Extractive Batch Fermentation with CO2 Stripping for Ethanol Production in a Bubble Column Bioreactor: Experimental and Modeling

In alcoholic fermentation processes, ethanol is the main component that is toxic to yeast because it acts as a noncompetitive inhibitor of metabolism. One way of overcoming the inhibition effect on yeast is to extract the ethanol from the broth during the fermentation. The present work evaluates eth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy & fuels 2014-12, Vol.28 (12), p.7552-7559
Hauptverfasser: Sonego, Jorge L. S, Lemos, Diego A, Rodriguez, Guilherme Y, Cruz, Antonio J. G, Badino, Alberto C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7559
container_issue 12
container_start_page 7552
container_title Energy & fuels
container_volume 28
creator Sonego, Jorge L. S
Lemos, Diego A
Rodriguez, Guilherme Y
Cruz, Antonio J. G
Badino, Alberto C
description In alcoholic fermentation processes, ethanol is the main component that is toxic to yeast because it acts as a noncompetitive inhibitor of metabolism. One way of overcoming the inhibition effect on yeast is to extract the ethanol from the broth during the fermentation. The present work evaluates ethanol production by extractive batch fermentation using CO2 as a stripping gas. Investigation was first made of the influence of specific CO2 flow rate (ϕ) and solution temperature on ethanol stripping. The best results, in terms of ethanol removal, were obtained at 2.0 vvm and 34.0 °C. Modeling of conventional and extractive ethanol fermentation was then performed considering cell growth, substrate consumption, ethanol production, and the entrainment of ethanol and water using first-order equations. The hybrid Andrews–Levenspiel model was able to describe the kinetics of the conventional fermentation process, and a model proposed here could accurately predict the behavior of the extractive fermentation. In all the extractive fermentations, there was faster substrate uptake and earlier substrate exhaustion, compared to the conventional fermentation. Extractive fermentation, with stripping initiated after 3 h at an ethanol concentration of 43.3 g·L–1, resulted in an ethanol productivity (in g·L–1·h–1) that was around 25% higher, and finished about 2 h earlier, compared to the control fermentation.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/ef5018797
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>acs_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_29094130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>e89864888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a322t-eaaf78960a5a9fd340aa0054a4af067b0c15b009e86127ac949f02ebd998575d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkLFOwzAURS0EEqUw8AdeGAPPTpzEbDRqAamoSMAcvSQ2dZXakeNA2fh0QkEw3eXo6OgScs7gkgFnV0oLYHkmswMyYYJDJIDLQzKBPM8iSHlyTE76fgMAaZyLCfmc74LHOpg3RWcY6jVdKL9VNmAwztJ3E9a0WHH6FLzpOmNfqXaezsMarWvpo3fNUO9JYynS2VBVraKFa4etpTPjvBrdzl_T-a5T3uzFLUXb0AfXqHb0nZIjjW2vzn53Sl4W8-fiLlqubu-Lm2WEMechUog6y2UKKFDqJk4AEUAkmKCGNKugZqICkCpPGc-wlonUwFXVSJmLTDTxlFz8eDvsa2y1R1ubvuzGKPQfJZcgExbDP4d1X27c4O1YVTIov-8t_-6NvwAkoW2T</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extractive Batch Fermentation with CO2 Stripping for Ethanol Production in a Bubble Column Bioreactor: Experimental and Modeling</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Sonego, Jorge L. S ; Lemos, Diego A ; Rodriguez, Guilherme Y ; Cruz, Antonio J. G ; Badino, Alberto C</creator><creatorcontrib>Sonego, Jorge L. S ; Lemos, Diego A ; Rodriguez, Guilherme Y ; Cruz, Antonio J. G ; Badino, Alberto C</creatorcontrib><description>In alcoholic fermentation processes, ethanol is the main component that is toxic to yeast because it acts as a noncompetitive inhibitor of metabolism. One way of overcoming the inhibition effect on yeast is to extract the ethanol from the broth during the fermentation. The present work evaluates ethanol production by extractive batch fermentation using CO2 as a stripping gas. Investigation was first made of the influence of specific CO2 flow rate (ϕ) and solution temperature on ethanol stripping. The best results, in terms of ethanol removal, were obtained at 2.0 vvm and 34.0 °C. Modeling of conventional and extractive ethanol fermentation was then performed considering cell growth, substrate consumption, ethanol production, and the entrainment of ethanol and water using first-order equations. The hybrid Andrews–Levenspiel model was able to describe the kinetics of the conventional fermentation process, and a model proposed here could accurately predict the behavior of the extractive fermentation. In all the extractive fermentations, there was faster substrate uptake and earlier substrate exhaustion, compared to the conventional fermentation. Extractive fermentation, with stripping initiated after 3 h at an ethanol concentration of 43.3 g·L–1, resulted in an ethanol productivity (in g·L–1·h–1) that was around 25% higher, and finished about 2 h earlier, compared to the control fermentation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-0624</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ef5018797</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENFUEM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Energy ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fuels</subject><ispartof>Energy &amp; fuels, 2014-12, Vol.28 (12), p.7552-7559</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ef5018797$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ef5018797$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=29094130$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sonego, Jorge L. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemos, Diego A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Guilherme Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz, Antonio J. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badino, Alberto C</creatorcontrib><title>Extractive Batch Fermentation with CO2 Stripping for Ethanol Production in a Bubble Column Bioreactor: Experimental and Modeling</title><title>Energy &amp; fuels</title><addtitle>Energy Fuels</addtitle><description>In alcoholic fermentation processes, ethanol is the main component that is toxic to yeast because it acts as a noncompetitive inhibitor of metabolism. One way of overcoming the inhibition effect on yeast is to extract the ethanol from the broth during the fermentation. The present work evaluates ethanol production by extractive batch fermentation using CO2 as a stripping gas. Investigation was first made of the influence of specific CO2 flow rate (ϕ) and solution temperature on ethanol stripping. The best results, in terms of ethanol removal, were obtained at 2.0 vvm and 34.0 °C. Modeling of conventional and extractive ethanol fermentation was then performed considering cell growth, substrate consumption, ethanol production, and the entrainment of ethanol and water using first-order equations. The hybrid Andrews–Levenspiel model was able to describe the kinetics of the conventional fermentation process, and a model proposed here could accurately predict the behavior of the extractive fermentation. In all the extractive fermentations, there was faster substrate uptake and earlier substrate exhaustion, compared to the conventional fermentation. Extractive fermentation, with stripping initiated after 3 h at an ethanol concentration of 43.3 g·L–1, resulted in an ethanol productivity (in g·L–1·h–1) that was around 25% higher, and finished about 2 h earlier, compared to the control fermentation.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><issn>0887-0624</issn><issn>1520-5029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkLFOwzAURS0EEqUw8AdeGAPPTpzEbDRqAamoSMAcvSQ2dZXakeNA2fh0QkEw3eXo6OgScs7gkgFnV0oLYHkmswMyYYJDJIDLQzKBPM8iSHlyTE76fgMAaZyLCfmc74LHOpg3RWcY6jVdKL9VNmAwztJ3E9a0WHH6FLzpOmNfqXaezsMarWvpo3fNUO9JYynS2VBVraKFa4etpTPjvBrdzl_T-a5T3uzFLUXb0AfXqHb0nZIjjW2vzn53Sl4W8-fiLlqubu-Lm2WEMechUog6y2UKKFDqJk4AEUAkmKCGNKugZqICkCpPGc-wlonUwFXVSJmLTDTxlFz8eDvsa2y1R1ubvuzGKPQfJZcgExbDP4d1X27c4O1YVTIov-8t_-6NvwAkoW2T</recordid><startdate>20141218</startdate><enddate>20141218</enddate><creator>Sonego, Jorge L. S</creator><creator>Lemos, Diego A</creator><creator>Rodriguez, Guilherme Y</creator><creator>Cruz, Antonio J. G</creator><creator>Badino, Alberto C</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141218</creationdate><title>Extractive Batch Fermentation with CO2 Stripping for Ethanol Production in a Bubble Column Bioreactor: Experimental and Modeling</title><author>Sonego, Jorge L. S ; Lemos, Diego A ; Rodriguez, Guilherme Y ; Cruz, Antonio J. G ; Badino, Alberto C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a322t-eaaf78960a5a9fd340aa0054a4af067b0c15b009e86127ac949f02ebd998575d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sonego, Jorge L. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemos, Diego A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Guilherme Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz, Antonio J. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badino, Alberto C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><jtitle>Energy &amp; fuels</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sonego, Jorge L. S</au><au>Lemos, Diego A</au><au>Rodriguez, Guilherme Y</au><au>Cruz, Antonio J. G</au><au>Badino, Alberto C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extractive Batch Fermentation with CO2 Stripping for Ethanol Production in a Bubble Column Bioreactor: Experimental and Modeling</atitle><jtitle>Energy &amp; fuels</jtitle><addtitle>Energy Fuels</addtitle><date>2014-12-18</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>7552</spage><epage>7559</epage><pages>7552-7559</pages><issn>0887-0624</issn><eissn>1520-5029</eissn><coden>ENFUEM</coden><abstract>In alcoholic fermentation processes, ethanol is the main component that is toxic to yeast because it acts as a noncompetitive inhibitor of metabolism. One way of overcoming the inhibition effect on yeast is to extract the ethanol from the broth during the fermentation. The present work evaluates ethanol production by extractive batch fermentation using CO2 as a stripping gas. Investigation was first made of the influence of specific CO2 flow rate (ϕ) and solution temperature on ethanol stripping. The best results, in terms of ethanol removal, were obtained at 2.0 vvm and 34.0 °C. Modeling of conventional and extractive ethanol fermentation was then performed considering cell growth, substrate consumption, ethanol production, and the entrainment of ethanol and water using first-order equations. The hybrid Andrews–Levenspiel model was able to describe the kinetics of the conventional fermentation process, and a model proposed here could accurately predict the behavior of the extractive fermentation. In all the extractive fermentations, there was faster substrate uptake and earlier substrate exhaustion, compared to the conventional fermentation. Extractive fermentation, with stripping initiated after 3 h at an ethanol concentration of 43.3 g·L–1, resulted in an ethanol productivity (in g·L–1·h–1) that was around 25% higher, and finished about 2 h earlier, compared to the control fermentation.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/ef5018797</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-0624
ispartof Energy & fuels, 2014-12, Vol.28 (12), p.7552-7559
issn 0887-0624
1520-5029
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_29094130
source ACS Publications
subjects Applied sciences
Energy
Energy. Thermal use of fuels
Exact sciences and technology
Fuels
title Extractive Batch Fermentation with CO2 Stripping for Ethanol Production in a Bubble Column Bioreactor: Experimental and Modeling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T06%3A26%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acs_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extractive%20Batch%20Fermentation%20with%20CO2%20Stripping%20for%20Ethanol%20Production%20in%20a%20Bubble%20Column%20Bioreactor:%20Experimental%20and%20Modeling&rft.jtitle=Energy%20&%20fuels&rft.au=Sonego,%20Jorge%20L.%20S&rft.date=2014-12-18&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=7552&rft.epage=7559&rft.pages=7552-7559&rft.issn=0887-0624&rft.eissn=1520-5029&rft.coden=ENFUEM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ef5018797&rft_dat=%3Cacs_pasca%3Ee89864888%3C/acs_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true