The RFP-Request for Punishment: or A Tool for Selecting an Automated Library System
A request for proposals (RFP) may be required by purchasing laws and regulations of a local jurisdiction. A library may choose to use the RFP to determine the capabilities and limitations of a number of possible systems. However, the RFP can be badly conceived, constructed, and applied, resulting in...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Library hi tech 1987-01, Vol.5 (1), p.15-21 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 21 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 15 |
| container_title | Library hi tech |
| container_volume | 5 |
| creator | Matthews, Joseph R. Salmon, Stephen R. Frye Williams, Joan |
| description | A request for proposals (RFP) may be required by purchasing laws and regulations of a local jurisdiction. A library may choose to use the RFP to determine the capabilities and limitations of a number of possible systems. However, the RFP can be badly conceived, constructed, and applied, resulting in few responses by vendors and disappointment, lost time, and wasted resources for the library. Advice is presented on when to use the RFP, how to construct it, and how to use it to achieve maximum success: selection and implementation of the product that best meets a library's specific needs. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1108/eb047674 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_7448272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57162063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-38943f542c14f9c92fecf79315d024bcd535ddb71951f26af368255ee63ea3053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0MtKAzEUBuAgCtYq-AgBRd2M5p4Zd6VYFQqWtoK7Ic2c2JG51GRm0bd37G2jq0M4H38OP0KXlNxTSuIHWBChlRZHqMeIFBFV6uMY9YjmOopjTk_RWQhfhBDJNOuh2XwJeDqaRFP4biE02NUeT9oqD8sSquYRd88Bntd1sdnMoADb5NUnNhUetE1dmgYyPM4X3vg1nq1DA-U5OnGmCHCxm330PnqaD1-i8dvz63AwjixTpIl4nAjupGCWCpfYhDmwTiecyowwsbCZ5DLLFpomkjqmjOMqZlICKA6GE8n76Gabu_L15vi0zIOFojAV1G1IpaaKEcU7eLeF1tcheHDpyudld3BKSfrbWrpvraPXu0wTrCmcN5XNw8FrIeKut45dbRmU4E2RHcA-KF1lrlO3_6s_3_4AfvWDQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57162063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The RFP-Request for Punishment: or A Tool for Selecting an Automated Library System</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Matthews, Joseph R. ; Salmon, Stephen R. ; Frye Williams, Joan</creator><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Joseph R. ; Salmon, Stephen R. ; Frye Williams, Joan</creatorcontrib><description>A request for proposals (RFP) may be required by purchasing laws and regulations of a local jurisdiction. A library may choose to use the RFP to determine the capabilities and limitations of a number of possible systems. However, the RFP can be badly conceived, constructed, and applied, resulting in few responses by vendors and disappointment, lost time, and wasted resources for the library. Advice is presented on when to use the RFP, how to construct it, and how to use it to achieve maximum success: selection and implementation of the product that best meets a library's specific needs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0737-8831</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-166X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/eb047674</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LIHTD2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: MCB UP Ltd</publisher><subject>Computers ; Data processing ; Exact sciences and technology ; General aspects ; Information and communication sciences ; Information science. Documentation ; Information service management ; Library and documentation centre management ; Purchasing ; Sciences and techniques of general use</subject><ispartof>Library hi tech, 1987-01, Vol.5 (1), p.15-21</ispartof><rights>MCB UP Limited</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-38943f542c14f9c92fecf79315d024bcd535ddb71951f26af368255ee63ea3053</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/eb047674/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/eb047674/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,966,11634,27923,27924,52685,52688</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7448272$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Joseph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmon, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frye Williams, Joan</creatorcontrib><title>The RFP-Request for Punishment: or A Tool for Selecting an Automated Library System</title><title>Library hi tech</title><description>A request for proposals (RFP) may be required by purchasing laws and regulations of a local jurisdiction. A library may choose to use the RFP to determine the capabilities and limitations of a number of possible systems. However, the RFP can be badly conceived, constructed, and applied, resulting in few responses by vendors and disappointment, lost time, and wasted resources for the library. Advice is presented on when to use the RFP, how to construct it, and how to use it to achieve maximum success: selection and implementation of the product that best meets a library's specific needs.