Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR): An Item Response Theory Analysis
The Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR) include 3 scales for anxious, ambivalent attachment (excessive dependency, interpersonal ambivalence, and compulsive care-giving), 3 for avoidant attachment (rigid self-control, defensive separation, and emotional detachment), and 1 for secure attachment. The scale...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of personality assessment 2014-07, Vol.96 (4), p.417-425 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 425 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 417 |
container_title | Journal of personality assessment |
container_volume | 96 |
creator | Pilkonis, Paul A. Kim, Yookyung Yu, Lan Morse, Jennifer Q. |
description | The Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR) include 3 scales for anxious, ambivalent attachment (excessive dependency, interpersonal ambivalence, and compulsive care-giving), 3 for avoidant attachment (rigid self-control, defensive separation, and emotional detachment), and 1 for secure attachment. The scales include items (ranging from 6-16 in their original form) scored by raters using a 3-point format (0 = absent, 1 = present, and 2 = strongly present) and summed to produce a total score. Item response theory (IRT) analyses were conducted with data from 414 participants recruited from psychiatric outpatient, medical, and community settings to identify the most informative items from each scale. The IRT results allowed us to shorten the scales to 5-item versions that are more precise and easier to rate because of their brevity. In general, the effective range of measurement for the scales was 0 to +2 SDs for each of the attachment constructs; that is, from average to high levels of attachment problems. Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity of the scales was investigated by comparing them with the Experiences of Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R) scale and the Kobak Attachment Q-sort. The best consensus among self-reports on the ECR-R, informant ratings on the ECR-R, and expert judgments on the Q-sort and the AAR emerged for anxious, ambivalent attachment. Given the good psychometric characteristics of the scale for secure attachment, however, this measure alone might provide a simple alternative to more elaborate procedures for some measurement purposes. Conversion tables are provided for the 7 scales to facilitate transformation from raw scores to IRT-calibrated (theta) scores. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00223891.2013.832261 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_28664210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1550984832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-cfb80b9d9c1003bc977c52a6286a78e61e4c76961fc7dfafcd2b864b411195163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0VtrFDEUB_Agil2r30BkQIT6MGtObpP4oB2Kl0JBWOpzyGQy3SmZyZrMWPbbm3V36-VBfAokv3M4OX-EngNeApb4DcaEUKlgSTDQpaSECHiAFsApKauKk4dosSPlzpygJyndYowBGHmMTgjDlBIhF-i8bmc_FfU0Gbse3DgVKzP1400qzup69fptUY_F5eSGYuXSJozJFddrF-I23xu_TX16ih51xif37HCeoq8fP1xffC6vvny6vKivSisIn0rbNRI3qlUWMKaNVVVlOTGCSGEq6QQ4ZiuhBHS2ajvT2ZY0UrCGAYDiIOgperfvu5mbwbU2jxqN15vYDyZudTC9_vNl7Nf6JnzXVHGmBM8Nzg4NYvg2uzTpoU_WeW9GF-akgXOsJMuL_A9KGavyVDLTl3_R2zDHvJufSgoiMFNZsb2yMaQUXXc_N2C9S1Mf09S7NPU-zVz24vc_3xcd48vg1QGYZI3vohltn345KQQjgLN7v3f92IU4mLsQfasns_UhHovoP0f5AWi6uH0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1538626049</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR): An Item Response Theory Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Pilkonis, Paul A. ; Kim, Yookyung ; Yu, Lan ; Morse, Jennifer Q.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pilkonis, Paul A. ; Kim, Yookyung ; Yu, Lan ; Morse, Jennifer Q.</creatorcontrib><description>The Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR) include 3 scales for anxious, ambivalent attachment (excessive dependency, interpersonal ambivalence, and compulsive care-giving), 3 for avoidant attachment (rigid self-control, defensive separation, and emotional detachment), and 1 for secure attachment. The scales include items (ranging from 6-16 in their original form) scored by raters using a 3-point format (0 = absent, 1 = present, and 2 = strongly present) and summed to produce a total score. Item response theory (IRT) analyses were conducted with data from 414 participants recruited from psychiatric outpatient, medical, and community settings to identify the most informative items from each scale. The IRT results allowed us to shorten the scales to 5-item versions that are more precise and easier to rate because of their brevity. In general, the effective range of measurement for the scales was 0 to +2 SDs for each of the attachment constructs; that is, from average to high levels of attachment problems. Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity of the scales was investigated by comparing them with the Experiences of Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R) scale and the Kobak Attachment Q-sort. The best consensus among self-reports on the ECR-R, informant ratings on the ECR-R, and expert judgments on the Q-sort and the AAR emerged for anxious, ambivalent attachment. Given the good psychometric characteristics of the scale for secure attachment, however, this measure alone might provide a simple alternative to more elaborate procedures for some measurement purposes. Conversion tables are provided for the 7 scales to facilitate transformation from raw scores to IRT-calibrated (theta) scores.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2013.832261</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24033268</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNPABU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Routledge</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anxiety disorders ; Attachment ; Avoidance behaviour ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Item response theory ; Male ; Measurement ; Middle Aged ; Object Attachment ; Personality disorders ; Personality. Affectivity ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data ; Psychological tests ; Psychological Theory ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics ; Ratings & rankings ; Selfreport</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality assessment, 2014-07, Vol.96 (4), p.417-425</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Routledge 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-cfb80b9d9c1003bc977c52a6286a78e61e4c76961fc7dfafcd2b864b411195163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-cfb80b9d9c1003bc977c52a6286a78e61e4c76961fc7dfafcd2b864b411195163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906,30980,30981</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28664210$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24033268$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pilkonis, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yookyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morse, Jennifer Q.</creatorcontrib><title>Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR): An Item Response Theory Analysis</title><title>Journal of personality assessment</title><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><description>The Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR) include 3 scales for anxious, ambivalent attachment (excessive dependency, interpersonal ambivalence, and compulsive care-giving), 3 for avoidant attachment (rigid self-control, defensive separation, and emotional detachment), and 1 for secure attachment. The scales include items (ranging from 6-16 in their original form) scored by raters using a 3-point format (0 = absent, 1 = present, and 2 = strongly present) and summed to produce a total score. Item response theory (IRT) analyses were conducted with data from 414 participants recruited from psychiatric outpatient, medical, and community settings to identify the most informative items from each scale. The IRT results allowed us to shorten the scales to 5-item versions that are more precise and easier to rate because of their brevity. In general, the effective range of measurement for the scales was 0 to +2 SDs for each of the attachment constructs; that is, from average to high levels of attachment problems. Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity of the scales was investigated by comparing them with the Experiences of Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R) scale and the Kobak Attachment Q-sort. The best consensus among self-reports on the ECR-R, informant ratings on the ECR-R, and expert judgments on the Q-sort and the AAR emerged for anxious, ambivalent attachment. Given the good psychometric characteristics of the scale for secure attachment, however, this measure alone might provide a simple alternative to more elaborate procedures for some measurement purposes. Conversion tables are provided for the 7 scales to facilitate transformation from raw scores to IRT-calibrated (theta) scores.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anxiety disorders</subject><subject>Attachment</subject><subject>Avoidance behaviour</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Item response theory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Object Attachment</subject><subject>Personality disorders</subject><subject>Personality. Affectivity</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Ratings & rankings</subject><subject>Selfreport</subject><issn>0022-3891</issn><issn>1532-7752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0VtrFDEUB_Agil2r30BkQIT6MGtObpP4oB2Kl0JBWOpzyGQy3SmZyZrMWPbbm3V36-VBfAokv3M4OX-EngNeApb4DcaEUKlgSTDQpaSECHiAFsApKauKk4dosSPlzpygJyndYowBGHmMTgjDlBIhF-i8bmc_FfU0Gbse3DgVKzP1400qzup69fptUY_F5eSGYuXSJozJFddrF-I23xu_TX16ih51xif37HCeoq8fP1xffC6vvny6vKivSisIn0rbNRI3qlUWMKaNVVVlOTGCSGEq6QQ4ZiuhBHS2ajvT2ZY0UrCGAYDiIOgperfvu5mbwbU2jxqN15vYDyZudTC9_vNl7Nf6JnzXVHGmBM8Nzg4NYvg2uzTpoU_WeW9GF-akgXOsJMuL_A9KGavyVDLTl3_R2zDHvJufSgoiMFNZsb2yMaQUXXc_N2C9S1Mf09S7NPU-zVz24vc_3xcd48vg1QGYZI3vohltn345KQQjgLN7v3f92IU4mLsQfasns_UhHovoP0f5AWi6uH0</recordid><startdate>20140704</startdate><enddate>20140704</enddate><creator>Pilkonis, Paul A.</creator><creator>Kim, Yookyung</creator><creator>Yu, Lan</creator><creator>Morse, Jennifer Q.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140704</creationdate><title>Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR): An Item Response Theory Analysis</title><author>Pilkonis, Paul A. ; Kim, Yookyung ; Yu, Lan ; Morse, Jennifer Q.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-cfb80b9d9c1003bc977c52a6286a78e61e4c76961fc7dfafcd2b864b411195163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anxiety disorders</topic><topic>Attachment</topic><topic>Avoidance behaviour</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Item response theory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Object Attachment</topic><topic>Personality disorders</topic><topic>Personality. Affectivity</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Ratings & rankings</topic><topic>Selfreport</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pilkonis, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yookyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morse, Jennifer Q.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pilkonis, Paul A.</au><au>Kim, Yookyung</au><au>Yu, Lan</au><au>Morse, Jennifer Q.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR): An Item Response Theory Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><date>2014-07-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>417</spage><epage>425</epage><pages>417-425</pages><issn>0022-3891</issn><eissn>1532-7752</eissn><coden>JNPABU</coden><abstract>The Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR) include 3 scales for anxious, ambivalent attachment (excessive dependency, interpersonal ambivalence, and compulsive care-giving), 3 for avoidant attachment (rigid self-control, defensive separation, and emotional detachment), and 1 for secure attachment. The scales include items (ranging from 6-16 in their original form) scored by raters using a 3-point format (0 = absent, 1 = present, and 2 = strongly present) and summed to produce a total score. Item response theory (IRT) analyses were conducted with data from 414 participants recruited from psychiatric outpatient, medical, and community settings to identify the most informative items from each scale. The IRT results allowed us to shorten the scales to 5-item versions that are more precise and easier to rate because of their brevity. In general, the effective range of measurement for the scales was 0 to +2 SDs for each of the attachment constructs; that is, from average to high levels of attachment problems. Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity of the scales was investigated by comparing them with the Experiences of Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R) scale and the Kobak Attachment Q-sort. The best consensus among self-reports on the ECR-R, informant ratings on the ECR-R, and expert judgments on the Q-sort and the AAR emerged for anxious, ambivalent attachment. Given the good psychometric characteristics of the scale for secure attachment, however, this measure alone might provide a simple alternative to more elaborate procedures for some measurement purposes. Conversion tables are provided for the 7 scales to facilitate transformation from raw scores to IRT-calibrated (theta) scores.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>24033268</pmid><doi>10.1080/00223891.2013.832261</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3891 |
ispartof | Journal of personality assessment, 2014-07, Vol.96 (4), p.417-425 |
issn | 0022-3891 1532-7752 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_28664210 |
source | MEDLINE; Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Adult Anxiety disorders Attachment Avoidance behaviour Biological and medical sciences Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Interpersonal Relations Item response theory Male Measurement Middle Aged Object Attachment Personality disorders Personality. Affectivity Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data Psychological tests Psychological Theory Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychometrics Ratings & rankings Selfreport |
title | Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR): An Item Response Theory Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T23%3A54%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adult%20Attachment%20Ratings%20(AAR):%20An%20Item%20Response%20Theory%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20assessment&rft.au=Pilkonis,%20Paul%20A.&rft.date=2014-07-04&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=417&rft.epage=425&rft.pages=417-425&rft.issn=0022-3891&rft.eissn=1532-7752&rft.coden=JNPABU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00223891.2013.832261&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E1550984832%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1538626049&rft_id=info:pmid/24033268&rfr_iscdi=true |