Aleurones from a barley with low alpha-amylase activity become highly responsive to gibberellin when detached from the starchy endosperm

The physiological and molecular bases for contrasting alpha-amylase phenotypes were examined in germinating seeds of two barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars, Morex and Steptoe. Morex is a high-quality malting barley that develops high alpha-amylase activity soon after germination. Steptoe is a fee...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant physiology (Bethesda) 1993-05, Vol.102 (1), p.195-203
1. Verfasser: Skadsen, R.W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The physiological and molecular bases for contrasting alpha-amylase phenotypes were examined in germinating seeds of two barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars, Morex and Steptoe. Morex is a high-quality malting barley that develops high alpha-amylase activity soon after germination. Steptoe is a feed barley that develops only low alpha-amylase activity levels during this period. The expression of all high- and low-isoelectric point (pI) alpha-amylase isozymes is reduced in Steptoe. The amount of alpha-amylase mRNA per gram of seedling tissue is correspondingly lower in Steptoe. Southern blot analysis revealed that the cultivars have the same copy number and organization for most high- and low-pI genes. Steptoe seedlings or embryoless half-seeds produce little alpha-amylase in response to exogenous applications of gibberellic acid (GA3) compared with Morex. However, when isolated aleurones of both cultivars are treated with GA3, they produce similar amounts of high- and low-pI alpha-amylase RNAs. This suggests that a factor in the starchy endosperm is responsible for lowered alpha-amylase response in Steptoe. The factor is probably not abscisic acid (ABA), since the two cultivars have similar concentrations of ABA during germination
ISSN:0032-0889
1532-2548
DOI:10.1104/pp.102.1.195