</description><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Information and communication sciences</subject><subject>Information science. Documentation</subject><subject>Information service management</subject><subject>Library and documentation centre management</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>Sciences and techniques of general use</subject><issn>0737-8831</issn><issn>2054-166X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpt0MtKAzEUBuAgCtYq-AgBRd2M5p4Zd6VYFQqWtoK7Ic2c2JG51GRm0bd37G2jq0M4H38OP0KXlNxTSuIHWBChlRZHqMeIFBFV6uMY9YjmOopjTk_RWQhfhBDJNOuh2XwJeDqaRFP4biE02NUeT9oqD8sSquYRd88Bntd1sdnMoADb5NUnNhUetE1dmgYyPM4X3vg1nq1DA-U5OnGmCHCxm330PnqaD1-i8dvz63AwjixTpIl4nAjupGCWCpfYhDmwTiecyowwsbCZ5DLLFpomkjqmjOMqZlICKA6GE8n76Gabu_L15vi0zIOFojAV1G1IpaaKEcU7eLeF1tcheHDpyudld3BKSfrbWrpvraPXu0wTrCmcN5XNw8FrIeKut45dbRmU4E2RHcA-KF1lrlO3_6s_3_4AfvWDQg</recordid><startdate>19870101</startdate><enddate>19870101</enddate><creator>Matthews, Joseph R.</creator><creator>Salmon, Stephen R.</creator><creator>Frye Williams, Joan</creator><general>MCB UP Ltd</general><general>Emerald</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19870101</creationdate><title>The RFP-Request for Punishment: or A Tool for Selecting an Automated Library System</title><author>Matthews, Joseph R. ; Salmon, Stephen R. ; Frye Williams, Joan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-38943f542c14f9c92fecf79315d024bcd535ddb71951f26af368255ee63ea3053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Information and communication sciences</topic><topic>Information science. Documentation</topic><topic>Information service management</topic><topic>Library and documentation centre management</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>Sciences and techniques of general use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Joseph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmon, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frye Williams, Joan</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Library hi tech</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matthews, Joseph R.</au><au>Salmon, Stephen R.</au><au>Frye Williams, Joan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The RFP-Request for Punishment: or A Tool for Selecting an Automated Library System</atitle><jtitle>Library hi tech</jtitle><date>1987-01-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>15-21</pages><issn>0737-8831</issn><eissn>2054-166X</eissn><coden>LIHTD2</coden><abstract>A request for proposals (RFP) may be required by purchasing laws and regulations of a local jurisdiction. A library may choose to use the RFP to determine the capabilities and limitations of a number of possible systems. However, the RFP can be badly conceived, constructed, and applied, resulting in few responses by vendors and disappointment, lost time, and wasted resources for the library. Advice is presented on when to use the RFP, how to construct it, and how to use it to achieve maximum success: selection and implementation of the product that best meets a library's specific needs.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>MCB UP Ltd</pub><doi>10.1108/eb047674</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0737-8831 |
| ispartof | Library hi tech, 1987-01, Vol.5 (1), p.15-21 |
| issn | 0737-8831 2054-166X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_7448272 |
| source | Emerald A-Z Current Journals |
| subjects | Computers Data processing Exact sciences and technology General aspects Information and communication sciences Information science. Documentation Information service management Library and documentation centre management Purchasing Sciences and techniques of general use |
| title | The RFP-Request for Punishment: or A Tool for Selecting an Automated Library System |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A35%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20RFP-Request%20for%20Punishment:%20or%20A%20Tool%20for%20Selecting%20an%20Automated%20Library%20System&rft.jtitle=Library%20hi%20tech&rft.au=Matthews,%20Joseph%20R.&rft.date=1987-01-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=15-21&rft.issn=0737-8831&rft.eissn=2054-166X&rft.coden=LIHTD2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/eb047674&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E57162063%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57162063&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |