Child Clustering Confidence intervals Day care centers Deoxyribonucleic acid Diversity indices DNA DNA sequencing Drug resistance Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field - methods Epidemiology Gel electrophoresis Genetic diversity Genetic Loci - genetics Genome, Bacterial - genetics Genotyping Health surveillance Humans Infectious diseases Laboratories Loci Methods Microorganisms Minisatellite Repeats - genetics Multilocus sequence typing Multilocus Sequence Typing - methods Multiplexing Nucleotide sequence Pneumonia Population structure Public health Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis Serotypes Serotyping Streptococcus infections Streptococcus pneumoniae Streptococcus pneumoniae - classification Streptococcus pneumoniae - genetics Streptococcus pneumoniae - isolation & purification Streptococcus pyogenes Vaccines |
title | Multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis for Streptococcus pneumoniae: comparison with PFGE and MLST |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T14%3A08%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiple-locus%20variable%20number%20tandem%20repeat%20analysis%20for%20Streptococcus%20pneumoniae:%20comparison%20with%20PFGE%20and%20MLST&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Elberse,%20Karin%20E%20M&rft.date=2011-05-26&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e19668&rft.epage=e19668&rft.pages=e19668-e19668&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0019668&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA476889580%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1298320806&rft_id=info:pmid/21637335&rft_galeid=A476889580&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_43236f1a06af482c8b7c4830d3d9ada0&rfr_iscdi=true |