The Effect of Urea on α-Helical Structure of Requiem Shark Myosin
Myosin and its fragments, rod and subfragment-1 (S1), were prepared from the requiem shark Triakis scyllia and examined for the effects of urea on their α-helical structure by monitoring with circular dichroism (CD) using corresponding proteins prepared from the carp Cyprinus carpio as references. A...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI 2000/09/15, Vol.66(5), pp.882-887 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | jpn |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 887 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 882 |
container_title | NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Kanoh, Satoshi Watanabe, Miyako Niwa, Eiji |
description | Myosin and its fragments, rod and subfragment-1 (S1), were prepared from the requiem shark Triakis scyllia and examined for the effects of urea on their α-helical structure by monitoring with circular dichroism (CD) using corresponding proteins prepared from the carp Cyprinus carpio as references. All of the protein preparations from requiem shark showed decreased α-helical contents with increasing urea concentrations. However, rod was most stable against urea treatment, whereas myosin and S1 exhibited similar patterns in urea concentration-dependent decrease of α-helix. When compared with the above results for requiem shark, proteins prepared from carp were less stable in terms of α-helical structure at least up to 2M urea examined in the present study, irrespective of myosin and its fragments. Furthermore, α-helical structure of myosin, rod and S1 from requiem shark were completely refolded when urea was removed from the sample solutions. On the other hand, the refolding of α-helix in carp proteins after urea treatment was not perfectly accomplished, especially in the case of myosin and S1. Taken together, it is concluded that the α-helical structure of requiem shark myosin is highly resistant to urea denaturation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2331/suisan.66.882 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstage_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_842048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>article_suisan1932_66_5_66_5_882_article_char_en</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j161t-bcfa655163a02dfc9c564c637c9b9a7514b29479d1dc926a9157cf63b2fa2e5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1Kw0AUhQdRMNQu3Q-4Tp3_ZJZaWitUBNuCu3AzmbFT07TOJIs-li_iMxmJdHPP4nwczj0I3VIyYZzT-9j5CM1EqUmeswuUUC50qnX-fokSQhhNJdfsGo1j9CUhRAvFSZ6gx_XW4plz1rT44PAmWMCHBv98pwtbewM1XrWhM20X7J__Zr86b_d4tYXwiV9Oh-ibG3TloI52_K8jtJnP1tNFunx9ep4-LNMdVbRNS-NASUkVB8IqZ7SRShjFM6NLDZmkomRaZLqildFMgaYyM07xkjlgVpZ8hO6G3CPEvpgL0Bgfi2PwewinIheMiLyn5gO1iy182LMNofWmtsWwE9WcFUoVcjj9ZGfA9K8VtuG_orJm_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Urea on α-Helical Structure of Requiem Shark Myosin</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Freely Accessible Japanese Titles</source><source>AgriKnowledge(アグリナレッジ)AGROLib</source><creator>Kanoh, Satoshi ; Watanabe, Miyako ; Niwa, Eiji</creator><creatorcontrib>Kanoh, Satoshi ; Watanabe, Miyako ; Niwa, Eiji</creatorcontrib><description>Myosin and its fragments, rod and subfragment-1 (S1), were prepared from the requiem shark Triakis scyllia and examined for the effects of urea on their α-helical structure by monitoring with circular dichroism (CD) using corresponding proteins prepared from the carp Cyprinus carpio as references. All of the protein preparations from requiem shark showed decreased α-helical contents with increasing urea concentrations. However, rod was most stable against urea treatment, whereas myosin and S1 exhibited similar patterns in urea concentration-dependent decrease of α-helix. When compared with the above results for requiem shark, proteins prepared from carp were less stable in terms of α-helical structure at least up to 2M urea examined in the present study, irrespective of myosin and its fragments. Furthermore, α-helical structure of myosin, rod and S1 from requiem shark were completely refolded when urea was removed from the sample solutions. On the other hand, the refolding of α-helix in carp proteins after urea treatment was not perfectly accomplished, especially in the case of myosin and S1. Taken together, it is concluded that the α-helical structure of requiem shark myosin is highly resistant to urea denaturation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-5392</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1349-998X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2331/suisan.66.882</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NSUGAF</identifier><language>jpn</language><publisher>Tokyo: The Japanese Society of Fisheries Science</publisher><ispartof>NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI, 2000/09/15, Vol.66(5), pp.882-887</ispartof><rights>The Japanese Society of Fisheries Science</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1877,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=842048$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kanoh, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Miyako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niwa, Eiji</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Urea on α-Helical Structure of Requiem Shark Myosin</title><title>NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI</title><addtitle>NSUGAF</addtitle><description>Myosin and its fragments, rod and subfragment-1 (S1), were prepared from the requiem shark Triakis scyllia and examined for the effects of urea on their α-helical structure by monitoring with circular dichroism (CD) using corresponding proteins prepared from the carp Cyprinus carpio as references. All of the protein preparations from requiem shark showed decreased α-helical contents with increasing urea concentrations. However, rod was most stable against urea treatment, whereas myosin and S1 exhibited similar patterns in urea concentration-dependent decrease of α-helix. When compared with the above results for requiem shark, proteins prepared from carp were less stable in terms of α-helical structure at least up to 2M urea examined in the present study, irrespective of myosin and its fragments. Furthermore, α-helical structure of myosin, rod and S1 from requiem shark were completely refolded when urea was removed from the sample solutions. On the other hand, the refolding of α-helix in carp proteins after urea treatment was not perfectly accomplished, especially in the case of myosin and S1. Taken together, it is concluded that the α-helical structure of requiem shark myosin is highly resistant to urea denaturation.</description><issn>0021-5392</issn><issn>1349-998X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1Kw0AUhQdRMNQu3Q-4Tp3_ZJZaWitUBNuCu3AzmbFT07TOJIs-li_iMxmJdHPP4nwczj0I3VIyYZzT-9j5CM1EqUmeswuUUC50qnX-fokSQhhNJdfsGo1j9CUhRAvFSZ6gx_XW4plz1rT44PAmWMCHBv98pwtbewM1XrWhM20X7J__Zr86b_d4tYXwiV9Oh-ibG3TloI52_K8jtJnP1tNFunx9ep4-LNMdVbRNS-NASUkVB8IqZ7SRShjFM6NLDZmkomRaZLqildFMgaYyM07xkjlgVpZ8hO6G3CPEvpgL0Bgfi2PwewinIheMiLyn5gO1iy182LMNofWmtsWwE9WcFUoVcjj9ZGfA9K8VtuG_orJm_w</recordid><startdate>20000915</startdate><enddate>20000915</enddate><creator>Kanoh, Satoshi</creator><creator>Watanabe, Miyako</creator><creator>Niwa, Eiji</creator><general>The Japanese Society of Fisheries Science</general><general>Nippon Suisan Gakkai</general><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000915</creationdate><title>The Effect of Urea on α-Helical Structure of Requiem Shark Myosin</title><author>Kanoh, Satoshi ; Watanabe, Miyako ; Niwa, Eiji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j161t-bcfa655163a02dfc9c564c637c9b9a7514b29479d1dc926a9157cf63b2fa2e5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>jpn</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kanoh, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Miyako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niwa, Eiji</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><jtitle>NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kanoh, Satoshi</au><au>Watanabe, Miyako</au><au>Niwa, Eiji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Urea on α-Helical Structure of Requiem Shark Myosin</atitle><jtitle>NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI</jtitle><addtitle>NSUGAF</addtitle><date>2000-09-15</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>882</spage><epage>887</epage><pages>882-887</pages><issn>0021-5392</issn><eissn>1349-998X</eissn><coden>NSUGAF</coden><abstract>Myosin and its fragments, rod and subfragment-1 (S1), were prepared from the requiem shark Triakis scyllia and examined for the effects of urea on their α-helical structure by monitoring with circular dichroism (CD) using corresponding proteins prepared from the carp Cyprinus carpio as references. All of the protein preparations from requiem shark showed decreased α-helical contents with increasing urea concentrations. However, rod was most stable against urea treatment, whereas myosin and S1 exhibited similar patterns in urea concentration-dependent decrease of α-helix. When compared with the above results for requiem shark, proteins prepared from carp were less stable in terms of α-helical structure at least up to 2M urea examined in the present study, irrespective of myosin and its fragments. Furthermore, α-helical structure of myosin, rod and S1 from requiem shark were completely refolded when urea was removed from the sample solutions. On the other hand, the refolding of α-helix in carp proteins after urea treatment was not perfectly accomplished, especially in the case of myosin and S1. Taken together, it is concluded that the α-helical structure of requiem shark myosin is highly resistant to urea denaturation.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>The Japanese Society of Fisheries Science</pub><doi>10.2331/suisan.66.882</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-5392 |
ispartof | NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI, 2000/09/15, Vol.66(5), pp.882-887 |
issn | 0021-5392 1349-998X |
language | jpn |
recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_842048 |
source | J-STAGE Free; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Freely Accessible Japanese Titles; AgriKnowledge(アグリナレッジ)AGROLib |
title | The Effect of Urea on α-Helical Structure of Requiem Shark Myosin |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T06%3A53%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstage_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Urea%20on%20%CE%B1-Helical%20Structure%20of%20Requiem%20Shark%20Myosin&rft.jtitle=NIPPON%20SUISAN%20GAKKAISHI&rft.au=Kanoh,%20Satoshi&rft.date=2000-09-15&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=882&rft.epage=887&rft.pages=882-887&rft.issn=0021-5392&rft.eissn=1349-998X&rft.coden=NSUGAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.2331/suisan.66.882&rft_dat=%3Cjstage_pasca%3Earticle_suisan1932_66_5_66_5_882_article_char_en%3C/jstage_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |