Antibiotic selection pressure and macrolide resistance in nasopharyngeal Streptococcus pneumoniae: a cluster-randomized clinical trial
It is widely thought that widespread antibiotic use selects for community antibiotic resistance, though this has been difficult to prove in the setting of a community-randomized clinical trial. In this study, we used a randomized clinical trial design to assess whether macrolide resistance was highe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PLoS medicine 2010-12, Vol.7 (12), p.e1000377-e1000377 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e1000377 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e1000377 |
container_title | PLoS medicine |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Skalet, Alison H Cevallos, Vicky Ayele, Berhan Gebre, Teshome Zhou, Zhaoxia Jorgensen, James H Zerihun, Mulat Habte, Dereje Assefa, Yared Emerson, Paul M Gaynor, Bruce D Porco, Travis C Lietman, Thomas M Keenan, Jeremy D |
description | It is widely thought that widespread antibiotic use selects for community antibiotic resistance, though this has been difficult to prove in the setting of a community-randomized clinical trial. In this study, we used a randomized clinical trial design to assess whether macrolide resistance was higher in communities treated with mass azithromycin for trachoma, compared to untreated control communities.
In a cluster-randomized trial for trachoma control in Ethiopia, 12 communities were randomized to receive mass azithromycin treatment of children aged 1-10 years at months 0, 3, 6, and 9. Twelve control communities were randomized to receive no antibiotic treatments until the conclusion of the study. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from randomly selected children in the treated group at baseline and month 12, and in the control group at month 12. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed on Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from the swabs using Etest strips. In the treated group, the mean prevalence of azithromycin resistance among all monitored children increased from 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8%-8.9%) at baseline, to 46.9% (37.5%-57.5%) at month 12 (p = 0.003). In control communities, azithromycin resistance was 9.2% (95% CI 6.7%-13.3%) at month 12, significantly lower than the treated group (p < 0.0001). Penicillin resistance was identified in 0.8% (95% CI 0%-4.2%) of isolates in the control group at 1 year, and in no isolates in the children-treated group at baseline or 1 year.
This cluster-randomized clinical trial demonstrated that compared to untreated control communities, nasopharyngeal pneumococcal resistance to macrolides was significantly higher in communities randomized to intensive azithromycin treatment. Mass azithromycin distributions were given more frequently than currently recommended by the World Health Organization's trachoma program. Azithromycin use in this setting did not select for resistance to penicillins, which remain the drug of choice for pneumococcal infections.
www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00322972. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000377 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1288088311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A245806065</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4ac6a4658ab242f38401dc29450eb1d3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A245806065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c735t-ce52f99fa738e4158ecf739dec5a6e59f3f3a64a0b17de87f325235bb0521b3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVk9uKFDEQhhtR3HX1DUQbBMWLGZNO0gcvhGHxMLC44Kq3oTpdPZMhnbRJWtQH8LnNOLPLDOyFkouEyvf_OVRVlj2mZE5ZRV9t3OQtmPk4YDenhBBWVXeyUyp4M6NlVd49WJ9kD0LYEFI0pCH3s5OC0qrhjJ9mvxc26la7qFUe0KCK2tl89BjC5DEH2-UDKO-M7jBPUR0iWIW5trmF4MY1-J92hWDyq-hxjE45paaQjxanwVkN-DqHXJkpRPQzn_zcoH9hl0LaapV00WswD7N7PZiAj_bzWfbl3dvP5x9mF5fvl-eLi5mqmIgzhaLom6aHitXIqahR9RVrOlQCShRNz3oGJQfS0qrDuupZIQom2paIgrYM2Fn2dOc7Ghfk_guDpEVdk7pmlCZiuSM6Bxs5ej2kF0oHWv4NOL-S4NNvGZQcVAm8FDW0BS96VnNCO1U0XBBsaceS15v9aVObsqTQRg_myPR4x-q1XLnvkhFC62Zr8GJv4N23CUOUgw4KjQGLbgqyTolsKsJ5Ip_tyBWkm2nbu2SotrRcFFzUpCSlSNTsFmqFFtPpzmKvU_iIn9_Cp9HhoNWtgpdHgsRE_BFXMIUgl1ef_oP9-O_s5ddj9vkBu061GdfBmWlb2eEY5Dsw1XcIHvubzFAitz12XSBy22Ny32NJ9uQwqzei66ZifwCMfCQZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821197044</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antibiotic selection pressure and macrolide resistance in nasopharyngeal Streptococcus pneumoniae: a cluster-randomized clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Skalet, Alison H ; Cevallos, Vicky ; Ayele, Berhan ; Gebre, Teshome ; Zhou, Zhaoxia ; Jorgensen, James H ; Zerihun, Mulat ; Habte, Dereje ; Assefa, Yared ; Emerson, Paul M ; Gaynor, Bruce D ; Porco, Travis C ; Lietman, Thomas M ; Keenan, Jeremy D</creator><contributor>Opal, Steven M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Skalet, Alison H ; Cevallos, Vicky ; Ayele, Berhan ; Gebre, Teshome ; Zhou, Zhaoxia ; Jorgensen, James H ; Zerihun, Mulat ; Habte, Dereje ; Assefa, Yared ; Emerson, Paul M ; Gaynor, Bruce D ; Porco, Travis C ; Lietman, Thomas M ; Keenan, Jeremy D ; Opal, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><description>It is widely thought that widespread antibiotic use selects for community antibiotic resistance, though this has been difficult to prove in the setting of a community-randomized clinical trial. In this study, we used a randomized clinical trial design to assess whether macrolide resistance was higher in communities treated with mass azithromycin for trachoma, compared to untreated control communities.
In a cluster-randomized trial for trachoma control in Ethiopia, 12 communities were randomized to receive mass azithromycin treatment of children aged 1-10 years at months 0, 3, 6, and 9. Twelve control communities were randomized to receive no antibiotic treatments until the conclusion of the study. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from randomly selected children in the treated group at baseline and month 12, and in the control group at month 12. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed on Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from the swabs using Etest strips. In the treated group, the mean prevalence of azithromycin resistance among all monitored children increased from 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8%-8.9%) at baseline, to 46.9% (37.5%-57.5%) at month 12 (p = 0.003). In control communities, azithromycin resistance was 9.2% (95% CI 6.7%-13.3%) at month 12, significantly lower than the treated group (p < 0.0001). Penicillin resistance was identified in 0.8% (95% CI 0%-4.2%) of isolates in the control group at 1 year, and in no isolates in the children-treated group at baseline or 1 year.
This cluster-randomized clinical trial demonstrated that compared to untreated control communities, nasopharyngeal pneumococcal resistance to macrolides was significantly higher in communities randomized to intensive azithromycin treatment. Mass azithromycin distributions were given more frequently than currently recommended by the World Health Organization's trachoma program. Azithromycin use in this setting did not select for resistance to penicillins, which remain the drug of choice for pneumococcal infections.
www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00322972. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-1676</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1549-1277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-1676</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000377</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21179434</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibiotics ; Bacteria ; Bacterial infections ; Bacterial pneumonia ; Causes of ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Clinical trials ; Community ; Complications and side effects ; Confidence intervals ; Development and progression ; Dosage and administration ; Drug resistance in microorganisms ; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial ; Drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infectious Diseases/Antimicrobials and Drug Resistance ; Infectious Diseases/Neglected Tropical Diseases ; Infectious Diseases/Respiratory Infections ; Macrolides - therapeutic use ; Male ; Nasopharynx - microbiology ; Pneumococcal Infections - drug therapy ; Pneumonia ; Public Health and Epidemiology/Global Health ; Risk factors ; Streptococcus infections ; Streptococcus pneumoniae - drug effects ; Streptococcus pneumoniae - physiology ; Studies</subject><ispartof>PLoS medicine, 2010-12, Vol.7 (12), p.e1000377-e1000377</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>Skalet et al. 2010</rights><rights>2010 Skalet et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Skalet AH, Cevallos V, Ayele B, Gebre T, Zhou Z, et al. (2010) Antibiotic Selection Pressure and Macrolide Resistance in Nasopharyngeal Streptococcus pneumoniae: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial. PLoS Med 7(12): e1000377. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000377</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c735t-ce52f99fa738e4158ecf739dec5a6e59f3f3a64a0b17de87f325235bb0521b3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c735t-ce52f99fa738e4158ecf739dec5a6e59f3f3a64a0b17de87f325235bb0521b3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3001893/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3001893/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21179434$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Opal, Steven M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Skalet, Alison H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cevallos, Vicky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayele, Berhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gebre, Teshome</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Zhaoxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jorgensen, James H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerihun, Mulat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habte, Dereje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assefa, Yared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emerson, Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaynor, Bruce D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porco, Travis C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lietman, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keenan, Jeremy D</creatorcontrib><title>Antibiotic selection pressure and macrolide resistance in nasopharyngeal Streptococcus pneumoniae: a cluster-randomized clinical trial</title><title>PLoS medicine</title><addtitle>PLoS Med</addtitle><description>It is widely thought that widespread antibiotic use selects for community antibiotic resistance, though this has been difficult to prove in the setting of a community-randomized clinical trial. In this study, we used a randomized clinical trial design to assess whether macrolide resistance was higher in communities treated with mass azithromycin for trachoma, compared to untreated control communities.
In a cluster-randomized trial for trachoma control in Ethiopia, 12 communities were randomized to receive mass azithromycin treatment of children aged 1-10 years at months 0, 3, 6, and 9. Twelve control communities were randomized to receive no antibiotic treatments until the conclusion of the study. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from randomly selected children in the treated group at baseline and month 12, and in the control group at month 12. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed on Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from the swabs using Etest strips. In the treated group, the mean prevalence of azithromycin resistance among all monitored children increased from 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8%-8.9%) at baseline, to 46.9% (37.5%-57.5%) at month 12 (p = 0.003). In control communities, azithromycin resistance was 9.2% (95% CI 6.7%-13.3%) at month 12, significantly lower than the treated group (p < 0.0001). Penicillin resistance was identified in 0.8% (95% CI 0%-4.2%) of isolates in the control group at 1 year, and in no isolates in the children-treated group at baseline or 1 year.
This cluster-randomized clinical trial demonstrated that compared to untreated control communities, nasopharyngeal pneumococcal resistance to macrolides was significantly higher in communities randomized to intensive azithromycin treatment. Mass azithromycin distributions were given more frequently than currently recommended by the World Health Organization's trachoma program. Azithromycin use in this setting did not select for resistance to penicillins, which remain the drug of choice for pneumococcal infections.
www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00322972. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Bacterial pneumonia</subject><subject>Causes of</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Drug resistance in microorganisms</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infectious Diseases/Antimicrobials and Drug Resistance</subject><subject>Infectious Diseases/Neglected Tropical Diseases</subject><subject>Infectious Diseases/Respiratory Infections</subject><subject>Macrolides - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nasopharynx - microbiology</subject><subject>Pneumococcal Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Public Health and Epidemiology/Global Health</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Streptococcus infections</subject><subject>Streptococcus pneumoniae - drug effects</subject><subject>Streptococcus pneumoniae - physiology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1549-1676</issn><issn>1549-1277</issn><issn>1549-1676</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVk9uKFDEQhhtR3HX1DUQbBMWLGZNO0gcvhGHxMLC44Kq3oTpdPZMhnbRJWtQH8LnNOLPLDOyFkouEyvf_OVRVlj2mZE5ZRV9t3OQtmPk4YDenhBBWVXeyUyp4M6NlVd49WJ9kD0LYEFI0pCH3s5OC0qrhjJ9mvxc26la7qFUe0KCK2tl89BjC5DEH2-UDKO-M7jBPUR0iWIW5trmF4MY1-J92hWDyq-hxjE45paaQjxanwVkN-DqHXJkpRPQzn_zcoH9hl0LaapV00WswD7N7PZiAj_bzWfbl3dvP5x9mF5fvl-eLi5mqmIgzhaLom6aHitXIqahR9RVrOlQCShRNz3oGJQfS0qrDuupZIQom2paIgrYM2Fn2dOc7Ghfk_guDpEVdk7pmlCZiuSM6Bxs5ej2kF0oHWv4NOL-S4NNvGZQcVAm8FDW0BS96VnNCO1U0XBBsaceS15v9aVObsqTQRg_myPR4x-q1XLnvkhFC62Zr8GJv4N23CUOUgw4KjQGLbgqyTolsKsJ5Ip_tyBWkm2nbu2SotrRcFFzUpCSlSNTsFmqFFtPpzmKvU_iIn9_Cp9HhoNWtgpdHgsRE_BFXMIUgl1ef_oP9-O_s5ddj9vkBu061GdfBmWlb2eEY5Dsw1XcIHvubzFAitz12XSBy22Ny32NJ9uQwqzei66ZifwCMfCQZ</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Skalet, Alison H</creator><creator>Cevallos, Vicky</creator><creator>Ayele, Berhan</creator><creator>Gebre, Teshome</creator><creator>Zhou, Zhaoxia</creator><creator>Jorgensen, James H</creator><creator>Zerihun, Mulat</creator><creator>Habte, Dereje</creator><creator>Assefa, Yared</creator><creator>Emerson, Paul M</creator><creator>Gaynor, Bruce D</creator><creator>Porco, Travis C</creator><creator>Lietman, Thomas M</creator><creator>Keenan, Jeremy D</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><scope>CZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Antibiotic selection pressure and macrolide resistance in nasopharyngeal Streptococcus pneumoniae: a cluster-randomized clinical trial</title><author>Skalet, Alison H ; Cevallos, Vicky ; Ayele, Berhan ; Gebre, Teshome ; Zhou, Zhaoxia ; Jorgensen, James H ; Zerihun, Mulat ; Habte, Dereje ; Assefa, Yared ; Emerson, Paul M ; Gaynor, Bruce D ; Porco, Travis C ; Lietman, Thomas M ; Keenan, Jeremy D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c735t-ce52f99fa738e4158ecf739dec5a6e59f3f3a64a0b17de87f325235bb0521b3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Bacterial pneumonia</topic><topic>Causes of</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Drug resistance in microorganisms</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infectious Diseases/Antimicrobials and Drug Resistance</topic><topic>Infectious Diseases/Neglected Tropical Diseases</topic><topic>Infectious Diseases/Respiratory Infections</topic><topic>Macrolides - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nasopharynx - microbiology</topic><topic>Pneumococcal Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Public Health and Epidemiology/Global Health</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Streptococcus infections</topic><topic>Streptococcus pneumoniae - drug effects</topic><topic>Streptococcus pneumoniae - physiology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Skalet, Alison H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cevallos, Vicky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayele, Berhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gebre, Teshome</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Zhaoxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jorgensen, James H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerihun, Mulat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habte, Dereje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assefa, Yared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emerson, Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaynor, Bruce D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porco, Travis C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lietman, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keenan, Jeremy D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PLoS Medicine</collection><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Skalet, Alison H</au><au>Cevallos, Vicky</au><au>Ayele, Berhan</au><au>Gebre, Teshome</au><au>Zhou, Zhaoxia</au><au>Jorgensen, James H</au><au>Zerihun, Mulat</au><au>Habte, Dereje</au><au>Assefa, Yared</au><au>Emerson, Paul M</au><au>Gaynor, Bruce D</au><au>Porco, Travis C</au><au>Lietman, Thomas M</au><au>Keenan, Jeremy D</au><au>Opal, Steven M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antibiotic selection pressure and macrolide resistance in nasopharyngeal Streptococcus pneumoniae: a cluster-randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Med</addtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e1000377</spage><epage>e1000377</epage><pages>e1000377-e1000377</pages><issn>1549-1676</issn><issn>1549-1277</issn><eissn>1549-1676</eissn><abstract>It is widely thought that widespread antibiotic use selects for community antibiotic resistance, though this has been difficult to prove in the setting of a community-randomized clinical trial. In this study, we used a randomized clinical trial design to assess whether macrolide resistance was higher in communities treated with mass azithromycin for trachoma, compared to untreated control communities.
In a cluster-randomized trial for trachoma control in Ethiopia, 12 communities were randomized to receive mass azithromycin treatment of children aged 1-10 years at months 0, 3, 6, and 9. Twelve control communities were randomized to receive no antibiotic treatments until the conclusion of the study. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from randomly selected children in the treated group at baseline and month 12, and in the control group at month 12. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed on Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from the swabs using Etest strips. In the treated group, the mean prevalence of azithromycin resistance among all monitored children increased from 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8%-8.9%) at baseline, to 46.9% (37.5%-57.5%) at month 12 (p = 0.003). In control communities, azithromycin resistance was 9.2% (95% CI 6.7%-13.3%) at month 12, significantly lower than the treated group (p < 0.0001). Penicillin resistance was identified in 0.8% (95% CI 0%-4.2%) of isolates in the control group at 1 year, and in no isolates in the children-treated group at baseline or 1 year.
This cluster-randomized clinical trial demonstrated that compared to untreated control communities, nasopharyngeal pneumococcal resistance to macrolides was significantly higher in communities randomized to intensive azithromycin treatment. Mass azithromycin distributions were given more frequently than currently recommended by the World Health Organization's trachoma program. Azithromycin use in this setting did not select for resistance to penicillins, which remain the drug of choice for pneumococcal infections.
www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00322972. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>21179434</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pmed.1000377</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1549-1676 |
ispartof | PLoS medicine, 2010-12, Vol.7 (12), p.e1000377-e1000377 |
issn | 1549-1676 1549-1277 1549-1676 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1288088311 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use Antibiotics Bacteria Bacterial infections Bacterial pneumonia Causes of Child Child, Preschool Clinical trials Community Complications and side effects Confidence intervals Development and progression Dosage and administration Drug resistance in microorganisms Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial Drug therapy Female Humans Infant Infectious Diseases/Antimicrobials and Drug Resistance Infectious Diseases/Neglected Tropical Diseases Infectious Diseases/Respiratory Infections Macrolides - therapeutic use Male Nasopharynx - microbiology Pneumococcal Infections - drug therapy Pneumonia Public Health and Epidemiology/Global Health Risk factors Streptococcus infections Streptococcus pneumoniae - drug effects Streptococcus pneumoniae - physiology Studies |
title | Antibiotic selection pressure and macrolide resistance in nasopharyngeal Streptococcus pneumoniae: a cluster-randomized clinical trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T10%3A46%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antibiotic%20selection%20pressure%20and%20macrolide%20resistance%20in%20nasopharyngeal%20Streptococcus%20pneumoniae:%20a%20cluster-randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20medicine&rft.au=Skalet,%20Alison%20H&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e1000377&rft.epage=e1000377&rft.pages=e1000377-e1000377&rft.issn=1549-1676&rft.eissn=1549-1676&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000377&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA245806065%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821197044&rft_id=info:pmid/21179434&rft_galeid=A245806065&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4ac6a4658ab242f38401dc29450eb1d3&rfr_iscdi=true |