Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking

Consent forms have lengthened over time and become harder for participants to understand. We sought to demonstrate the feasibility of creating a simplified consent form for biobanking that comprises the minimum information necessary to meet ethical and regulatory requirements. We then gathered preli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2010-10, Vol.5 (10), p.e13302-e13302
Hauptverfasser: Beskow, Laura M, Friedman, Joëlle Y, Hardy, N Chantelle, Lin, Li, Weinfurt, Kevin P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e13302
container_issue 10
container_start_page e13302
container_title PloS one
container_volume 5
creator Beskow, Laura M
Friedman, Joëlle Y
Hardy, N Chantelle
Lin, Li
Weinfurt, Kevin P
description Consent forms have lengthened over time and become harder for participants to understand. We sought to demonstrate the feasibility of creating a simplified consent form for biobanking that comprises the minimum information necessary to meet ethical and regulatory requirements. We then gathered preliminary data concerning its content from hypothetical biobank participants. We followed basic principles of plain-language writing and incorporated into a 2-page form (not including the signature page) those elements of information required by federal regulations and recommended by best practice guidelines for biobanking. We then recruited diabetes patients from community-based practices and randomized half (n = 56) to read the 2-page form, first on paper and then a second time on a tablet computer. Participants were encouraged to use "More information" buttons on the electronic version whenever they had questions or desired further information. These buttons led to a series of "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) that contained additional detailed information. Participants were asked to identify specific sentences in the FAQs they thought would be important if they were considering taking part in a biorepository. On average, participants identified 7 FAQ sentences as important (mean 6.6, SD 14.7, range: 0-71). No one sentence was highlighted by a majority of participants; further, 34 (60.7%) participants did not highlight any FAQ sentences. Our preliminary findings suggest that our 2-page form contains the information that most prospective participants identify as important. Combining simplified forms with supplemental material for those participants who desire more information could help minimize consent form length and complexity, allowing the most substantively material information to be better highlighted and enabling potential participants to read the form and ask questions more effectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0013302
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1292444433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A473855599</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9be83c8178ce4b45b2d07b206b489a23</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A473855599</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-e07740935e2aac8f1a0b16566208b831e2b44827cc681d7752c1f27fbe639b043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QHBMWLGfPVJrkRlvVrYGHBr9uQpKedjGlTm3bRf2_qdJep7IUJJCF5zntykjfLnmK0wZTjN_sw9q32my60sEEIU4rIvewUS0rWBUH0_tH6JHsU4x6hnIqieJidECSZREyeZvQdXIMPnWvrlV5F13TeVQ7KlQ1thHZYVaFvpmFlXDC6_ZHAx9mDSvsIT-b5LPv24f3Xi0_ry6uP24vzy7UtJB7WgDhnSNIciNZWVFgjg4u8SBcSRlAMxDAmCLe2ELjkPCcWV4RXBgoqDWL0LHt-0O18iGquNypMJGGpUZqI7YEog96rrneN7n-roJ36uxH6Wul-cNaDkgYEtQJzYYEZlhtSIm4IKgwTUpNJ6-2cbTQNlDYV32u_EF2etG6n6nCtiMyxxDwJvJoF-vBzhDioxkUL3usWwhgVz4WgIlWcyBf_kHcXN1O1Tvd3bRVSWjtpqnPGqcjzXMpEbe6gUi-hcekToXJpfxHwehGQmAF-DbUeY1TbL5__n736vmRfHrE70H7YxeDHwSUnLUF2AG0fYuyhun1jjNRk7ZvXUJO11WztFPbs-H9ug268TP8A-mDxQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292444433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Beskow, Laura M ; Friedman, Joëlle Y ; Hardy, N Chantelle ; Lin, Li ; Weinfurt, Kevin P</creator><creatorcontrib>Beskow, Laura M ; Friedman, Joëlle Y ; Hardy, N Chantelle ; Lin, Li ; Weinfurt, Kevin P</creatorcontrib><description>Consent forms have lengthened over time and become harder for participants to understand. We sought to demonstrate the feasibility of creating a simplified consent form for biobanking that comprises the minimum information necessary to meet ethical and regulatory requirements. We then gathered preliminary data concerning its content from hypothetical biobank participants. We followed basic principles of plain-language writing and incorporated into a 2-page form (not including the signature page) those elements of information required by federal regulations and recommended by best practice guidelines for biobanking. We then recruited diabetes patients from community-based practices and randomized half (n = 56) to read the 2-page form, first on paper and then a second time on a tablet computer. Participants were encouraged to use "More information" buttons on the electronic version whenever they had questions or desired further information. These buttons led to a series of "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) that contained additional detailed information. Participants were asked to identify specific sentences in the FAQs they thought would be important if they were considering taking part in a biorepository. On average, participants identified 7 FAQ sentences as important (mean 6.6, SD 14.7, range: 0-71). No one sentence was highlighted by a majority of participants; further, 34 (60.7%) participants did not highlight any FAQ sentences. Our preliminary findings suggest that our 2-page form contains the information that most prospective participants identify as important. Combining simplified forms with supplemental material for those participants who desire more information could help minimize consent form length and complexity, allowing the most substantively material information to be better highlighted and enabling potential participants to read the form and ask questions more effectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013302</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20949049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Best practice ; Buttons ; Confidentiality ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Diabetes mellitus ; Diabetes Mellitus - physiopathology ; Ethics ; Feasibility studies ; Federal regulation ; Genetics and Genomics ; Humans ; Informed Consent ; Language ; Medical records ; Non-Clinical Medicine/Bioethics ; Science Policy ; Sentences ; Studies ; Tablet computers ; Tissue Banks ; Websites</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2010-10, Vol.5 (10), p.e13302-e13302</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2010 Beskow et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Beskow et al. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-e07740935e2aac8f1a0b16566208b831e2b44827cc681d7752c1f27fbe639b043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-e07740935e2aac8f1a0b16566208b831e2b44827cc681d7752c1f27fbe639b043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2951917/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2951917/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20949049$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beskow, Laura M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedman, Joëlle Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, N Chantelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinfurt, Kevin P</creatorcontrib><title>Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Consent forms have lengthened over time and become harder for participants to understand. We sought to demonstrate the feasibility of creating a simplified consent form for biobanking that comprises the minimum information necessary to meet ethical and regulatory requirements. We then gathered preliminary data concerning its content from hypothetical biobank participants. We followed basic principles of plain-language writing and incorporated into a 2-page form (not including the signature page) those elements of information required by federal regulations and recommended by best practice guidelines for biobanking. We then recruited diabetes patients from community-based practices and randomized half (n = 56) to read the 2-page form, first on paper and then a second time on a tablet computer. Participants were encouraged to use "More information" buttons on the electronic version whenever they had questions or desired further information. These buttons led to a series of "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) that contained additional detailed information. Participants were asked to identify specific sentences in the FAQs they thought would be important if they were considering taking part in a biorepository. On average, participants identified 7 FAQ sentences as important (mean 6.6, SD 14.7, range: 0-71). No one sentence was highlighted by a majority of participants; further, 34 (60.7%) participants did not highlight any FAQ sentences. Our preliminary findings suggest that our 2-page form contains the information that most prospective participants identify as important. Combining simplified forms with supplemental material for those participants who desire more information could help minimize consent form length and complexity, allowing the most substantively material information to be better highlighted and enabling potential participants to read the form and ask questions more effectively.</description><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Buttons</subject><subject>Confidentiality</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Federal regulation</subject><subject>Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informed Consent</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Non-Clinical Medicine/Bioethics</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tablet computers</subject><subject>Tissue Banks</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QHBMWLGfPVJrkRlvVrYGHBr9uQpKedjGlTm3bRf2_qdJep7IUJJCF5zntykjfLnmK0wZTjN_sw9q32my60sEEIU4rIvewUS0rWBUH0_tH6JHsU4x6hnIqieJidECSZREyeZvQdXIMPnWvrlV5F13TeVQ7KlQ1thHZYVaFvpmFlXDC6_ZHAx9mDSvsIT-b5LPv24f3Xi0_ry6uP24vzy7UtJB7WgDhnSNIciNZWVFgjg4u8SBcSRlAMxDAmCLe2ELjkPCcWV4RXBgoqDWL0LHt-0O18iGquNypMJGGpUZqI7YEog96rrneN7n-roJ36uxH6Wul-cNaDkgYEtQJzYYEZlhtSIm4IKgwTUpNJ6-2cbTQNlDYV32u_EF2etG6n6nCtiMyxxDwJvJoF-vBzhDioxkUL3usWwhgVz4WgIlWcyBf_kHcXN1O1Tvd3bRVSWjtpqnPGqcjzXMpEbe6gUi-hcekToXJpfxHwehGQmAF-DbUeY1TbL5__n736vmRfHrE70H7YxeDHwSUnLUF2AG0fYuyhun1jjNRk7ZvXUJO11WztFPbs-H9ug268TP8A-mDxQQ</recordid><startdate>20101008</startdate><enddate>20101008</enddate><creator>Beskow, Laura M</creator><creator>Friedman, Joëlle Y</creator><creator>Hardy, N Chantelle</creator><creator>Lin, Li</creator><creator>Weinfurt, Kevin P</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101008</creationdate><title>Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking</title><author>Beskow, Laura M ; Friedman, Joëlle Y ; Hardy, N Chantelle ; Lin, Li ; Weinfurt, Kevin P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-e07740935e2aac8f1a0b16566208b831e2b44827cc681d7752c1f27fbe639b043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Buttons</topic><topic>Confidentiality</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Federal regulation</topic><topic>Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informed Consent</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Non-Clinical Medicine/Bioethics</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tablet computers</topic><topic>Tissue Banks</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beskow, Laura M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedman, Joëlle Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, N Chantelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinfurt, Kevin P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beskow, Laura M</au><au>Friedman, Joëlle Y</au><au>Hardy, N Chantelle</au><au>Lin, Li</au><au>Weinfurt, Kevin P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2010-10-08</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e13302</spage><epage>e13302</epage><pages>e13302-e13302</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Consent forms have lengthened over time and become harder for participants to understand. We sought to demonstrate the feasibility of creating a simplified consent form for biobanking that comprises the minimum information necessary to meet ethical and regulatory requirements. We then gathered preliminary data concerning its content from hypothetical biobank participants. We followed basic principles of plain-language writing and incorporated into a 2-page form (not including the signature page) those elements of information required by federal regulations and recommended by best practice guidelines for biobanking. We then recruited diabetes patients from community-based practices and randomized half (n = 56) to read the 2-page form, first on paper and then a second time on a tablet computer. Participants were encouraged to use "More information" buttons on the electronic version whenever they had questions or desired further information. These buttons led to a series of "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) that contained additional detailed information. Participants were asked to identify specific sentences in the FAQs they thought would be important if they were considering taking part in a biorepository. On average, participants identified 7 FAQ sentences as important (mean 6.6, SD 14.7, range: 0-71). No one sentence was highlighted by a majority of participants; further, 34 (60.7%) participants did not highlight any FAQ sentences. Our preliminary findings suggest that our 2-page form contains the information that most prospective participants identify as important. Combining simplified forms with supplemental material for those participants who desire more information could help minimize consent form length and complexity, allowing the most substantively material information to be better highlighted and enabling potential participants to read the form and ask questions more effectively.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>20949049</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0013302</doi><tpages>e13302</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2010-10, Vol.5 (10), p.e13302-e13302
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1292444433
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Best practice
Buttons
Confidentiality
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Diabetes mellitus
Diabetes Mellitus - physiopathology
Ethics
Feasibility studies
Federal regulation
Genetics and Genomics
Humans
Informed Consent
Language
Medical records
Non-Clinical Medicine/Bioethics
Science Policy
Sentences
Studies
Tablet computers
Tissue Banks
Websites
title Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T04%3A28%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developing%20a%20simplified%20consent%20form%20for%20biobanking&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Beskow,%20Laura%20M&rft.date=2010-10-08&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e13302&rft.epage=e13302&rft.pages=e13302-e13302&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0013302&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA473855599%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292444433&rft_id=info:pmid/20949049&rft_galeid=A473855599&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_9be83c8178ce4b45b2d07b206b489a23&rfr_iscdi=true