Methods of improving the performance of drilled piers in weak rock
Investigations were made of two methods to improve the load-displacement performance of concrete piers socketed into very weak rock. Results of load tests on six full-size piers are reported.One method involved cutting grooves into the socket wall to roughen the pier-rock interface and thus increase...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian geotechnical journal 1983-11, Vol.20 (4), p.758-772 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 772 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 758 |
container_title | Canadian geotechnical journal |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Horvath, R. G Kenney, T. C Kozicki, P |
description | Investigations were made of two methods to improve the load-displacement performance of concrete piers socketed into very weak rock. Results of load tests on six full-size piers are reported.One method involved cutting grooves into the socket wall to roughen the pier-rock interface and thus increase the shaft resistance component of load support. Two types of piers were tested: piers with a void at the base (shaft resistance only) and piers having both shaft resistance and end-bearing resistance. In the latter case, flatjack load cells were installed to measure base loads. The test results indicated that increasing the roughness of the socket wall can cause important increases in shaft resistance.The second method involved the application of preload to the socket base to increase the end-bearing component of load support at small displacements. The test results showed that preloading the socket base resulted in a stiffer load-displacement behaviour of the pier-socket system.The initial portions of the load-displacement curves from all the tests were linear, reflecting elastic behaviour of the pier-socket system. This elastic behaviour did not appear to rely on socket roughness. Beyond the limit of proportionality, the load-displacement behaviour of each pier departed from that of an elastic system, and this departure was more rapid for the piers with smooth sockets than for those with roughened socket walls. Preloading the socket base caused the elastic range of loading to be extended.Two design approaches, limit-state analysis and elastic-state analysis, are discussed. Keywords: drilled piers and caissons, large-bored piles, shaft resistance, grooved shaft, load transfer, preload, shale, weak rock. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1139/t83-081 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pascalfrancis_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_9516204</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>9516204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-5410f2d106b8d2d49a9c7f00f0fdb896d6dfe1b01f2cab3c59c5aadf6090e5443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j01LxDAQQIMouK7iX8hBFITqJE2zzVEXv2DFi55LmmTcuN22TIriv7fLyh4ETzMwjzc8xk4FXAmRm-uhzDMoxR6bCAllpkHAPpsAjHuuZ-qQHaX0ASCUknLCbp_DsOx84h3yuO6p-4ztOx-WgfeBsKO1bV3YHD3Fpgme9zFQ4rHlX8GuOHVudcwO0DYpnPzOKXu7v3udP2aLl4en-c0ic3mphqxQAlB6AbouvfTKWONmCICAvi6N9tpjEDUIlM7WuSuMK6z1qMFAKJTKp-xi63XUpUQBq57i2tJ3JaDapFdjejWmj-TZluxtcrZBGiNi2uGmEFrCRni-xVpyFFKw5JY76NdV9R5H8PJ_8O_zH_DQdCY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methods of improving the performance of drilled piers in weak rock</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Horvath, R. G ; Kenney, T. C ; Kozicki, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Horvath, R. G ; Kenney, T. C ; Kozicki, P</creatorcontrib><description>Investigations were made of two methods to improve the load-displacement performance of concrete piers socketed into very weak rock. Results of load tests on six full-size piers are reported.One method involved cutting grooves into the socket wall to roughen the pier-rock interface and thus increase the shaft resistance component of load support. Two types of piers were tested: piers with a void at the base (shaft resistance only) and piers having both shaft resistance and end-bearing resistance. In the latter case, flatjack load cells were installed to measure base loads. The test results indicated that increasing the roughness of the socket wall can cause important increases in shaft resistance.The second method involved the application of preload to the socket base to increase the end-bearing component of load support at small displacements. The test results showed that preloading the socket base resulted in a stiffer load-displacement behaviour of the pier-socket system.The initial portions of the load-displacement curves from all the tests were linear, reflecting elastic behaviour of the pier-socket system. This elastic behaviour did not appear to rely on socket roughness. Beyond the limit of proportionality, the load-displacement behaviour of each pier departed from that of an elastic system, and this departure was more rapid for the piers with smooth sockets than for those with roughened socket walls. Preloading the socket base caused the elastic range of loading to be extended.Two design approaches, limit-state analysis and elastic-state analysis, are discussed. Keywords: drilled piers and caissons, large-bored piles, shaft resistance, grooved shaft, load transfer, preload, shale, weak rock.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-3674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1208-6010</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/t83-081</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CGJOAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa, Canada: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Buildings. Public works ; Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geotechnics</subject><ispartof>Canadian geotechnical journal, 1983-11, Vol.20 (4), p.758-772</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-5410f2d106b8d2d49a9c7f00f0fdb896d6dfe1b01f2cab3c59c5aadf6090e5443</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=9516204$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horvath, R. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenney, T. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozicki, P</creatorcontrib><title>Methods of improving the performance of drilled piers in weak rock</title><title>Canadian geotechnical journal</title><addtitle>Revue canadienne de géotechnique</addtitle><description>Investigations were made of two methods to improve the load-displacement performance of concrete piers socketed into very weak rock. Results of load tests on six full-size piers are reported.One method involved cutting grooves into the socket wall to roughen the pier-rock interface and thus increase the shaft resistance component of load support. Two types of piers were tested: piers with a void at the base (shaft resistance only) and piers having both shaft resistance and end-bearing resistance. In the latter case, flatjack load cells were installed to measure base loads. The test results indicated that increasing the roughness of the socket wall can cause important increases in shaft resistance.The second method involved the application of preload to the socket base to increase the end-bearing component of load support at small displacements. The test results showed that preloading the socket base resulted in a stiffer load-displacement behaviour of the pier-socket system.The initial portions of the load-displacement curves from all the tests were linear, reflecting elastic behaviour of the pier-socket system. This elastic behaviour did not appear to rely on socket roughness. Beyond the limit of proportionality, the load-displacement behaviour of each pier departed from that of an elastic system, and this departure was more rapid for the piers with smooth sockets than for those with roughened socket walls. Preloading the socket base caused the elastic range of loading to be extended.Two design approaches, limit-state analysis and elastic-state analysis, are discussed. Keywords: drilled piers and caissons, large-bored piles, shaft resistance, grooved shaft, load transfer, preload, shale, weak rock.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geotechnics</subject><issn>0008-3674</issn><issn>1208-6010</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j01LxDAQQIMouK7iX8hBFITqJE2zzVEXv2DFi55LmmTcuN22TIriv7fLyh4ETzMwjzc8xk4FXAmRm-uhzDMoxR6bCAllpkHAPpsAjHuuZ-qQHaX0ASCUknLCbp_DsOx84h3yuO6p-4ztOx-WgfeBsKO1bV3YHD3Fpgme9zFQ4rHlX8GuOHVudcwO0DYpnPzOKXu7v3udP2aLl4en-c0ic3mphqxQAlB6AbouvfTKWONmCICAvi6N9tpjEDUIlM7WuSuMK6z1qMFAKJTKp-xi63XUpUQBq57i2tJ3JaDapFdjejWmj-TZluxtcrZBGiNi2uGmEFrCRni-xVpyFFKw5JY76NdV9R5H8PJ_8O_zH_DQdCY</recordid><startdate>19831101</startdate><enddate>19831101</enddate><creator>Horvath, R. G</creator><creator>Kenney, T. C</creator><creator>Kozicki, P</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>National Research Council of Canada</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19831101</creationdate><title>Methods of improving the performance of drilled piers in weak rock</title><author>Horvath, R. G ; Kenney, T. C ; Kozicki, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-5410f2d106b8d2d49a9c7f00f0fdb896d6dfe1b01f2cab3c59c5aadf6090e5443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geotechnics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horvath, R. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenney, T. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozicki, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Canadian geotechnical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horvath, R. G</au><au>Kenney, T. C</au><au>Kozicki, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methods of improving the performance of drilled piers in weak rock</atitle><jtitle>Canadian geotechnical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Revue canadienne de géotechnique</addtitle><date>1983-11-01</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>758</spage><epage>772</epage><pages>758-772</pages><issn>0008-3674</issn><eissn>1208-6010</eissn><coden>CGJOAH</coden><abstract>Investigations were made of two methods to improve the load-displacement performance of concrete piers socketed into very weak rock. Results of load tests on six full-size piers are reported.One method involved cutting grooves into the socket wall to roughen the pier-rock interface and thus increase the shaft resistance component of load support. Two types of piers were tested: piers with a void at the base (shaft resistance only) and piers having both shaft resistance and end-bearing resistance. In the latter case, flatjack load cells were installed to measure base loads. The test results indicated that increasing the roughness of the socket wall can cause important increases in shaft resistance.The second method involved the application of preload to the socket base to increase the end-bearing component of load support at small displacements. The test results showed that preloading the socket base resulted in a stiffer load-displacement behaviour of the pier-socket system.The initial portions of the load-displacement curves from all the tests were linear, reflecting elastic behaviour of the pier-socket system. This elastic behaviour did not appear to rely on socket roughness. Beyond the limit of proportionality, the load-displacement behaviour of each pier departed from that of an elastic system, and this departure was more rapid for the piers with smooth sockets than for those with roughened socket walls. Preloading the socket base caused the elastic range of loading to be extended.Two design approaches, limit-state analysis and elastic-state analysis, are discussed. Keywords: drilled piers and caissons, large-bored piles, shaft resistance, grooved shaft, load transfer, preload, shale, weak rock.</abstract><cop>Ottawa, Canada</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/t83-081</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-3674 |
ispartof | Canadian geotechnical journal, 1983-11, Vol.20 (4), p.758-772 |
issn | 0008-3674 1208-6010 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_9516204 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Applied sciences Buildings. Public works Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls Exact sciences and technology Geotechnics |
title | Methods of improving the performance of drilled piers in weak rock |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T10%3A00%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pascalfrancis_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methods%20of%20improving%20the%20performance%20of%20drilled%20piers%20in%20weak%20rock&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20geotechnical%20journal&rft.au=Horvath,%20R.%20G&rft.date=1983-11-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=758&rft.epage=772&rft.pages=758-772&rft.issn=0008-3674&rft.eissn=1208-6010&rft.coden=CGJOAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/t83-081&rft_dat=%3Cpascalfrancis_cross%3E9516204%3C/pascalfrancis_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |