Size, rarity and charisma: valuing African wildlife trophies
We explore variation in the prices paid by recreational hunters of trophy animals in Africa and its possible causes, including perceived rarity. Previous work has raised the possibility that extinction can result if demand rises fast enough as a species becomes rarer. We attempt to disentangle this...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2010-09, Vol.5 (9), p.e12866-e12866 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e12866 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e12866 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Johnson, Paul J Kansky, Ruth Loveridge, Andrew J Macdonald, David W |
description | We explore variation in the prices paid by recreational hunters of trophy animals in Africa and its possible causes, including perceived rarity. Previous work has raised the possibility that extinction can result if demand rises fast enough as a species becomes rarer. We attempt to disentangle this from other inter-correlated influences affecting price. Species with larger body sizes and larger trophies were more valuable. Value increased less steeply as a function of size for bovids than for felids and the effect was consistent across countries. Power laws, ubiquitous in physical and social systems, described the trends. The exponent was approximately 0.4 for bovids, compared with approximately 1.0 for felids. Rarity (as indexed by IUCN score) influenced the value of bovid trophies - price was higher for species in categories denoting higher global threat. There was substantial variation in price among and within families not explained by either size or rarity. This may be attributable to a 'charisma' effect, which seems likely to be a general attribute of human perceptions of wildlife. Species where prices were higher than predicted by size or rarity are ranked high in published accounts of desirability by hunters. We conclude that the valuation of these species is explicable to a large extent by body size and perceived rarity, and that differences in valuation between taxonomic groups are related to less easily quantified 'charisma' effects. These findings are relevant for conservationists considering the threat status of species exploited in open access markets, and where license quotas are adjusted in response to changes in perceived rarity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0012866 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1292811110</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A473857957</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_606394cabe684c45b5aa2f4c479a506d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A473857957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c761t-2b6acdae8a01a0c7bfafda4f3c73c56a830ff21ed7cc30c0a8e02c3aa8f718aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9EBQRHcNR8zSUZEWIofC4WCVW_DmUwymyU72SYz1frrzbrTsiO9MLnIIXnOm5yTN8ueYjTHlOO3az-EDtx86zs9RwgTwdi97BhXlMwYQfT-QXyUPYpxjVBJE_QwOyJIcF6y4jh7f2F_6zd5gGD76xy6JlerFMcNvMuvwA22a_OFCVZBl_-0rnHW6LwPfruyOj7OHhhwUT8Z15Ps-6eP306_zM7OPy9PF2czxRnuZ6RmoBrQAhAGpHhtwDRQGKo4VSUDQZExBOuGK0WRQiA0IooCCMOxAKAn2fO97tb5KMfCo8SkIgKngRKx3BONh7XcBruBcC09WPl3w4dWQuitcloyxGhVKKg1E4UqyroEICZFvIISsSZpfRhvG-qNbpTu-gBuIjo96exKtv5KkqqgFRZJ4NUoEPzloGMvNzYq7Rx02g9R8rKsGK8wT-SLf8i7ixupFtL7bWd8ulbtNOWi4FSUvCp3WvM7qDQbvbEqmcTYtD9JeD1JSEyvf_UtDDHK5cXX_2fPf0zZlwfsSoPrV9G7obe-i1Ow2IMq-BiDNrc9xkjuPH7TDbnzuBw9ntKeHf7PbdKNqekfRaz3Aw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292811110</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Size, rarity and charisma: valuing African wildlife trophies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Johnson, Paul J ; Kansky, Ruth ; Loveridge, Andrew J ; Macdonald, David W</creator><contributor>Bennett, Peter M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Paul J ; Kansky, Ruth ; Loveridge, Andrew J ; Macdonald, David W ; Bennett, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><description>We explore variation in the prices paid by recreational hunters of trophy animals in Africa and its possible causes, including perceived rarity. Previous work has raised the possibility that extinction can result if demand rises fast enough as a species becomes rarer. We attempt to disentangle this from other inter-correlated influences affecting price. Species with larger body sizes and larger trophies were more valuable. Value increased less steeply as a function of size for bovids than for felids and the effect was consistent across countries. Power laws, ubiquitous in physical and social systems, described the trends. The exponent was approximately 0.4 for bovids, compared with approximately 1.0 for felids. Rarity (as indexed by IUCN score) influenced the value of bovid trophies - price was higher for species in categories denoting higher global threat. There was substantial variation in price among and within families not explained by either size or rarity. This may be attributable to a 'charisma' effect, which seems likely to be a general attribute of human perceptions of wildlife. Species where prices were higher than predicted by size or rarity are ranked high in published accounts of desirability by hunters. We conclude that the valuation of these species is explicable to a large extent by body size and perceived rarity, and that differences in valuation between taxonomic groups are related to less easily quantified 'charisma' effects. These findings are relevant for conservationists considering the threat status of species exploited in open access markets, and where license quotas are adjusted in response to changes in perceived rarity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012866</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20877564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Africa ; Animals ; Animals, Wild - physiology ; Attitudes ; Body Size ; Bovidae ; Conservation of Natural Resources - economics ; Ecology ; Ecology/Conservation and Restoration Ecology ; Ecology/Ecosystem Ecology ; Encyclopedias ; Endangered & extinct species ; Felidae ; Human Activities - economics ; Humans ; Hunting ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Life sciences ; Open access ; Perceptions ; Population ; Pricing policies ; Quotas ; Species extinction ; Valuation ; Wildcats ; Wildlife ; Wildlife conservation ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2010-09, Vol.5 (9), p.e12866-e12866</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2010 Johnson et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Johnson et al. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c761t-2b6acdae8a01a0c7bfafda4f3c73c56a830ff21ed7cc30c0a8e02c3aa8f718aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c761t-2b6acdae8a01a0c7bfafda4f3c73c56a830ff21ed7cc30c0a8e02c3aa8f718aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2943918/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2943918/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20877564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Bennett, Peter M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kansky, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loveridge, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, David W</creatorcontrib><title>Size, rarity and charisma: valuing African wildlife trophies</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>We explore variation in the prices paid by recreational hunters of trophy animals in Africa and its possible causes, including perceived rarity. Previous work has raised the possibility that extinction can result if demand rises fast enough as a species becomes rarer. We attempt to disentangle this from other inter-correlated influences affecting price. Species with larger body sizes and larger trophies were more valuable. Value increased less steeply as a function of size for bovids than for felids and the effect was consistent across countries. Power laws, ubiquitous in physical and social systems, described the trends. The exponent was approximately 0.4 for bovids, compared with approximately 1.0 for felids. Rarity (as indexed by IUCN score) influenced the value of bovid trophies - price was higher for species in categories denoting higher global threat. There was substantial variation in price among and within families not explained by either size or rarity. This may be attributable to a 'charisma' effect, which seems likely to be a general attribute of human perceptions of wildlife. Species where prices were higher than predicted by size or rarity are ranked high in published accounts of desirability by hunters. We conclude that the valuation of these species is explicable to a large extent by body size and perceived rarity, and that differences in valuation between taxonomic groups are related to less easily quantified 'charisma' effects. These findings are relevant for conservationists considering the threat status of species exploited in open access markets, and where license quotas are adjusted in response to changes in perceived rarity.</description><subject>Africa</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Wild - physiology</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>Bovidae</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecology/Conservation and Restoration Ecology</subject><subject>Ecology/Ecosystem Ecology</subject><subject>Encyclopedias</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>Felidae</subject><subject>Human Activities - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Life sciences</subject><subject>Open access</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Pricing policies</subject><subject>Quotas</subject><subject>Species extinction</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>Wildcats</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9EBQRHcNR8zSUZEWIofC4WCVW_DmUwymyU72SYz1frrzbrTsiO9MLnIIXnOm5yTN8ueYjTHlOO3az-EDtx86zs9RwgTwdi97BhXlMwYQfT-QXyUPYpxjVBJE_QwOyJIcF6y4jh7f2F_6zd5gGD76xy6JlerFMcNvMuvwA22a_OFCVZBl_-0rnHW6LwPfruyOj7OHhhwUT8Z15Ps-6eP306_zM7OPy9PF2czxRnuZ6RmoBrQAhAGpHhtwDRQGKo4VSUDQZExBOuGK0WRQiA0IooCCMOxAKAn2fO97tb5KMfCo8SkIgKngRKx3BONh7XcBruBcC09WPl3w4dWQuitcloyxGhVKKg1E4UqyroEICZFvIISsSZpfRhvG-qNbpTu-gBuIjo96exKtv5KkqqgFRZJ4NUoEPzloGMvNzYq7Rx02g9R8rKsGK8wT-SLf8i7ixupFtL7bWd8ulbtNOWi4FSUvCp3WvM7qDQbvbEqmcTYtD9JeD1JSEyvf_UtDDHK5cXX_2fPf0zZlwfsSoPrV9G7obe-i1Ow2IMq-BiDNrc9xkjuPH7TDbnzuBw9ntKeHf7PbdKNqekfRaz3Aw</recordid><startdate>20100922</startdate><enddate>20100922</enddate><creator>Johnson, Paul J</creator><creator>Kansky, Ruth</creator><creator>Loveridge, Andrew J</creator><creator>Macdonald, David W</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100922</creationdate><title>Size, rarity and charisma: valuing African wildlife trophies</title><author>Johnson, Paul J ; Kansky, Ruth ; Loveridge, Andrew J ; Macdonald, David W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c761t-2b6acdae8a01a0c7bfafda4f3c73c56a830ff21ed7cc30c0a8e02c3aa8f718aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Africa</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Wild - physiology</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>Bovidae</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecology/Conservation and Restoration Ecology</topic><topic>Ecology/Ecosystem Ecology</topic><topic>Encyclopedias</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>Felidae</topic><topic>Human Activities - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Life sciences</topic><topic>Open access</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Pricing policies</topic><topic>Quotas</topic><topic>Species extinction</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>Wildcats</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kansky, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loveridge, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, David W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Paul J</au><au>Kansky, Ruth</au><au>Loveridge, Andrew J</au><au>Macdonald, David W</au><au>Bennett, Peter M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Size, rarity and charisma: valuing African wildlife trophies</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2010-09-22</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e12866</spage><epage>e12866</epage><pages>e12866-e12866</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>We explore variation in the prices paid by recreational hunters of trophy animals in Africa and its possible causes, including perceived rarity. Previous work has raised the possibility that extinction can result if demand rises fast enough as a species becomes rarer. We attempt to disentangle this from other inter-correlated influences affecting price. Species with larger body sizes and larger trophies were more valuable. Value increased less steeply as a function of size for bovids than for felids and the effect was consistent across countries. Power laws, ubiquitous in physical and social systems, described the trends. The exponent was approximately 0.4 for bovids, compared with approximately 1.0 for felids. Rarity (as indexed by IUCN score) influenced the value of bovid trophies - price was higher for species in categories denoting higher global threat. There was substantial variation in price among and within families not explained by either size or rarity. This may be attributable to a 'charisma' effect, which seems likely to be a general attribute of human perceptions of wildlife. Species where prices were higher than predicted by size or rarity are ranked high in published accounts of desirability by hunters. We conclude that the valuation of these species is explicable to a large extent by body size and perceived rarity, and that differences in valuation between taxonomic groups are related to less easily quantified 'charisma' effects. These findings are relevant for conservationists considering the threat status of species exploited in open access markets, and where license quotas are adjusted in response to changes in perceived rarity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>20877564</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0012866</doi><tpages>e12866</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2010-09, Vol.5 (9), p.e12866-e12866 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1292811110 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Africa Animals Animals, Wild - physiology Attitudes Body Size Bovidae Conservation of Natural Resources - economics Ecology Ecology/Conservation and Restoration Ecology Ecology/Ecosystem Ecology Encyclopedias Endangered & extinct species Felidae Human Activities - economics Humans Hunting Laws, regulations and rules Life sciences Open access Perceptions Population Pricing policies Quotas Species extinction Valuation Wildcats Wildlife Wildlife conservation Zoology |
title | Size, rarity and charisma: valuing African wildlife trophies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T22%3A30%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Size,%20rarity%20and%20charisma:%20valuing%20African%20wildlife%20trophies&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Johnson,%20Paul%20J&rft.date=2010-09-22&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e12866&rft.epage=e12866&rft.pages=e12866-e12866&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0012866&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA473857957%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292811110&rft_id=info:pmid/20877564&rft_galeid=A473857957&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_606394cabe684c45b5aa2f4c479a506d&rfr_iscdi=true |