Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR): An Item Response Theory Analysis

The Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR) include 3 scales for anxious, ambivalent attachment (excessive dependency, interpersonal ambivalence, and compulsive care-giving), 3 for avoidant attachment (rigid self-control, defensive separation, and emotional detachment), and 1 for secure attachment. The scale...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of personality assessment 2014-07, Vol.96 (4), p.417-425
Hauptverfasser: Pilkonis, Paul A., Kim, Yookyung, Yu, Lan, Morse, Jennifer Q.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 425
container_issue 4
container_start_page 417
container_title Journal of personality assessment
container_volume 96
creator Pilkonis, Paul A.
Kim, Yookyung
Yu, Lan
Morse, Jennifer Q.
description The Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR) include 3 scales for anxious, ambivalent attachment (excessive dependency, interpersonal ambivalence, and compulsive care-giving), 3 for avoidant attachment (rigid self-control, defensive separation, and emotional detachment), and 1 for secure attachment. The scales include items (ranging from 6-16 in their original form) scored by raters using a 3-point format (0 = absent, 1 = present, and 2 = strongly present) and summed to produce a total score. Item response theory (IRT) analyses were conducted with data from 414 participants recruited from psychiatric outpatient, medical, and community settings to identify the most informative items from each scale. The IRT results allowed us to shorten the scales to 5-item versions that are more precise and easier to rate because of their brevity. In general, the effective range of measurement for the scales was 0 to +2 SDs for each of the attachment constructs; that is, from average to high levels of attachment problems. Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity of the scales was investigated by comparing them with the Experiences of Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R) scale and the Kobak Attachment Q-sort. The best consensus among self-reports on the ECR-R, informant ratings on the ECR-R, and expert judgments on the Q-sort and the AAR emerged for anxious, ambivalent attachment. Given the good psychometric characteristics of the scale for secure attachment, however, this measure alone might provide a simple alternative to more elaborate procedures for some measurement purposes. Conversion tables are provided for the 7 scales to facilitate transformation from raw scores to IRT-calibrated (theta) scores.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00223891.2013.832261
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_28664210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1550984832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-cfb80b9d9c1003bc977c52a6286a78e61e4c76961fc7dfafcd2b864b411195163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0VtrFDEUB_Agil2r30BkQIT6MGtObpP4oB2Kl0JBWOpzyGQy3SmZyZrMWPbbm3V36-VBfAokv3M4OX-EngNeApb4DcaEUKlgSTDQpaSECHiAFsApKauKk4dosSPlzpygJyndYowBGHmMTgjDlBIhF-i8bmc_FfU0Gbse3DgVKzP1400qzup69fptUY_F5eSGYuXSJozJFddrF-I23xu_TX16ih51xif37HCeoq8fP1xffC6vvny6vKivSisIn0rbNRI3qlUWMKaNVVVlOTGCSGEq6QQ4ZiuhBHS2ajvT2ZY0UrCGAYDiIOgperfvu5mbwbU2jxqN15vYDyZudTC9_vNl7Nf6JnzXVHGmBM8Nzg4NYvg2uzTpoU_WeW9GF-akgXOsJMuL_A9KGavyVDLTl3_R2zDHvJufSgoiMFNZsb2yMaQUXXc_N2C9S1Mf09S7NPU-zVz24vc_3xcd48vg1QGYZI3vohltn345KQQjgLN7v3f92IU4mLsQfasns_UhHovoP0f5AWi6uH0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1538626049</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR): An Item Response Theory Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Pilkonis, Paul A. ; Kim, Yookyung ; Yu, Lan ; Morse, Jennifer Q.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pilkonis, Paul A. ; Kim, Yookyung ; Yu, Lan ; Morse, Jennifer Q.</creatorcontrib><description>The Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR) include 3 scales for anxious, ambivalent attachment (excessive dependency, interpersonal ambivalence, and compulsive care-giving), 3 for avoidant attachment (rigid self-control, defensive separation, and emotional detachment), and 1 for secure attachment. The scales include items (ranging from 6-16 in their original form) scored by raters using a 3-point format (0 = absent, 1 = present, and 2 = strongly present) and summed to produce a total score. Item response theory (IRT) analyses were conducted with data from 414 participants recruited from psychiatric outpatient, medical, and community settings to identify the most informative items from each scale. The IRT results allowed us to shorten the scales to 5-item versions that are more precise and easier to rate because of their brevity. In general, the effective range of measurement for the scales was 0 to +2 SDs for each of the attachment constructs; that is, from average to high levels of attachment problems. Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity of the scales was investigated by comparing them with the Experiences of Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R) scale and the Kobak Attachment Q-sort. The best consensus among self-reports on the ECR-R, informant ratings on the ECR-R, and expert judgments on the Q-sort and the AAR emerged for anxious, ambivalent attachment. Given the good psychometric characteristics of the scale for secure attachment, however, this measure alone might provide a simple alternative to more elaborate procedures for some measurement purposes. Conversion tables are provided for the 7 scales to facilitate transformation from raw scores to IRT-calibrated (theta) scores.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2013.832261</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24033268</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNPABU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Routledge</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anxiety disorders ; Attachment ; Avoidance behaviour ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Item response theory ; Male ; Measurement ; Middle Aged ; Object Attachment ; Personality disorders ; Personality. Affectivity ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Psychological tests ; Psychological Theory ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics ; Ratings &amp; rankings ; Selfreport</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality assessment, 2014-07, Vol.96 (4), p.417-425</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Routledge 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-cfb80b9d9c1003bc977c52a6286a78e61e4c76961fc7dfafcd2b864b411195163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-cfb80b9d9c1003bc977c52a6286a78e61e4c76961fc7dfafcd2b864b411195163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906,30980,30981</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28664210$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24033268$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pilkonis, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yookyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morse, Jennifer Q.</creatorcontrib><title>Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR): An Item Response Theory Analysis</title><title>Journal of personality assessment</title><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><description>The Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR) include 3 scales for anxious, ambivalent attachment (excessive dependency, interpersonal ambivalence, and compulsive care-giving), 3 for avoidant attachment (rigid self-control, defensive separation, and emotional detachment), and 1 for secure attachment. The scales include items (ranging from 6-16 in their original form) scored by raters using a 3-point format (0 = absent, 1 = present, and 2 = strongly present) and summed to produce a total score. Item response theory (IRT) analyses were conducted with data from 414 participants recruited from psychiatric outpatient, medical, and community settings to identify the most informative items from each scale. The IRT results allowed us to shorten the scales to 5-item versions that are more precise and easier to rate because of their brevity. In general, the effective range of measurement for the scales was 0 to +2 SDs for each of the attachment constructs; that is, from average to high levels of attachment problems. Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity of the scales was investigated by comparing them with the Experiences of Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R) scale and the Kobak Attachment Q-sort. The best consensus among self-reports on the ECR-R, informant ratings on the ECR-R, and expert judgments on the Q-sort and the AAR emerged for anxious, ambivalent attachment. Given the good psychometric characteristics of the scale for secure attachment, however, this measure alone might provide a simple alternative to more elaborate procedures for some measurement purposes. Conversion tables are provided for the 7 scales to facilitate transformation from raw scores to IRT-calibrated (theta) scores.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anxiety disorders</subject><subject>Attachment</subject><subject>Avoidance behaviour</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Item response theory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Object Attachment</subject><subject>Personality disorders</subject><subject>Personality. Affectivity</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Ratings &amp; rankings</subject><subject>Selfreport</subject><issn>0022-3891</issn><issn>1532-7752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0VtrFDEUB_Agil2r30BkQIT6MGtObpP4oB2Kl0JBWOpzyGQy3SmZyZrMWPbbm3V36-VBfAokv3M4OX-EngNeApb4DcaEUKlgSTDQpaSECHiAFsApKauKk4dosSPlzpygJyndYowBGHmMTgjDlBIhF-i8bmc_FfU0Gbse3DgVKzP1400qzup69fptUY_F5eSGYuXSJozJFddrF-I23xu_TX16ih51xif37HCeoq8fP1xffC6vvny6vKivSisIn0rbNRI3qlUWMKaNVVVlOTGCSGEq6QQ4ZiuhBHS2ajvT2ZY0UrCGAYDiIOgperfvu5mbwbU2jxqN15vYDyZudTC9_vNl7Nf6JnzXVHGmBM8Nzg4NYvg2uzTpoU_WeW9GF-akgXOsJMuL_A9KGavyVDLTl3_R2zDHvJufSgoiMFNZsb2yMaQUXXc_N2C9S1Mf09S7NPU-zVz24vc_3xcd48vg1QGYZI3vohltn345KQQjgLN7v3f92IU4mLsQfasns_UhHovoP0f5AWi6uH0</recordid><startdate>20140704</startdate><enddate>20140704</enddate><creator>Pilkonis, Paul A.</creator><creator>Kim, Yookyung</creator><creator>Yu, Lan</creator><creator>Morse, Jennifer Q.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Routledge, Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140704</creationdate><title>Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR): An Item Response Theory Analysis</title><author>Pilkonis, Paul A. ; Kim, Yookyung ; Yu, Lan ; Morse, Jennifer Q.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-cfb80b9d9c1003bc977c52a6286a78e61e4c76961fc7dfafcd2b864b411195163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anxiety disorders</topic><topic>Attachment</topic><topic>Avoidance behaviour</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Item response theory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Object Attachment</topic><topic>Personality disorders</topic><topic>Personality. Affectivity</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Ratings &amp; rankings</topic><topic>Selfreport</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pilkonis, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yookyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morse, Jennifer Q.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pilkonis, Paul A.</au><au>Kim, Yookyung</au><au>Yu, Lan</au><au>Morse, Jennifer Q.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR): An Item Response Theory Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><date>2014-07-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>417</spage><epage>425</epage><pages>417-425</pages><issn>0022-3891</issn><eissn>1532-7752</eissn><coden>JNPABU</coden><abstract>The Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR) include 3 scales for anxious, ambivalent attachment (excessive dependency, interpersonal ambivalence, and compulsive care-giving), 3 for avoidant attachment (rigid self-control, defensive separation, and emotional detachment), and 1 for secure attachment. The scales include items (ranging from 6-16 in their original form) scored by raters using a 3-point format (0 = absent, 1 = present, and 2 = strongly present) and summed to produce a total score. Item response theory (IRT) analyses were conducted with data from 414 participants recruited from psychiatric outpatient, medical, and community settings to identify the most informative items from each scale. The IRT results allowed us to shorten the scales to 5-item versions that are more precise and easier to rate because of their brevity. In general, the effective range of measurement for the scales was 0 to +2 SDs for each of the attachment constructs; that is, from average to high levels of attachment problems. Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity of the scales was investigated by comparing them with the Experiences of Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R) scale and the Kobak Attachment Q-sort. The best consensus among self-reports on the ECR-R, informant ratings on the ECR-R, and expert judgments on the Q-sort and the AAR emerged for anxious, ambivalent attachment. Given the good psychometric characteristics of the scale for secure attachment, however, this measure alone might provide a simple alternative to more elaborate procedures for some measurement purposes. Conversion tables are provided for the 7 scales to facilitate transformation from raw scores to IRT-calibrated (theta) scores.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>24033268</pmid><doi>10.1080/00223891.2013.832261</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3891
ispartof Journal of personality assessment, 2014-07, Vol.96 (4), p.417-425
issn 0022-3891
1532-7752
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_28664210
source MEDLINE; Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Adult
Anxiety disorders
Attachment
Avoidance behaviour
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Item response theory
Male
Measurement
Middle Aged
Object Attachment
Personality disorders
Personality. Affectivity
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data
Psychological tests
Psychological Theory
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychometrics
Ratings & rankings
Selfreport
title Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR): An Item Response Theory Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T23%3A54%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adult%20Attachment%20Ratings%20(AAR):%20An%20Item%20Response%20Theory%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20assessment&rft.au=Pilkonis,%20Paul%20A.&rft.date=2014-07-04&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=417&rft.epage=425&rft.pages=417-425&rft.issn=0022-3891&rft.eissn=1532-7752&rft.coden=JNPABU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00223891.2013.832261&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E1550984832%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1538626049&rft_id=info:pmid/24033268&rfr_iscdi=true