A revision of Blight's model of field vane testing
Vane shear test data obtained by a number of researchers show that the excess pore pressures generated within the soil surrounding the vane by vane insertion and rotation and their effects on the measured vane shear strength have been misinterpreted for many years. The accepted model developed by Bl...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian geotechnical journal 2000-10, Vol.37 (5), p.1089-1098 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1098 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1089 |
| container_title | Canadian geotechnical journal |
| container_volume | 37 |
| creator | Morris, Peter Henri Williams, David John |
| description | Vane shear test data obtained by a number of researchers show that the excess pore pressures generated within the soil surrounding the vane by vane insertion and rotation and their effects on the measured vane shear strength have been misinterpreted for many years. The accepted model developed by Blight of field vane testing and the accepted criteria for determining undrained and fully drained vane shear strengths are based on this misinterpretation. Consequently, estimates that are based on this model of the degree of drainage that has been attained at the time the vane shear strength is measured may be significantly in error, and the measured undrained shear strengths may be unconservative. A revision of Blight's approximate theory of field vane testing is presented which is consistent with the available experimental data. Revised practical criteria for determining the undrained and fully drained shear strengths are also presented, and a simple revision of current standard vane shear test methods is proposed which would eliminate, for all but those soils with very high coefficients of consolidation, the possibility that estimates of the undrained vane shear strength may be unconservative.Key words: vane shear, undrained strength, drained strength, excess pore pressure. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1139/t00-035 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_816773</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>64820482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a367t-ccf77e4e358edd57bbe4f49d6062d14eaedeba51e743e84ad2e487234b56e9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf4F4qCA6Garybt5Rx-wcCb3Yc0OdkyunYm3cB_b8rGLgSvzuHw8D6HF6Fbgp8IYdVzj3GOWXGGRoTiMheY4HM0wjjtTEh-ia5iXGNMOKd0hOg0C7D30Xdt1rnspfHLVT-J2aaz0AwX56Gx2V63kPUQe98ur9GF002Em-Mco8Xb62L2kc-_3j9n03muk6fPjXFSAgdWlGBtIesauOOVFVhQSzhosFDrgoDkDEquLQVeSsp4XQioHBuju0PsNnTfu6RW624X2mRUlDBWECyqBE0OkAldjAGc2ga_0eFHEayGOlSqQ6U6Enl_jNPR6MYF3RofT3hJhJQsUQ8Hqg0mQAQdzOrEHKPU1g7fPf4P_nX_AsBoeLs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213351069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A revision of Blight's model of field vane testing</title><source>NRC Research Press</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Morris, Peter Henri ; Williams, David John</creator><creatorcontrib>Morris, Peter Henri ; Williams, David John</creatorcontrib><description>Vane shear test data obtained by a number of researchers show that the excess pore pressures generated within the soil surrounding the vane by vane insertion and rotation and their effects on the measured vane shear strength have been misinterpreted for many years. The accepted model developed by Blight of field vane testing and the accepted criteria for determining undrained and fully drained vane shear strengths are based on this misinterpretation. Consequently, estimates that are based on this model of the degree of drainage that has been attained at the time the vane shear strength is measured may be significantly in error, and the measured undrained shear strengths may be unconservative. A revision of Blight's approximate theory of field vane testing is presented which is consistent with the available experimental data. Revised practical criteria for determining the undrained and fully drained shear strengths are also presented, and a simple revision of current standard vane shear test methods is proposed which would eliminate, for all but those soils with very high coefficients of consolidation, the possibility that estimates of the undrained vane shear strength may be unconservative.Key words: vane shear, undrained strength, drained strength, excess pore pressure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-3674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1208-6010</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/t00-035</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CGJOAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa, Canada: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Engineering geology ; Exact sciences and technology ; Soils ; Surficial geology ; Testing</subject><ispartof>Canadian geotechnical journal, 2000-10, Vol.37 (5), p.1089-1098</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright National Research Council of Canada Oct 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a367t-ccf77e4e358edd57bbe4f49d6062d14eaedeba51e743e84ad2e487234b56e9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a367t-ccf77e4e358edd57bbe4f49d6062d14eaedeba51e743e84ad2e487234b56e9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/t00-035$$EPDF$$P50$$Gnrcresearch$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/full/10.1139/t00-035$$EHTML$$P50$$Gnrcresearch$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2932,27924,27925,64428,65234</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=816773$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morris, Peter Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, David John</creatorcontrib><title>A revision of Blight's model of field vane testing</title><title>Canadian geotechnical journal</title><addtitle>Revue canadienne de géotechnique</addtitle><description>Vane shear test data obtained by a number of researchers show that the excess pore pressures generated within the soil surrounding the vane by vane insertion and rotation and their effects on the measured vane shear strength have been misinterpreted for many years. The accepted model developed by Blight of field vane testing and the accepted criteria for determining undrained and fully drained vane shear strengths are based on this misinterpretation. Consequently, estimates that are based on this model of the degree of drainage that has been attained at the time the vane shear strength is measured may be significantly in error, and the measured undrained shear strengths may be unconservative. A revision of Blight's approximate theory of field vane testing is presented which is consistent with the available experimental data. Revised practical criteria for determining the undrained and fully drained shear strengths are also presented, and a simple revision of current standard vane shear test methods is proposed which would eliminate, for all but those soils with very high coefficients of consolidation, the possibility that estimates of the undrained vane shear strength may be unconservative.Key words: vane shear, undrained strength, drained strength, excess pore pressure.</description><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Engineering geology</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Surficial geology</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>0008-3674</issn><issn>1208-6010</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf4F4qCA6Garybt5Rx-wcCb3Yc0OdkyunYm3cB_b8rGLgSvzuHw8D6HF6Fbgp8IYdVzj3GOWXGGRoTiMheY4HM0wjjtTEh-ia5iXGNMOKd0hOg0C7D30Xdt1rnspfHLVT-J2aaz0AwX56Gx2V63kPUQe98ur9GF002Em-Mco8Xb62L2kc-_3j9n03muk6fPjXFSAgdWlGBtIesauOOVFVhQSzhosFDrgoDkDEquLQVeSsp4XQioHBuju0PsNnTfu6RW624X2mRUlDBWECyqBE0OkAldjAGc2ga_0eFHEayGOlSqQ6U6Enl_jNPR6MYF3RofT3hJhJQsUQ8Hqg0mQAQdzOrEHKPU1g7fPf4P_nX_AsBoeLs</recordid><startdate>20001001</startdate><enddate>20001001</enddate><creator>Morris, Peter Henri</creator><creator>Williams, David John</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>National Research Council of Canada</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001001</creationdate><title>A revision of Blight's model of field vane testing</title><author>Morris, Peter Henri ; Williams, David John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a367t-ccf77e4e358edd57bbe4f49d6062d14eaedeba51e743e84ad2e487234b56e9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Engineering geology</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Surficial geology</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morris, Peter Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, David John</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Canadian geotechnical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morris, Peter Henri</au><au>Williams, David John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A revision of Blight's model of field vane testing</atitle><jtitle>Canadian geotechnical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Revue canadienne de géotechnique</addtitle><date>2000-10-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1089</spage><epage>1098</epage><pages>1089-1098</pages><issn>0008-3674</issn><eissn>1208-6010</eissn><coden>CGJOAH</coden><abstract>Vane shear test data obtained by a number of researchers show that the excess pore pressures generated within the soil surrounding the vane by vane insertion and rotation and their effects on the measured vane shear strength have been misinterpreted for many years. The accepted model developed by Blight of field vane testing and the accepted criteria for determining undrained and fully drained vane shear strengths are based on this misinterpretation. Consequently, estimates that are based on this model of the degree of drainage that has been attained at the time the vane shear strength is measured may be significantly in error, and the measured undrained shear strengths may be unconservative. A revision of Blight's approximate theory of field vane testing is presented which is consistent with the available experimental data. Revised practical criteria for determining the undrained and fully drained shear strengths are also presented, and a simple revision of current standard vane shear test methods is proposed which would eliminate, for all but those soils with very high coefficients of consolidation, the possibility that estimates of the undrained vane shear strength may be unconservative.Key words: vane shear, undrained strength, drained strength, excess pore pressure.</abstract><cop>Ottawa, Canada</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/t00-035</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0008-3674 |
| ispartof | Canadian geotechnical journal, 2000-10, Vol.37 (5), p.1089-1098 |
| issn | 0008-3674 1208-6010 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_816773 |
| source | NRC Research Press; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics Engineering geology Exact sciences and technology Soils Surficial geology Testing |
| title | A revision of Blight's model of field vane testing |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T07%3A30%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20revision%20of%20Blight's%20model%20of%20field%20vane%20testing&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20geotechnical%20journal&rft.au=Morris,%20Peter%20Henri&rft.date=2000-10-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1089&rft.epage=1098&rft.pages=1089-1098&rft.issn=0008-3674&rft.eissn=1208-6010&rft.coden=CGJOAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/t00-035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E64820482%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213351069&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |