A fracture mechanics study of natural rubber-to-metal bond failure
An exploratory experimental study has been made of those bond strength test methods that are amenable to a fracture mechanics interpretation: peel, rod pull-out, and simple shear. Equations for calculating fracture energies from these test pieces are given. For strong bonds, the calculated fracture...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of adhesion science and technology 1996-01, Vol.10 (7), p.593-616 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 616 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 593 |
| container_title | Journal of adhesion science and technology |
| container_volume | 10 |
| creator | Muhr, A.H. Thomas, A.G. Varkey, J.K. |
| description | An exploratory experimental study has been made of those bond strength test methods that are amenable to a fracture mechanics interpretation: peel, rod pull-out, and simple shear. Equations for calculating fracture energies from these test pieces are given. For strong bonds, the calculated
fracture energies are not independent of the test geometry. This is attributed to different morphologies of the failure surfaces: the sharper the effective crack tip, the lower the fracture energy. Fracture surfaces observed for peel at low angles (near-bond failure) and for simple shear (failure
at the bond or in the rubber leaving smooth fracture surfaces along a straight trajectory) are taken to correspond to sharp crack tips, in contrast to the rough fracture surfaces formed in the rubber for the other test geometries. Application of fracture mechanics to the simple shear test
piece is complicated by the need ideally to use the retraction energy in the calculations, and by the observation that failure did not initiate from artificially introduced cuts placed where intuition suggests initiation should occur. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1163/156856196X00661 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_3143289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>26119124</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-f272191193cbe3f2d9f78dc8de79cb4197f3e57c8f939650ed8c94b67b18715d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMouK6evfYg3upmmjZpvK3iFyx4UfAW0nxgJW3WJEX2vzfLrh4ET8PMvN8b5iF0DvgKgJIFNLRtKHD6hjGlcIBm20mZR_QQzTBQXtZVTY7RSYwfGAOhGGboZlnYIFWagikGo97l2KtYxDTpTeFtMcq8ka4IU9eZUCZfDiblvvOjLqzsXeZO0ZGVLpqzfZ2j1_u7l9vHcvX88HS7XJWKNDiVtmIVcABOVGeIrTS3rNWq1YZx1dXAmSWmYaq1nHDaYKNbxeuOsg5aBo0mc3S5810H_zmZmMTQR2Wck6PxUxQVzeaQX5yjxU6ogo8xGCvWoR9k2AjAYpuV-JNVJi721jIq6XIio-rjL0agJlXLs-x6J-tH68Mgv3xwWiS5cT78MOS_G98CY3q3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>26119124</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A fracture mechanics study of natural rubber-to-metal bond failure</title><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Muhr, A.H. ; Thomas, A.G. ; Varkey, J.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Muhr, A.H. ; Thomas, A.G. ; Varkey, J.K.</creatorcontrib><description>An exploratory experimental study has been made of those bond strength test methods that are amenable to a fracture mechanics interpretation: peel, rod pull-out, and simple shear. Equations for calculating fracture energies from these test pieces are given. For strong bonds, the calculated
fracture energies are not independent of the test geometry. This is attributed to different morphologies of the failure surfaces: the sharper the effective crack tip, the lower the fracture energy. Fracture surfaces observed for peel at low angles (near-bond failure) and for simple shear (failure
at the bond or in the rubber leaving smooth fracture surfaces along a straight trajectory) are taken to correspond to sharp crack tips, in contrast to the rough fracture surfaces formed in the rubber for the other test geometries. Application of fracture mechanics to the simple shear test
piece is complicated by the need ideally to use the retraction energy in the calculations, and by the observation that failure did not initiate from artificially introduced cuts placed where intuition suggests initiation should occur.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-4243</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-5616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/156856196X00661</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JATEE8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leiden: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Application fields ; Applied sciences ; cavitation ; crack morphology ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fracture energy ; peel angle ; Polymer industry, paints, wood ; rod pull-out ; shear ; Technology of polymers ; trouser tear</subject><ispartof>Journal of adhesion science and technology, 1996-01, Vol.10 (7), p.593-616</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1996</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-f272191193cbe3f2d9f78dc8de79cb4197f3e57c8f939650ed8c94b67b18715d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-f272191193cbe3f2d9f78dc8de79cb4197f3e57c8f939650ed8c94b67b18715d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1163/156856196X00661$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1163/156856196X00661$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3143289$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muhr, A.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, A.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varkey, J.K.</creatorcontrib><title>A fracture mechanics study of natural rubber-to-metal bond failure</title><title>Journal of adhesion science and technology</title><description>An exploratory experimental study has been made of those bond strength test methods that are amenable to a fracture mechanics interpretation: peel, rod pull-out, and simple shear. Equations for calculating fracture energies from these test pieces are given. For strong bonds, the calculated
fracture energies are not independent of the test geometry. This is attributed to different morphologies of the failure surfaces: the sharper the effective crack tip, the lower the fracture energy. Fracture surfaces observed for peel at low angles (near-bond failure) and for simple shear (failure
at the bond or in the rubber leaving smooth fracture surfaces along a straight trajectory) are taken to correspond to sharp crack tips, in contrast to the rough fracture surfaces formed in the rubber for the other test geometries. Application of fracture mechanics to the simple shear test
piece is complicated by the need ideally to use the retraction energy in the calculations, and by the observation that failure did not initiate from artificially introduced cuts placed where intuition suggests initiation should occur.</description><subject>Application fields</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>cavitation</subject><subject>crack morphology</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fracture energy</subject><subject>peel angle</subject><subject>Polymer industry, paints, wood</subject><subject>rod pull-out</subject><subject>shear</subject><subject>Technology of polymers</subject><subject>trouser tear</subject><issn>0169-4243</issn><issn>1568-5616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMouK6evfYg3upmmjZpvK3iFyx4UfAW0nxgJW3WJEX2vzfLrh4ET8PMvN8b5iF0DvgKgJIFNLRtKHD6hjGlcIBm20mZR_QQzTBQXtZVTY7RSYwfGAOhGGboZlnYIFWagikGo97l2KtYxDTpTeFtMcq8ka4IU9eZUCZfDiblvvOjLqzsXeZO0ZGVLpqzfZ2j1_u7l9vHcvX88HS7XJWKNDiVtmIVcABOVGeIrTS3rNWq1YZx1dXAmSWmYaq1nHDaYKNbxeuOsg5aBo0mc3S5810H_zmZmMTQR2Wck6PxUxQVzeaQX5yjxU6ogo8xGCvWoR9k2AjAYpuV-JNVJi721jIq6XIio-rjL0agJlXLs-x6J-tH68Mgv3xwWiS5cT78MOS_G98CY3q3</recordid><startdate>19960101</startdate><enddate>19960101</enddate><creator>Muhr, A.H.</creator><creator>Thomas, A.G.</creator><creator>Varkey, J.K.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Brill</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960101</creationdate><title>A fracture mechanics study of natural rubber-to-metal bond failure</title><author>Muhr, A.H. ; Thomas, A.G. ; Varkey, J.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-f272191193cbe3f2d9f78dc8de79cb4197f3e57c8f939650ed8c94b67b18715d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Application fields</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>cavitation</topic><topic>crack morphology</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fracture energy</topic><topic>peel angle</topic><topic>Polymer industry, paints, wood</topic><topic>rod pull-out</topic><topic>shear</topic><topic>Technology of polymers</topic><topic>trouser tear</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muhr, A.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, A.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varkey, J.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of adhesion science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muhr, A.H.</au><au>Thomas, A.G.</au><au>Varkey, J.K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A fracture mechanics study of natural rubber-to-metal bond failure</atitle><jtitle>Journal of adhesion science and technology</jtitle><date>1996-01-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>593</spage><epage>616</epage><pages>593-616</pages><issn>0169-4243</issn><eissn>1568-5616</eissn><coden>JATEE8</coden><abstract>An exploratory experimental study has been made of those bond strength test methods that are amenable to a fracture mechanics interpretation: peel, rod pull-out, and simple shear. Equations for calculating fracture energies from these test pieces are given. For strong bonds, the calculated
fracture energies are not independent of the test geometry. This is attributed to different morphologies of the failure surfaces: the sharper the effective crack tip, the lower the fracture energy. Fracture surfaces observed for peel at low angles (near-bond failure) and for simple shear (failure
at the bond or in the rubber leaving smooth fracture surfaces along a straight trajectory) are taken to correspond to sharp crack tips, in contrast to the rough fracture surfaces formed in the rubber for the other test geometries. Application of fracture mechanics to the simple shear test
piece is complicated by the need ideally to use the retraction energy in the calculations, and by the observation that failure did not initiate from artificially introduced cuts placed where intuition suggests initiation should occur.</abstract><cop>Leiden</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1163/156856196X00661</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0169-4243 |
| ispartof | Journal of adhesion science and technology, 1996-01, Vol.10 (7), p.593-616 |
| issn | 0169-4243 1568-5616 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_3143289 |
| source | Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
| subjects | Application fields Applied sciences cavitation crack morphology Exact sciences and technology Fracture energy peel angle Polymer industry, paints, wood rod pull-out shear Technology of polymers trouser tear |
| title | A fracture mechanics study of natural rubber-to-metal bond failure |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T17%3A36%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20fracture%20mechanics%20study%20of%20natural%20rubber-to-metal%20bond%20failure&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20adhesion%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Muhr,%20A.H.&rft.date=1996-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=593&rft.epage=616&rft.pages=593-616&rft.issn=0169-4243&rft.eissn=1568-5616&rft.coden=JATEE8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/156856196X00661&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E26119124%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=26119124&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |