Low adherence to secondary prophylaxis among clients diagnosed with rheumatic fever, Jamaica

Objectives: To determine the level of adherence and possible barriers to secondary prophylaxis among clients with rheumatic fever in Kingston, Jamaica. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of 39 clients diagnosed with rheumatic fever, receiving penicillin prophylaxis for more than a year using a 22-item...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pathogens and global health 2014-07, Vol.108 (5), p.229-234
Hauptverfasser: Thompson, Sheron Boswell, Brown, Cerese Hepburn, Edwards, Ann Marie, Lindo, Jascinth L. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 234
container_issue 5
container_start_page 229
container_title Pathogens and global health
container_volume 108
creator Thompson, Sheron Boswell
Brown, Cerese Hepburn
Edwards, Ann Marie
Lindo, Jascinth L. M.
description Objectives: To determine the level of adherence and possible barriers to secondary prophylaxis among clients with rheumatic fever in Kingston, Jamaica. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of 39 clients diagnosed with rheumatic fever, receiving penicillin prophylaxis for more than a year using a 22-item self-administered questionnaire on adherence to secondary prophylaxis and knowledge of rheumatic fever. The patients' records were reviewed to determine the number of prophylaxis injections the patients received for the year 2010. Results: The majority of participants (74%) were females and 51% were adults. Only 48·7% had a high level of adherence. The majority (72%) had low knowledge levels regarding their illness, while only 5% had a high knowledge level score. Most clients (70%) strongly agreed that nurses and doctors encouraged them to take their prophylaxis. However, over 60% reported that they travelled long distances and or waited long periods to get their injections. One-third reported that they missed appointments because of fear of injections and having to take time off from work or school. Discussion: Clients attending the health centers studied had limited knowledge about rheumatic fever. Barriers to adherence included fear of the injections, long commutes, and long waiting periods at the facilities studied.
doi_str_mv 10.1179/2047773214Y.0000000146
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_28752699</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1559010500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-914a708775b0cd24338790f3d6ede1e883fcd77a168b621ee143d6c55b6628923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhi0EolXoX6h8QeJAij_WH3tBqipoQZG4wAEJyZrYs4nR7jrYm4b8e3aVNC2n-mBbep-ZeUcvIZecXXFu6g-CVcYYKXj184odDq_0C3I-CfNJeXn6i-qMXJTye4K04kaI1-RMKM6lsuqc_FqkHYWwxoy9RzokWtCnPkDe001Om_W-hb-xUOhSv6K-jdgPhYYIqz4VDHQXhzXNa9x2MERPG7zH_J5-hQ6ihzfkVQNtwYvjOyM_Pn_6fnM3X3y7_XJzvZh7JdUwr3kFhllj1JL5ICopralZI4PGgBytlY0PxgDXdqkFR-TVqHmllloLWws5Ix8PfTfbZYfBjx4ztG6TYzfu4RJE97_Sx7VbpXtXcSXtOHBG3h0b5PRni2VwXSwe2xZ6TNviuNLaSj1dz6OqZpwpxkZUH1CfUykZm5MjztwUpHsSpHsMciy8fLrPqewhthF4ewSgeGibDL2P5ZGzRgld1yN3feBi36TcwS7lNrgB9m3KD0XyGTP_ANwkul8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1559010500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Low adherence to secondary prophylaxis among clients diagnosed with rheumatic fever, Jamaica</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Thompson, Sheron Boswell ; Brown, Cerese Hepburn ; Edwards, Ann Marie ; Lindo, Jascinth L. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Sheron Boswell ; Brown, Cerese Hepburn ; Edwards, Ann Marie ; Lindo, Jascinth L. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To determine the level of adherence and possible barriers to secondary prophylaxis among clients with rheumatic fever in Kingston, Jamaica. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of 39 clients diagnosed with rheumatic fever, receiving penicillin prophylaxis for more than a year using a 22-item self-administered questionnaire on adherence to secondary prophylaxis and knowledge of rheumatic fever. The patients' records were reviewed to determine the number of prophylaxis injections the patients received for the year 2010. Results: The majority of participants (74%) were females and 51% were adults. Only 48·7% had a high level of adherence. The majority (72%) had low knowledge levels regarding their illness, while only 5% had a high knowledge level score. Most clients (70%) strongly agreed that nurses and doctors encouraged them to take their prophylaxis. However, over 60% reported that they travelled long distances and or waited long periods to get their injections. One-third reported that they missed appointments because of fear of injections and having to take time off from work or school. Discussion: Clients attending the health centers studied had limited knowledge about rheumatic fever. Barriers to adherence included fear of the injections, long commutes, and long waiting periods at the facilities studied.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2047-7724</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-7732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1179/2047773214Y.0000000146</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25113585</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Adherence ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis - psychology ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Bacterial arthritis and osteitis ; Bacterial diseases ; Barriers ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; General aspects ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Jamaica ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medication Adherence - psychology ; Medication Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Original ; Penicillins - therapeutic use ; Rheumatic fever ; Rheumatic Fever - prevention &amp; control ; Rheumatic Fever - psychology ; Secondary Prevention - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Secondary Prophylaxis ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Pathogens and global health, 2014-07, Vol.108 (5), p.229-234</ispartof><rights>W. S. Maney &amp; Son Ltd 2014 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-914a708775b0cd24338790f3d6ede1e883fcd77a168b621ee143d6c55b6628923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-914a708775b0cd24338790f3d6ede1e883fcd77a168b621ee143d6c55b6628923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4153824/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4153824/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28752699$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25113585$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Sheron Boswell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Cerese Hepburn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Ann Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindo, Jascinth L. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Low adherence to secondary prophylaxis among clients diagnosed with rheumatic fever, Jamaica</title><title>Pathogens and global health</title><addtitle>Pathog Glob Health</addtitle><description>Objectives: To determine the level of adherence and possible barriers to secondary prophylaxis among clients with rheumatic fever in Kingston, Jamaica. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of 39 clients diagnosed with rheumatic fever, receiving penicillin prophylaxis for more than a year using a 22-item self-administered questionnaire on adherence to secondary prophylaxis and knowledge of rheumatic fever. The patients' records were reviewed to determine the number of prophylaxis injections the patients received for the year 2010. Results: The majority of participants (74%) were females and 51% were adults. Only 48·7% had a high level of adherence. The majority (72%) had low knowledge levels regarding their illness, while only 5% had a high knowledge level score. Most clients (70%) strongly agreed that nurses and doctors encouraged them to take their prophylaxis. However, over 60% reported that they travelled long distances and or waited long periods to get their injections. One-third reported that they missed appointments because of fear of injections and having to take time off from work or school. Discussion: Clients attending the health centers studied had limited knowledge about rheumatic fever. Barriers to adherence included fear of the injections, long commutes, and long waiting periods at the facilities studied.</description><subject>Adherence</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - psychology</subject><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Bacterial arthritis and osteitis</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Jamaica</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medication Adherence - psychology</subject><subject>Medication Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Penicillins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Rheumatic fever</subject><subject>Rheumatic Fever - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Rheumatic Fever - psychology</subject><subject>Secondary Prevention - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Secondary Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2047-7724</issn><issn>2047-7732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhi0EolXoX6h8QeJAij_WH3tBqipoQZG4wAEJyZrYs4nR7jrYm4b8e3aVNC2n-mBbep-ZeUcvIZecXXFu6g-CVcYYKXj184odDq_0C3I-CfNJeXn6i-qMXJTye4K04kaI1-RMKM6lsuqc_FqkHYWwxoy9RzokWtCnPkDe001Om_W-hb-xUOhSv6K-jdgPhYYIqz4VDHQXhzXNa9x2MERPG7zH_J5-hQ6ihzfkVQNtwYvjOyM_Pn_6fnM3X3y7_XJzvZh7JdUwr3kFhllj1JL5ICopralZI4PGgBytlY0PxgDXdqkFR-TVqHmllloLWws5Ix8PfTfbZYfBjx4ztG6TYzfu4RJE97_Sx7VbpXtXcSXtOHBG3h0b5PRni2VwXSwe2xZ6TNviuNLaSj1dz6OqZpwpxkZUH1CfUykZm5MjztwUpHsSpHsMciy8fLrPqewhthF4ewSgeGibDL2P5ZGzRgld1yN3feBi36TcwS7lNrgB9m3KD0XyGTP_ANwkul8</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Thompson, Sheron Boswell</creator><creator>Brown, Cerese Hepburn</creator><creator>Edwards, Ann Marie</creator><creator>Lindo, Jascinth L. M.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Maney</general><general>Maney Publishing</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Low adherence to secondary prophylaxis among clients diagnosed with rheumatic fever, Jamaica</title><author>Thompson, Sheron Boswell ; Brown, Cerese Hepburn ; Edwards, Ann Marie ; Lindo, Jascinth L. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-914a708775b0cd24338790f3d6ede1e883fcd77a168b621ee143d6c55b6628923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adherence</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - psychology</topic><topic>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Bacterial arthritis and osteitis</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Jamaica</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medication Adherence - psychology</topic><topic>Medication Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Penicillins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Rheumatic fever</topic><topic>Rheumatic Fever - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Rheumatic Fever - psychology</topic><topic>Secondary Prevention - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Secondary Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Sheron Boswell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Cerese Hepburn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Ann Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindo, Jascinth L. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Pathogens and global health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thompson, Sheron Boswell</au><au>Brown, Cerese Hepburn</au><au>Edwards, Ann Marie</au><au>Lindo, Jascinth L. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Low adherence to secondary prophylaxis among clients diagnosed with rheumatic fever, Jamaica</atitle><jtitle>Pathogens and global health</jtitle><addtitle>Pathog Glob Health</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>234</epage><pages>229-234</pages><issn>2047-7724</issn><eissn>2047-7732</eissn><abstract>Objectives: To determine the level of adherence and possible barriers to secondary prophylaxis among clients with rheumatic fever in Kingston, Jamaica. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of 39 clients diagnosed with rheumatic fever, receiving penicillin prophylaxis for more than a year using a 22-item self-administered questionnaire on adherence to secondary prophylaxis and knowledge of rheumatic fever. The patients' records were reviewed to determine the number of prophylaxis injections the patients received for the year 2010. Results: The majority of participants (74%) were females and 51% were adults. Only 48·7% had a high level of adherence. The majority (72%) had low knowledge levels regarding their illness, while only 5% had a high knowledge level score. Most clients (70%) strongly agreed that nurses and doctors encouraged them to take their prophylaxis. However, over 60% reported that they travelled long distances and or waited long periods to get their injections. One-third reported that they missed appointments because of fear of injections and having to take time off from work or school. Discussion: Clients attending the health centers studied had limited knowledge about rheumatic fever. Barriers to adherence included fear of the injections, long commutes, and long waiting periods at the facilities studied.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>25113585</pmid><doi>10.1179/2047773214Y.0000000146</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2047-7724
ispartof Pathogens and global health, 2014-07, Vol.108 (5), p.229-234
issn 2047-7724
2047-7732
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_28752699
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central
subjects Adherence
Adolescent
Adult
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Antibiotic Prophylaxis - psychology
Antibiotic Prophylaxis - statistics & numerical data
Bacterial arthritis and osteitis
Bacterial diseases
Barriers
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
General aspects
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Human bacterial diseases
Humans
Infectious diseases
Jamaica
Male
Medical sciences
Medication Adherence - psychology
Medication Adherence - statistics & numerical data
Original
Penicillins - therapeutic use
Rheumatic fever
Rheumatic Fever - prevention & control
Rheumatic Fever - psychology
Secondary Prevention - statistics & numerical data
Secondary Prophylaxis
Young Adult
title Low adherence to secondary prophylaxis among clients diagnosed with rheumatic fever, Jamaica
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T10%3A02%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Low%20adherence%20to%20secondary%20prophylaxis%20among%20clients%20diagnosed%20with%20rheumatic%20fever,%20Jamaica&rft.jtitle=Pathogens%20and%20global%20health&rft.au=Thompson,%20Sheron%20Boswell&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=234&rft.pages=229-234&rft.issn=2047-7724&rft.eissn=2047-7732&rft_id=info:doi/10.1179/2047773214Y.0000000146&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E1559010500%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1559010500&rft_id=info:pmid/25113585&rfr_iscdi=true