Field evaluation and impact on clinical management of a rapid diagnostic kit that detects dengue NS1, IgM and IgG

Dengue diagnosis is complex and until recently only specialized laboratories were able to definitively confirm dengue infection. Rapid tests are now available commercially making biological diagnosis possible in the field. The aim of this study was to evaluate a combined dengue rapid test for the de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PLoS neglected tropical diseases 2012-12, Vol.6 (12), p.e1993-e1993
Hauptverfasser: Andries, Anne-Claire, Duong, Veasna, Ngan, Chantha, Ong, Sivuth, Huy, Rekol, Sroin, Kim Kim, Te, Vantha, Y, Bunthin, Try, Patrich Lorn, Buchy, Philippe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e1993
container_issue 12
container_start_page e1993
container_title PLoS neglected tropical diseases
container_volume 6
creator Andries, Anne-Claire
Duong, Veasna
Ngan, Chantha
Ong, Sivuth
Huy, Rekol
Sroin, Kim Kim
Te, Vantha
Y, Bunthin
Try, Patrich Lorn
Buchy, Philippe
description Dengue diagnosis is complex and until recently only specialized laboratories were able to definitively confirm dengue infection. Rapid tests are now available commercially making biological diagnosis possible in the field. The aim of this study was to evaluate a combined dengue rapid test for the detection of NS1 and IgM/IgG antibodies. The evaluation was made prospectively in the field conditions and included the study of the impact of its use as a point-of-care test for case management as well as retrospectively against a panel of well-characterized samples in a reference laboratory. During the prospective study, 157 patients hospitalized for a suspicion of dengue were enrolled. In the hospital laboratories, the overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the NS1/IgM/IgG combination tests were 85.7%, 83.9%, 95.6% and 59.1% respectively, whereas they were 94,4%, 90.0%, 97.5% and 77.1% respectively in the national reference laboratory at Institut Pasteur in Cambodia. These results demonstrate that optimal performances require adequate training and quality assurance. The retrospective study showed that the sensitivity of the combined kit did not vary significantly between the serotypes and was not affected by the immune status or by the interval of time between onset of fever and sample collection. The analysis of the medical records indicates that the physicians did not take into consideration the results obtained with the rapid test including for care management and use of antibiotic therapy. In the context of our prospective field study, we demonstrated that if the SD Bioline Dengue Duo kit is correctly used, a positive result highly suggests a dengue case but a negative result doesn't rule out a dengue infection. Nevertheless, Cambodian pediatricians in their daily practice relied on their clinical diagnosis and thus the false negative results obtained did not directly impact on the clinical management.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001993
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1288113480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A314800286</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_82a463a96e6e483fbdcf2f0a02c5ce13</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A314800286</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-4499998d4370723126f3e17e64294f402c87b4e163b431519f555838200cd1e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBYQkJc0OITO4lzg1RNbKtU4AK4tk4dJ3Vx7C52KvHvcdduaqclF3ZOnvc9HzpZ9hboFFgFX9Z-HBza6cbFZkophbpmz7JzqFkxyStWPD-6n2WvQlhTWtSFgJfZWc4YBQB6nt1eGW0bordoR4zGO4KuIabfoIokfSlrnFFoSY8OO91rl8ItQTLgxjSkMdg5H6JR5K-JJK4wkkZHrWJIp-tGTX78gs9k3n2_M55316-zFy3aoN8czovsz9W335c3k8XP6_nlbDFRZZnHCed1ekTDWUWrnEFetkxDpUue17zlNFeiWnINJVtyBgXUbVEUgomcUtWArthF9n7vu7E-yMO0goRcCADGBU3EfE80HtdyM5geh3_So5F3AT90EofUmtVS5MhLhnWpS80Fa5eNavOWYiqjUBpY8vp6yDYue92oNKcB7Ynp6R9nVrLzW8kKBrzmyWCyN1g9kt3MFnKDIepxkJSKHQ5bSPynQ8LB3446RNmboLS16LQfd31WjPESijqhHx6hT0_jQHWYGjau9alOtTOVs5RTUJqLMlHTJ6j0Nro3yjvdmhQ_EXw8Eqw02rgK3o67XQunIN-DavAhDLp9mAJQudv4-6rlbuPlYeOT7N3x4B9E9yvO_gNBZvlU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1288113480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field evaluation and impact on clinical management of a rapid diagnostic kit that detects dengue NS1, IgM and IgG</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Andries, Anne-Claire ; Duong, Veasna ; Ngan, Chantha ; Ong, Sivuth ; Huy, Rekol ; Sroin, Kim Kim ; Te, Vantha ; Y, Bunthin ; Try, Patrich Lorn ; Buchy, Philippe</creator><contributor>Farrar, Jeremy</contributor><creatorcontrib>Andries, Anne-Claire ; Duong, Veasna ; Ngan, Chantha ; Ong, Sivuth ; Huy, Rekol ; Sroin, Kim Kim ; Te, Vantha ; Y, Bunthin ; Try, Patrich Lorn ; Buchy, Philippe ; Farrar, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><description>Dengue diagnosis is complex and until recently only specialized laboratories were able to definitively confirm dengue infection. Rapid tests are now available commercially making biological diagnosis possible in the field. The aim of this study was to evaluate a combined dengue rapid test for the detection of NS1 and IgM/IgG antibodies. The evaluation was made prospectively in the field conditions and included the study of the impact of its use as a point-of-care test for case management as well as retrospectively against a panel of well-characterized samples in a reference laboratory. During the prospective study, 157 patients hospitalized for a suspicion of dengue were enrolled. In the hospital laboratories, the overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the NS1/IgM/IgG combination tests were 85.7%, 83.9%, 95.6% and 59.1% respectively, whereas they were 94,4%, 90.0%, 97.5% and 77.1% respectively in the national reference laboratory at Institut Pasteur in Cambodia. These results demonstrate that optimal performances require adequate training and quality assurance. The retrospective study showed that the sensitivity of the combined kit did not vary significantly between the serotypes and was not affected by the immune status or by the interval of time between onset of fever and sample collection. The analysis of the medical records indicates that the physicians did not take into consideration the results obtained with the rapid test including for care management and use of antibiotic therapy. In the context of our prospective field study, we demonstrated that if the SD Bioline Dengue Duo kit is correctly used, a positive result highly suggests a dengue case but a negative result doesn't rule out a dengue infection. Nevertheless, Cambodian pediatricians in their daily practice relied on their clinical diagnosis and thus the false negative results obtained did not directly impact on the clinical management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-2735</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1935-2727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-2735</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001993</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23301110</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Viral ; Antibodies, Viral - blood ; Antigens ; Antigens, Viral ; Antigens, Viral - blood ; Biology ; Cambodia ; Care and treatment ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods ; Clinical medicine ; Dengue ; Dengue - diagnosis ; Dengue fever ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods ; Female ; Health aspects ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Immune status ; Immunoassay ; Immunoassay - methods ; Immunoglobulin G ; Immunoglobulin G - blood ; Immunoglobulin M ; Immunoglobulin M - blood ; Infections ; Laboratories ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Management decisions ; Medicine ; Microbiology and Parasitology ; Physicians ; Point-of-Care Systems ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies ; Quality assurance ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Serology ; Tropical diseases ; Vector-borne diseases ; Viral Nonstructural Proteins ; Viral Nonstructural Proteins - blood ; Virology</subject><ispartof>PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2012-12, Vol.6 (12), p.e1993-e1993</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2012 Andries et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Andries A-C, Duong V, Ngan C, Ong S, Huy R, et al. (2012) Field Evaluation and Impact on Clinical Management of a Rapid Diagnostic Kit That Detects Dengue NS1, IgM and IgG. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6(12): e1993. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001993</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>2012 Andries et al 2012 Andries et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-4499998d4370723126f3e17e64294f402c87b4e163b431519f555838200cd1e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-4499998d4370723126f3e17e64294f402c87b4e163b431519f555838200cd1e73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0353-1678</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3531494/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3531494/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2929,23870,27928,27929,53795,53797</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23301110$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://riip.hal.science/pasteur-00853141$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Farrar, Jeremy</contributor><creatorcontrib>Andries, Anne-Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duong, Veasna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngan, Chantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Sivuth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huy, Rekol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sroin, Kim Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Te, Vantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Y, Bunthin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Try, Patrich Lorn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchy, Philippe</creatorcontrib><title>Field evaluation and impact on clinical management of a rapid diagnostic kit that detects dengue NS1, IgM and IgG</title><title>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</title><addtitle>PLoS Negl Trop Dis</addtitle><description>Dengue diagnosis is complex and until recently only specialized laboratories were able to definitively confirm dengue infection. Rapid tests are now available commercially making biological diagnosis possible in the field. The aim of this study was to evaluate a combined dengue rapid test for the detection of NS1 and IgM/IgG antibodies. The evaluation was made prospectively in the field conditions and included the study of the impact of its use as a point-of-care test for case management as well as retrospectively against a panel of well-characterized samples in a reference laboratory. During the prospective study, 157 patients hospitalized for a suspicion of dengue were enrolled. In the hospital laboratories, the overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the NS1/IgM/IgG combination tests were 85.7%, 83.9%, 95.6% and 59.1% respectively, whereas they were 94,4%, 90.0%, 97.5% and 77.1% respectively in the national reference laboratory at Institut Pasteur in Cambodia. These results demonstrate that optimal performances require adequate training and quality assurance. The retrospective study showed that the sensitivity of the combined kit did not vary significantly between the serotypes and was not affected by the immune status or by the interval of time between onset of fever and sample collection. The analysis of the medical records indicates that the physicians did not take into consideration the results obtained with the rapid test including for care management and use of antibiotic therapy. In the context of our prospective field study, we demonstrated that if the SD Bioline Dengue Duo kit is correctly used, a positive result highly suggests a dengue case but a negative result doesn't rule out a dengue infection. Nevertheless, Cambodian pediatricians in their daily practice relied on their clinical diagnosis and thus the false negative results obtained did not directly impact on the clinical management.</description><subject>Antibodies, Viral</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral - blood</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Antigens, Viral</subject><subject>Antigens, Viral - blood</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Cambodia</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Dengue</subject><subject>Dengue - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dengue fever</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests, Routine</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune status</subject><subject>Immunoassay</subject><subject>Immunoassay - methods</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - blood</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin M</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin M - blood</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management decisions</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Microbiology and Parasitology</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Serology</subject><subject>Tropical diseases</subject><subject>Vector-borne diseases</subject><subject>Viral Nonstructural Proteins</subject><subject>Viral Nonstructural Proteins - blood</subject><subject>Virology</subject><issn>1935-2735</issn><issn>1935-2727</issn><issn>1935-2735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBYQkJc0OITO4lzg1RNbKtU4AK4tk4dJ3Vx7C52KvHvcdduaqclF3ZOnvc9HzpZ9hboFFgFX9Z-HBza6cbFZkophbpmz7JzqFkxyStWPD-6n2WvQlhTWtSFgJfZWc4YBQB6nt1eGW0bordoR4zGO4KuIabfoIokfSlrnFFoSY8OO91rl8ItQTLgxjSkMdg5H6JR5K-JJK4wkkZHrWJIp-tGTX78gs9k3n2_M55316-zFy3aoN8czovsz9W335c3k8XP6_nlbDFRZZnHCed1ekTDWUWrnEFetkxDpUue17zlNFeiWnINJVtyBgXUbVEUgomcUtWArthF9n7vu7E-yMO0goRcCADGBU3EfE80HtdyM5geh3_So5F3AT90EofUmtVS5MhLhnWpS80Fa5eNavOWYiqjUBpY8vp6yDYue92oNKcB7Ynp6R9nVrLzW8kKBrzmyWCyN1g9kt3MFnKDIepxkJSKHQ5bSPynQ8LB3446RNmboLS16LQfd31WjPESijqhHx6hT0_jQHWYGjau9alOtTOVs5RTUJqLMlHTJ6j0Nro3yjvdmhQ_EXw8Eqw02rgK3o67XQunIN-DavAhDLp9mAJQudv4-6rlbuPlYeOT7N3x4B9E9yvO_gNBZvlU</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Andries, Anne-Claire</creator><creator>Duong, Veasna</creator><creator>Ngan, Chantha</creator><creator>Ong, Sivuth</creator><creator>Huy, Rekol</creator><creator>Sroin, Kim Kim</creator><creator>Te, Vantha</creator><creator>Y, Bunthin</creator><creator>Try, Patrich Lorn</creator><creator>Buchy, Philippe</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0353-1678</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Field evaluation and impact on clinical management of a rapid diagnostic kit that detects dengue NS1, IgM and IgG</title><author>Andries, Anne-Claire ; Duong, Veasna ; Ngan, Chantha ; Ong, Sivuth ; Huy, Rekol ; Sroin, Kim Kim ; Te, Vantha ; Y, Bunthin ; Try, Patrich Lorn ; Buchy, Philippe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-4499998d4370723126f3e17e64294f402c87b4e163b431519f555838200cd1e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Viral</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral - blood</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Antigens, Viral</topic><topic>Antigens, Viral - blood</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Cambodia</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Dengue</topic><topic>Dengue - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dengue fever</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests, Routine</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune status</topic><topic>Immunoassay</topic><topic>Immunoassay - methods</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - blood</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin M</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin M - blood</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management decisions</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Microbiology and Parasitology</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Serology</topic><topic>Tropical diseases</topic><topic>Vector-borne diseases</topic><topic>Viral Nonstructural Proteins</topic><topic>Viral Nonstructural Proteins - blood</topic><topic>Virology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andries, Anne-Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duong, Veasna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngan, Chantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Sivuth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huy, Rekol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sroin, Kim Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Te, Vantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Y, Bunthin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Try, Patrich Lorn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchy, Philippe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andries, Anne-Claire</au><au>Duong, Veasna</au><au>Ngan, Chantha</au><au>Ong, Sivuth</au><au>Huy, Rekol</au><au>Sroin, Kim Kim</au><au>Te, Vantha</au><au>Y, Bunthin</au><au>Try, Patrich Lorn</au><au>Buchy, Philippe</au><au>Farrar, Jeremy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field evaluation and impact on clinical management of a rapid diagnostic kit that detects dengue NS1, IgM and IgG</atitle><jtitle>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Negl Trop Dis</addtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e1993</spage><epage>e1993</epage><pages>e1993-e1993</pages><issn>1935-2735</issn><issn>1935-2727</issn><eissn>1935-2735</eissn><abstract>Dengue diagnosis is complex and until recently only specialized laboratories were able to definitively confirm dengue infection. Rapid tests are now available commercially making biological diagnosis possible in the field. The aim of this study was to evaluate a combined dengue rapid test for the detection of NS1 and IgM/IgG antibodies. The evaluation was made prospectively in the field conditions and included the study of the impact of its use as a point-of-care test for case management as well as retrospectively against a panel of well-characterized samples in a reference laboratory. During the prospective study, 157 patients hospitalized for a suspicion of dengue were enrolled. In the hospital laboratories, the overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the NS1/IgM/IgG combination tests were 85.7%, 83.9%, 95.6% and 59.1% respectively, whereas they were 94,4%, 90.0%, 97.5% and 77.1% respectively in the national reference laboratory at Institut Pasteur in Cambodia. These results demonstrate that optimal performances require adequate training and quality assurance. The retrospective study showed that the sensitivity of the combined kit did not vary significantly between the serotypes and was not affected by the immune status or by the interval of time between onset of fever and sample collection. The analysis of the medical records indicates that the physicians did not take into consideration the results obtained with the rapid test including for care management and use of antibiotic therapy. In the context of our prospective field study, we demonstrated that if the SD Bioline Dengue Duo kit is correctly used, a positive result highly suggests a dengue case but a negative result doesn't rule out a dengue infection. Nevertheless, Cambodian pediatricians in their daily practice relied on their clinical diagnosis and thus the false negative results obtained did not directly impact on the clinical management.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>23301110</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pntd.0001993</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0353-1678</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1935-2735
ispartof PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2012-12, Vol.6 (12), p.e1993-e1993
issn 1935-2735
1935-2727
1935-2735
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1288113480
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Antibodies, Viral
Antibodies, Viral - blood
Antigens
Antigens, Viral
Antigens, Viral - blood
Biology
Cambodia
Care and treatment
Child
Child, Preschool
Clinical Laboratory Techniques
Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods
Clinical medicine
Dengue
Dengue - diagnosis
Dengue fever
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods
Female
Health aspects
Hospitals
Humans
Immune status
Immunoassay
Immunoassay - methods
Immunoglobulin G
Immunoglobulin G - blood
Immunoglobulin M
Immunoglobulin M - blood
Infections
Laboratories
Life Sciences
Male
Management decisions
Medicine
Microbiology and Parasitology
Physicians
Point-of-Care Systems
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies
Quality assurance
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Serology
Tropical diseases
Vector-borne diseases
Viral Nonstructural Proteins
Viral Nonstructural Proteins - blood
Virology
title Field evaluation and impact on clinical management of a rapid diagnostic kit that detects dengue NS1, IgM and IgG
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T06%3A50%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20evaluation%20and%20impact%20on%20clinical%20management%20of%20a%20rapid%20diagnostic%20kit%20that%20detects%20dengue%20NS1,%20IgM%20and%20IgG&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20neglected%20tropical%20diseases&rft.au=Andries,%20Anne-Claire&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e1993&rft.epage=e1993&rft.pages=e1993-e1993&rft.issn=1935-2735&rft.eissn=1935-2735&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001993&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA314800286%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1288113480&rft_id=info:pmid/23301110&rft_galeid=A314800286&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_82a463a96e6e483fbdcf2f0a02c5ce13&rfr_iscdi=true