Comparison of methods for detection of Blastocystis infection in routinely submitted stool samples, and also in IBS/IBD Patients in Ankara, Turkey

This study compared diagnostic methods for identifying Blastocystis in stool samples, and evaluated the frequency of detection of Blastocystis in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). From a set of 105 stool specimens submitted for routine parasitological...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2010-11, Vol.5 (11), p.e15484-e15484
Hauptverfasser: Dogruman-Al, Funda, Simsek, Zahide, Boorom, Kenneth, Ekici, Eyup, Sahin, Memduh, Tuncer, Candan, Kustimur, Semra, Altinbas, Akif
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e15484
container_issue 11
container_start_page e15484
container_title PloS one
container_volume 5
creator Dogruman-Al, Funda
Simsek, Zahide
Boorom, Kenneth
Ekici, Eyup
Sahin, Memduh
Tuncer, Candan
Kustimur, Semra
Altinbas, Akif
description This study compared diagnostic methods for identifying Blastocystis in stool samples, and evaluated the frequency of detection of Blastocystis in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). From a set of 105 stool specimens submitted for routine parasitological analysis, 30 were identified as positive for Blastocystis by the culture method. From that group of 30 positives, Lugol's stain, trichrome staining, and an immunofluorescence assay identified 11, 15, and 26 samples as positive respectively. Using culture as a standard, the sensitivity of Lugol's stain was 36.7%, trichrome staining was 50%, and the IFA stain was 86.7%. The specificity of Lugol's stain was 91%, trichrome staining was 100%, and the IFA stain was 97.3%. In the group of 27 IBS and IBD patients, using all methods combined, we detected Blastocystis in 67% (18/27) of the patients. Blastocystis was detected in 33% (2/6) of IBD patients and 76% (16/21) of IBS patients. For comparison, trichrome staining alone, the method most frequently used in many countries, would have only identified Blastocystis infection in 29% (6/21) of the IBS patients. No parasitic co-infections were identified in the IBS/IBD patients. Most Blastocystis-positive IBS/IBD patients were over 36 with an average length of illness of 4.9 years. Most IBS patients in this study were infected with Blastocystis. IFA staining may be a useful alternative to stool culture, especially if stool specimens have been chemically preserved.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0015484
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1292230496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A473832466</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_47e6dbd0d0d64416b71c3b4eeafcb825</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A473832466</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-ef27041d2f2d1e67d30f02489f694e0b8a7b74ced6e17bc82556fbc7e6c2ef493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk21v0zAQxyMEYmPwDRBYQgIhrZ2f6iRvkLbyVGnSEBu8tRz70npL4mI7iH4NPjEOzaYW7QXyC1t3v_uf7-zLsucETwnLycm1632nmunadTDFmMx4wR9kh6RkdCIoZg93zgfZkxCuMZ6xQojH2QElhPKyYIfZ77lr18rb4DrkatRCXDkTUO08MhBBR7t1nDUqRKc3IdqAbFePHtsh7_poO2g2KPRVa2MEgxLqGhRUu24gHCPVGaSa4AZ8cXZ5sjh7j76oaKGLgxg67W6UV8foqvc3sHmaPaoTDc_G_Sj79vHD1fzz5Pzi02J-ej7RoiRxAjXNMSeG1tQQELlhuMaUF2UtSg64KlRe5VyDEUDyShd0NhN1pXMQmkLNS3aUvdzqrhsX5NjOIAktKWWYlyIRiy1hnLqWa29b5TfSKSv_GpxfSuWj1Q1InnRNZXBagnMiqpxoVnEAVesq5U5a78ZsqUtgdKrdq2ZPdN_T2ZVcup-SlkVeEJwE3owC3v3oIUTZ2qChaVQHrg-yILNScMEG8tU_5P3FjdRSpfunJ3UprR405SnPWcEoFwM1vYdKy0Brdfp6tU32vYC3ewGJifArLlUfglxcfv1_9uL7Pvt6h12BauIquKYfvmHYB_kW1N6F4KG-6zHBcpic227IYXLkODkp7MXu-9wF3Y4K-wOuYhWj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292230496</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of methods for detection of Blastocystis infection in routinely submitted stool samples, and also in IBS/IBD Patients in Ankara, Turkey</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Dogruman-Al, Funda ; Simsek, Zahide ; Boorom, Kenneth ; Ekici, Eyup ; Sahin, Memduh ; Tuncer, Candan ; Kustimur, Semra ; Altinbas, Akif</creator><creatorcontrib>Dogruman-Al, Funda ; Simsek, Zahide ; Boorom, Kenneth ; Ekici, Eyup ; Sahin, Memduh ; Tuncer, Candan ; Kustimur, Semra ; Altinbas, Akif</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared diagnostic methods for identifying Blastocystis in stool samples, and evaluated the frequency of detection of Blastocystis in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). From a set of 105 stool specimens submitted for routine parasitological analysis, 30 were identified as positive for Blastocystis by the culture method. From that group of 30 positives, Lugol's stain, trichrome staining, and an immunofluorescence assay identified 11, 15, and 26 samples as positive respectively. Using culture as a standard, the sensitivity of Lugol's stain was 36.7%, trichrome staining was 50%, and the IFA stain was 86.7%. The specificity of Lugol's stain was 91%, trichrome staining was 100%, and the IFA stain was 97.3%. In the group of 27 IBS and IBD patients, using all methods combined, we detected Blastocystis in 67% (18/27) of the patients. Blastocystis was detected in 33% (2/6) of IBD patients and 76% (16/21) of IBS patients. For comparison, trichrome staining alone, the method most frequently used in many countries, would have only identified Blastocystis infection in 29% (6/21) of the IBS patients. No parasitic co-infections were identified in the IBS/IBD patients. Most Blastocystis-positive IBS/IBD patients were over 36 with an average length of illness of 4.9 years. Most IBS patients in this study were infected with Blastocystis. IFA staining may be a useful alternative to stool culture, especially if stool specimens have been chemically preserved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015484</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21124983</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Animals ; Blastocystis - isolation &amp; purification ; Blastocystis hominis ; Blastocystis Infections - diagnosis ; Blastocystis Infections - parasitology ; Colon ; Comparative analysis ; Culture ; Diagnostic systems ; Dientamoeba fragilis ; Entamoeba histolytica ; Feces - parasitology ; Female ; Gastrointestinal diseases ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Immunofluorescence ; Infections ; Inflammatory bowel disease ; Inflammatory bowel diseases ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - parasitology ; Intestine ; Irritable bowel syndrome ; Irritable Bowel Syndrome - parasitology ; Male ; Medical diagnosis ; Medicine ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Parasitic diseases ; Patients ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Staining ; Staining and Labeling - methods ; Studies ; Turkey ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2010-11, Vol.5 (11), p.e15484-e15484</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2010 Dogruman-Al et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Dogruman-Al et al. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-ef27041d2f2d1e67d30f02489f694e0b8a7b74ced6e17bc82556fbc7e6c2ef493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-ef27041d2f2d1e67d30f02489f694e0b8a7b74ced6e17bc82556fbc7e6c2ef493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2987810/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2987810/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21124983$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dogruman-Al, Funda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simsek, Zahide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boorom, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekici, Eyup</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahin, Memduh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuncer, Candan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kustimur, Semra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altinbas, Akif</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of methods for detection of Blastocystis infection in routinely submitted stool samples, and also in IBS/IBD Patients in Ankara, Turkey</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>This study compared diagnostic methods for identifying Blastocystis in stool samples, and evaluated the frequency of detection of Blastocystis in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). From a set of 105 stool specimens submitted for routine parasitological analysis, 30 were identified as positive for Blastocystis by the culture method. From that group of 30 positives, Lugol's stain, trichrome staining, and an immunofluorescence assay identified 11, 15, and 26 samples as positive respectively. Using culture as a standard, the sensitivity of Lugol's stain was 36.7%, trichrome staining was 50%, and the IFA stain was 86.7%. The specificity of Lugol's stain was 91%, trichrome staining was 100%, and the IFA stain was 97.3%. In the group of 27 IBS and IBD patients, using all methods combined, we detected Blastocystis in 67% (18/27) of the patients. Blastocystis was detected in 33% (2/6) of IBD patients and 76% (16/21) of IBS patients. For comparison, trichrome staining alone, the method most frequently used in many countries, would have only identified Blastocystis infection in 29% (6/21) of the IBS patients. No parasitic co-infections were identified in the IBS/IBD patients. Most Blastocystis-positive IBS/IBD patients were over 36 with an average length of illness of 4.9 years. Most IBS patients in this study were infected with Blastocystis. IFA staining may be a useful alternative to stool culture, especially if stool specimens have been chemically preserved.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Blastocystis - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Blastocystis hominis</subject><subject>Blastocystis Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Blastocystis Infections - parasitology</subject><subject>Colon</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Dientamoeba fragilis</subject><subject>Entamoeba histolytica</subject><subject>Feces - parasitology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal diseases</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunofluorescence</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Inflammatory bowel disease</subject><subject>Inflammatory bowel diseases</subject><subject>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - parasitology</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Irritable bowel syndrome</subject><subject>Irritable Bowel Syndrome - parasitology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Parasitic diseases</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Staining</subject><subject>Staining and Labeling - methods</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk21v0zAQxyMEYmPwDRBYQgIhrZ2f6iRvkLbyVGnSEBu8tRz70npL4mI7iH4NPjEOzaYW7QXyC1t3v_uf7-zLsucETwnLycm1632nmunadTDFmMx4wR9kh6RkdCIoZg93zgfZkxCuMZ6xQojH2QElhPKyYIfZ77lr18rb4DrkatRCXDkTUO08MhBBR7t1nDUqRKc3IdqAbFePHtsh7_poO2g2KPRVa2MEgxLqGhRUu24gHCPVGaSa4AZ8cXZ5sjh7j76oaKGLgxg67W6UV8foqvc3sHmaPaoTDc_G_Sj79vHD1fzz5Pzi02J-ej7RoiRxAjXNMSeG1tQQELlhuMaUF2UtSg64KlRe5VyDEUDyShd0NhN1pXMQmkLNS3aUvdzqrhsX5NjOIAktKWWYlyIRiy1hnLqWa29b5TfSKSv_GpxfSuWj1Q1InnRNZXBagnMiqpxoVnEAVesq5U5a78ZsqUtgdKrdq2ZPdN_T2ZVcup-SlkVeEJwE3owC3v3oIUTZ2qChaVQHrg-yILNScMEG8tU_5P3FjdRSpfunJ3UprR405SnPWcEoFwM1vYdKy0Brdfp6tU32vYC3ewGJifArLlUfglxcfv1_9uL7Pvt6h12BauIquKYfvmHYB_kW1N6F4KG-6zHBcpic227IYXLkODkp7MXu-9wF3Y4K-wOuYhWj</recordid><startdate>20101118</startdate><enddate>20101118</enddate><creator>Dogruman-Al, Funda</creator><creator>Simsek, Zahide</creator><creator>Boorom, Kenneth</creator><creator>Ekici, Eyup</creator><creator>Sahin, Memduh</creator><creator>Tuncer, Candan</creator><creator>Kustimur, Semra</creator><creator>Altinbas, Akif</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101118</creationdate><title>Comparison of methods for detection of Blastocystis infection in routinely submitted stool samples, and also in IBS/IBD Patients in Ankara, Turkey</title><author>Dogruman-Al, Funda ; Simsek, Zahide ; Boorom, Kenneth ; Ekici, Eyup ; Sahin, Memduh ; Tuncer, Candan ; Kustimur, Semra ; Altinbas, Akif</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-ef27041d2f2d1e67d30f02489f694e0b8a7b74ced6e17bc82556fbc7e6c2ef493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Blastocystis - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Blastocystis hominis</topic><topic>Blastocystis Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Blastocystis Infections - parasitology</topic><topic>Colon</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Dientamoeba fragilis</topic><topic>Entamoeba histolytica</topic><topic>Feces - parasitology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal diseases</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunofluorescence</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Inflammatory bowel disease</topic><topic>Inflammatory bowel diseases</topic><topic>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - parasitology</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Irritable bowel syndrome</topic><topic>Irritable Bowel Syndrome - parasitology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Parasitic diseases</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Staining</topic><topic>Staining and Labeling - methods</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dogruman-Al, Funda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simsek, Zahide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boorom, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekici, Eyup</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahin, Memduh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuncer, Candan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kustimur, Semra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altinbas, Akif</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dogruman-Al, Funda</au><au>Simsek, Zahide</au><au>Boorom, Kenneth</au><au>Ekici, Eyup</au><au>Sahin, Memduh</au><au>Tuncer, Candan</au><au>Kustimur, Semra</au><au>Altinbas, Akif</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of methods for detection of Blastocystis infection in routinely submitted stool samples, and also in IBS/IBD Patients in Ankara, Turkey</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2010-11-18</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e15484</spage><epage>e15484</epage><pages>e15484-e15484</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>This study compared diagnostic methods for identifying Blastocystis in stool samples, and evaluated the frequency of detection of Blastocystis in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). From a set of 105 stool specimens submitted for routine parasitological analysis, 30 were identified as positive for Blastocystis by the culture method. From that group of 30 positives, Lugol's stain, trichrome staining, and an immunofluorescence assay identified 11, 15, and 26 samples as positive respectively. Using culture as a standard, the sensitivity of Lugol's stain was 36.7%, trichrome staining was 50%, and the IFA stain was 86.7%. The specificity of Lugol's stain was 91%, trichrome staining was 100%, and the IFA stain was 97.3%. In the group of 27 IBS and IBD patients, using all methods combined, we detected Blastocystis in 67% (18/27) of the patients. Blastocystis was detected in 33% (2/6) of IBD patients and 76% (16/21) of IBS patients. For comparison, trichrome staining alone, the method most frequently used in many countries, would have only identified Blastocystis infection in 29% (6/21) of the IBS patients. No parasitic co-infections were identified in the IBS/IBD patients. Most Blastocystis-positive IBS/IBD patients were over 36 with an average length of illness of 4.9 years. Most IBS patients in this study were infected with Blastocystis. IFA staining may be a useful alternative to stool culture, especially if stool specimens have been chemically preserved.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>21124983</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0015484</doi><tpages>e15484</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2010-11, Vol.5 (11), p.e15484-e15484
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1292230496
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adult
Animals
Blastocystis - isolation & purification
Blastocystis hominis
Blastocystis Infections - diagnosis
Blastocystis Infections - parasitology
Colon
Comparative analysis
Culture
Diagnostic systems
Dientamoeba fragilis
Entamoeba histolytica
Feces - parasitology
Female
Gastrointestinal diseases
Health aspects
Humans
Immunofluorescence
Infections
Inflammatory bowel disease
Inflammatory bowel diseases
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - parasitology
Intestine
Irritable bowel syndrome
Irritable Bowel Syndrome - parasitology
Male
Medical diagnosis
Medicine
Methods
Middle Aged
Parasitic diseases
Patients
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Staining
Staining and Labeling - methods
Studies
Turkey
Young Adult
title Comparison of methods for detection of Blastocystis infection in routinely submitted stool samples, and also in IBS/IBD Patients in Ankara, Turkey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T13%3A38%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20methods%20for%20detection%20of%20Blastocystis%20infection%20in%20routinely%20submitted%20stool%20samples,%20and%20also%20in%20IBS/IBD%20Patients%20in%20Ankara,%20Turkey&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Dogruman-Al,%20Funda&rft.date=2010-11-18&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e15484&rft.epage=e15484&rft.pages=e15484-e15484&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0015484&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA473832466%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292230496&rft_id=info:pmid/21124983&rft_galeid=A473832466&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_47e6dbd0d0d64416b71c3b4eeafcb825&rfr_iscdi=true